>$300 console
How?
Very outdated grass textures.
>>343010831
I don't own a PS4, PCuck here but that's a pretty shitty screenshot. I've seen way better Uncharted 4 screens.
UC4 did look really fucking good.
>>343011212
>outdated texture
lmaooooo
Optimization. Most of that foliage is batched draws which are super cheap. This isn't exclusive to consoles but does show that they put a lot of thought into their rendering architecture. Having a target platform to design for almost always gives you some really good optimization gains if you have the development time for it.
>>343010831
there are literally better looking last-gen games
>>343011468
That looks no better than Battlefield 4. It's outdated. It was good at one time though.
that looks awful. complete lack of detail on textures. if you focus your eyes on anything its garbage. there isn't a single thing that doesn't look like plastic.
>those jaggies, literally PS2-tier
>flat lighting
>water doesn't reflect lighting
yeah no, looks pretty accurate for $300. chinese dog shit.
>>343011949
>Not posting green
You had ONE job.
It's a decent looking game, but I don't get why sonyfags think it's so amazing. Battlefront looks shit tons better, as does games like Crysis 3 or RotTR on PC.
>>343011981
Whenever I try to focus on anything in any video of UC4, it just looks cartoonish for whatever reason.
Show me a webm with some uncharted 4 grass.
>>343012549
It's because it has no ambient occlusion and the shading sucks.
Naughty Dog is known for their optimization tricks
>>343012678
>P2P korean MMO with no end game
>>343010831
im confused. is that supposed to be impressive, or making fun of it
>>343013049
>looks far better than uncharted.
>Is an actual game, not a cinematic experience
>cheaper
>IS AN ACTUAL GAME
Check & Mate.
>>343010831
linear games, just like how Alien Isolation looked really good and was well optimized
>>343010831
>that water
>that nintendo 64 fog shortening the view distance
Hint, that's not what water looks like.
>>343010831
>400$ console and another 400$ console because the first models were shit
FTFY
>>343010831
Naughty dog have always been the masters of optimization
>>343010831
30 fps that's how.
At the end of the day, nobody cares about graphics.
You'll be stuck inside your own world, alone and crying because nobody on Neo-/v/, in 2020 will remember the game you like; just like what happened to all PS1 classics.
No-one on the street remembers them. Yet all N64 titles are dearly recalled by people who owned one.
Heck, PS3 was supposed to be impressive. Nobody remembers it. Nobody remembers PC games either. Everybody remembers Halo 3 though. Because it was a good game. Everybody remembers the Zeldas. Good games. Everybody remembers Cave Story. Good game.
Gameplay > graphics.
Thanks for reading my post.
>>343016197
Yep.
Every good looking game today will look like garbage 5 years from now... so what does it matter in the end?
>>343016197
>>343016485
What a ridiculous load of shit.
Graphics aren't the same as visuals. The visual component of a game is one of the most important and basic aspects of feedback that fuels the basic satisfaction everyone gets from playing it.
In addition to that, there are tons of older games that look great regardless of what year it is now.
>>343016485
what matters is that these faggots are killing gameplay. You can't remember "gameplay" if it never existed in the games.
>>343016998
>In addition to that, there are tons of older games that look great regardless of what year it is now.
Like.......?
>>343017153
Ico
SoTC
Bioshock
MGS1-2-3
XIII
Crash 1-2-3
Too many sprite based games to even bother listing.
>>343012549
Side effect of pre baked lighting
Most angles it looks shit
>>343017619
Am I the only one that thinks crackdown still look okay?
>>343017619
Those PS2 games run like shit on the PS2 hardware. HDC doesn't count here since you're claiming these games look good on the console it was intended for, and they run at 4:3 standard ratio, too.
sprites aren't 3D tho.
>>343010831
720p silky smooth 17 fps
>>343016197
>Gameplay > graphics.
Why dose this board love witcher 3 then? It has bad gameplay and is a cinematic story driven game with fetch and trail quests.
>>343010831
photo mode
>>343017818
>Most angles it looks shit
???
>>343018309
1. Just because there's slowdown and/or it doesn't run at 60 fps doesn't magically make the game look bad,
2. Aspect ratio has nothing to do with anything.
3. No one ever specified 3D graphics.
>>343018526
terrible water just like The Witcher 3, why can't anyone into water?
>unlimited detail with no use of the GPU
How?because devs actually can make ps3 looking games on a ps2, but they dont give a shit about optimization
>>343010831
Closed levels
No realtime TOD
No realtime GI
No AO
Low resolution shadows
No full physically based rendering on first pass
>>343019592
UNLIMITED POINTCLOUD DATA
>>343010831
>psfags thinks this looks good
OH AM I LAUGHIN M8 OHHOOHHO
>>343016197
nobody remembers ps1 classic ...... that has to be bait. The only game people remember on n64 is ocarina of time and maybe mario 64
>>343010831
How can the Sega Dreamcast compete with this?
>>343017619
I'll give you ICO but SOTC doesn't look good outside of the bosses.
>>343016197
Load of bull
WHY ARE MORE OF YIU NOT BRINGING UP FPS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
