Pokémon don't breed in the Day care at all.
They play around with each other.
Fuck off Richard. Let pokéfuckers have their fetish. Don't you understand everyone on this board wants you gone ?
>>26434325
I was holding a gun to my head, finger on the trigger, when I thought of browsing /vp/ one last time before I left this cruel world. This is the first thread on the page. I read the entire thread, tears streaming down my face in pure joy. I've been saved.
>>26434325
How can you be so sure? It's never stated in the pokedex
>ass burgers
>>26434347
epic blog post
>>26434342
1. They are not Pokémon whatever.
Whatever you call it.
2. Pokémon Day care don't breed Pokémon at all.
>>26434358
The Pokémon Day care have nothing do with the Pokédex.
The Pokédex was created by a professor oak.
The Pokémon Day care was created by a completely different person.
>no one knows the definition of "playing together"
It's probably that the old couple don't want to tell a 10 year old: "YOUR POKÉMON FUCKED EACH OTHER SENSELESS! THEY HAVE A KID NOW!"
they play around all right
I wish I were there to play around with them too.
>>26434489
Nah.
>>26434325
Next thing I know you're going to tell me that babies are delivered by the stork and that your parents are just going over their bills when they go to their room and close the door.
>>26434562
Did your parents never teach you?
Sex is how kids are made.
When a girl pokemon and a boy pokemon love each other very much, Arceus sends them a baby pokemon in an egg-shaped cradle. And he makes legendaries by creating an entire universe.
>>26434572
Arceus doesn't create Pokémon eggs.
Arceus is not omnipotent and omniscience.
You idiot. Arceus is sleeping in the Hall of Origin.
>>26434564
stork?
If that was the case. It'll be a random egg which hatch into a completely different Pokémon.
>>26434571
I know how breeding work but Pokémon don't breed in the Day care.
>>26434460
Playing arouding?
>>26434621
>I don't know how breeding work
They have genders in Pokémon for a goddamn reason.
How enjoyable do you think it to play around with a Pokémon until you get an egg?
>>26434325
Pokemon eggs arent eggs but pokemon cradles that the baby comes out of once its ready.
>>26434633
game mechanics are not part of Pokémon lore.
Pokémon probably could breed but not in the Pokémon Day care.
The Pokémon Day care is a Game mechanic.
>>26434689
I wonder how Pokemon eggs smell like haha
>>26434689
0 and Game mechanics are not part of Pokémon lore.
Pokémon probably could breed but not in the Pokémon Day care.
The Pokémon Day care is a game mechanic.
>>26434761
What's that have to do with anything? I'm just talking about playing around with Glaceon. Isn't she pretty?
>>26434720
game mechanics are non-canon and not part of Pokémon lore.
>>26434775
Well I do agree that she's pretty.
I would love to touch her paws.
And smell her eggs.
>>26434775
1.Glaceon can be born as a male or a female.
2.Glaceon isn't confirm pretty or Ugly by the Pokédex.
>>26434798
She has nice paws.
>>26434814
Beauty is subjective and the Pokedex is basically a scientific journal.
Why can't the Glaceon he's posting be a female? Something can't simultaneously be male and female, the ratio only determines what sex the creature is at birth.
>>26434784
>that shit filter
>game mechanics aren't part of game lore
Then what is retard? Anime? Lmao.
>>26434823
The Pokédex tell us, how Pokémon actually are and etc.
>>26434814
>Glaceon can be born as a male or a female.
It cannot be born a Glaceon. It would be an Eevee. Your autism has failed you.
>>26434836
Anime series is non-canon.
Pokémon BST are a game mechanic and not part of Pokémon lore.
>>26434842
simple type error.
>>26434836
Battle mechanics are not part of Pokémon lore.
http://www.strawpoll.me/10206291
>>26434900
No thanks.
Votes doesn't matter and It doesn't make anything canon or non-canon.
>>26434838
But it is impossible to objectively define what is pretty or isn't. It is all a matter of opinion and taste. If the pokédex tried to say a pokémon was cute or not, then it would be wrong from an ethical standpoint.Also Richard, since your English is somewhat broken, I'll ask this : are you French by any chance ? Just taking a wild guess. If so, I'd gladly talk with you in French if it makes discussion with you easier.
>>26434919
Is this cannon?
>>26434842
Can't you tell that someone is pretending to be me and giving you inaccurate info.
Read the comments.
I know that Eeeve evolve into a Glaceon.
I always read the Pokédex and It's entries.
>>26434950
That's not a Pokémon.
>>26434991
Honestly between two infuriating retards I can't really tell the difference.
>>26434948
The Pokédex is always right.
No matter what you say.
>>26434991
There's nothing in the pokedex that says Eevee evolves into a Glaceon.
It could evolve into a Snorunt and Gamefreak just made a mistake they were too stubborn to own up to. You don't know.
>>26434998
Answer the question.
>>26435007
Richard, does that mean there is no pokémon you like because the pokédex doesn't tell you to like them ?
>>26435000
I always follow the Pokédex and It's entries.
I don't talk about Speculation and it's theories.
I don't call a Pokémon pretty, unless the Pokédex says it is.
>>26434950
That appears to be a cat, not a cannon.
>>26435013
That's not a Pokémon.
I have no interest in talking non-Pokémon.
>>26435013
That's not a Pokémon.
I have no interest in talking about non-Pokémon.
..
>>26435035
Okay, what do you think Glaceon's paws smell like? Fresh snow? Cat? Dog? Cog? Fox?
>>26435022
That means there is nothing to talk about. Nothing to think about. All you can say if you follow that logic is "the pokédex is right". How is that interesting ?
>>26435014
I like/use every Pokémon (species).
>>26435046
Pokédex is tell us, how Pokémon actually are and etc.
Don't you find that interesting?
Richard, I have another question for you.
Why do you continue coming here ? All people do is tell you to fuck off or try to prove you wrong. I'm pretty sure there is almost nobody here that agrees with you. We don't like talking with you. We don't want to. All we want is that you go away and never come back.
>>26435041
If I made a pokedex entry for corned cabbage, would you discuss it with me?
>>26435042
Glaceon Is a Pokémon.
Pokémon are not Animals.
>>26435063
No, because there's barely any lines at all. What I think, what I imagine, what I want them to be is a lot more interesting. Because it's what I like. I often ignore pokédex entries because they're so short and boring there's nothing to talk about. I'd thousands and thousands of pages to be even remotely satisfied. The pokédex is too short to be interesting. There is virtually nothing to talk about, especially if you ignore anything that is said that isn't in the pokédex.
That's not how science works, even if it's somewhat unrelated. Do you think Scientists just say "no, it's wrong because it's not in the book" whenever a new theory is made ?
>>26435081
What's that have to do with how Glaceon paws smell? To add to that, what do you think they feel like?
>>26435071
I don't read the fan fiction.
>>26435093
But it's not fiction.
It's a pokedex entry.
And besides.
How do you know,
I could work for Gamefreak
Maybe
I
Write
The
Poke
Dex
E
n
t
r
i
e
s
.
>>26435090
I don't know.
The Pokédex says nothing about it yet.
>>26435108
What do you think the Pokédex would say? Take a guess.
>>26435102
No thanks and I don't read fan fiction.
>>26435111
No guesses.
Speculation and facts are two completely different things.
Anyone who thinks that the Pokemon fuck and one of them passes an egg through their body is literally fucking retarded.
They're magical creatures, the egg just spawns.
This isn't being "ignorant" to biology (which doesn't fucking apply here anyway), it's being logical to the act that this is a franchise primarily aged at children.
Fuckers are sick in the head NEETS
Another thing Richard. Please answer this.
Why do you care what other people discuss ? It's blatantly obvious people here don't discuss the pokédex and care little about it. Why don't you go somewhere else where people talk about the pokédex ?
>>26435129
But Glaceon has paws and they would have a distinct texture and scent. The Pokédex's information is obviously incomplete so what do you think it's missing?
>>26435139
I don't know?
>>26435346
Then just imagine it so it fits what you'd like it to be ! Pokémon shouldn't be what it is, it should be what you want it to be !
>>26435346
But just imagine her sexy little paws on your bare flesh and tell me what feeling you imagined, it's that simple.
Doesn't stop me from wanting to fuck them silly
>>26435130
Eggs spawning is just a game mechanic.
I wouldn't take it seriously at all.
It's not part of Pokémon lore.
>>26435362
>>26435360
Speculation is not a fact.
>>26435383
But Speculation is so much more fun than a couple lines of boring pokédex entries !
>>26435383
Is Glaceon warm or cool on the inside?
>>26435131
You haven't answered me, Richard. Please, I want to know why you obstinate yourself to talk to people who don't want to talk to you. I seriously wish I wasn't talking to you but I want you to go away and leave this place so, so bad.
>>26435366
I Have nothing against you and your thoughts about Pokémon.
I never said that Pokémon can't breed at all. It is currently unknown, if Pokémon could breed.
>>26435395
No. Speculation is not fun at all.
My mommy tell me I smart Pokédex Researcher.
You are, all Dumb meme posters.
>>26435398
I don't know and the Pokédex says nothing about it.
>>26435420
It is to many, many, many people. Why don't you make a new thread to ask people if they like thinking and speculating more than canon info ? That way you'd see that this place is definitely not for you.
>>26434489
This makes sense.
>>26435432
Would it be better if she was warm or cool?
>>26435407
That question is not important to me, since It's unrelated to Pokémon.
>>26435436
I don't care.
Only Thing, important me are Pokédex and mommy changing, my diapers.
>>26435442
Richard.
JUST GET THE FUCK OUT OF THIS BOARD.
NOBODY LIKES TALKING WITH YOU.
NOBODY AGREES WITH YOU.
GET
THE
FUCK
OUTSorry for the autism burst but I'm so upset that I can't filter him and that he won't stop making shit threads and derailing others with his stupidity
>>26435441
I don't know?
Ask Game freak.
>>26435462
But this is discussion of a fact, not even speculation.
This thread is fucking stupid.
Witness this 9
>>26435462
Richard, at least please use a tripcode so we can filter you, you can find out how in the FAQ. I'm so sick of seeing your shit threads without being able to filter them, and of seeing your fucking shitty pokédex entries in threads meant to share fanart. Please do that. At least do this.
Also again, if you do happen to speak French by pure luck, I'd be glad to talk with you in French.
Richard, is the TCG canon?
Check out my Pokémon card collection.
>>26435102
>implying Game Freak would let Danielewski write Pokedex entries
House of Leaves was your only good book.
>>26435373
Well neither is them fucking, inseminating, and birthing an egg.
>>26435575
I used to do this in Steven universe threads on /co/ . Probably got banned three times.
>>26434325
How do they get eggs then?
Checkmate, athiests.
>>26435651
I used to this all the time on /v/
Worked for me ;)
Fuck off, Richard.
>>26435533
>>26435542
>>26435551
>>26435559
>>26435562
