[CONFIDENTIAL]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmzDL1l3Fag
(Min. 1:45)
>>26616863
Fake. Tiger has five fingers per hand. In real life, tigers has only four toes on their paws.
It's all over. Everyone can go home, for the fake has been proven fake with concrete evidence.
>>26616863
Popplio looks like Braixen/Delphox furbait.
>>26616863
This only proves that whoever made this fakes is a lot smarter than the average "leak" retard.
Still, nice catch.
All that shows is that the faker is clever enough to put the same style "confidential" on his art.
I mean, sure, could be real, but the confidential thing isn't necessarily proof. It could just be a good detail to fool idiots like you.
>>26616863
Litten looks like he's saying "IMMA FIRIN' MAH LAZOR!!!"
lol
![[CONFIDENTIAL].png](https://i.imgur.com/ZeN55mP.png "[CONFIDENTIAL].png")
holy shit
i am a gamefreek employee confirmed
>>26616881
i sincerely hope you're kidding with that argument.
i don't think these are real either, but at least give more concrete evidence than fucking fingers on an anthropomorphic fictitious tiger.
>>26616863
10/10 for effort/art and consistency.
Best fake so far if fake, strangest leak so far if real.
>>26616881
> What is Blaziken
Font looks off
>>26616863
>fire/fighting cat
fug
>>26616863
Great finding!, I guess this proves the leaker clearly watched the trailers before designing these fakes.
>>26616954
It also proves even further that it's fake, since the leaker went out of his way to copy the confidental stamp.
>>26616922
They are tge same just covered by feathers/ fur
I don't know if I'm surrounded by gullible idiots or ebin trollzars
>>26616863
Is this going to be the next Wottergate, or whatever it was called?I sure hope so.
>>26616863
>fire/fighting
end my life now
>>26616863
I like that Popplio and Rowlet but Litten looks TERRIBLE.
>>26616863
Baby got back
>>26616863
Proves nothing. Could have been taken from this.
>>26616994
Definitely not the same font as this
>>26616994
The leaker copy pasta'd the confidental sign on that picture and applied it to his fakes. If people still can't tell that they're fake after this evidence, then they need to fuck off.
>https://youtu.be/hmzDL1l3Fag
>/hmzDL1l3Fag
>Fag
Seems about right.
>>26616863
>hand written notes for the fakes
>digital text for the stuff shown in the trailers/top left pictures
Plus hasn't it been confirmed that this is the person that made the purple-ish ninetails looking fenniken fake evo?
>>26616994
Are the internet detectives of /vp/ really so retarded that they can't see the stamp in this image and the ones posted are neither the same dimensions nor colors at a first glance?
>>26617003
Then shouldn't that be even more concrete evidence it's fake, then?
>>26617014
Haha homosexual slurs so funny! Fuck off.
>>26617024
If they're not the same dimensions or colors, that just proves that they're fake.
>>26617024
>neither the same dimensions nor colors at a first glance?
Gee, it's almost as if someone couldn't stretch and recolor something in some type of photomanipulation program.
>>26617033
Found the queer.
>>26617026
I ain't even saying they're real, I think they're fake
But even then that ain't total concrete, maybe this gen they have a different stamp
>>26617026
>>26617037
You can't be this dumb, can you? The Noivern pic is a generation old, and the stamps in the supposed leaks checks out (dimensions and color) with the concept art shown in the reveal trailer.
The stamp design itself would be extremely easy to recreate but you're seriously inbred if you think the Noivern pic stamp could be used to prove anything one way or the other.
>>26617015
>digital text
>>26617033
I'm sorry, are you triggered? That sucks. PTSD can be real rough sometimes.
Has anyone went as so far as to search Pixiv because I don't think anyone did.
>>26616863
Doesn't that just prove that it's fake though?
>be artist
>see confidential stamp in trailer
>recreate confidential stamp
>slap it on fakes
>profit
In fact, why are we even discussing this if it just got proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that it's fake?
>>26616863
The owl looks like it would be under 3 feet tall.
[CONFIDENTIAL]
>>26617033
wow you're an idiot
>>26617088
it's not proof it's fake. But it's not proof it's real either.
>>26617089
To be fair, it would hardly be the first time a starter is a manlet. See Charizard.
>>26616863
Fake, of course, but good attention to detail.
Does anyone else question why the Fire Type one has Ash and Pikachu in it, when this is supposed to be concept art for the game, not the anime?
>>26616863
Where those pics first appeared? I looked today and they were all over /vp but what was the source?
>>26616863
Give it a rest, they're fake and you fags will be BTFO to oblivion when the real shit leaks out. Also leaks that are this early and coincidentally STARTERS are always fake.
Why leak the obvious starter crap instead of actual new pokemon from the game? Because they got nothing to work on and make them convincing while with starters you can pull up stuff like these with basic ideas
>>26617065
Is that not text? I can't see it really well.
>>26616863
Can someone please tell me WHEN there have ever been final evolution leaks THIS early? They usually come way closer to release. Judging by Gamefreak's work flow I actually wouldn't be surprised if they havent even designed the final evolutions yet. You people need to slow the fuck down.
I don't know about you, but as far as I know, I think reference/concept arts only go so far as put only necessary information for those aware, including color references and special parts of a design that may not be as obvious, not cramp up a concept art with unnecessary shit.
>>26617118
Looked to me like a generic trainer and Pikachu included for scale.
Still fake, though.
>>26617118
The anime and games are pretty heavily intertwined nowadays development-wise. I'd say they used Ash because by this point they hadn't designed the player characters, if it's real.
>>26617119
There's no source, because it's fake.
>>26617055
>>26617070
>>26617099
*sigh* thought this place would be cool but it's filled with shitheads. Welp, back to Tumblring.
>>26617143
Even fakes have a source. I mean ESPECIALLY fakes have a source that later wants to get the credit for leaking and attention
>/vp/ is so retarded that literally 99% of /vp/ believes that these fakes are real
>>26617134
>havent even designed the final evolutions yet
They've probably been finalized for a year or more. They do these well in advance. That being said, these leaks aren't real.
>>26617156
>*sigh*
>Tumblring
Obvious bait is obvious.
>>26617156
>back to Tumblring.
That would be best.
>>26617169
who would put so much effort into them without a reason?
>>26617135
Exactly. This guy gets it.
>>26617134
This and this>>26617125
its always starter leaks and never anything else that can be convincing because everyone sucks shit at making "real" pokemons. with starters you can just simply use the original idea and go creative to make their evolution more convincing then a new separated pokemon from scratch
I have no convincing non-anecdotal arguments to prove it but these are fake and definitely not real.
>>26616863I'm not going to lie. These are some pretty cool evolutions
>>26617197
It's to fool retards like you, especially it has already been proven that they're fake.
>>26616863
Absolutely disgusting
0/10
If this is real all 3 belong in the trash
>>26616922
>new they could've pulled a Malamar with Blaziken in Gen VI
>>26616969
>>26616922
You can usually tell when an evolution isn't designed by the same person quite easily.
>>26617169
The fuck did you expect on a board full of underage autist?
>>26617197
Speaking of gullible autist...is not a first time someone put a lot of effort on a fake for the ultimate ruse. Recent example, the NX leak
>>26617173
>they do those well in advance
I don't know, I'm basing my reasoning of that image of that concept gen 5 pokemon that was done like mid way through development of the games.
They probably have a rough idea of where to go with them but I wouldn't be surprised if they hadn't finalized it to that point yet.
>>26616910
Digimon rip-off.in all seriousness, I'd have it on my team
>>26616863
I really, really, really want that owl.
>>26617026
>>26617003
>>26616994
A font change would actually imply it's legit, because otherwise they'd have just copied it from the actual font that exists.
>>26617230
Saya Tsuruta designed all three of those
>>26617265
Saya Tsuruta is an illustrator for the Pokémon Trading Card Game.
I'll admit these are the best fakes yet, but they're fake. I've been following pokemon game releases for 4 generations now and they've never leaked starter evolutions this early.
can you imagine a better design? Like the owl could be...just bigger owl that would simple use its weight to tackle the opponents. and use solar beam from its beak. Could be so much better than those un-original fakes.
>>26617258
>A font change would actually imply it's legit
Hahahahahahahahaha.
No.
That's just the leaker's way of getting gullible idiots to fall for his obvious fakes. He just recreated the confidential stamp.
>>26617285
He could have copied from >>>26616994
The fact that he didn't is just more evidence it's real. You do realize the font itself is public domain right?
This better be fake
>>26617300
>The fact that he didn't is just more evidence it's real
Again, the faker recreated the font. He saw it in the trailer and recreated it because that's what artists can do.
>>26617308
read >>>26617300
>If Litten final evo is Fire/Fighting I can nickname it El Tigre
I'm fine with that.
>>26617320
And he saw it in the trailer, and used it to make his fakes look authentic. Sorry that we're disproving everything about the obvious fakes.
>>26617334
Read >>>26617320
>>26616863
I'm picking litten if it turns into this motherfucking angry tiger.
>>26617215
where's the proof, I wanna know who made it
>>26617340
Your point has already been proven wrong.
>I know, I'll copy the confidential remark and brandish my own kind of Japanese dialog to go along with these overbearingly cramped concept arts with way too much than it should have then I'll save these as a .jpeg with a shitty resolution as to not make people realize the artifacts and mistakes found within the confidential remark and the lineart itself
>AND NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW
Sasuga, mystery leaker, there definitely couldn't have been a easier way to digitalize or save these with a bigger resolution, especially in 2016!
>>26617352
read >>>26617340
>>26617362
Read >>26617354
>>26616863
Resized so that the "confidential" stamp matches.
>>26617366
Can't even do it properly
>>26616863
Best evos. Hope they are true!
>>26617373
Read >>26617354
>>26617265
Nope. The last one was Sugis.
>>26617348
Proof that they're fake? No, we start by presuming that they're fake (because almost all leaks are) and look for evidence that they're real. As of yet, there is none.
>>26617384
Can't even do it properly
>>26617394
This. There's also a truckload of evidence that they're fake.
>all that denial
>>26617394
Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
>>26617405
Such as?
>>26616863
Also AROWL is oficial name for the final evo of Rowlet
>>26617414
>Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence
This is true, and also entirely irrelevant to the question at hand.
>>26617414
Nice image for ants.
>>26617414
The confidential sign is very clearly copy pasted from the trailer.
The low resolution of the pictures to hide mistakes.
The anime characters in the concept art.
The starters being literally called Owl3, Tiger3 and Seal3 in the art.
The complete lack of a source.
The fact that it originates from 4chan.
The common knowledge that Popplio will evolve into something fat and stupid looking, since it's the Tepig/Chespin of Gen 7.
The actual leak that Litten and Popplio will be ground or fighting as their final evolution, and Seal3 looks nothing like a ground or fighting type.
>>26617432
>irrelevant
Your wrong statement hinting at bias suggests otherwise
>>26617441
>not a square
>>26616863
Shame I do like these, a little furbaity but everything is furbait if you think hard enough
>>26616863
I'd love for these to be real, but if they aren't, these are some top tier fakes. The artist certainly put in a lot of effort to make them seem real.
>>26617405
Post it all then.
>>26616863
My biggest gripe with these is that they're way too busy. All the comparable concept art sheets we've had thus far have a lot more spacing. Here, the sketches almost overlap in various places, which means these must have been digitally designed and then collaged together.
Also, as shown by >>26617369 the sheets have different sizes. This is unlikely to be a result of cropping, since the artwork in all cases neatly falls within the given borders (note, for example, popplio 3's head in the bottom center part). This enforces my suspicion that these are digitally collaged.
>>26616863
I'd love having this beautiful evolution for my popplio, she's so awesome, make me a lot think of gorebyss
>>26617033
dude you are not cut out for 4chan
>>26617197
The fact that there's so much effort is actually evidence that it's fake. After all, Gamefreak hates doing so much effort.
>>26617441
Your right though, but all my highres punpun screencaps are too highres for 4chan.
>>26617452
>very clearly copypasted
Why does that disprove anything? Also see >>>26616994
>The low resolution of the pictures to hide mistakes.
If it's hiding mistakes point them out.
>anime characters in concept art
Why would this mean anything? The anime has leaked concept art before.
>starters not having a name
If anything this proves further that it's a legit leak. Probably from the anime studio as those don't get the names yet.
>lack of source
That only proves it's a leak. If it had a source, then it wouldn't be a leak.
>it originates from 4chan
I just thought you said it had no source? You're just parroting a manchild that plays the pokemon slots weekly aren't you?
>the common knowledge pattern
ah so, bias is your reasoning. Because two is a pattern.
>this other leak
Only applying leaks when it's convenient hmm? The other leak is irrelevant of this. Or do you have some evidence for that leak?
>>26617156
as someone who actually does use tumblr and 4chan, you're a fucking faggot. also,
> *sigh*
>If anything this proves further that it's a legit leak
Stopped reading. Not even gonna give you a (You) because gullible retards are the worst.
>>26617452
>The confidential sign is very clearly copy pasted from the trailer.
Resolution, mate, it's far poorer from the trailer than in either of these images.
>The low resolution of the pictures to hide mistakes.
Nearly every leak picture has had low resolution.
>The anime characters in the concept art.
Gen 5 second stagers had anime characters nearby as scale reference when they were leaked.
>The starters being literally called Owl3, Tiger3 and Seal3 in the art.
Especially in the era of simultaneous world release pokemon, we know names are never finalized until very late in development or before they are officially revealed.
>The complete lack of a source.
>The fact that it originates from 4chan.
4chan is as much a source as anywhere else.
>The common knowledge that Popplio will evolve into something fat and stupid looking, since it's the Tepig/Chespin of Gen 7.
None of your points so far have been actual evidence, just supposition, and this is the worst of all.
>The actual leak that Litten and Popplio will be ground or fighting as their final evolution, and Seal3 looks nothing like a ground or fighting type.
This is the best and only evidence you have.
Too perfect 4 be real
>>26617452
>The complete lack of a source.
>The fact that it originates from 4chan.
>>26617632
That means that Ground and Fighting is legit for Popplio and Litten, and GF tried to hastily get rid of them to hide that. Which disproves this leak even further because the Mermaid looks nothing like a ground or fighting type.
>>26617529
>Replying to bait
Rowlet's evolution actually looks great.
I fucking know that Litten's is gonna be Fire/Fighting.
Popplio's looks way too feminine.
If this is legitimate, I'm going with Rowlet.
they're fake because they look incredibly fake you tards. Just look at them, they aren't even close to pokemon style.
>>26617632
That's not true
http://www.pokemon.co.jp/ex/sun_moon/pokemon/images/icon03.png
http://www.pokemon.co.jp/ex/sun_moon/pokemon/images/icon06.png
>>26616863
Why the fuck does Rowlet turn in Elton John?
>Litten's final evo looks fucking great despite being another Fire / Fighter
Even if it's fake it's miles better than Ballio
>>26617452
>The starters being literally called Owl3, Tiger3 and Seal3 in the art.
Someone posted concept art of Burmy and it literally said Bug 4
>>26616863
>[CONFIDENTIAL]
Kevin please you lied with the S;G 0 translating team.
>>26617758
Post it then.
And even if that's a thing, that just shows that the faker went out of their way to make their fakes look authentic.
>>26616863
>Litten becomes bipedal bara furbait
Why do they keep doing this? Why must every quadraped become an awkward looking mess on two legs?
Better not be fucking real.
>>26617452
>The actual leak that Litten and Popplio will be ground or fighting as their final evolution, and Seal3 looks nothing like a ground or fighting type.
Why the hell people still believe this shitty 'leak'? There is no evidence that it relates to the starters. Why would they put the types there months too early when they know people check this stuff?
>>26617496
>dude you are not cut out for 4chan
Implying that 4chan has to be a cesspool of shithead teenagers forever.
>>26617789
>Why must every quadraped become an awkward looking mess on two legs?
Grass starters never have this problem.
Quit picking a shit starter type.
>>26617653
Why would Litten be a fucking Ground/Fire type?
Rowlett becomes Grass/Ground, idiot.
>>26617241
Greninja, Delphox, and Chesnaught were all finalized in designed by the time X and Y had barely begun development. Sakurai said as much when explaining how he managed to get Greninja into Smash 4 before X and Y were even complete.
Starter final evolutions, as of gen 6, are finalized by the time the new game's development begins.
Sure.
Confidential.
Yup.
I'll buy it.
That's all fine and dandy, but if these leaks were indeed true, then how on earth would you explain the type icon leaks?
>Implying any of these fit the implied Ground and Fighting type
That's a archer owl.
That's a luchador tigre.
That's atransvestite.
Please tell me in my face these types apply to these supposed final evolutions.Not even going to mention how crowded these concept arts are and how the tinier sketches are poorly done.This artist went through the effort, but then decided to act too proud by shoving too much shit in there.
>>26616863
These are at least more believable than those Final Fantasy evolutions. I'm not one to believe leaks without proof, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.
I feel like Popplio 3 is far too feminine to fit within the 87.5% chance of being Male. Now before you say some bullshit like "b-but Delphox," look over Delphox's design. Yes it does have feminine features but it is ambiguous enough to be perceived as male. Popplio 3 lacks that ambiguity.
>>26617876
No, I made a honest mistake.
Fighting type COULD fit luchador tigre.
Good luck putting Ground type on a owl though.
>>26617907
Braixen is way more feminine anyways
>>26617873
That clearly spells out ミノムッチ, i.e. Burmy's Japanese name.
>>26617118
It could potentially be concept art for the anime, right?
>>26617834
Why would Fennekin be a Psychic type?
Why would Piplup be a Steel type?
Why would Turtwig be a Ground type?
>>26617876
>type icon leaks
You do realize those Fighting and Ground Type Icons could have been released by accident, right? And there is no guarantee that they are intended for the starters, either.
>but muh numerical order
Please, the site now has icons for Psychic, Ghost, and Steel, in that order, and Solgaleo comes before Lunala. Numerical order means nothing.
>>26617907
And Samurott has a mustache. Your point is moot.
Why are there more fake leaks spreading? Can we just stop fueling the fire?
>>26617953
It should be /vp/'s duty to insult everyone who posts fakes like OP, and mock them to the point that nobody ever wants to post fakes ever again.
>>26617834
>Rowlett becomes Grass/Ground
>A owl becomes Ground type
>A bird becomes Ground type
If it were a ostrich, I'd at least try to understand
>>26617925
Not what I meant, idiot. Why would Litten's 2nd type be before fire type in the item numbering. Doesn't make fucking sense.
>>26617965
What is a burrowing owl?
>>26617968
Again, see >>26617939
>>26617941
All Sea Lions have whiskers. Also the argument is its less likely for feminine starters to be real because once again the ratio is 87.5/12.5
My biggest reservation is that Litten is drawn so obviously as being fire/fighting, it seems like an obvious troll move - like they've gone out of their way to make it as 'fighting' as possible.
>>26618014
Yes and all tigers have whiskers so where are litten3's?
>>26618031
The big "you can't miss it" red spikes protruding from each side of it's face
>>26618013
Why not Grass/Fighting, Fire, Water/Ground?
>People making assumptions
Fuck 4chan is worse than Tumblr.
>>26618042
Last time I checked whiskers protruded from snouts and not cheeks.
Why? Why do the fake leakers keep making the Litten evolutions shit? I'm already worried about the real ones.
>>26618060
Maybe it's you
>>26616863
This is clearly supposed to be game concept art so why is Ash and Pikachu in the one with Litten's final evo?
>>26618077
Because it's fake, but /vp/ is too retarded to understand such a simple fact.
>>26618050
>>People making assumptions
>Makes the assumption that the type icon leaks actually mean anything
>>26618077
>clearly
HOLY FUCK THAT POPPLIO MY DICK I WANT TO CUM IN HER HAIR AND FUCK THAT
T H I C K
H
I
C
K
M E R M A I D
E
R
M
A
I
D
A S S
S
S
>>26618058
Looks like somewhere along the line Litten's stylized whiskers became huge tufts of fur.
>>26618103
Who said I thought it meant anything, you 12 year old? Just why is the common assumption Fire/Ground and Water/Fighting if the order means jackshit?
>>26617642
>>26617599
>>26617520
4chan is anonymous. Nothing originating here has a source.
>>26616863
>Owliver Queen looks great
>Tiger Mask is cool but it's another bipedal fire type with a fighting type. If it's dark then it still has a fighting/wrestling theme. Emboar already did wrestling
>Mermaid is ugly
If it turns out to be real then I can live with it. Sad that the water starter is worse than Samurott though
>>26617230
just because the design follow the theme that you wanted means that a different designer did it
>>26617270
also a designer credited in XY
>>26617386
source? oh right, you don't have one because there is no source that states who designed them.
>>26618122
That's the common assumption because it doesn't make sense for Rowlet to be Flying Type ALREADY if gains Ground later. Popplio's performing theme can be followed through with Fighting, so people assume the Ground Type is for Litten. But here's the thing: they don't HAVE to be for the Starters. They could have been added to the site by accident for future Pokemon they plan to add, and not mean anything for the Starters at all.
it's not like trying to mimic real concept art is hard at all. if you know japanese and you do a tiny bit of research you can make something believable.
>>26618126
You have not understood.
>>26618188
>holy shit this CONCEPT ART looks like CONCEPT ART how can you be so gullible?!?!?!
>>26617965
What is a Kakapo?
>>26616863
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmzDL1l3Fag
>Fag
>>26616863
Don't think a starter would be so overtly female, especially since they're male more often than not.
I like the designs, though.
>>26616905
XDD
>>26618014
This argument is dumb. These are fake for more reasons than muh patterns
>>26617332
>not King
>>26618278
Can you look at Popplio 3 and tell me that has a 87.5% chance of being male?
>>26616863
I think the dick-fire prevents it from being real.
>>26616863
>"implying that Gamefreak would write Confidential in English"
First, it is in English... oddly, anyways.
Second, anyone with half a brain would think to use that in order to make it look legitimate. The leaks are low-res enough to help it pass off as legit.
If it proves to be legit, this will (unfortunately) be the second time I've gone with the Grass starter.
Litten has so much more promise to it than to be another fucking Fire/Fighting type. Those lanky-ass arms and stubby legs are NOT helping its case.
>>26618287
How do you know Popplio's gender ratio will be the same as the others?
Also Braixen was overtly female and no one cared.
>>26618261
>braixen
>>26618287
>Can you look at Popplio 3 and tell me that has a 87.5% chance of being male
Can you do the same for Braixen you piece of shit. Only you retards make it sound like a big deal.
>>26616863
>someone replicated a rectangle and found a font that resembles the one in vid
>it's gotta be real
Spotted the subhuman monkey.
>>26618314
Yeah but it ended up becoming more gender-neutral for its last evolution.
For this to be real Popplio's evolution would have to very feminine for it to be THAT feminine for its last evolution.
>>26618304
Did you miss the part where official GF stuff has been stamped with CONFIDENTIAL in the past?
>>26618287
Can you look at Sylveon and tell me that has a 87.5% chance of being male?
>>26618304
if you had a brain at all you'd read the OP and see that OP's point was that the S/M stuff in the trailers have that stamp. Plus >>26616994
>>26616863
If it's fake, it's one of the better looking fakes I've seen. I would be okay if this was real. Way better than edgey owl and creepy clown seel.
>>26618287
I'm pretty sure there's plenty of Pokemon with weird gender ratios but even if I were to try and prove it to you, you will find some dumb reasons to dispute them so there's really no effort worth arguing with you about it.
>>26618304
There are multiple examples in this thread where they use [CONFIDENTIAL] in this sort of stuff, including the 1st SM teaser trailer
>>26616863
Bow thing for the owl is super-clever. Goes really well with it being a silent, physical attacker.
Hey guys, someone here has that image of the rotom dex so we can compare the sizes, to see if they match?
I remember seeing that Litten's final was not too big to be bipedal
>>26616863
These are all awful
>>26618307
Popplio's design, just like Fennekin, lacks anything that would warrant a change from the starter gender ratio that's been in place since Pokemon genders were made universal. The only Pokemon that has a different ended ratio from the rest of its line in Azurill.
>>26618314
>>26618322
>B-but braixen
It's not hard. We only think of Braixen as female because everything that has featured the Pokemon has made it female (i.e Ashinme, Pokken, etc.). Just like Delphox it has the ambiguity that Popplio 3 lacks.
>>26616994
>people still don't know that this is how new 'mons appear in concept art
>>26618289
the featherdick didn't keep BLaziken out of Pokken
>>26618379
The ideas and detail behind all 3 go a little bit beyond your typical 'It got bigger and looks EDGY(TM)' starter evolution guesses which is probably what is throwing some people off.
>>26618399
I only want Popplio3 to be real so it can spike your autism over this.
If these are real (which the aren't) I'm boxing my starter.
>>26618399
jesus christ, you need to spam pink or something to make it look female, it looks female mostly for its eyes, body format and mouth design
even the hair in its ear looks like girl's hair
http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/No-Cat-Meme-06.jpg
>>26618058
Last time I checked we were talking about cartoony monsters, not real-life animals.
>>26618423
If it's real I'll accept my loses and just pick Litten or Rowlet. I just find it hard to believe is all.
>>26618430
I'll give you the eyes but the rest of that is kind of a stretch yeah?
>>26618459
>>26618430
Aw shit I forgot you said body format.
2/4 things
>>26618458
So why would this cartoony non-real-life animal monster have to have whiskers?
Say whatever you want but I 100% believe these are the final evolutions of the starters. The design is just perfect for gamefreak tastes.
Anyone calling it fake is just trying to be cool, can suck a dick if you want.
Screencap this, if these aren't the official starters I will post a pic of sucking a dick instead.
>>26616863
A lot of thought when into these designs. They're quirky and interesting, way more in-depth than the scary clown seal and assassin owl, which were really just there for shock value. These are genuinely cool.
I hope they're real.
There's no way these are real.
Popplio's is too feminine. It would be fine if Popplio itself was feminine, so kids would know what they're in for upon evolving, just like Fenekin, but it isn't. Some lad is gonna pick Popplio and promptly stop playing once it evolves into something so girly.
And we already have a wrestler in Emboar, no need for another, especially when it looks Fire/ Fighting.
Rowlet evo is shit hot though, beast of a design. Shame its fake.
>>26618440
You realize you're on an image board you fucking newfag?
>>26618497
Emboar isn't even a wrestler. Nothing about it is wrestler related. It learns like one fighting move on level up and it isn't a wrestling move.
>>26616863
autistic """"leak"""" thread
>>26618497
Reminder this arguent has been used a thousand times and debunked a thousand times.
>>26617369
>>26618497
>Some lad is gonna pick Popplio and promptly stop playing once it evolves into something so girly.
>kid is this much of a faggot and doesnt pick "muh cool fire black cat"
Its not like there are over 600 other mons in the game
>And we already have a wrestler in Emboar.
We felt the same 3 gens in a row regsrding fire fighting
>Rowlet evo is shit hot though
"Every major movie has an archer, archers are cool. We will put one in Pokemon. Kids who like the hunger games will love it"
>>26616863
I can see the fire one being true, that's kind of what I expect Litten's final evo to look like. The oter true are shit though.
Either way, owlfags win. enjoy your furfag bait, catfags and just LOL at sealfags.
>>26618504
Pignite obviously is, so that's probably where he's getting the connection from.
Frankly I wouldn't blame him if that's the case. I don't know what the fuck Emboar is supposed to be based on myself, so if I had to guess I'd just assume there was supposed to be an ongoing theme there.
Well, well, well... they could enter perfectly in it
>>26618600
It's almost as if the faker noticed this too, just like how they saw the confidential marks in the trailer.
>>26618617
Are you seriously so delusional you believe these designs were thought up and finalized after the last S&M trailer was uploaded?
>>26618617
> The faker is something like a god and noticed all of these details
I begin to believe it's no coincidence.
>>26616863
>rohan kishibe headband
>>26618652
>>26618654
You underestimate the lengths leakers will go to make their fakes look legit.
>>26618600
This just further proves that it's fake, since the artist clearly took note of that and quickly made the art fit these pokeballs.
The fact that I want these starters to be real means it's fake.
>>26618721
>>26618721
>quickly
I don't know about you, but the kind of attention to detail in these fakes doesn't really imply any of it was a spur of the moment thing.
>>26616863
These would make me very disappointed
>>26618763
You would be surprised at how fast sufficiently skilled artists can draw.
>Those hands on the Litten evolution
>Those incredibly tiny, yet obviously badly drawn sketches that even a fifteen year old could replicate as opposed to the more meticulously drawn thumbnail sketches in former concept art
>The clutter of it all
>Clearly edited in to fit everything into the same canvas
>And yet, art that has a missing limb
>The obvious blank slate girl anyone could design to make sure no one gets the drill
>Even more simplified for the tiny sketch itself
>Unnecessary clutter that does not help at all for reference
>Thumbnail sketches of Robin Hoot look like they barely tried
>Out of place eye style
>At least, this one doesn't have much to complain about
>Where do I even begin
>The artist overall goofed up big time with the [CONFIDENTIAL] antique, enough to let it be obvious as fuck that the person merely resized that thing without even considering for proportions
>Has barely anything at all to describe her in detail
>Probably the most overly complicated design to ever exist for a Popplio final evolution
>Gains hair and just so happens to use bubbles to hold such hair
>Is expected to be ambiguous in any way
>It only does ONE attack and the attack itself doesn't even make bloody sense
>Seriously, try to make sense of that attack
>>26618958
Who are you quoting?
>>26618958
What even is this.
>>26618958
>Out of place eye style
What do you mean? They look like regular old eyes to me.
>>26618958
Memelord from reddit discovers the quote function.
>>26618967
>>26619128
Obvious glaring points if someone even bothered trying to look at the images for more than fifteen seconds.
>>26619203
Not sure, they just so happened to feel out of place to me. At least the owl doesn't get much hate from me. At the very least, the artist bothered with him and gave interesting remarks on how the hood works.
>>26616863
If it wasn't for the idea that the fire cat would be another god damn fire/fighting type I would legit want this to be real.
>>26619240
>Can't be bothered to read because all the green text bothers him
>Fuck it, I'm just gonna call Reddit on this one
I didn't ask you to read that either, but I appreciate the effort.
>>26618140
>source? oh right, you don't have one because there is no source that states who designed them.
>I don't have a source either but I don't have to prove anything
>>26616863
I will literally eat my own cum if this is real, screenshot this.
>>26616863
I regret making this image now, its just making the fakers better. Why couldn't they have just stayed obvious and shitty.
>>26617197
If I may use the parlance of older 4chan, "4 teh lulz".
>>26619404
>concept art
Noone said that Ballio & friends pictures are concept art. People just assumed they are finished artworks.
And about Roothoot... I have no idea who would ever think this is real.
>>26616863
Tbh I like them except for Popplio's, the eyes are really weird and the clashing of the hair/tail's color scheme makes it an eyesore, and overall not very pokemon-like, looks more like a digimon or yokai to me
>>26619501
loads of people said they were just concept art, thats why i made the picture
>>26619552
The only people who would say Ballio and co. were concept art are people who know absolutely nothing about art or the design process. The Ballio group were polished and clean, they were in no way concept art nor sketches. And the quality of their design was what led me to believe that they had a decent chance of being real, thats not something an amateur could come up with nor does the average fakemon artist have that kind of talent anyway. Whoever drew them, real or fake, is extremely talented and very likely a professional artist of some kind. But either way the pictures of them we got were the finished product of those designs.
>>26619654
Anyone can draw if you put enough effort in, sugi/ohmura art is honestly a piece of piss to pull off, not only that, they aren't even creative, they're all just slight exaggerations on the pokedex entries
Its simple
>>26619503
it has pretty much the exact same color scheme as Oshawott. In fact if the middle stage were mostly that lighter blue color it'd have the exact opposite color transitions, where Popplio starts off primarily dark and ends up white whereas Oshawott started with the most eye catching color being white and ending up its dark blue.
>>26616863
They are all too humanoid.
>>26619701
Then by all means, please come up with your own designs and draw us a picture of what you think the starters final evos will be. We'll all wait patiently. : )
Protip: you can't
>>26619743
Give me three days like the Ballio guy had and I will, don't worry, ill include your post along side them so you can be sure its me.
