Pokémon designs ruined by a single detail
- Home
- Board: /vp/ - Pokemon
- Reading: Pokémon designs ruined by a single detail
Pic-related: Ho-oh's independent black woman hairstyle-shaped crest. I would really like the design otherwise.
>>25707811
>Ho-oh's independent black woman hairstyle-shaped crest
Simply eric
It's head looks boring
It's easy to see they'd want something there, and i think the hairstuff is fine
>>25707811
Personally I don't like the tail feathers. It should have been more flowing rather than a pom pom.
>>25707865
Granted, but I find it too goofy.
Couldn't they have thought of something better? Ho-oh is like Lugia's ugly sister.
>>25707865
Should've gave it big eyelashes or something.
>>25707811
>independent black woman hairstyle-shaped crest
get off of /pol/ and you might stop seeing retarded shit
>>25707895
Needs to be wider
>>25707903
Pic related is the kind I mean
>>25707811
Here fixed.
Something like this would look a bit better.
I still love Ho-Oh though.
>>25707935
agreed
>>25707811
The flames?
Garchomp and clashing colors.
>>25707903
you clearly dont know what youre talking about, as thats some funny as shit commentary. thanks OP
Floatzel's flotation device looking fucking stupid. It should have stayed only around the neck like Buizel.
Shiny Ho-oh is more in line with today's trends. Silver hair is in.
>>25707921
removing details =/= fixing them
many of the things you removed because "muh overdesigned" are actual biological animal features that were used accurately
>>25709460
you may think you're telling people that they don't understand color theory, but you don't understand color theory. garchomp is one of the best pokemon designs around.
>>25707811
It's crest comes from mythology and paintings in China and Japan for thousands of years.
That's like saying Buddha needs a mullet because bald is unrealistic.
>>25709551
You don't need to use the fucking scientific method to tell if something looks like shit or not. And Garchomp looks like shit.
Pichu would look a lot better with longer ears.
>>25707921
God. I hate overdesignedfags. It's like you think any use of detail instantly means it's "overdesigned".
>>25709598
>You don't need to use the fucking scientific method to tell if something looks like shit or not
You sure as hell do if youre gonna try and objectify something thats naturally subjective.
>>25709615
Yeah and if he was yellower and his cheecks were red and if he had a lightingbolt for a tail
I kinda hate luxray's goofy mouse ears
