Jets do have a strong erection
>>787563
>>787742
>>787745
Fucking Russians
>>787565
webm version
get mad
>>788373
fuck me man that gave me a flashback
>>789054
>>788952
never understood the ending when the missile turns in a shotgun and then in a hadouken. This missile really exist or its just fiction?
>>789588
Just about everything in that scene is bullshit.
>>788952
i know everything about this scene is wrong, but would a ground radar even detect them flying through valleys like that?
>>789937
Electrical Engineer specializing in radar systems. Short answer; no, theres so many number of problems trying to track low flying shit in mountains. Let alone any radar guided munitions trying to hit the fucking thing. Heat seeking is viable but have fun with hitting any modern plane loaded up in the ass with chaff and flares
>>789588
did you not pay attention to the missile that shot down Malaysia airline in Ukraine?
>>789954
is that webm implying that part of the eject system is to sabotage any hard drives before crash? genuinely curious.
>>789909
uhh dumb question, is this sped up? his head movements seem strangely jerky
>>790088
checked
>>790108
:]
>>790662
no im not that retarded, i know that one isnt sped up :P
i guess i underestimated the g's experienced by the pilot or smthing
>>790094
They look jerky because of the gforce he's pulling.
>>788373
What are you playing that on? Cuz when Agaion detects you and you start the fight in earnest, it plays different music than that.
>also, fuck that mission
>>791573
The music was added in later, it's from Starship Troopers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJuihwnoFYM
>>788373
What game?
Fucking nice thread!
>>792142
see
>>792127
>>789046
explain please?
>>793589
its refueling
>>790053
They just explode near the aircraft, the shrapnel and over pressure is what damages the airframe not some shotgun missle.
fuck i posted in wrong thread might be duplicate
>>792748
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT
>>794700
>no sound
What is even the fucking point.
>>794063
damn it i'm hard
>>790912
I remember this series. Test Pilot?
> old fag
>>788952
This triggered me.
>>794923
Happy, anon?
>>794977
>Staying Alive playing before the crash
Heh
>>788952
What kind of fucking Sam is that!?
>>794748
Interesting who won in the end?
>>788952
I know it's a weird ass scene but it's the most action filled jet scene made for cinema. Makes me want a big budget Ace Combat movie. All jets all noise all the time.
>>795186
The rafale is lighter and more agile for but such a big and heavy plane the F-22 is giving it a run for it's money. In combat it's shocking what the F-22 can do.
Looks like he got a gun lock in that view.
>>795179
shotgun to ass missile
>>795220
seems like it had a good lock twice- yeah F-22 is definitely heavy. US disclosed that during the early stages that their F-16 were able to beat them multiple times in mock dog fights. I dont know how those scenarios really start, either by putting the F-22 at disadvantage and letting them get close? either way in all the mock fights that the F-22 lost is due to the opponent being able to "merge" with them and all bets are off if the other plane is lighter and more agile.
>>794877
Nice sound
>>795098
Might as well include the next part too
RIP A-10
>>795098
Sound effects not accurate though. Movies never get it right. Saw 4 A-10's and 2 AC-130's light up a mountain while I was in Afghanistan. Just thinkin about it gives me a hard-on.
Calvin in fighter jets:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhp-6i3P4ao
>>795365
Pretty sure rules of engagement often require a pilot to close to visual range and identify the target before firing, so that's why dogfights often start with a fast head on pass. That's where it misses out. Either way - dogfighting isn't even what most of these planes do anymore. They mostly need close air support aircraft, which is what actually wins wars.
>>794977
That shit is scary even in fsx
>>795186
The French team. If I remember well, during this training they "shot down" 5 F-22s and "lost" 1 Rafale.
>>787563 Something from my country guys. IA-63 Pampa
>>796365
sure they did ;)
>>795939
dat nigga was wild lucky
good fucking looks superman
>>795995
for you
>>797549
wrong one
>>795995
>>796325
>Pretty sure rules of engagement often require a pilot to close to visual range and identify the target before firing,
i was talking about mock fights and why the 22 lost and that rafale was also part of a joint training.
>>794877
warthunder is that you
>>788373
The UI and the graphics are telling me Ace Combat, but the music at the beginning is from Metal Gear. Interesting.
>>797560
No warthunder even in sim mode is only at the most around 60% sim. And none of the sounds especially jets sound good.
>>789588
>>795179
As for the agility and tracking in the mountains it's pretty bullshit. And missiles don't have a continuous burn like that, same for in mountain radar tracking. Few if any SAM are self illuminating.
There is a real world missile that fires tungsten spikes at a target a near hypersonic speeds from the missile. But it's american made not russian and not a SAM. I always thought it was for anti ship.
>>797576
The music is actually the theme to starship troopers.
>>788373
>>789047
>that light flick
>that slow approach
>that blue diamond afterburner glow
>that twin vertical stabilizer
>that slow reveal
>that bad ass mofo pilot
HNGGGGGG OP/anon I LOVE YOU
>>799008
>afterburner
nigga wat
>>790108
pilots loved this plane, surprisingly agile, and could really take a beating, there's a story about one losing a wing to a missile and still landing safely on its carrier
>>796325
Are you sure?
It was once part of the rules of war that they had to visually identify targets, like definitely in the 50s. Somehow I ended up thinking they had changed that.
Like, I remember learning that at an air and space museum, and it was in the context of the F-4 Phantom being the first America Jet in combat that had no machine gun, and had radar. The F-4 Phantom was designed with a combat technique of hitting targets from far away with missiles, which violated the rules of war at the time. But that was like 50 years ago, and its not like we've stepped back from that technique. Having to approach and then visually identify targets seems infeasible in modern aerial combat.
>>796365
If it's the same video I saw posted on /k/ however many years ago if was from a Rafale that had just taken off and immediately climbed because he knew the F-22 was above them engaging other fighters.
>>799117
It can fly on one wing and one jet, it's amazing
>>796325
what are IFF....
>>799192
is this IAF?
>mfw if i flew an F-14 this is how i would normally taxi my jet to the runway.
>>799192
one_night_at_the_roxbury.webm
Cmon we gotta keep this thread alive for just a bit longer!
I know this is a fighter not a bomber thread but has anybody got some a6-intruder stuff?
>>789937
For about a hundredth of a second if it passed directly over the search radar.
>>788952
This made me so gad damn angry.
>>795840
Got another one I meant to post but forgot.
>>797560
Soon lad, soon. Miggers will wish they'd never been born.
>>789049
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KkyHvT4Yzk
>>794003
Not true, anti-air warheads are continuous-rod warhead. A bundle of steel rods are aranged into a cylinder and have alternating ends welded together on both ends. When an explosive in the center is detonated, the rods expand, flexing around the welds until at their maximum extension form a steel hoop traveling at hyper sonic speeds. This is enough to cut through control surfaces and cause maximum damage to air frames.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous-rod_warhead
There is no amount of "over pressure" that can effect an aircraft traveling at supersonic speeds, by their very existence they will outrun any pressure wave produced by an explosion.
>>801400
this gives ne a reason to play gb
I came here looking for BRRRRT
>>799195
Identify Friend or Foe.
>>801526
i think you missed the joke.
>>801427
>There is no amount of "over pressure" that can effect an aircraft traveling at supersonic speeds, by their very existence they will outrun any pressure wave produced by an explosion.
Holy shit I don't think I've read a more retarded sentence that might actually not be bait. You do realize that explosion shock waves travel multiple times the speed of sound?
Here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhp-6i3P4ao
Great clip
>>802098
>>788952
That's a pretty great action scene despite being inaccurate. A realistic depiction would have been boring as fuck.
>>787567
Dassault mirage?
>>789909
The adrenaline would actually kill me on this one.
>>791120
LIKE RUSSIA
Sorry I'm too lazy to learn this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6xcamVTE3Y
>>802606
>>>>>>>
https://youtu.be/2uh4yMAx2UA?t=270
>>790108
Going to see dance with the dead this october- what up!
>>799196
>HGU-68P helmets
>Pilot wearing an MBU-23/P Oxygen mask
>Aircraft painted Navy Grey with NATO safety markings
They're US Navy. This is an old video.
>>791120
<< GOOD JOB KID, WE LOOK GREAT! >>
>>794877
That's the stuff
>>801481
gb?
>>806502
>>794926
looks like a guy
>>789909
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siwpn14IE7E
>>799117
Entirely true, and with the capacity for armament, they could go from patrol to strike without returning to base. They still aren't entirely dead either. The Airforce uses them on testing bases when possible to fire experimental munitions because of their stability and because they aren't used anywhere else, but thats being fazed out fast now.
>>805789
The feels
>>795098
This shit irks the fuck out of me.
>>789909
>tfw playing FuShe Pass on BF2
Mind if I cut in?
>>795186
Looks like they're both turning hard, then the F-22 and his pursuer (the Rafale) enter a steep climb. When the F-22 is kind of hovering in air at the top of his climb (shortly before the Rafale pilot starts getting low speed warnings) he has a clear guns solution with deflection included. Had him dead to rights with that one, though to the F-22s credit he was already turning sideways with post-stall maneuvering to slip the sights.
>>795365
>>796325
The F-22 can dogfight just fine - the F-4 Phantom prevailed in close fights with little MiG-17s multiple times because the pilots knew how to play to the plane's strengths. The F-22 is a far better balanced aircraft than the Phantom was, too. Learning how to use the plane, however, is a tough task that requires a lot of dissimilar air combat training like in that video. All the 5th gen magic in the world can't change the fact that the margins of victory in air combat are extremely narrow; only by repeatedly pushing the aircraft to its limits can the pilots truly exploit it to come out on top.
>>796325
>Pretty sure rules of engagement often require a pilot to close to visual range and identify the target before firing, so that's why dogfights often start with a fast head on pass.
Fighter planes have used high-tech long-range cameras for years now to alleviate that issue - the first (cockpit integrated) long range camera system was in the F-14, IIRC, and the "sniper" sensor pod includes that functionality too (and that's been integrated into the F-35, now.)
The "Merge" is the traditional way any old-fashioned dogfight begins - when both parties are aware of each other (neither one has gained surprise advantage, which is what accounts for most air-to-air kills in history) and they're both trying to engage each other. Both planes will jockey to open up lateral or vertical separation, to gain enough space to swing onto the enemies tail with a turn, for example, so it's always of benefit for the defender to maneuver to guarantee a head-on pass from almost zero distance to negate whatever advantage the other guy's seeking. Both pilots will probably avoid taking a head-on snapshot, because the other guy can take a snapshot too and a game of chicken with cannons is, at best, a 50/50 chance of victory - you want to point your guns at him from behind, where he can't shoot back! Some pilots will habitually make a tiny barrel-roll or jink as they close to ensure the enemy won't nail them with a head-on attack.
Thus, both planes blast past each other with almost no separation, and the instant they cross they have "merged" and can begin maneuvering hard for advantage. It's the theoretical "all things equal" starting point for air combat, and shows up in real life often enough to be considered.
>>814930
Oh the memories. Kubra Dam <3
>>812218
i chuckled
>>793589
the sacred art of airplane mating.
>>823643
That plane makes me cri
muh tax dollars T-T
>>812218
That graphic in top left corner -- what is it? I've seen it several times. The calligraphy looks a little like al-Nusra Front flag, but I don't know enough about Arabic to say.
>>795365
>US disclosed that during the early stages that their F-16 were able to beat them multiple times in mock dog fights.
Only when they heavily handicapped the F-22. Same with the Rafale. They basically said "for this exercise, we're going to completely remove the primary thing that makes this fighter the most advanced fighter in the world."
Keep in mind that even when purposely compromising their stealth capability, the F-22 is still the better dogfighter thanks mostly due to thrust vectoring, which basically no 4th or 4.5th generation fighters have.
>>830346
Can't speak to the rafale video, but in the simulation with german typhoons, the test was specifically dogfighting. The Germans said that in more realistic simulations, they couldn't even get near the F-22s with being targeted, but claimed that they were evenly matched in a dogfight. The thing is, in actual combat, a stealth fighter should never be involved in a dogfight. You'll see them so much farther away than they'll see you, that you'd have to be an idiot or out of munitions to not win.
Also consider the fact that in all of these stories you here, the Americans are never interviewed. Basically, we have a lot of claims from one only, with almost no actual information.
What is really amazing, though, is that such a hefty aircraft CAN dogfight. Unlike the F-35, which absolutely cannot dogfight against 4.5 generation fighters, the F-22 is at least an even match for anything out there right now. At least based on what we know so far. It will be even better if they ever install those upgrades they promised, then backed out of, then promised again. No one can really be certain until a large scale conflict occurs. Which is unlikely. If the F-22 every get into air combat, it'll probably be against some monkey model 4th generation fighters that haven't updated their avionics in three or four decades.
If you want a real take-away, it's this: nobody knows shit. The media sure as hell doesn't, and we don't have enough information to speculate that wildly either. Many people on every side will brag, but it's all meaningless.
>>795939
What happens to the first A-10's pilot? It seems he gets vaporized.
>>806506
this was the most fucking epic movie when it came out. seein it when i was in middle school... cant get that feeling back. Almost two decades ago
>>805617
jesus shit
this gave me sweaty palms
>>799117
Wasn't the story about an F-15?
>>795186
it depends on the scope you view it at.
rafale could get a gun kill, but it lost all its energy which means its as good as dead.
>>796365
It's from a 2009 exercise between US and French pilots in the UAE. In the WVR guns only training (which that video is from) the Raptor and Rafale each took one round and four were draws. The French claim that if they were allowed MICA's they would have scored several more kills, but by the same measure the Raptors would have had AIM-9X's and could presumably claim the same.
>>826547
Islamic Front
Army of Islam.
>>789046
that's hot
>>805797
great britan, in war thunder
>>834640
At 13 seconds into the clip the kryptonian popped him like a grape
>>797549
>doof warrior theme
beautiful
>>790108
what song is that?
>>802606
It was still boring as shit Anon
>>842645
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbTcmfEGrds
>>792675
>"OUR INVINCIBLE FLEET IS GOING TO BE DESTROYED"
>ywn be a fighter pilot
jdimsa
I have some awesome F-35 webms, but no sound :(
>>846022
>>846027
>>846034
>>846037
>>846040
>>846046
>>846060
Does that count as a miss?
>>846122
It made physical contact with the tank treads. It was inert, if it was live that tank would be in pieces.
>>790094
Yeah it's sped up like 2x. It's from this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJbHo8RPnHs
>>805885
Anyone can sauce me on this?
>>846022
lewd
>>808703
why do you think he's hard?
dumbass
>>836166
watch it on bluray on a big screen and blast it with good sound system, its fucking amazing how well it holds up!
What does /jet/ think of Swat Kats?
>>846346
Yukikaze
Not really a figher jet, but still cool as fuck
>>846228
Except its not sped up at all. That is real time
Damn...that takes me back right there.
>>792142
Ace Combat
>>850474
And guess what happened...
>>854330
I still can't believe it honestly.
>>854330
>Not showing him screaming when the planes fly past
>>857859
whoops, wrong plane gif
>>793610
is that a DH Sea Venom?
>>838176
I hate to tell you this but it's not great, it's only advantage over F-86, CL-13, MiG-15bis etc is its topspeed. If you don't have an energy advantage all you can do is run.
No wonder this guy downed 5 of them in less than 1 minute while flying an F-86F, the Hunter was a good export ground attacker, not so much a fighter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Mahmood_Alam
>>858843
Can I get some sauce? I need to annoy a friend.
>>791120
<< They're all Yellows! >>
>>854330
NO, PC PLEASE!!!! GAHHHH
>>858973
http://w3.uwyo.edu/~jimkirk/guidance.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZe5J8SVCYQ
>>788952
>this kills the /k/
>>836241
That one story where the pilot finds out that he didnt have the wing until he lands, that one he's flying an f15. Anon is probably talking about some other story.
>tfw F14 is my favourite
>tfw I will never fly
>tfw
>>858843
>>805789
chopper pls no
>>805693
Jealous
>>796375
Argentina is shit, I would know, I live there.
>>790108
i feel like playing volleyball on the beach with nothing but jeans... and bros with me?
>>806506
>>806502
You know I always wondered how the alien's shields would hold up if they just dropped a fuckmassive weight onto the thing. The US Air Force experimented with several kinds in the mid 1900s and they were all fairly devastating despite lacking any kind of explosive.
Good old rock, nothing beats rock.
>>854359
Can any real world plane do this in real life?
>>788349
From one of the greatest movies ever.
>>868088
They can do something similar but at a much shallower angle. The aircraft still needs lift not to just fall like a brick.
>>868088
>>863081
To be honest they didn't expect a shield or know anything about what it was made out of
I did a thing.
https://youtu.be/lsLPbVXW14I
>>870033
what game?
>>873306
Ace Combat Infinity.
>>814970
>>794047
hah
>>789110
go ahead Demon Lord
https://youtu.be/yZMh-_CmoGE?t=2m13s
>>857893
It has to refuel in the air because the gas tank doesn't actually seal at ground level. Only under extreme heat from cruising does it all expand and close up.
Those planes are freaking made of magic.
>>789047
Fuckin KC-10 ass gucci bullshit.
>>878120
The KC-135s that could refuel SR-71s had a modified fuel system to accommodate the special fuel that the Blackbird required, without contaminating the standard fuel that the Stratotanker uses.
The Cold War was such a neat time for advances in aviation.
>>797552
what am i hearing first the gun or the rounds hitting?
>>857893
Funfact. SR 71 pilots were not trained in evasive maneuvers. This was because the plane's agility was rather poor. Instead, pilots were just instructed to "speed up" to outrun missiles and pursuers. That's how fast those fuckers were.
>>869620
>suddenly the pilot's seat is much warmer
>>787563
Strong thrusts too
>>878206
Rounds hitting first
>>812272
Iran has been refurbishing their Tomcats very recently
>>879798
>>878234
Interesting but does that factor in acceleration of the plane? I mean how quick does it get to mach 0.95 to mach 3?
>>879801
>>881029
>>881037
>>865637
>implying Tucanos are much better
They are not. I live in Hueland.
>>879809
Here are some figures from Robet Graham's book "The Complete Book of the SR-71".
>>858843
STOP IT JIM, JUST TELL ME HOW TO LAUNCH THIS
>>857873
I love that we are still flying the F-5 though lol
