While I was bored I decided to come up with a new Nuzlocke concept. Is this playable or too basic?
A little too basic, since it's not really restrictive enough. I like the idea of summer and winter themes though.
>>26200472
Thanks, is there anything I could add to make it better?
>>26200458
I think it's good, but remove the thing about if it evolves into your solstice type, and only I think it should only be able to be used if both of its types are in your solstice. I.e, Medicham cannot be used because it belongs to both solstices
>>26200498
Eh, that would make it so that some pokemon that aren't necessarily broken are completely unuseable.
I'd go for a primary type deal myself, with mons like Infernape and Chesnaught falling under summer and not Winter.
DO THE CAPSLOCKE CHALLENGE:
>EVERY POKÉMON
>EVERY GENDER DIFFERENCE
>EVERY SHINY
>EVERY LANGUAGE
>FINAL DESTINATION
Is there a place to post nuzlocke variations and get feedback?
Friends and I have a rather different multiple person competitive nuzlocke ruleset and I kind of want help with a few details.
I think this is prettty good, thanks for the feedback guys. Hope it trend lol.
>>26200458
Should've made "normal type = equinox
>>26200458
>>26200620
Fighting and Psychic should be swapped.
>>26200688
Seconding this, also Fairy or some other type should be moved to neutral to keep both sides equal and to satisfy my autism. Also, swap rock and dragon.
>>26200722
I'd say move Flying to neutral, since getting a Flying type is more or less necessary in most runs.
>>26200662
Changed it to that, thank you
>>26200688
Did that as well, thank you
>>26200722
The only reason that Winter has 9 is because Fairy is a newer type, and only Gen 6 has it other than hacks. Plus if anyone does this for a Gen 1 game, they now only have 6 options. I feel you though. Btw Dragon for Rock may be considered.
>>26200732
I was thinking that, but then what should be on the Summer side to replace it?
