750ti meme successor
- Home
- Board: /v/ - Video Games
- Reading: 750ti meme successor
rx480
>beats gtx980 at only $200 = 180euros
http://www.engadget.com/2016/05/31/amds-radeon-rx480-gpu-is-vr-ready-for-just-199/
I will fuckin buy this new meme & gift my 750ti to wife's son
>>339576175
950SE was the new 750Ti anon.
>>339576175
>150W
no thanks
>>339577851
ok then spend $400 on a 1070 just so that you save $4 worth of electricity in a YEAR
>>339578041
I think he meant how it uses 150w instead 75W.
>>339578113
how fuckin poor can these fools be. they should just game on a ps2
>caring about your cards wattage
KEK
>>339578212
third world countries like the US have to pay an outrageous rate for electricity compared to most west EU countries
>>339578164
that's not only about energy, it also requires more space, it heats more, need an extra cable from the PSU
it doesn't have anything to do with 750Ti
it's AMD so shit drivers and OpenGL performance
200 $ card that can run vr, what does this mean for consoles. Surely this is the time to release xbox 2 and ps5 with real gpu power?
>>339578268
>doesnt know that the U.S. has a golde standard for energy reserves and natural gas fracking while EU gets completely cucked by the Middle East for its gas reserves and sucks Russia's dick for coal
>>339578318
my africaan, the rx4800 surpasses the gtx980 and you comparing it to a 750ti?
its about 5 times as powerful
>>339578268
Electricity is dirt cheap in the US
You'd know if you were old enough to pay an electric bill
>>339578408
i know that is faster, since is newer, but it doesn't fit all the use cases that a 750Ti does thus it isn't a "successor" my retarded anon
is like saying that a Ducati is a successor of your everyday bike, because IT'S FASTER!
Does it matter if you keep an external HDD full?
>>339576175
Does AMD just have cheaper manufacturing costs? Are they taking a loss for each of these they sell?
everything but power is a meme. especially for /v/.nobody cares how hot it is, how much psu it uses, any of that other stuff. unless its literally ruining the card with its heat or your shit psu cant run it
>>339576175
200$ gpu in US is 240€ in most eu countries
>>339578736
no. nvidia is like buying a bmw youre paying a premium for the brand. amd is like a fucking moped so they sell as cheap as theyre made
>>339578664
full of what
>>339576175
>tfw have 750ti
>will replace it with this almost 100%
meme magic
>You could also run two RX480 units simultaneously, a configuration that managed to beat out NVIDIA's GTX 1080. (And better yet, that configuration would only be around $400, compared to $600 or more for the 1070.)
FUCK LADS ITS OVER
well for people who have a motherboard capable of this
>>339578949
memes bro...memes
swim in dat meme river & you wont get BLACKED
Can someone explain to me if this would be a decent upgrade to my 750Ti? Poor/dumbfag reporting in
>>339579009
How could anyone possibly tell you before all the benchmarks are in
>>339578985
>still believing on CrossFireX/SLI meme
enjoy your not so micro stutters
>>339578212
this
>>339578393
>Dumb fuck American thinks any other nation but his is retarded enough to use gas and coal for power
>>339578268
i live in Brazil and pay only R$150 for electricity
>>339579153
I'm sorry you live in brazil.
>>339576175
Wonder how well the 480 overclocks
>>339579153
I'm sorry you live in brazil.
>>339576175
Will this card play GTAV at maximum settings 1080p60?
I mean maximum, with the extended distance sliders and grass settings on ultra and MSAA enabled.
>>339579089
Direct X 12 should be able to get rid of that, but I don't see any games supporting it.
>>339578736
>Does AMD just have cheaper manufacturing costs? Are they taking a loss for each of these they sell?
No, they just use third world materials and standards to make the cheapest Chinese tier trash possible.
>>339579231
probably like shit, like all the late AMD cards
>>339576175
I bought a 390x in January and now i already want to upgrade.
Should i do it lads?
>>339578318
you know the rx480 has only one six pin connector and it uses hbm memory right?
>>339579306
yes
>>339576175
Holy shit. Why is it so cheap?
Cool. I'll get this.
>>339576175
>more expensive
No. It doesn't beat the 750ti
>>339579469
AMD
>>339576175
I doubt it'll be as powerful as a 980. I'm thinking slightly better than 390 performance.
>>339579241
Everything including AA completely maxed out? I doubt it. Even a 980 at 1080p has trouble. Turn the AA down, then probably.
>>339579241
at that point you're more CPU bound, it won't do shit on a $7 Xeon or a i3 laptop
>>339579342
you know that the 750Ti has no energy connector, being fed only through the PCI-E slot right?
>>339579306
no your 390x is stronger and with an overclock can probably reach 7 tflops
>>339579306
no
you'd have to be a retard to buy a new gpu every year
>>339579706
I got the Sapphire Nitro and it doesn't overclock for shit.
>>339579141
That's not my point, you uneducated Yurocuck.
We have a massive amount of energy reserves on domestic land and you're tonguing Iran and Russia's sweaty assholes to keep the lights on.
>>339579641
thats good if its fed by its own slot but why are you in the thread if you don't have any intention of getting the card? it seems that if its only benefit is the power then I don't think its really worth just sticking to that. that is unless you can't upgrade right now.
>>339579306
yes
>>339579342
It doesn't use hbm memory right
>>339576175
So from specs alone it looks like competitor to 1070, but half the price... fuck, i need benchmarks pronto. Won't believe this till I see some independent proof
>>339579260
Are you saying that Ashes is not enough? Have you forgotten that it's a best game ever that was totally made by a competent dev and in no way affiliated with AMD?
>>339576175
thanks marketer, it's time I updated my 750ti
>>339579306
It's not going to be any more powerful. It wouldn't be an "upgrade" at all. You'd be better off getting a 1070 or waiting to see if they release a 490.
Even if it's slower than a 1070 I'm buying one of these. Still chugging along with an i5 2500 so I don't want to bother getting a very expensive video card. This should tide me over for another few years.
>>339580413
This
>>339576175
AMD WON
>>339580413
is any game actually limited by an i5 2500 regardless of the gpu your using?
>>339578268
No one cares then, if you're using the internet in an actual 3rd world country (UK for example) then stop wasting electricity
>>339576175
Good enough for me when my current card is a HD 5850. My only hope is that I can get a card with DVI output instead of HDMI. Currently use that port for the PS3 and I do occasionally play Ace Combat: Infinity on it.
>>339579264
>third world materials and standards to make the cheapest Chinese tier trash possible.
"The Radeon RX 480 is based on the 14 nm "Ellesmere" silicon, fabbed by GlobalFoundries. It's publicly known that GloFlo has a 14 nm fab in Malta (upstate New York), USA."
http://www.techpowerup.com/223040/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-launched-at-usd-199
#REKT
>>339577851
>>339577851
> High bandwidth memory
no shit you need 150w, stuff runs at like 30ghz
>>339580947
not really
2500K will go down in history as the best consumer chip ever made
I have no doubt that an overclocked 2500K will last for another 10 years for gaming
so 980s are worth about $100 now lol
>>339581683
and few years from now they say the same about 1080
>>339576175
>200$
Is this is true im getting one and crossfireing it with my 390
Like, holy shit.
What kinda toilet witch magic is this card made with to be so cheep
>>339581409
I'd give it to the first gen i3s anon. Those still run everything especially overclocked. They are approaching 7 years old
>>339580947
On stock speeds yes.
Witcher 3 for example would have big frame rate issues on stock speeds in the cities where a lot of CPU power is needed.
But most 2500K's overclock to 4.5Ghz easily, and that gets rid of the CPU bottleneck in those areas.
$200 means about €300 with all the import taxes and shit. Still seems like a pretty good deal. I am running an R7-200 and an upgrade to the RX480 would probably be a good idea.
Looks like I may finally replace my HD 7850
>>339582384
>i3
>overclocked
I think you're confused
>>339579264
You're an idiot who doesn't know how chips are made.
The dies are made by fabs like Global Foundries/ TSMC/ Samsung.
The actual PCB's those dies sit on are then made by the various third party card resellers like Sapphire/ ASUS/ EVGA/ MSI.
There is no difference in material quality between AMD and Nvidia, except you pay a premium to get fucked raw up the ass by architectural fuck ups like 3.5GB, and planned obsolescence through diminished driver support for older cards (see Keplar, observe current Maxwell driver trend) when you buy Nvidia.
>>339582654
Nah you are just senile. The first gen i3s were overclockable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxDEw-0MhA0
Intel wouldn't be able to sell i5s if they remained overclockable
Hey guys guess what.
Those PS4 neo rumours depicted 5tf performance and 2304 compute cores.
Low and behold what does the 480 have?
5tf performance and 2304 compute cores.
Waiting for the 490/x
Fuck g-sync
>>339582521
American electronics prices is about the only thing I'm jelly of
My CPU is bottlenecking my games, what's a good cheap CPU to upgrade to?
>>339583074
Anything not AMD and you're good to go.
>>339582749
>diminished driver support for older cards (see Keplar, observe current Maxwell driver trend) when you buy Nvidia.
nvidia still give support to any card up to 8000 series that's 10yo card
while AMD dropped the support of 5000 series only 3 years after its release
>>339583161
yeah but which one is cheap?
Intel CPUs are expensive as hell.
>>339583193
Depends on your socket. Even lower end i5s are excellent CPUs.
>$200
>it'll be €250-300 here as always
>>339583074
Why cherap out on the cpu though
Just get a good one that you can overclock eventually and you're set for half a decade
got a 3570K oced to 4.5ghz , would it bottleneck with these new gen gpus?
Would this make a good upgrade from a GTX 670?
>>339583193
>Intel CPUs are expensive as hell.
no they're not
a Ferrari is expensive as hell
a CPU is a couple hundred bucks
>>339583352
Overclocking CPUs is massively overrated and unnecessary for most users. A good i5 CPU has way more perf that users actually require, unless they do CPU intensive programming or run distributed science supporting software like folding at home. It is way better to get a fast and power efficient CPU and just leave it at stock, that way you have enough performance and at the same time are not reducing the lifespan of the tech you spent your hard earned autism bux on.
>>339583490
nope
>>339583490
Nope. Dont forget your CPU is still very modern, there havent been many improvements since that generation other than power efficiency and heat reduction.
>>339583560
Or you could get an unlocked one and overclock it when you actually need it
>>339583516
yup
>>339583560
pretty much
some games (anything made by Bethesda) benefit from having higher clock speeds through overclocking but 99% of the time a locked i5 or even an i3 is plenty for most gaming demands
>>339579241
Pretty sure this card can handle Wither 3 almost maxed on 1080p 60 fps with no hairworks
>>339583606
>>339583610
>>339583689
thanks guys
>>339579839
>70+% nuclear power contribution in power generation here
>needing hydrocarbons for electricity
>2016
So I have:
>amd phenom ii x6 1055t CPU
>R7-200 GPU
Which of those bottlenecks my fps more, the GPU or the CPU?
>>339583870
i dont even know what an r7 200 is so probably that.
>>339578268
My bill on average is maybe $30-40 a month. If that's too much for you maybe you shouldn't move out of your parents' house.
>>339583870
your GPU, obviously
is it a 250?
>>339584025
I think? Just confused since the CPU is already like.. 5 years old. Guess I'll wait for the first few polaris reviews and decide then if I want a 1070 or the rx480.
>>339584240
You'll still have to upgrade your cpu or your new gpu will be bottlenecked hard
>>339584351
>cpu bottleneck
Sure, maybe if he is rendering a movie in the background while playing.
>>339584415
Plenty of games tax the CPU
>>339576175
>gift my 750ti to wife's son
>wife's son
Do I even have to say ut?
>>339584510
Sure thing buddy,
Thats cool, but what about them CPUs?
My 8350 isn't cutting it.
Is this the new 7870 of this era?
Because that was a damn good card
Why do AMDfags always seem like they have an inferiority complex?
>>339578602
go to bed shill, you're 5 cents will be deposited into your poo account later
>>339576175
>>339577851
>>339578113
>>339578041
How much power supply minimum be for 150w?
>>339583295
It'll be $350-400 in Australia.
EU never wins.
>>339580231
It's also a great benchmarking tool.
What is wrong with you? Buy 480s in SLI already.
>>339581218
lol America is 3rd world now?
>>339579306
No. Wait for Vega. RX 480 shouldnt be much faster.
>>339584794
Probably get by on a 500-550w.
I've been dancing around the idea of getting a r9 380 to replace my antiquated 6950.
Is now the time to do it, or should I wait for the new cards to come out?
Pretty much need to stick to 300-series, since it'd highly doubtful the 400-series is going to have DVI-I available.
>>339583165
6000 also just lost support at the end of last year.
And their last release of drivers ended up gimping them by disabling OpenCL support.
>>339577851
Literally who cares?
OFFICIAL SPECS
COMPUTE: ">5TFLOPS"
CUs: 36
Memory Bandwidth: 256GB/s
Data Rate (Effective): 8Gbps
Memory Size: 4/8GB GDDR5
Memory Interface: 256-bit
TDP / Power: 150W
(1x 6-pin)
DisplayPort: 1.3/1.4 HDR
So it has been confiremed now that there will be a 4GB and a 8GB version.
The 4GB is the one that will cost 200$ and the 8GB version price has not been finalized but will probably land on the 250 mark
>>339584718
7870 here
looks to be the case
>>339578268
Literal pennies when you consider it's almost never under 100% load. Even in the most expensive state m80.
>>339584351
Depends on the games. Some MMO when it is crowded, but the x6 should still hold up reasonably well unless they plan on playing games in 1440p. For 1080p it should still hold up well enough.
>>339585047
I just want something to play Witcher 3 at 1080p/60 fps
>>339584839
the point was that it isn't made in China
>>339585047
i expect 230 for reference 8GB and 250 for aftermarket models
>>339585172
It will do it no problem.
>>339578268
Ohio here
I pay about $25/month with the AC/Heat on all the time
>>339585047
It is a retardedly low price for those specs. I am expecting either the cooling to be complete shit or some internal fuckery that limits the card.
Rumours say that P10 consumes much less that 150W, somewhere around 110-130W.
Intel does this - they say 95W TDP but the chips only use 75-80W max.
It's very strange that they advertise the max power that the card can get. I guess they are going to promote 150W because there will be many AIBs that will show up with factory overclocked 8pin conectors cards and then the average of RX 480 will be 150W.
>>339585252
what will limit the card is potential power draw from a single 6-pin
>mfw finally a good upgrade from my 770
is dis real life
>>339577851
>he poorfagged on the Power Supply, the most important part
lmao
>>339578268
Germany here. electricity is stupidly expensive over here due to the government deciding to completely quit nuclear power. Turn out that green energy is rather expensive, who would have thought?
>>339585284
I'm thinking dual 6-pin for the high-end models, like MSi Lightning and such
>>339585356
>completely
I somehow thought so too but there's still a lot of nuclear reactors in duty
>>339585356
meh, it'll pay for itself within a decade
>>339576175
I can't wait for benchmarks, this better not be a meme card like 970 again
>>339585407
Yes, and we get a big chunk of our electricity from French nuclear plants. But hey, any excuse to get another "Öko-strom steuer" to jw the people out of their shekel.
Oh thank fuck, I can't wait to ditch the shitty Nvidia with their shitty drivers.
>>339585047
>no DVI
why? Isn't it targeting poorfags?
AMD shills sure are doing work today, huh?
>>339585356
It's a sham because you still import a lot of electricity from France, letting us run and squeeze money from dustbins and like the Fessenheim and Bugey plants, both nearing 50 years of activity
Can't wait for the benchmarks, I guess now I know which card I'll buy for Christmas
>>339585562
>live in Luxembourg
>threat of Cattenom blowing up looming over us daily
You guys are some cheap fags
>>339577851
>He thinks 150W is a lot
Nigger what in the fuck card do you have that requires less then 150W?
sure as shit aint any good once
>inb4 970
>>339585646
I blame EDF and Areva
waiting for Vega and HBM2 this Fall
>>339585815
the 750Ti hinted by OP?
it consumes 75W
>twice bigger, twice hotter, twice as much power draw, twice as powerful
doesn't sounds like a successor, just a supersized competitor
>>339577851
RX 480 will for sure use less than 150W, that 150W is more like PEG PCIE+6pin typical rating just plastered on.
>>339585986
its not a successor nor a competitor
750ti is old news and 3 gens behind
Is there any reason to get the $200 4gb version over the $250 8gb one?
>>339586137
great that we agree
now if you don't mind reading OP again
>>339585986
More like 5x performance, and considering physical size and power usage/heat output are irrelevant for 99% of usage cases...
>>339576175
>$200 = 180euros
Components are more expensive in Europe than the US, so it will probably be in the range of 250 Euro.
So crossfireed RX480's is said to beat out the 1070 and compete with the 1080
I don't personally believe this but if it is true once we finaly get the benchmarks, how on suicide watch do you think Nvidia is gonna be
>>339578268
>Third world countries like the US.
I like you because you tell the truth.
>>339586247
cheaper for your needs i.e. single 1080p screen
>>339586384
> i don't believe this
in ideal scenerio probably will. But shit optimization/ports make dual GPU not always work DX12 will make this even more so.
>how suicide watch will Nvidea be.
Not at all. AMD has in past flat out outperformed nvidea for cheaper and still sold way less cards.
>>339585986
>much power draw
Dude 150W has practiclly been standart for 3 years now
>twice as powerful
I don't think you know just how big the gap between then 750TI and 970 even is.
>>339586402
1st world literally means western/capitilist/USA and it's allies
2nd world was soviets and friends
3rd world is unaligned.
So people say that trying to sound cool and edgy haha america is third world. They are actually just being complete idiots.
>>339582287
Well its literally only a bit of metal they aren't expensive to make only expensive to invent
>>339586754
>literally only metal
Yeah man 14nm silicon waffers cheap as fuck to make, especially with those kow as yields they are getting.
You do realize margins are probably insanely thin right?
>>339586754
That's really retarded, you should look into how GPUs and other similar components are actually produced, it's not as cheap as you think.
>>339576175
Is this piece of meme wizardry suited for qhd gaming? If yes, how much will the rest of the rig cost?
>>339586892
margins are probably negative for desktops
If I have 0 interest in 1440p, 4k or VR and just want to play games in 1080p @ 60fps for the forseeable future, will this card be a good investment?
Should I upgrade to this 480 from a gtx 670?
I'm going to be waiting on both ends, since I wasn't planning on upgrading until 1080ti at the very least time frame wise, but I've used both manufacturers of cards and I got to say, that Nvidia does have some really nice features like Shadowplay and generally don't have too many issues with games, but AMD was fairly annoying when it came to drivers and generally always seemed to have random issues more often in games than Nvidia did, and Nvidia did have some issues as well but still.
>tfw I owned the 280, the 380 and now prob gonna buy the 480
>Selling old Video card after a year of use
>Literally spending only $30-50 for a grapichal upgrade
Life is good
>>339585047
Educate a poorfag who's gonna be building his first PC this or next year.
What specs are average, and what is considered high-end?
Memory size is VRAM?
>5TFLOPS
Is that really bad?
>>339587083
Looking at the raw specs?
Yea probably
I would wait for the benchmarks to drop first but it will probably handle 1080 @60 easy
>GTX 1080
USA: $699 (626 Euro)
Europe: 789 Euro ($880 USD)
That's a price hike of $181, which is almost the price of a RX480 in the USA.
>AMD R9 Fury X
USA: $680 (610 Euro)
Europe: 599 Euro ($668)
That's a price that's actually lower in Europe than in the USA. Obviously this is an old card at this point, but point still stands.
>>339587217
VRAM bitrate is same as the 1070 so its ok.
Yes Memory size is the VRAM niga, what kinda question is that.
5tflops (Or 5.5 not sure yet) is pretty gud, considering the 980 has the 5 too for $400
>>339585252
Why?
AMD has been spamming thei "low price aim" for years now and we are now going to see what they meant.
>>339587383
Just making sure m8.
I'm still fucking broke, so I have time to do my research.
>>339587368
What's the EU price for non-founders 1070?
>>339584849
>>339584794
I use a 550w PSU with a GPU that uses 250W at max load.
People over-estimate how much power their entire machine will need.
>>339587504
I would wait till first Benchmark but what AMD said is right this is pretty much the new sweet spot in Prife/Perfomance.
If you only want to play 1080p60 this is going to be excelent. Some titles in 1440p and some Competive games/older titles will run 4K
>>339587217
>Educate a poorfag
these new cards from nvidia and amd will all have between 4-8GB VRAM (video memory), which will serve any HD+ screen (1080, 1440) fine but probably not 4K with a single card
your main concern should be with framerate on whatever display you're running - shoot for 60fps as a minimum number
specs are difficult to compare across manufacturers, but teraflops is a good indicator for how well a card may perform.
just for reference, the 980 puts out about 5 Tflops, the 780 put out around 4, the 680 around 3
I sure hope AMD continues on that great bang/buck, low high-tier route they chose, it's the best
>>339587217
Most of the stuff in it looks on par with the 980Ti and the 980Ti had been the price to preformance king for years until very recently
what is impressive to is that the memory size.
The one we are looking at right now is the 4GB version
But the other one that is gonna cost a little more has 8GB where as the 980TI only has 6GB
Overall it's pretty impressive for it to look as it does for the price it has
crossfire 480 8GB is going to annihilate the 1080
>>339587875
Yes and that's what AMD should've done long ago. People with money will always go to Nvidia now. People with budget alternate between Nvidia and AMD depending on who offers the cheapest shit. I think AMD can make a decent return selling a $200 GPU that is enough for 1080p 60 fps for most games.
I've never understood the shitting between these two fanboys.
Now tell me which new card to buy in August.
>>339587531
the price of the 1070 hasn't been release yet
>>339576175
>180euros
whoever thinks it'll be that cheap is delusional. It'll probably be more like 300euro
And people will still complain about this card.
>>339588197
>it's not free
>>339588096
Im hoping for 230-250
I will flip shit if it's over 300
>>339588242
>it runs on electricity
FUCKING AMD KEKS.
>>339586746
Thanks for imparting your 5th grade knowledge, I've already been to 5th grade though so nothing new learned here, maybe in 6th grade you'll learn how to suck up a fucking joke.
>>339587918
>980Ti had been the price to preformance king for years until very recently
>for years
>Release date: June 2nd, 2015.
Nigga the thing hasn't even been out for a year.
And I sure as hell wouldn't call it the king of price to performance either.
>mfw every year since 2010 AMD, and NVidia announce new cards
>mfw everytime they put out these dumb fuck press releases about how the new cards will blow the last cards dick out of the water
>mfw everytime AMD's new card ends up being a cheap alternative that's a total piece of shit but atleast you didn't pay much for it
>it's practically a beefier version of the last GPU chip but with a tricycle wheel for a fan tied to some makeshit power source
>mfw everytime NVidias new card ends up being a better card in the long run but is so over priced that you could've bought a new car
>it's practically the same chip but with more NANOMACHINES or some shit that's been crammed in that justifies forking over an extra 300$
>mfw people shitfling over this day in and day out and then cry foul when they get burned by one side before jumping to the next and repeating the cycle
>mfw this is the state of PC gaming
>>339588076
Why did my autistic friend claim it was 500 Euro then? I can't trust him with anything.
>>339588430
>king of price to performance
currently the 290 4GB
>>339576175
>Wife's son
KEK
>>339588430
>released last year
>It feels like years to me
What would so say is the "best" card on the market right now
490 better be only $300 and perform better than 1080.
>>339587752
>>339587217
Too add to this, historically AMD ends up yielding less fps per tflop than an Nvidia tflop, so comparing the 480 to the old 900 series isn't exactly apple to apples.
However this may change with DX12 if devs take the time to get more of that potential power out of the 480 unlike last generation.
>>339578268
>>339578268
?
I live in the US and my electricity bill is under $70 month.
>>339582901
PS4 Neo will use an APU, not a dedicated GPU
>>339585356
>>339585407
>>339585507
This is depressing. Nuclear Reactors are safer to operate now.
And alternative energy can never really be a main source of power today, its expensive to maintain and the resource can get finicky.
>>339587752
>>339587918
>>339588785
Thanks guys.
I think I understand graphics cards a bit more now.
>>339588441
>AMD's new card ends up being a cheap alternative that's a total piece of shit
Citation needed.
Chips made by same fabs for both Nvidia and AMD. Global Foundry / TSMC etc.
PCB's of the cards made by the third party vendors, many of which are the same between AMD / Nvidia.
ASUS, MSI, Gigabyte etc.
There are architectural differences between the dies but those are shown in comparison in game benchmarks, and both AMD and Nvidia are neck and neck each generation.
AMD cards are cheaper because of their current market position.
The one thing they suffer greatly, and the thing that Nvidia is very good at, is advertising.
Nvidia have been very good at advertising their cards to be the best choice to make in the public eye, even if it wasn't true.
While AMD suffer in creating that sort of image of their products and showing consumers why they're a very viable competitor over Nvidia.
The price differences also have the nasty knock on effect of making them seem like the cheap chinese knock off brand, and you can see that being parroted everywhere on here by idiots who don't know any better.
>>339588583
not him, but the best performing card out right now is the 1080, followed closely by the Titan X
>>339589226
I wouldn't mind nvidia being the premium choice if it weren't for retards who think they HAVE to buy nvidia even if they can't afford their actual good cards.
I've talked to people who bought the 960 even though they could have bought a more powerful AMD card for cheaper a year earlier because in their eyes they're choosing a team as opposed to a product.
>>339589027
True, but unfortunately problems with old light water nuclear reactors that run on solid uranium fuel have ruined any chance for more modern liquid salt reactors running on thorium in first world countries at least for the foreseeable future.
>>339588475
The EU price of the founders was released, but not the nonfounders. It is expected to be about 500 though.
>>339588441
GPU threads are 90% false flagging, concern trolling, cherry picked data, mixed with false equivalences.
Just laugh at the fuckers projecting their insecurities about their previous purchasing decisions onto the other team, nothing will change.
>>339579241
FUCK NO
it barely runs ashes of memes at minimum settings in CF
>>339589705
no one can shake my satisfaction of my 980. it's perfect for my needs. 980ti owners, i'm not so sure.
>>339576175
>>beats gtx980 at only $200 = 180euros
[sources and citations needed]
until then go fuck yourself and bring up some benchmarks faggot
>>339589834
its a great card, wish I had the money to buy one even now
>>339576175
no DVI slot
apex kek
>>339583724
Why?
The Chip+Motherboard is 50-70 bucks more expensive. You might as well save that money and put it into a better GPU or save it and use it to upgrade sooner if need be, it's the better strategy.
>>339589226
>wants citation
>claims AMD and Nvidia are neck and neck every year
>AMD's flagship GPU is always some dual-GPU setup with a water block that still gets outperformed by Nvidias ti variant utilizing regular fans
Kind of shot yourself in the foot there
>>339589582
Just wait for oil to pump dry. Does't help that all the "green power" fags keeps lobbying and blocking nuclear development, like what they did to the Pebble-bed reactor.
It really makes me mad to look at the world and see that almost everyone are easily scared gullible sheep. Barely anyone appreciates that we can communicate around the world almost instantly.
>>339590115
Unlocked to locked is like 10 bucks difference
>>339589521
Except Nvidia has the best drivers and offers the best performance for your money. Only retards buy AMD when Nvidia has shown they actually care about gamers by making sure their GPUs actually run well with all the latest games.
>>339576175
Umm no. You realise also this is the 4gb version price not the 8gb.
Also its the inbetween 970 & 980
>>339590216
>Just wait for oil to pump dry.
I don't think China has even started fracking yet, it'll be a long fucking time for oil supplies to run out when fracking is relatively cheap now.
>>339590297
except for at the low-mid end.
Like I said, the 960 was literally more expensive and performed worse than the R9 280x, which was available well before the 960 was even announced.
Go look at the benchmarks, even in gameworks titles the 960 fell behind.
If you're not a poorfag go nvidia and get their real offerings, don't buy their shitty baby cards and pretend you're something you're not.
>>339587154
Thanks Mr.Wick
>>339587154
Doing the same, famalan. Sapphire?
>people here not seeing this is the 4gb price.
>8gb price higher. x2 of them will be close to a 1080 hold the door.
> price for 2 is what the price for 1 1080 is.
How is that better?
>>339591167
>price for 2 is what the price for 1 1080 is
this is where you fucked up
Watch Canada find an excuse to sell it for $500.
>>339590131
>always some dual-GPU setup with a water block
>always
The past two flagship cards is "always" now?
They've been competing for over a decade now. That hardly constitutes as always.
The 295x2 outperformed every Nvidia card under the sun at the time, including the 780ti in SLI.
Nvidia is no stranger to dual card solutions either, remember the 690? Or even the 590?
Or perhaps the Titan Z? Which was released as an answer to the 295x2, yet was DOUBLE the price of the 295x2 and performed the same.
All the other Dual cards AMD released were also on air, just like the competing Nvidia dual cards at the time. The 5970, 6990, 7990 etc.
All the single card flagships between AMD and Nvidia were also neck to neck.
Nvidia have only very recently had the edge in the upper end market, just like AMD did a few years prior. And I'm guessing it'll swing around to their side again within the next few years. That's just how the market works.
>>339576175
Can you run an Nvidia card at the same time just for Shadowplay? I don't want to give up that "record the past" feature.
>>339585067
>>339584718
>7870
>Not the 7870 LE Tahiti
>As powerful as 7950 / 660 Ti at stock
>Mad overclockability
>At the same price point as GTX 660
Now that was a damn good card.
>>339584849
Are you fucking retarded? 500-550w is way overkill for a 150w gpu.
The gpu is the main power consumer in a PC, and you could run it on a 250w psu if your cpu matches you gpu.
>>339591434
>import tax
>GST
>PST
>retail markup
>fuck you we're Canada tax
>>339591167
Because of their ultra-high end nature and limited numbers 1080s and 1070s are unlikely to actually be available for MSRP for some time and Nvidia selling their own cards for $100 more isn't going to help drive prices down. Currently prices on 1080s on Amazon are in the $800-$1000
Meanwhile Polaris 10 cards are going to be cheap and readily available even if the cards are $250 and face a similar 33% markup it would still be cheaper to buy two 480x cards for $330 each than it would be to buy one 1080 for $800.
>>339591652
>7870 LE Tahiti
gimped chip
7870 is pure
>mfw 560ti
Am I out of date?
>>339592221
o fuk yes
>>339592221
You are fine for 4k
Folks with Fury Xs should be good for a while, yes?
>>339592468
yeah, until the end of the month or so
>>339592584
Ach, whatever. Not like I'm planning on 4k for the foreseeable future anyway.
>>339576175
Holy shit that's awesome.
Finally some good news on /v/
>>339579743
Well then judging from the speccy threads here and on /g/, 95% of all of you are retards. People already posting with SLI 1080 Founders Edition© The Way© It's Meant© To Be Played©.
>>339592221
>mfw 560 no ti
Overwatch runs smooth as silk.
>>339584839
America has been a third world country since 2008 when Obongo Jones took over and made everyone jobless.
Why the fuck is it even cheaper than GTX970?
>>339584796
Man the aussie dollar is like half a euro senpai
apparently it won't be 180 euros but more like 230 euros in europe.
>>339593268
Because nVidia has been abusing his leading market position for years with overpriced parts
>>339593728
but why? Why are graphic cards so fucking expensive compared to the US prices? 100$ are even less than 100€, basically we pay 130-150% for the cards in europoor countrys, why is that?
>>339578985
>Look at this benchmark where the AMD card is running on very obvious lower settings but has a slightly higher framerate!
That way I can look my 3 year old laptop look better than a gtx 1080 aswell
>>339581091
I'm in the same boat. I'm running with hd radeon 5700 right now. I'm just hoping my cpu wouldn't bottleneck this card.
>>339578985
>HURR BEATS 1080
Don't give me that ashes of singularity bullshit, they didn't use the same settings on both cards.
I'll wait on some benchmarks from more reputable sources.
Besides multi GPU sounds like bad news for the majority of traditional vidya which don't support crossfire.
For VR on the other hand assigning one GPU per eye would be handy. Problem is VR as a medium hasn't matured yet and there currently aren't any roomscale VR games I know of that utilize multi GPU setups let alone DX12.
Call me when specs on the 490x are out, this is not news to me
>480 crossfire stutters
I mean if you can live with this horrific frame time be my guest, i'm getting a 1070 for my 1440p screen.
What's wrong with 150watt usage?
Isn't 150watt low as fuck?
Am I thinking of something else or am I out of time?
>>339599590
no you're correct, 150 is actually pretty low
>>339599590
Nvidia shills are out in full force.
>>339591772
Im glad I didnt spend $800 on my 1080 then.
Also do I have any regrest buying one. nope nope & nope
>>339579241
>grass on ultra
good luck
at this point people should realize that Nvidia is going to be for HD+, multi-monitor, or simply people who want overkill for gaming
AMD is going to dominate mid-tier and offer cost effective solutions for people playing on a single 1080/1440 screen
They are no longer competing with each other
>Finally thinking about getting a 750ti
>It's years out of date already
I'll never be cutting edge
>>339600694
op here. i guess you nailed it. no way nvidoa can compete now
BTFO
>>339600884
you realize 980s are going for around $100 now
>>339600925
>unironically tumblr
leave and never come back
>>339585225
Fucking AMD shill faggot
>>339582901
That's because
1) Neo either uses Polaris in the new APU
2) some faggot read the leaked Polaris specs and starting saying that Neo will use them without any evidence
>>339599590
150W is great unless you want to put this GPU in a laptop or iMac or something
AMD will probably make a lower-clocked version that hits 100W.
>>339579839
Britfag here
>Implying the Midlands isn't sat on enough coal to do the whole Industrial Revolution all over again
>Implying the North Sea has no oil and gas
>Implying we're not switching to renewables
>Implying you're not further up Saudi Arabia's asshole than we will ever be
Fuck off you Yankee twat.
>>339601812
>the Midlands
lol all of Appalachia coal country says hi
>North Sea
Alaskan oil reserves alone trump that, and we have Texas and the Gulf
>Implying you're not further up Saudi Arabia's asshole than we will ever be
lol whatever you say Mohammud
"only one in three British Muslims (34%) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with jihadists."
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7861/british-muslims-survey
>>339579306
Wait a year save money and buy a 1070/80
>>339597782
This. The rx 480 looks great but if you are thinking that two of them will outperform one top class card you are gonna have a bad time. Simply go toreddit amd pageand look at all the crossfire whining. And the fact that crossfire profiles for games are a feature of the drivers just shows you that it's a point where everything can get fucked up and you will have one more headache source to worry about. I will most likely still get this card because it seems to be good enough for most stuff but if you want a top tier experience go with 1080 (or whatever high end amd will offer).
>>339602426
It's not a competition to have more, dumbfuck, we could keep the lights on if we really had to and that's the whole and only point I'm making.
>lol whatever you say Mohammud
I bet you're one of those dipshits who thought Birmingham was a no go zone. You have no right to laugh about jihadis when you dipshits created the borders that divided the middle east and then repeatedly kicked hornets' nests for years. They wouldn't care about the west if you weren't such godawful murderous warmaking cunts. 'Murica's like the kid that bullies everyone and cries when they hit him back once.
What's a good CPU to get, anons? My current one is many years old. I have a mediocre graphics card carrying me right now.
Is everyone just amazed at the $200 price tag?
I mean it's impressive but not that amazing.
>>339591712
yes, so? low wattage PSU's are usually lower efficiency. get a nice 550W or even higher PSU and you will never have to upgrade it. a PSU only supplies the power needed by the components after all, it's not like it'll cost you more in electricity.
>>339604671
Thanks for giving us so much information...
Depends on your budget, but an i5 4460 or i5 6500 is good.
>>339604671
6500 or 6600k
>>339604509
>you dipshits created the borders that divided the middle east and then repeatedly kicked hornets' nests for years.
lol it's like you never watched Lawrence of Arabia
tl;dr: Your fault, not ours; we were isolationist at the time
>>339576175
>980
970 on some games maybe.
I know this because their aim for the card was vr and the 970 meets that at the minimum.
>>339604686
>not that amazing
it is considering the next best card cost 3x as much at launch just last year
>>339578212
You should because practically everything is a mobile device these days, do you want a battery powered housefire in your laptop?
Wait is it better or worse than the 390 I just bought
>>339585549
Surely it'll come with adapters.
>>339605164
>discreet GPU
>mobile device
pick one
>>339585424
>Oy vey, green energy will pay for itself, goy, you just gotta invest in it! Nuclear power is too dangerous and totally not worth getting near unlimited, cheap energy, at the 0.05% chance of it exploding!
>>339605726
There are finite quantities of uranium to extract and recycle
The amounts of solar and wind power available are far less finite, and their use for power and heat generation generate far less trash we don't know what the fuck to do with it
>>339605726
what's more unlimited and widely available:
1. artificially enriched uranium
2. THE SUN
its ok, I'll wait
>>339605726
It's not the volatility of nuclear power that's an issue, you stupid fuck. It's the waste byproducts.
Based Thorium reactors when?
Will my i7 4960k bottleneck it?
I might get two since it's pretty cheap.
>>339601294
>150W is great unless you want to put this GPU in a laptop or iMac or something
That's what Polaris 11 is for.
>>339606325
>i7
>bottleneck in games
man /v/ is full of retards
>>339606067
You realize the two of you agree, right?
>>339583560
lol no.
5 year old i5 2500k here.
I play cpu intensive games like r6s and arma3 and dorf
Noticed it getting a bit slow @ 3.3, bought a 20 quid cooler and ocd it to 4.5 for a 24/7 clock.
If anything OC'ing is underrated.
>>339606325
yes
you should definitely start saving up for Broadwell-E
Hope you have $1700
>>339606029
Except that solar power is innately very brittle, relies on non-unlimited, relatively expensive (for the power yield) materials for construction, ridiculous amounts of space, and large amounts of upkeep that doesn't justify it (they break down very easily, a fucking hailstorm can destroy a crapton of them).
Wind power has a moderate impact on the environment, is loud, requires moderate upkeep that doesn't justify it's cost and HUGE tracts of land, far beyond anything that could viably be available.
Thorium nuclear power plants, as >>339606263 said are the true future. High-yield power generation using a somewhat safer process that produces very safe byproducts rather than toxic waste. As of now, it's really the best option for a balance between pragmatic, safe, and cost for energy.
>>339589705
this
I just enjoy my 970 for gamedev and light gaming use
>>339606857
My 970 has gone back into its box. Im thinking of keeping as a backup if my 1080 ever goes for a shit.
I dont think its worth selling 2nd hand now, or is it?
>>339605459
Better, return it if you can.
>>339576175
In XFIRE it is more powerful than a 1080 apparently and cheaper to buy two of the cards than one 1080
Question is how well will XFIRE be supported?
>>339589027
Soviet ruined nuclear powers future by being retarded
>>339576175
>$199
>near Fury performance
>150w
I'm sold, unless Nvidia releases a 1060(ti) or something.
>>339576175
>wife's son
disgusting cuck
>>339607091
>how well will XFIRE be supported?
i'll wait for nvidia's response to this
Is this the time to upgrade from my 5770?
But what about my i5-2400?
>>339579469
No drivers
Shit thermals
>>339579241
No
I dont know if even a 1080 will do that, most benchmarks dont max out all the sliders and extra shit
I've got an XFX 7970 Black(ed) edition.
If it turns out to be good, would it be worth upgrading?
>>339607428
Just about.
>>339602426
Hey dipshit, the middle East doesn't control the sun. Stop licking single berries out of big coals underpants and think for a minute.
Yawn, just another fucking shitty card for poorfags. I didn't wait over a year (DUDE POLARIS IS GONNA CHANGE EVERYTHING BRO IT'S GONNA BE GREAT BRO JUST OVER DA HORIZON) for this fucking shit. At least the 1080 is more powerful than the current top-tier cards.
>>339583560
If I couldnt overclock my 2500k I would have dumped it and upgraded when bf4 released. It cant handle many games on stock, witcher 3 is another example.
When you bump it up to 4.3+ghz its more than enough for any game.
>>339576175
So basically the go to for 1080p @ 60fps max/ultra settings?
But what if I want 1440p? GTX 1070?
Should I get this GPU if I have a FX 8350 CPU or it will bottleneck??
>>339607726
1440p on max/ultra? Go for the 1080, the 1070 won't hold up long in that range.
>>339607091
Ashes of the Singularity is also a bit of a special case. It supports the DX12 multi GPU functionality which allows mixing all sorts of GPUs together. That support doesn't however come automatically and it's up to the devs if they want to implement it. Need more details.
Right now I have this and a 6300.
I'm going to completely upgrade.
Should I go with an i5 and a 1060 or an i5 and this new card?
I mostly play csgo.
>>339576175
remind me how shitty their drives and game support is
>>339607626
if you thought polaris was anything but a 970 replacement, you only deluded yourself
this is the way its been for the past decade or more
Vega and Big Pascal is coming, and I can't fucking wait
>>339608065
>no drivers
>2016
Nice meme.
>>339608016
i5 and this new card
>>339607920
The benchmarks at 1440p are pretty good though. 1080 is obviously the superior choice but a lot more expensive.
>card not released
>no benchmark results
>guise should i get it?
>>339608016
>1060
unless it costs 100 dollars it's not going to be value
>>339607726
980 ti the best overclocked version, don't remember what it's called
or wait for 1080 ti or 1080 superclocked aftermarket whatever who gives a shit
>>339608358
wrong thread pedo
>>339583560
I've had my Phenom X4 II BE OCed for half a decade now with no problems at all. It's saved me a ton of money on upgrades.
>>339608115
i7 and 480
Wish I got a i7 2600k over my i5 2500k. Still a good cpu but im gonna have to replace it this/next year, if I had chosen the 2600k would have lasted another couple years.
>AMD level
>Bollywood music starts playing
>>339608632
JUST
>>339592221
>560 ti
>all those drivers you couldn't use becuase nvidia dropped the ball hard
i was happy when it died
>>339607917
Pls respond.
>>339576175
AMD owns the market, Nvidia dont have anything else than the 1080 and a overpriced 1070.
480 now rules sovereign with superb price/performance that people want.
Nvidia must drop the prices or be totally destroyed.
>>339608682
POO
>>339584839
That's debatable at the current time but everyone agrees that is transitioning into a 3rd world country somewhat rapidly.
>>339608895
they have a month to reap the harvest, then the 480 drops for real
>>339608895
>nice cherry picked amiibos
never mind that Marth's rerelease is no longer a borb.
i would buy more nintendo toys but i wouldn't at a McDonalds. fuck that disgusting shit.
I'll wait for AMD's top tier to be shown. I don't really want to crossfire, I've always stuck with one card. The 480 is looking to be a great value card though. I have a 290x at the moment and for 1080p gaming it performs great for 60hz but I really want to get a 144hz monitor and at the moment the 290x just isn't good enough to justify it. Hopefully it's a lot cheaper than the 1080 and performs almost as good.
Holy christ my MSI 7870 is aging pretty badly, this 200 motherfucker sound like a damn good deal. What do you think lads?
>>339608252
A leaked benchmark was posted a day or two ago. This puts it right above 980 and below Fury.
$199.
The weaker C4 variant is stronger than 970 and will be around $150 or less
>>339606409
Depends on the i7. Some first gen ones actually can be a bottleneck.
>>339609382
If you can afford a 144hz monitor why are you so concerned about price?
>>339609627
>i7 4690k
No.
>>339608810
>560 ti
Biggest meme card in history. Especially when the HD6950 existed.
>>339581409
I couldn't part with my 2500k when I upgraded to a 4670k so I put it in my dad's build. My 2500k binned well and iirc would oc 4.5ghz Np.
>>339609583
>better than 980
>$200
seems too good to be true
>>339584846
>No, don't get X this year
>Wait another year!
>2017
>No, don't get X this year
>Wait another year, it'll be better!
Fuck off.
>>339609437
same boat
I'm waiting for HBM2
>>339609668
Because if I can save like $150-200 then why wouldn't I? I'm not poor but 200 bucks is 200 bucks. That $200 can go into getting myself a better quality monitor. I like to save money wherever possible. I don't care about Nvidia's specific features, I just want raw power for the best price.
>>339610135
How will that overall effect performance?
>>339609909
If you exclude the new AMD cards, the chart and the real world performance scales same.
>1080 > Titan X > 980 ti > Fury X > Fury > 980 > 390X > 970
Thats the average real world gaming performance tier.
So it would be weird to have the new cards' performance be out of bound.
>>339610270
better
>>339609583
If this can be oc'd slightly it will be ahead of stock fury/980 ti
Thats amazing for $200.
Wonder what their $300 490 card will be like, 1070 beating performance is looking real.
>>339585552
better than novidya shills constantly telling me to buy their overpriced shit. You guys are the Apple of the video game industry.
>>339585356
the irony is that they have to use more and more coal now, which is a hell of a lot worse than nuclear
>>339609921
>Upgrading from 390x to RX480
Gotta be retarded, anyone with a 390/970 or higher should wait for vega/big pascal as this will be a sidegrade. Its great for people on lower/older cards though.
>>339576175
This isn't videogames.
>>>/g/
>>339604509
>you dipshits created the borders that divided the middle east
No that was you twats and the french after the first world war. Along with the Balfour Declaration.
The Americans were only the icing on the cake after they had just declared their independence from colonization.
>>339588441
>everytime NVidias new card ends up being a better card in the long run
isn't that the complete opposite?
r9 3xx are beating the shit out of 9xx at the moment
>>339592468
Fury X is more than 20% better than RX 480, why wouldn't you?
>buying cards from Pajeet
>>339611143
I wasn't referring to that, I was referring to the people constantly telling people to wait another yet, every year.
>>339576175
Call me up again when a new better card can be put into a 300W pre-built PC.
>>339608863
8350 is pretty good, i dont see why it would hold anything back.
>If you only play Ashes of the Singularity
Buy AMD
>If you play anything else
Buy nVidia
>>339612829
With near Fury performance (benchmarks pending of course) it will be good in other games too though.
Until we see the 1060 revealed of course, I don't see why people are even mentioning the 1070 or 1080 with their prices.
>>339583529
>a Ferrari is expensive as hell
no it's not
a 100m yacht is expensive as hell
>>339578268
Why do you people have such a huge superiority complex? What drives you to jump at every opportunity to say you're better than the US?
>>339613032
1060 is not gonna be good enough man
probably like 240 bucks at 970 performance
>>339613742
It's envy mostly.
>>339613805
>$200 at 970 performance
That would be a flop even at that price
>>339610389
Actually it would be 1080 > 1070 > Titan X > 980ti > Fury X > Fury > 980 >390X > 970
>>339614173
That's why I said it won't be good enough
>>339601812
It's so easy to tell which EU country you cancerous assholes are from since Brits always have pussy-riddled inferiority complexes against the U.S., jumping at every chance to try to prove they're better. In a video game thread for fuck's sakes.
I vastly prefer Australians over you cock knockers.
>AMD and Nvidia both drop high end cards at consumer-level prices
>mfw I now have to choose between money and driver support... again
>>339614362
no shit it's easy to tell where he's from, he literally wrote it in his post, you retard
>>339614546
Cheers mate, right told off that Yankee twat
>>339579241
MSAA is that one setting that brings even the most powerful cards on their knees
its something so big I'll never take any benchmarks seriously when they're talking about 'maxed' settings in a game like GTA 5 or Witcher 3, and you see cards like the 390 or 970 getting 70-80 fps, which is bullshit.
MSAA is just that demanding, and there is no sweet spot right now.
Either you go MSAA 2x at 1080p with a mid range card to still get ok framerate, or you buy a 1080 and play at 4k without any AA.
I'd be very interested to see real performance of the 1080 in wicher 3, gta5 or the latest total war warhammer at 1080p and 8x MSAA, I bet it will struggle to maintain 60 fps.
tl;dr : there is no point worrying about MSAA in particular. And high settings are very, very close visually at 1080p to ultra settings nowadays.
>>339576175
What should I replace my GTX 770 with?
300-400e budget
Should I hop on the AMD train or save up for a 1070?
144Hz monitor so I am looking for a card that'll run most games on high/max settings with +100fps
>>339615183
NVIDIA SPECIAL SHOW MAY 5-6/2016
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SHOW:
1. NVIDIA ANSEL
3D screenshots and Super-Hi-Res screenshots capability
Comes to 1000s series with launch, comes to 9xx series later this year. Free, with drivers.
2. PHYSICAL-BASED VIRTUAL SOUND
3. GTX 1070 AND 1080 ANNOUNCED
4. SINGLE PASS MULTI-PROJECTIONS FOR MULTI-MONITOR SETUP (for any 1000s card, free with drivers)
5. SINGLE-PASS STEREO FOR VR (free, comes with driver for 1000s)
AMD COMPUTEX 2016 SHOW
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SHOW:
1. RADEON 480X ANNOUNCED
------
Damn, Nvidia sure got just told, kek.
>but... but! look at the benchs!
Sure I did, see picrelated...d
..
>>339615183
200$ < 600$
>>339615183
>$700 card does better than a $200 card
Stop the presses
>>339615420
Correct.
And it shows, the performance 2x worse, kek
Which is why I'm goig to play Doom on my 144Hz with the help of GTX1080
>>339615214
I'm in the same boat pretty much and will hop on dat sweet 1070 ass.
So, meme1050 when? O r wil stuck on 960/50TI bullshit?
>>339615526
Why are you telling me this?
Tell the official shill who was desperately position it as one.
You can't backpedal here, AMDcuck. Your own manufacturer of choice positioned it as rival to GTX1080 "while being cheaper".
Now he and his "creation" has to answer these claims.
Oh boy, my popcorn is ready.
>>339609583
jesus that other polaris card
if it's cheaper and better than the 1070 nvidia are fugd
>>339615543
pretty sure doom is frame limited to 60
>>339591712
If you're that fucking prick from that other thread a few weeks ago that spent hours and hours trying to prove to other people that you can run a 980 TI or some shit on like a 150W PSU then please let me know so I can exit the thread now and save myself from having to die of laughter.
>AMD's brand new card
>Same performance as a 970 at the same price the 970 would be if it wasn't phased out of production
People care about this why?
>>339615906
my sides
>>339615981
i don't understand your reaction image. pretty sure doom is framerate limited to 60.
>>339615834
2 cents of nvidia stock has been deposited in your portfolio
>>339616102
>pretty sure doom is framerate limited to 60.
>>339613805
So I'll get a 480 then.
Will it be a good a idea to upgrade to this from a 750ti?
>>339616154
Only so few posts left to cover my 1070 preorder.
Stay mad AMDcuck. Your cheap-ass chink company cucked you again. meanwhile Imma gonna make some nice 8k ansel screenshots.
>>339616174
uh, yeah, i'm pretty sure it is and i own the game and you haven't shown anything to the contrary.
>>339615906
>>339616102
The menus are, but the in-game frame rate was uncapped at launch.
>>339590846
not the same powter, but ive been doing this.
with the 6660, 7770, and now i have a r9280x.
all sapphire.
ill probably buy a 480
>>339616301
oh, okay. so it WAS limited.
i knew it was limited because they did that demo on the 1080, and the game was clearly just running super fast, like the game logic was running too fast.
>>339615932
>People care about this why?
AMDrones think it's a new light for their failing company.
In reality the 480 is going to come out as shit.
One AMD endorsed game is somehow fooling them into thinking AMD magically broke two-three price barriers down to the $200 point.
I imagine at the very least, heat is going to be a problem.
>>339616281
>paying like 170 dollars extra for the same performance
que
>>339616380
im dying please can you stop ?
It's a "people think ashes of the singularity benchmarks matter" episode
it's funny how doom just came out and is pretty much the benchmark in pc graphics right now but they didn't benchmark doom?
>>339578268
>US Electric
>Expensive
It's our Internet that's expensive. If you're gonna insult us, at least use the correct insult, Commie!
>>339576175
>beats gtx980
source?
>>339616602
I feel kinda bad for AMD. What other choice do they have?
>>339615834
oh man
multigpu is the worst meme in this industry
Why does it always seem like theres a permanant flamewar and fanboy attachment to these companies? Why are nvidiots so hostile to a rivial company? The lack of competition is the sole reason stagnation in the market exists, shouldn't we all come together and hope that amd can finally rival nvidia so that we can all get bigger and better cards?
>>339616301
>>339616552
>>339616174
>>339615981
>trying to reason with autistic retarded troll mongoloid
>>339616493
Show me a single game besides Shills of SIngularity that shwos AMD480 is on par with GTX1080 performance.
One.For example, Doom
checkmate amdcuck
>>339616978
>Why does it always seem like theres a permanant flamewar and fanboy attachment to these companies?
>Why are nvidiots so hostile to a rivial company?
You tell me, AMD.
>>339616602
>but they didn't benchmark doom?
>help I'm blind and retarded
>>339615183
>>339617146
I have a 780ti. A smart consumer holds little brand loyalty and picks the best card for their pricerange and performance.
>>339617396
Post speccy.
Also complaining about fan-boys while using a fan-boy term for company Y isn't the smartest thing.
The threads just attacking the absurdidty of AMD and their fans who think a $200 card is going to make any waves with Nvidia.
>>339616978
Thank you, Abdullah. 20 rupees have been deposited to इंडियन बैंक wccftech checking account.
>>339617091
1070 not 1080 senpai
also they don't exist, try again in a month
>>339617683
>Also complaining about fan-boys while using a fan-boy term for company Y isn't the smartest thing.
AMDorks are also a problem, but obviously the hatred towards rival cards comes from the biggest player in the market.
Was thinking of buying a 1070, because it's marketed at $370. Turns out thats goin to be around €500, which is above my budget, plus the card is massive overkill for what I want anyway.
How does the rx480 compare? Looking real good for that price. Maybe thinking of getting that one instead.
>>339576175
Model Launch
GeForce GTX 980 September 18, 2014
2 years I fucking hope it can beat it. Jesus.
>>339616260
It would be a very good deal. With the card only consuming about 100-130w, if you have a 1 6 pin connector, you'd be set.
Lets see now, you have 750ti, which is about 1 tier below 950. 480 card competes at 980. So thats about 4 tiers(950/960/970/980) upgrade for you. A HUGE upgrade.
If I'm deciding between an AMD and Nvidia card and they're close, I'll go with AMD.
Better to support the company producing open source software and plugins than the giga-jew fuck that is Nvidia.
>>339618139
The reference 1070 clocks in at 6.5 tflops, which is probably the boost clock tflops but whatever
amds 480 just lists more than 5 tflops
Price performance is obviously in the 480s favor
I would wait for a 490 if that happens which would probably be around the same price as the 1070 or somewhere between 1070 and 1080
>>339617838
>also they don't exist, try again in a month
So if they don't exist where are your claims:
>>339616493
>>paying like 170 dollars extra for the same performance
came from?
hold that thought, I will answer - your shit posting ass
Come back with facts and arguments and may be we will accept you into out elite 4chan club. may be.
>>339618139
980 is about 20% worse than 980ti. 1070 is about same level as 980ti.
480 is supposedly in between 980 and Fury. So this card is about 20% worse than 1070, at almost half the price. If you overclock the 480 about 20%, it will reach close to 1070 performance since the performance gain is usually around 1%:1% ratio.
tl;dr $200 RX480 OC 20% would be close to 1070.
>>339615183
>mfw I'm a poorfag and can only realisticly shoot for 60FPS at 1080
>>339618502
Thanks for the info.
Well, I just said the 1070 is already overkill AND probably above my budget (no official yurop price yet). So I don't need a card in the same price range, even if it's more powerfull
>>339618702
What do you have right now?
>>339618452
>not supporting the better products
AMD might as well just become a redhat company then.
>>339585549
Recent low budget monitors come with HDMI and Displayport only now.
680 to 1070 seems like a good jump.
>>339618768
GTX660. Was thinking of upgrading to 970 last month, since I could get a good deal. Then I heared about the 1070/80 and the $370 pricetag. Now I already added the 21% yurop tax, but somehow its gonna cost a lot more. So a friend told me to wait for polaris.
>>339600573
grass quality reks framerate hard :c
>>339619129
If the 1070 is overkill for you then the 480 is probably gonna be perfect
it'd be a really good jump too
RX480 is not a top card. It's a card for people who don't have money to get 1070 or 1080, but want a better card than their old one and for retards who will crossfire it. I'm getting 1070 and my friend is getting RX480 because he doesn't have much money and still using GTX450.
>>339619269
Yeah I figured. Just want 1080/60 on new releases, so I think the 480 is perfect. When does it release?
Werent they going to announce a 50W card too?
>>339618849
For me, the 290 is the "better" product. Fits my needs better than that jew shit anyway.
But yeah, I would prefer to avoid a total market monopoly with planned obsolecence and no competition, thanks. Nvidia would charge out the ass for its products without thinking twice and you know it would.
>>339619298
>tfw your friend does this >>339618661
How mad will you be?
>>339618452
Thanks for taking one for the team, my friend.
>>339619401
I think in a month? I haven't been looking to closely, except for at the performance of it, it might even be a paper launch
I have a fury myself and was planning on building a new pc late this year but if vega doesn't release by then..
>august 2015
>BREAKING NEWS: NVIDIA does not support Async Compute! Async Compute is ""CURCIAL"" to DX12 games!!!11
>nvidia randomly tells theym at some point, will implement it via drivers support, no hw changes required
>fastforward to may 2016, literally almost a year
>AMD Live Show
>they showcase Ashes of Singularity, THE ONLY ONE SINGLE FUCKING games that uses spoken Async Compute
>performance difference between AMD card that supports it and GTX card that does not support it is on that famous screencap: 62.5FPS vs 58.7FPS
>that's WHOPPING 4 FPS gain aka 6.4%
>there is literally single fucking game on the market within a year that uses retarded Async
>it is 63 on Metacritic
>all this big deal out of literally nothing and everyone, except AMDcucks, forgot about it
AMD literally reeks of desperation.
this is just laughable
you'd think as a company you would have dignity to sue something more substantiation for your claims
I can give it kek/10
>>339578268
Bro electricity is 3x as expensive in the EU to USA
you morons are paying out the ass for solar panels while we burn cheap coal and oil all day
I went to europe and no one even has A/C because electricity is so expensive
>>339619536
Not at all, actually. It would be nice to compare our benchmarks in various situations.
>>339618661
The mental gymnastics in this post is astounding.
If I could delude myself this much I'd probably buy AMD too.
>>339619806
Nobody has an AC in europe because we don't get fucking florida and arizona temps here m8
>>339618661
what the fuck dude its like youre trying to warp reality as much as possible to create this fantasy world where amd just wiped the floor with nvidia and totally btfo them out of business
because thats what would actually happen if the world you just described existed
>>339613335
no its not
the bank bailout was expensive as hell
>>339576175
>180euros
before tax
it will probably be 250€ here
EU gets jewed over every time
>>339619942
>ywf he keeps trying
>he puts all his soul into it
>the reality starts to change
that's what anime taught me
>>339620035
The tax that is applied to other cards too, so your comment is meaningless.
>>339619867
>>339619942
>overclocking is mental gymnastics
Idiocracy wasn't meant to be a documentary
>>339619924
https://weather.com/news/climate/news/europe-heat-wave-poland-germany-czech-august-2015
>Germany tied its all-time record high last Friday, Aug. 7, when Kitzingen soared to a high of 40.3 degrees Celsius
>40 FUCKING DEGREES CELSIUS WITH NO A/C
>>339619942
>>339620076
WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK I AM
BELIEVE IN THE NDIVIA THAT BELIEVES IN YOU
YOURS IS THE GPU THAT WILL PIERCE HEAVEN AND EARTH
GIGAAAAA
HERTZZZZZU
BREAKKKKUUUUUUUUU
>>339620423
>NDIVIA
someoone please draw her
I want to see cute and pretty green girl (lewd)
>>339619942
Overclocking usually, on average, gains at 1 to 1 scale.
10% oc will net about 10% improvement.
20% oc will net about 20% improvement.
Do you not overclock?
>>339620230
>>339620568
Damage control initiated.
It's a shame people this retarded are allowed to post.
>>339620493
isn't there an nvidia-tan already?
>>339620785
The fairy mascot?
They forgot about her quickly.
Before that it was mermaid mascot.
Then things kinda died.
>>339620568
>10% oc will net about 10% improvement.
>20% oc will net about 20% improvement.
wtf is wrong with your brain
>>339620234
No wonder US has such a SJW issue. You pussies can't take the heat.
>>339620914
no like the drawfag console-tans
>>339621010
Hmm, not aware of thatis she cute?
>>339591652
7870/270x was the best poorfag card
i have the sapphire tahiti xt version,recently opened and cleaned it up now it barely gets over 68 C while playing gpu heavy games.sapphire dual x is absolutely more than enough to cool the card
evenmore when i bought it was 30-40 bucks cheaper than 660.newer games it competes with 760/670 even.fermi is getting crippled.if you cant afford to buy another gpu for 3-4 years amd is definently and arguably better.
>>339621147
>7870/270x was the best poorfag card
still have mine
still going strong
>>339620918
>>339620760
>http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/msi_radeon_r9_390x_gaming_8g_oc_review,26.html
1100 -> 1200 OC ~ 9%
>Tomb Raider
>134 vs 154 ~15%
>Hitman
>93 vs 96 ~3%
>Bioshock Infinite
>118 vs 126 ~ 7%
>FireStrike
>11686 vs 12610 ~8%
Stop being retarded.
>>339620234
>one day of the year
dumfuk
>>339620234
>40°C in one day
Dude just turn on the fan.
Average temperature here is 46°C for 7 months.
And gets hotter.
>>339621084
there's this in the booru
>>339622886
yeah, there wasn't much on gelbooru too
