Creative ISK-Making Edition
Old thread: >>121048575
>Can I make enough ISK to PLEX during the trial?
If you have to ask, you can't do it.
>I just started, what should I do?
Do the Opportunities then find the Career Agents & run all of their missions; they give you ISK, ships, skillbooks and teach you basics. Talk to players and try to find a corp. The game is only as boring as you are.
>Is it too late to start playing EVE?
No.
Read the pastebin: http://pastebin.com/t9Af7NJY
Future:
>Spring: Citadel expansion & cap rebalance release
>Winter: Ship rebalances, new frigs (navy ewar, t2 logi, t2 ice miner), new t2 MJD dessies, missile disruption mod
>Nov 08: Amarr Championship begins (House Single Elimination)
>Nov 03: "Parallax" - jump fatigue 6x shorter, entosis regen, killmarks, Brain in a Box, Crimson Harvest removed
Past:
>Oct 30: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/amarr-championships-rules-and-schedule/
>Oct 26: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/building-your-citadel-one-block-at-a-time/
>Oct 25: All-Out all out of K-Space
>Oct 25: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/reworking-capital-ships-and-thus-it-begins/
>Oct 23: This Week 99: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=452067
>Oct 15: SP trading concept presented
>Oct 06: Try the beta launcher
>Oct 06: Hydra/Camel AT collusion confirmed, prizes confiscated, Smug Legion new "winner"
>Oct 01: First "Focus Group" will be discussing T3Ds
>Sep 29: Battlecruisers get Foozie'd nice and good.
>Sep 14: CSM 2015 minutes http://community.eveonline.com/community/csm/meeting-minutes/
>Aug 13: Citadel FAQ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mEbMx9xUXje3KH4AppvcjSSoALUVtVEaK6ZZ-zy2Lrs/edit#
>Foozie makes a bunch of stupid pointless changes (don't ever remove this from the OP, because it is always true)
1st for you're all a bunch of dinguses for letting the old thread die
2ND FOR SCANNING IS THE FUCKING WORST
>>121084493
Is the guy that makes these portraits still around? I only see the same ones everytime.
>>121085649
if i had to guess, i'd say he got swamped with requests and gave up. see filename for contact info. he might be open for new stuff now, this one is from 8 months ago. it was 500m iirc.drawfags wantedshard pls draw me like one of your french girls, i have the jungle fever
falling off at 40 posts edition
>>121085937
>he only has 40 posts falloff range
how embarrassing.
Please help me, please.
I'm getting a massive headache just to figure out this shit.
I simply want to make my Logitech extreme 3D pro control my ship and camera.
I want the joystick to control the ship direction and I want the HAT to control the camera. Please help me I'm going to kill someone if I can't get this to work.
I'll pay ISK to anyone who can help me solve this.
>>121087739
I remember a project like that from many years ago, they used scripts to spam left click in space
No idea if you can make it work with the new keys though
>>121088518
Is there at least a way you can get the nose of the ship to point the camera in the same direction?
>>121085893
It was the best 100m I ever spent.
>amarr
>>121084493
>khanid unable to keep a thread alive
Foreshadowing the fate of their heir :^)
>amarr
>>121090895
u can hike right off m8
>old blood
>ever good for progress
>Amarr
>this game is so boring, there's nothing to shoot!
Will Brain in a Box make anime real?
>>121091621
It already did.
how do i become an ISD
>Body Modifications
>goggles
>>121087586
heh
>>121090895
Tash-Murkon has this ez
i am going to do the guristas epic arc, for the dank gila bpc isk
I can fly caldari and minmatar ass frigs, and I can use t2 hybrids and projectiles
does anybody have a good fit for a Harpy or something that can destroy the missions with ease, or at least recommendation for tank and dps requirements?
>>121103152
according to popular consensus, t3ds are objectively superior to assfrigs, so you might want to consider that
>>121103582
yeah no shit, t3ds are not allowed through the acceleration gates
so, assault frig
>>121103992
I have no idea what the gurista epic arc consists of, sorry
>>121103152
I heard you can run it in combat interceptors, so it's probably not very hard
>>121105890
>>121104228
aight then well i'll probably just stick with either a trasher or a basic buffer harpy if i bother
nobody come to venal and kill me
i'm so glad fozziesov made null fun again
>Amarr
>>121111974
except it didn't really, sort of turned it into a job having to log on between these specific hours
>>121112501
maybe your alliance shouldn't have sov if there's no one online during your prime time
>>121113613
agreed
just make your alliance bigger and then you can have sov, fozziesov is no place for the little guys
>>121113995
Relax friend, you sound bitter.Fatigued even
>>121114576
i was agreeing with you
>>121113613
Thats not it, its not an alliance wide thing its a personal thing that now instead of doing what ever I wanted before, now I'm obligated to stand guard and shit its annoying as piss because I don't wanna play EVE as a job I want to play eve as a game.
>Minmatar
what race to train to cruisers to V
>>121117434
gallente
>>121117434
gallente for good ships, minmatar for bad ships
caldari or amarr if you're a faggot
>>121117492
>>121117510
What makes gallente so good? The deimos seems to be very fun for a solo pvp ship at least.
>>121117434
AMARR MASTER RACE
>>121117586
they're "in the meta" right now
drones and blasters and rails really dominate as they're some of the most popular ships
>>121117586
all of their t1 cruisers are top tier
both their hacs are top tier, if you include solo as a thing to use a hac for
both their recons are usable/pretty good for whatever, just like the minmatar recons
the oneiros is kinda trash, but a load of idiots use it for some reason
vexor navy issue is top tier
How decent is a solo thorax? If I try to web and blaster someone will I just get kited to death?
>>121118017
not if you're good, I've used it a bunch of times. it's very fast if you active tank it rather than shitting it up with plates.
the only concern is fighting afterburner frigates in lowsec and getting kited by frigates in lowsec plexes.
I get around these problems by carrying a mobile depot, warp stabs and and spare stasis web in my cargo. that way if I fuck up and get permatackled I can stab out, or if some obnoxious armor tracking disruptor hookbill gets under my guns I can stab out or get the second web on and shit on him.
>>121118017
you might get kited to death which is why I suggest going kitey yourself
200mm rails in the highs
cap booster, scram, web, 50mn microwarp drive
DCU, EANM, Nanofiber, AAR, magnetic field stab
for rigs, either a damage rig like the collision accelerator or a polycarbon engine housing to go faster, then the third should be a nano pump to make the armor repairer work better
>>121118392
shield fit with triple magstab is pretty hilairous too
>>121117660
Thats past meta, the best ships are caldari right now.
Knock knock
>>121122072
Who be
>>121117586
ishtar is the best afk ratting ship outside of carriers
Goodnight eog
>>121126026
o/
Does CCP still ban if you reactivate an account to use a PLEX but it's bought off the market instead of spending actual money?
Also, not sure if I do come back whether I should run incursions or something more lucrative, and/or start fresh and join some low/nullsec faggots
>>121127529
From personal experiences to your q, no.
I may have been lucky tho or something.
>>121127529
theyve never banned to my knowledge
they might disable hours 4 plex on that account though, if theyre feeling like assholes
considering the player count though, you should be safe
>>121127529
why would they ban you for that?
If I said navy issue raven, what would be the first thing you think of?
>>121129804
bellicose
>>121127529
>use a PLEX but it's bought off the market
That's the purpose of Hours for PLEX.
>>121129804
Raven Navy Issue
>>121129804
RNI
>>121129804
CNR.
>>121129804
mission running fit
>>121130681
>>121130912
>>121129804
barely better than boosted hisec mining isk/hour
>still no autocannon nerf
longest dt ever...
>Tranquility (Unknown)
Game over, man! Brain in a Box broke EVE.
Do i need a mic to fully enjoy this game?
>>121133619
yes, got to shittalk with your m8s. $5 desk mic master race.
>>121133116
>autocannon
>op
I finally understand why the minmatar ships are all top tier and overused.... Oh wait.
They're also probably the most skill intensive.
>>121133484
They're migrating skills and stuff.
>>121134389
couldn't they have done that before?
>>121133619
Almost every single fleet requires you to have TeamSpeak.
>>121134414
They need everyone to be offline to have our final SP.
offline again...
free sp ccp??????????????????
>you will never be a VIP
What happened to the Blood Raider cerebral accelerators after downtime? Did they change into something else or disappear?
I used all mine yesterday.
>>121137065
I've heard that they'll remain but become unusable.
>>121137065
I've still got them.
Expired Blood Raider Advanced Cerebral Accelerator
Earned from a Blood Raider Gauntlet site, this accelerator was once used to boost a pilots attributes across the board.
Now however, its genetic make up has collapsed and dissolved, rendering its effects completely useless.
>>121137854
Neat. Thanks.
>>121137854
sounds like it's just a collectible now.
>>121138789
Yep, it can also be listed on the market now.
>expansion released
>no new launcher background
not much of an expansion unless you're a sovfag or amarr pilot with bad taste
>Cartesian space coordinates of the victim's vessel in killmails are now recorded and exposed via the XML API and CREST
>>121139740
speak for yourself; i can't wait to play with the probing changes and see if they've done something good yet
>>121140543
the new map is shit as usual.
>>121140661
it's not really that bad anymore.
>>121090152
>Amarr
what kind of ironic omen setup should I fly for solo nullsec?
>>121144634
drop a turret slot for a nos, discharge elutriation rigs, active armor tank with cap booster, cap battery.
>>121145145
>>121145145
that's way too ironic for me
Do we get sp for the downtime?
>>121145727
NopeWhy are bats so cute?
>>121146751
Not sure, Anon. They are justmagic.
>>121140310
CCP's API system is just the most fucked up thing.
There's so many exploits, like feeding locator agent data through the API to expose the ship, fitting, and exact position in space of a target. Then there's the moon goo one which can tell what a moon produces if someone got killed on its grid.
>>121147439
I've never heard of these. does ccp know?
How can I figure out what I should trade LP for to get the most ISK? It seems like a huge hassle even if I use some sketchy website.
>>121149212
there is a website for it. you might be able to find it some how...
>>121149294
Right but it's annoying to cross check the site, hope the rates are correct, then move everything to put it up on the market. Is it supposed to be this frustrating?
>>121149125
Probably. They aren't going to waste time fixing them since only a few specialised groups use them.
>>121149540
so you have to check a site, press a couple of buttons and then move some things to a hub. that's not exactly difficult.
>>121149757
And then get killed 1 jump before Jita
>>121149790
l2haul
>>121149790
aren't all the best things implants and blueprints and shit anyway? this is really a lot of spoonfeeding
>Evemon times tell me blood raider booster is in effect
>In-game it's not boosted
y u do dis
>>121149651
I must know how to use these exploits.
For research purposes.......
>yesterday
>probe a wh
>bookmark it
>today
>same sig is there
>wormhole is there again, same class, same location
>goes somewhere else
huh
>>121149790
>Being this bad
>>121152605
Same thing happened to my static the other day.
new probe map is pretty. as soon as it stops hiding my modules and shit it'll be nice.
Is it just me or does the movement on this map feels sluggish as fuck. I think I'll stick to the old probing.
>>121156641
It's fast enough for me. Get a better computer maybe?
>>121156641
seems pretty smooth to me. I'm using it full screen. I found it less annoying after turning off scanner probes in the menu thing at the top.
>$150,000
Guessing they're gonna hotfix shit because since this morning's patch my map has been fucked.
>>121156641
Use the old map.
Also
>tfw 80mil SP but I never did Heavy drones
>>121149212
I was once raped for about 1.4 plexes worth of some heavy thing in an indy transporting LP stuff. I was stupid. Don't be like me, anon.
Fly safe. Pay someone to take the transport risk, just sell it near the LP hub, or just don't be stupid.
>>121157485
Yeah, there's a patch coming out tomorrow. Apparently Parallax broke a lot of shit.
>>121157207
>Pledge $500 or more
>Two hour strategy consultation with The Mittani
>>121119124
I've always had a hard time getting that to work because of fitting and lack of resists
>>121158998
why would you fly a slow not tanky ship to transport something that could fit in a frigate
why would you ever fly a t1 indy for any reason whatsoever
literally the only purpose of t1 indies is to broadcast 'I am a retard plz kill me' to everyone who sees you
fuck
>>121159591
noobs in t1 haulers are fine because they don't have enough stuff to warrant a gank
it's only a bad choice if you're carrying valuables
>>121159631
I never liked the coercer, other destroyers just out performed it on large
hell the cormorant gets a double optimal range bonus AND a tracking bonus, meanwhile the coercer just gets a regular optimal bonus and a tracking bonus
also the guns cap it out regardless of your set up
>Start fucking with PI out of boredom
>>121159591
It was a long time ago, so my recollection is messy, but:
It couldn't fit in a frigate. It was one of the armor plates which was the best LP:ISK I could get for that LP brand, which could actually sell instantly in Jita.
The rest of what you say is correct.
>>121159631
none of those amarr raata skins don't look terrible
>>121159801
shitter pls
>>121161502
>2 mids
>a cap "bonus" that doesn't work well at all
>less range than a rail corm by far
>>121159784
except t1 indies get ganked by solo vexors
almost anything is enough to warrant a gank, unless you're moving unrefined ore or something
>>121160064
meh, ok
sorry if I was a bit harsh
>>121163161
>indies
Do you mean inties?
>>121159801
Long range cormorants are awesome, but I can't dislike eight energy turrets. I like to think there's a spot for the coercer as a gun platform if the gang fits.
>>121159839
Do you have a pretty planet?
>>121162973
>2 mids
so? catalyst has 2 mids. cormorant has 2 mids if you tank it
>cap bonus
what's the problem here exactly
>less range than a rail corm
no shit. do you go around saying all the destroyers are terrible because the cormorant has more range?
>>121163954
>>cap bonus
>
>what's the problem here exactly
its such shit that it caps itself out even with the cap "bonus" its a fucking crutch
>>121163954
>>so? catalyst has 2 mids. cormorant has 2 mids if you tank it
the catalyst is just better purely because it puts out more DPS at better ranges and even up close
oh yea and it doesn't cap itself out
>>121164192
it's -50% not -100%. get good, nobody else manages to cap out in a coercer. if you manage to live long enough to cap out, consider yourself lucky and look at the big stack of frigates you killed.
>>121164362
>get good
nice comback for a shit destroyer that has the same cap regen of other destroyers and whose weapons use 50% more cap than hybrids even with the extra 50% to cap usage.
>if you manage to live on enough
>capacitor depletes in 0:00:15
>>121164347
Post that catalyst fit please
>>121164851
>I'll fit 3 armor reps and 2 shield boosters that'll show how bad the cap is
yeah nice comeback shitter
>>121165002
>fit just guns that'll show how bad the cap is
>>121164978
for you, threw it together in like 5 minutes
>>121165294
heres a better one that gets more tank
oh hey look at that, cap stable at 55% with guns AND an AB
>>121165537
>ab on a destroyer
shitter confirmed
>>121165294
>better range
lmao the cormorant can hit up to like 90kms and do like 160dps
The only thing the catalyst is good for is blasters
>>121165776
thats better range than the coercer with dual light beams and more DPS too
Math time /eog/!
I have two ventures mining gas.
Venture A is flown by a skilled pilot with t2 gas harvesters and a max skill venture. A gets 2.67 m3s.
Venture B is flown by a scrub with t1 gas miners. B gets 1.59 m3s.
To maximize efficiency they decide that venture A should drop a certain amount of gas over to B's ore hold to prevent unnecessary trips.
The question is how many m3 of gas must A give to B for them to fill their holds at the same time?
>>121165776
>rails on catalyst
now I've seen it all /eog/
If you want good medium range just get a trasher, you also get svipul tier alpha with it.
You want insane range? Rails cormorant.
You want Battleship dps in your face? Catalyst
Coercer sadly doesn't cut it and does nothing spectacular or unique.
When are the navy Ewar frigs supposed to come out?
>>121166192
you would do a proportionate ratio based on their rate and the time it takes to fill each cargohold, assuming you can jet can multiple times per minute that is
>>121165776
The corm fit I have volleys for 354 and does 129 dps at 84k.
A coercer with dual light beams volleys for 460 and does 197 dps at 54k.a really retarded coercer fit with focused beams and a pg implant can volley for 650 at 50k
>>121166291
December
>>121166320
Yes but you can calculate the amount that you need to transfer in total. I think i got the answer right but wanted to check it.
>>121166192
Do you need to know the hold space for each venture?
>>121166550
harvester 2's cycle at double the amount that harvest 1's do
average that out for ever 2500m3 that Venture B harvests, Venture A harvests 5000m/3
thats your big hint and you should be able to get the rest of it
>>121166827
it's always the same...
>>121166349
54k is not sniping range tho, any frigate can close the distance before it dies.
>>121167643
>54k is not sniping range tho, any frigate can close the distance before it dies.
it kinda as, any frigate that wants to close on that even going 3000m/s is going to take like 150-200 DPS for that entire time assuming the shooter doesn't move at all
>>121166827
Its always 5k
>>121166853
Still depends on mining frigate skill.
I got how much they each get per second.
I just solved it graphically:
>>121167865
>Still depends on mining frigate skill.
assuming they had the same, the proportion is 1:2
Is anyone doing sites/missions now or later? Would you let me salvage you wrecks?
>>121167960
sure, but i gave the actual prop in the original post
>>121167643
I don't think it's a viable solo fit at all if that's what you mean. I'm not really sure how to use pyfa to check damage against something like a frigate orbiting at close range. Is there a good estimate for angle and velocity I can use?
>>121168167
>frigate orbiting at close range.
If a frigate is orbiting your sniping ship you're already dead.
At anything past 20kms you're gonna hit any T1 frigate in the game with small rails, and if its just burning sideways for maximum transversal then its not making any range on you and you can always just leave.
And sniping fits are viable for solo, as long as your targets are dumb, which is a lot of people.
why are you talking about 1v1s with sniper destroyers lol
>>121168795
That's what I assumed, but it's good to check and put numbers on things.
Regardless, there's not really a point in flying a beam coercer or a sniper corm solo. If you're flying with other people I think the coercer is definitely viable.
>>121166192
(2.67-1.59)*.5/((2.67+1.59)*.5) % of their hold.
Oi lads. We're on page 10.
Lets not have the thread die early again like last thread.
>>121172841
>Amarr
>>121166853
>>121167960
Tech2 huffers are twice the per-cycle yield, but also have a 33% longer cycle time.
In the original question, Pilot A has Mining Frig V, and Pilot B has Mining Frig III (based what he said the m3/s yields were for each).
bretty gud
>>121175375
>Le high sec pvp
What's worst is that you're PVPing noobs in Couster.
>>121175635
>Reinforce POCOs
>Wait patiently to kill POCOs
>Shit comes out of reinforced mode at 90% shields
>Shit reinforces again
>New timers are literally impossible, being less than 24 hours or more than 48 hours from when they were reinforced
>Trying to make well-rounded character
>Fucking skill system makes everything take ages
I WILL NOT MAKE ALTS
>>121176972
Buy implants and boosters.
This new probing interface takes time getting used to
Drifter Incursions are back next week.
That's cool, I guess.
>tfw no drifters interdicting systems and randomly blasting haulers
>yfw drifters prefer targeting sleeper based t3 ships
>desperately trying to leave my shitty dead WH corp
>can't find any not shit kspace exits
>ccp changes scanning
>can barely scan
im trapped
pic related, worst turret in game
>>121175375
https://zkillboard.com/character/91551533/
Oh wow.
>>121185610
>literal bottom feeders that kill noobs all day
How are these faggots not banned?
>>121186282
It's probably his alt
>>121186282
Looks like they're just killing their alt over and over. For whatever reason.
Would you pay 10 million ISK for a service where you warp to a bookmark I give you, I jettison some shuttles and let you kill me in the shuttles and I kill you in the shuttles until your kill and loss pages on zkill are full of shuttle kills and thus essentially cleared from anyone trying to scope out your usual fits/hunting grounds?
Where would you want this service? Jita?
>>121186924
Unless you think you can fill somebody's KB with over 10 pages of shuttle kills and not kill yourself of boredom, don't even bother.
>>121187145
I could do it with trial alts in newbie ships
>>121186924
shuttles don't count in the killmark
>>121186872
>For whatever reason
Oh wait, I guess he's farming killmarks with his Sin.
>>121176495
>>>Shit comes out of reinforced mode at 90% shields
this doesn't happen, the shields come out at sub 50%
>>121187712
Not for killmarks, for clearing killboards. So your enemies can't look at your kill stats to see what fits you've lost or where you've been killing people.
>>121187954
There's a filter that shows lost ships in zkill. You can also filter by specific ship or sec status (i.e. low/nullsec)
>>121187954
who cares? everyone knows how people fit, "clearing your KB" is a waste of time and money
>>121187869
>this isn't meant to happen, the shields are supposed to come out at sub 50%
FTFY
It happened anyway, and like I said the new timers are screwed up too, they not within the normal durations that POCO timers can come out in, they're either impossibly short or impossibly long.
It remains to be seen if it's just the POCOs that were reinforced before todays patch deployment or if it's bugged across the board.
>>121190057
if what you said was true then the POCO can never be killed because once the POCO goes above 50% shields it will reset the reinforcement cycles
>>121190303
It seems like it's related to patch deployment today because the amount they recharged was basically as if they'd been recharging normally since downtime. There were multiple POCOs coming out so we FRAPSed one coming out and instantly being at 90% and took screenshots of the screwed up timers and submitted a support ticket about it.
But shit, it's still super annoying and we'll see tomorrow if POCOs turn out to be magically invulnerable again tomorrow or if they'll actually be destructible.
>>121191383
So what's the reason to assault a poco? Want that tax yourself?
>>121193521
you'll get to charge taxes
problem is if people don't use your Poco's and they get destroyed prematurely they can be a really bad investment
>>121194494
The average tax income on a poco can't be all that much compared to the initial cost.
>>121193521
The tax income these particular POCOs bring in is fairly extreme.
Like the whole "set" is approximate to a dysprosium moon.
What do I spend my concord LP on?
>>121198168
meta capital guns or mods and shit
>>121198168
Meta XL blasters used to be the shit.
>Amarr
>people ACTUALLY think 10% to cap usage per level is a real bonus
>they actually think its "just as valid" bonus as any other ship's bonuses
>they think that its ok that amarr laser ships have only 1 combat bonus and every other ship in the game as 2 combat bonuses
>>121204002
>the sacrilege (a ship with capless guns) has better cap regen than the zealot
>even with a 50% cap usage bonus at max level, lasers use 2 times the amount of capacitor that hybrids do
>the abaddon and apoc cannot fit a full rac of tachyon beam lasers without severely going over powergrid
>>121185002
just go back to the old interface in options
>got reimbursed
feelsgoodman
Noob question - How time consuming is even (i know about the no casuals allowed meme but can i still "have fun" with a couple of hours a week without spending too much money?
Im not trying to make it into massive scale battles but maybe some solo pvp shenanigans. Also how grindy is it compared to runescape?
>>121208525
how "new" are you?
I'm not being sarcastic just generally curios
>>121208525
EVE isn't a couple hours a week kind of game sadly.
>>121208746
this new
>>121209070
starting to realize that, i just dont have the time for mmorpgs anymore. i wish i never overlooked this game all these years
>>121209330
getting money in EVE is pretty easy from shitty mining to level 2 missions you can have your first 10 million isk in as little as a half an hour
>>121209330
WHY ARENT YOU TRAINING ANY SKILLS
and yes eve can be played casually, because you learn skills while offline, so you can come back in a few days and have a dozen new things learned
>>121209330
keep your guy subbed and skilling up tho.
You never know when you get into a car accident, become paralyzed from the waist down and become a NEET with all the time in the world .
>>121209330
TRAIN A SKILL
ANYTHING
NAVIGATION OR SOMETHING
YOU'RE WASTING TIME
Anyway, take it slow and explore the game. I think you can play it casually as long as you don't have any illusions about becoming the king of nullsec or something. It's an RPG, so advance your character and enjoy it.
Any issue with using a throwaway email for a trial account? I wanna see if I feel like coming back to this game but I don't wanna spend 10$ to reactivate my old account yet.
>>121209885
Shouldn't be any problem. Obviously it's a brand new trial character. I think CCP only gets mad when you're multiboxing trial accounts.
>>121209885
absolutely normal
>>121209330
pls join all-out sempai, we will make you lose ships in interesting ways
>>121209640
>>121209881
do these skills affect my current ship only or my character in general and how do i gain more skill point if i run out?
>>121210061
>>121210113
Rad, thanks. Am I reading this right that trial accounts can't use any industrial ships? That's pretty butts.
>>121210195
Character in general.
You always gain more, it increases over time. Hence why they're all screaming to start doing SOMETHING.
>>121210195
lmao you thinks respawn?
Those skills are for your character, if a ship dies its dead forever.
>>121210195
skills affect everything
train shield management? you just got 5% extra shields on every single ship you will ever fly
all that sort of shit
shit... fuck, i was looking for relics
still alive though
>>121212974
you sir look like you enjoy going all-out
>>121214710
i was thinking of fighting them but after the first missile hit me i nope'd out. anyway ill con't tomorrow thanks for the tips guys
>Amarr
>Patch with least content since oceanus
>Has every possible bug
>>121212974
>unironically flying an Ibis
d'aww
>>121212974
get a real scanning ship.
>>121221849
What do you expect from a dev team that's lost 200 people?
Citadels are going to be trash too.
Why are half my modules offline when I undock, they're all online while fitting in station
Is scanning completely fucking broken?
I've already tried old and experimental and I can't get anything past 0%, earlier when I scanned a WH it wasn't actually there.
>>121227902
works fine for me
>>121227902
>top down
>while scanning
kek
have you considered that you are way above or way below the signature
>>121233542
i did not realize that this was a rookie ship until you posted - i assumed it was a tengu or something
now i have to save it
>>121234925
I deleted my post because I missed that he was doing career agent: exploration and didn't have access to a Heron yet, and his modules are probably civilian modules. The only bizarre thing is that I think he warped to an anomaly rather than a signature.
Would've been cute if he was genuinely trying to explore with a rookie ship.
(_) Try the New Map
(_) Try the New Probe and Directional Scanners
Into the trash.
>>121233648
no, I moved the camera at the end
it was perfectly centered
>>121235887
use longer range
Holy fuck, this patch sucks...
I just saw time dilation factor spike to 90% in an empty system.
>>121239261
It's Brain in a Box, anon. Brain in a Box is killing EVE. We didn't listen.
>all out successfully runs a WH op without losing a ship AND makes money out of it
what on earth is happening
Join Anime Masters Guys.
>>121239261
90% means it's running at 90% of normal time, it's not a big deal
>>121090152
>amarr
>>121185002
Who is this wormhole corp?
>Bloodraiders
