>Starter guide
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10886965/smtstarterguide.png
>Tips and tricks
http://pastebin.com/qqxkrWFh
>Artbook, soundtrack, manga, and other downloads
http://pastebin.com/fgVp423S
OST need re-up apparently
>Misc. Translations
http://pastebin.com/LHKVLNQB
>Booru
http://smtg.booru.org/
>Recommended Reading
http://pastebin.com/YppqPPjf
Last thread: >>92506328
Pascal the dog is here.
Fuck Lawfags
I want to fuck Mirai
Time to discuss why chaos is the true alignment, and law are slaves, and neutral is pussy fence sitters.
>>92644436
>Posting worst philosopher
>>92644436
Chaosfags always want more, they represent the ideal person.
Lawfags want as much as everybody else, even if everybody else has nothing, they represent the worst kind of person.
Neutralfags represent the indecisive nature of man, I don't know where to place them.
>>92644436
White is right, motherfucker.
>New Thread
>Not even 100 posts over the bump limit
Defend this, lawfags.
>>92644654
Page 10, dummy.
>>92644654
It's on page 10 genius, do you even know how 4chan works?
>>92644550
>implying there are good chaotic philosophers.
At best you have epicurus. In practice he wasn't chaotic at the time though, even though modern chaotic types like to say they are epicurean.
>>92644703
>>92644735
You Chaosfags will have your day.
>>92644703
>>92644735
Not him but it will be there for at least an hour. You're all fags.
Anyways this thread is off to a good start already.
No Hope left.
>>92644593
>always want more
> the ideal person
>>92645060
The person that is never content with where he is and always wants to move up is the most ideal person in the world anon.
>>92645060
What? Don't you idolize impulsive people who have no clue what they really want out of life?
>>92644767
What philosophers line up with the SMT meaning of Neutral? I can't think of any.
>>92645164
>This is how lawfags defend themselves
Disgusting, people that always want more know exactly what they want, try again. Neutralfags that don't know what they want are what you're talking abuot.
>>92645134
No it's not, boundless ambition isn't a virtue, it can be inoffensive i'll admit that, but it can also lead to conflicts and injustice as it's the case most of the times.