Alright, fess up. Which one of you faggots DDoS'd NeoFAG?
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
sleep tight porker
>>317347963
No sane man would waste his time DDOSing a site that has doomed itself.
based
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317348203
based faget
It was me, I did it because they wouldn't allow me to set my username as NIGGERFAGGOTS
>>317348203
>NeoFAG admin making a totally not butthurt post about his fag logo vs. a logo about something actually related to video games
>>317347963
I'd start any investigation by looking at their mods.
>>317348343
As if we needed anymore confirmation that there are shills from the SJW website here.
How 'bout that DriveClub, eh?
>>317348392
I'd start a child endangerment investigation by looking at their mods. This Kotaku shit may have finally pissed off the wrong set of assholes.
Hopefully it stays down.
>scum
Tyler Malka is currently in negotiations to sell NeoGAF to Gawker.
>>317347963
It's just Sony's servers going down again.
>>317347963
Why would you even know that garbage was being ddosed? Go away faggot
>>317348450
This is actually pretty funny.
I thought on neogaf everything is deleted if it's not a developer cock sucking / SJW thread
>>317348203
He's right in that he can do whatever the fuck he wants with his website, it's just that he and said website are pure cancer to the gaming industry.
>>317347963
feel free to leave anytime, neofaggot.
it was ebaumsworld
Damn, was trying to post there as well.
Oh well, /v/ it is.
>>317348587
A year later he'll sell it to Li Yanhong.
>>317348516
They actually did it and banned Tom? I don't know why that great and reasonable guy put up with that filth for so long.
>>317347963
>le 4chan is a one-man hacker team who attacks peepole at randumb meme
Why would you give even half a fuck about a shithole worse than Youtube comments?
>>317348698
You assume he is in charge. He's not. His SJW nigger mod who happens to be a Sony employee is running the show. A corrupt nigger who bans people for talking shit about Anita and black people.
>>317348825
Which mod? They're all pieces of shit.
>>317348825
Bish
>>317348587
the fuck would gawker do with a forum?
>>317348972
Bish. He's the one who fucked up NeoFag. He only makes other SJWs mods and he kicked mods who aren't. Tyler is a retard. He's just happy he can be friends with niggers and faggots.
hue
>post a perfectly normal picture of a woman
>MUH SOGGY KNEES
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317349021
good god, fix your font, man...
>>317349110
That's not real.
>>317349021
Yeah, that marketing deal with Angry Joe was odd.
>>317349165
sure it is
thread title is right there
last post iirc
look it up when it's back up
>>317348825
>>317349081
>Bish gets upset people still make fun of him for Turok
>Never mind the fact he walked out on his wife and child over Turok of all games
Maximum kek
Also guess who he set up a company with in 2008?
>>317349165
Most of these screencaps aren't.
>>317348626
I knew they were shill but I didn't know it was THAT bad.
>>317349110
That legit? It might be the first meaningful post I read from that asshole.
>>317349165
Yeah it is. Search for the text.
>>317349287
sure is
capped it myself
>>317349261
Yes they are. That's what make NeoGAF so hilarious. You can;t this shit up.
NeoGAF hate thread?
>>317349165
>>317349261
>>317349287
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=170682037&postcount=217
>>317349261
NeoFAG lurker here. Almost all the posts you see, despite being completely and utterly insane, are legitimate.
Look at their off-topic section. Just a week after Paris attacks and they're already back being Islamic bitches whining about muh discrimination. NeoFaggers should be put to rest.
>>317348203
>not vidya thing happens
>change the logo for your vidya forum
>vidya thing happens
>don't change the logo for your vidya forum
Thank god no one takes that shitpile seriously anymore.
>>317349407
Doesn't seem to be down to me.
>>317349524
just came back up
which is why I linked it
>>317349524
you just can't kill it
Can someone confirm to me if they really banned Tom from XSEED? Link to the thread where it happened?
>>317349519
He didn't change it because he's a bitch to his SJW nigger mod who is a Sony employee. EviLore has lost control of NeoFag.
>>317348626
>I feel like an 8/10 is less than what Uncharted 3 deserves [...] I, obviously, haven't had a chance to play Uncharted 3 yet [...] I think Uncharted 3 deserves more than an 8
>>317349165
It is. Suprisingly malka besides being a huge asshoel is nto a SJW.
The reason he tolerates SJW is because without them neogaf is even more of a dead place. No one cares about them anymore, devs hate them, every other gaming forum laugh at them. It's now a SJW group therapy and Malka knows that.
Which proves how much beta that faggot is.
>>317349524
It was down for about ten seconds, then the Voat crew came here because for those whole ten seconds their lives had no meaning.
>/v/ hates neofag
>thread everyday about the place
For fuck's sake.
>>317348626
Is everybody on that site a shill?
>>317349665
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=184871270&postcount=1232
hard to tell which of his posts got him done in
>>317349665
https://archive.is/Rcd5o#selection-4031.0-4031.7
>>317349519
And it's all their own doing, which makes it even better. They ban anyone with an incorrect opinion and this caused a bunch of people to wise up and keep their mouth shut which makes it even more of a hugbox for SJW faggots.
Enjoy their latest Chris-Chan thead,
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1143257
Let the rage flow.
>>317349665
Yes it happened, he provided justification for his stance but just didn't have the right opinion and got axed.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317349813
This was his last post before he was banned
>>317349761
They just keep outdoing their own stupidity which makes it hard to stay away.
>>317349665
He really did get banned. It wasn't a single individual post, it was caused by a constant and steady refusal to disagree with the hivemind.
>>317349813
There were people in that thread calling other posters pedophiles for liking anime. They never got banned. That site is cancer. Look how hard they shit on anything from Japan. Fuck them.
>>317347963
Why is there a conspiracy that there are NeoGAF members lurking /v/ all the time?
There probably aren't that many, this is once again a meme the tards on /v/ ended up believing.
>>317349920
And the justification for it
>>317349965
NeoFaggot spotted, that was easy
>>317349951
Japan treats women like shit.
They deserve to be on blast for their attitudes.
>>317349937
agree*, not disagree obviously
>>317347963
Hilarious news.
But still, who gives a fuck about neoFAGs?
That place hasn't been relevant since 2006.
>>317350006
Japan treats everyone like shit. That's the appeal.
>>317349965
Because it's not a conspiracy, they openly talk about it both on here and on their own forum.
Of course you don't believe it because you're a retarded memer in denial.
>>317350006
t. neofag that gets all of his info about japan from seasonal anime
>>317348203
yeah because faggots buttfucking each other legally is related to vidya games, isn't it?
these people are really touched in the head
>>317349982
Nevermind the fact that these "children" are pixels on a screen.
>>317348216
Even Cliffy hates neofags.
Based.
>>317349665
They did, also a mod recently practically indirectly told Brittany/Hatsuu to "align" with the hivemind or else... while addressing another poster asking why Tom got banned.
https://archive.is/7yhG5
>>317349056
Ban everyone who dissented with the site opinion. So they might as well keep him in charge, then.
>>317350102
And you believe those posts? They might as well be shitposters posting names they found when they were googeled GAF.
>>317349965
There are 100% definitely crossposters. They can't have an opinion that is at odds with the hivemind so they come here to show their true colors.
>>317349965
Not only there are members in both sites.
Some come here specifically to "raid" following orders from mods
>>317349761
First nineogag thread i've seen in a month
>>317350192
>YOU CAN'T BELIEVE THOSE POSTS MUH FALSE FLAG
You're in denial
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350192
People on NeoGAF talk about 4chan like they do in fact go here, save for some idiots who believe we blew up a van. They even tried to have a thread for 4chan's 12th birthday but it got locked because some robot BTFO some normies that same day.
I don't understand why so many SJW's like Sony.
They seem far more compatible with Nintendo right now.
>>317349081
Tyler Malka, the owner of neofags, is entirely to blame.
He's a shill
He takes payouts from publishers to shill their products
He controls an army of sock puppet accounts
He's always been a shill, on the take from a certain company
He profits from shitting up the industry with console wars bullshit.
He doesn't even play video games.
He's also a creep.
>>317350243
You can see how everyone hates each other on NeoGaf by reading their passive-aggressive posts. They think they're progressive while in truth they're just bigoted and sheltered.
>>317350134
Are you retarded? This doesn't change the fact you want to see some 10 year old girl titties. So if a game give you the option of raping a baby, this is not a problem since it's just pixels, right?
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317349982
>banned for having controversial opinions
These are the people who call themselves liberals. They're just as bad as old conservatives and Tom fucking told them in his last post.
>>317350405
He looks like some disgusting mixture of a Doctor Who character and an elf.
>>317349965
Gee, you don't think that there are people who visit both websites, do you? Wow! What a shocking revelation!
Take yourself for example. Get out NeoFAG.
>>317350405
He also sexually assaulted a female forum member and banned her when she called him out.
>>317349937
It really is bizarre looking at issues discussed on neogaf that are discussed elsewhere on the web. There's often very little disagreement; a single opinion repeated and rephrased many times. I suppose that's the consequence of allowing mods to censor opinion and having a 'venerated' inner circle members culture.
>>317350430
There's a huge difference between uguu moeblobs and real children. Real children are disgusting.
>>317349982
What a fucking idiot. Their own moderators are actual pedophiles and they ban some guy defending a videogame.
>>317350536
I've met him in person. I've been covering the E3 Expo since 1999. About two years ago I ran into him at the show. He was wearing a neogaf T-shirt. I didn't actually know who he was, although I had heard of the website.
When I didn't recognize him and immediately kiss his ass he gave me the most hateful, evil scowl.
The next year he was rejected for E3 admission.
True story.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350430
Well no, it's not. It's pixels, they don't exist.
>>317350573
I heard about that. I wish more people knew that story. Especially the SJWs they love to champion.
I honestly think that's the real reason for all the SJW crusading on that forum. They're trying to cover for the fact that the site owner is a well known perv creep.
>>317350583
>>317350650
Classic pedo defence.
>Are you implying my massive collection of pictures featuring underage girls in skimpy clothes and provocative poses are in any way sexual? You disgusting pervert!
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317350405
Tyler Malka is the biggest, most evil sellout in all of video game culture. He destroyed his own forum to make a home for SJWs because they were more profitable, all while the users lick his asshole like he's fucking Jesus Christ. He doesn't even believe in their ideals, he just wants to make money of it. He gleefully sexually assaults women overseas and bans anyone who takes issue with it.
>>317350691
Even if we're going there I don't see why you would bring in fantasy into reality.
I enjoy killing people in videogames, does that mean I want to do this in real life? This is what you're saying. Are you also claiming that if you play violent games you enjoy violence IRL? I assume you do play games with violence in them, correct?
>>317350430
because 10 year old anime styled titties = disgusting 3d shit
>>317350696
All of this is true.
And the worst part is he doesn't even play videos games. He doesn't care about them at all. His opinions and his forums are for sale to the highest bidder. It's just about money.
>>317350691
I'm a milf guy.
I'm also intelligent enought to realize that drawings 2D or 3D are...drawings.
>>317348060
sleep tight poker
>>317350760
Sexual arousal works differently so that's a faulty comparison.
>I'm not really gay, they're anime dicks!
>>317350778
Do we really need to get into this? Art is a representation of something. If it arouses you, you are aroused by what it represents. Why would people like drawn tits except that they look enough like real tits? Why else would it arouse them? Same for little kids.
>>317350430
>acting as if people should be jailed over fictional material because you personally don't approve of it
Here's your (You) you enormous faggot, now go back to NeoGAF.
>>317350691
Classic NeoFagger posting
>if your mind isn't as twisted as mine, you're a liar because I know you're like me who can't differentiate games and real life
>>317350430
so all the slaughtering in video games means you want to do it in real life, yeah? thats your line of logic, fucking idiot.
>>317350824
>Sexual arousal works differently
no it doesn't.
>>317350824
Sexual arousal is stimulation, much the same as getting accomplishment from violence.
You should really go back to NeoGAF.
>>317350538
>you don't think that there are people who visit both websites
No, I'm just saying the numbers probably aren't up there, as stated in my post.
But... I suppose I could be wrong reading this 10 page thread and at the end of the day looking at its homepag it is a big community.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=952249
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350893
>>317350865
Violence in video games is an abstraction, sexual arousal you feel in response to video games is real.
If a video game made you bleed you might change your opinion on violence in games too.
>>317350848
This is where I'm at. I think jailing someone over a drawing is some 1984 bullshit, even if it's content I find objectionable.
>>317350824
Can NeoFag come back online so this dumb shit can go back to his little liberal circlejerk?
>>317350929
I dunno. It can feel pretty good to mow down a bunch of niggers in GTAV.
>>317350824
>Sexual arousal works differently so that's a faulty comparison.
You're going off the premise of everyone defending this stuff getting sexually aroused by it, that's wrong.
Some people can differentiate fantasy from reality just fine and see risque content the same way they see gore in videogames, is just a game for us.
>>317350907
>No, I'm just saying the numbers probably aren't up there
Well, /v/ gets about 200 times the traffic that neofags gets.
/v/ crushes neofags in both Alexa and Compete rankings. Neofags isn't even relevant any more.
When people want news they go to Reddit. It's a great news aggregator. A good way to get all your news in one place.
When people want to talk about games freely and openly they come here.
>>317350929
You really are a dumb fuck. If you weren't stimulated by violence in games, you wouldn't play them.
>>317350957
it's online, dunno why that fag is here
>>317350929
>abstraction
nigger it's stimulation, because you obtain thrill from doing them in video games
>>317350824
I literally don't like real looking tits on a drawing though. I like fucking dodge balls with nipples.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350929
Considering porn pics do not make you feel as if something is actually touching your dick, the analogy makes no sense.
It is brain stimulation in both cases
>neogaf would defend this
>>317351046
>>317351002
Can't get more real than a boner m80s
Would you also defend real child porn because it's not a child, it's only a picture of a child?
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350824
It's been a long time since I've seen puritan-tier justifications like this. The only thing this post is missing is "what about the children?!".
>>317348814
The actual tweet: https://twitter.com/EleanorVarrot/status/664187637952028672
>>317351046
>as if something is actually touching your dick,
It doesn't for you ?
>>317349982
>meanwhile they defend sarah "edgelord" nyberg
>>317351029
That's not the point. The point of the analogy is that the effect on the player would be the same as if the events in the game were actually happening, not whether he likes it or not.
>>317351068
SWEDEN YES
>>317351093
Okay, so the main thing objectionable to masturbating to child pornography (If we're not basing anything off morals) Is that children are sexually expolited in it's creation, If pedophiles are masturbating to 2d anime toddlers, that's a positive thing, someones fucked up sexual urges are pleased, without hurting anyone, why should i give a shit?
>>317351190
It's exactly the same though. You psycopath.
>>317351034
fuck year
>>317351093
>Would you also defend real child porn
>because it's not a child
>real child porn
>not a child
Did you completely skipped the part about differentiating FANTASY from REALITY?
>>317351232
>>317351273
But it's only an image, anons. Sure, it's an image of an event that happened, but it's not like that could be undone anyway. The picture itself is harmless and if anyone were to be aroused by it it's only fantasy and not actually abusing a kid.
Didn't they have a thread about pedophilia and a mod threatened to ban a user who was a victim of sexual assault because they were "too biased" or something?
>>317351310
Of course they did. Even things that sound like exaggerations are real on NeoGAF.
>>317351093
>Would you also defend real child porn because it's not a child, it's only a picture of a child?
>>317351003
Well on the homepage it says 165,000 members, okay so not all of them are active obviously. But still if 5-10% would frequent it would be about 10.000 NeoGAFers visiting this place from time to time and I suppose those are substantial numbers.
>>317351093
Also, once again, you're going off thinking these characters/topics cause sexual arousal, I repeat, that's a wrong assumption.
I don't get boners from the Bravely Default chibi models, nor potato-chan from Xenoblade, but I sure as hell feel annoyed that Nintendo went and censored them.
>>317351262
They're not the same though. Yes, it's a fantasy, but with real consequences in one case.
>>317349982
jesus, i used to think of aeana as a normal person that liked JRPG, not this huge cunthead
>>317351301
Man, you should win an award for mental gymnastics. A drawn figure is not a rape victim taken photos of, you literal retard.
>>317350006
No, no, no you got it wrong.
They hate anime as a thing for pedo but preach compassion for actual pedo.
>>317351372
No, I think that one happened. I believe someone got demodded for it.
Happened after it came out that some psycho SJW tranny was a pedophile. They were defending him because he hated gamergate or something.
>>317351420
Both pleasure different part of the brain's reward system. So no. Both are the same.
>>317351301
The difference being that the very existence of a physical picture of a naked child in a sexual manner means there was a very high chance of child abuse.
You still have yet to provide any evidence that stimulation from sexual arousal is entirely unique from other forms of stimulation, but I have a feeling that won't stop you from being a massive moralizing faggot.
>>317351301
There is a big difference between an imaginary drawn character and a real child who suffered from real sexual abuse, the fact that even dare to compare them is frankly, disgusting, even for /v/
>>317351446
>>317351505
Okay, so if you made a drawing of it instead, would that be alright? What if you traced it?
>>317351520
So, you're perfectly okay with kids being sexualized if nobody is harmed. So its perfectly okay for you if mindless 10 yr old accept your offer of having sex on fair terms himself. Nice logic, but kind of a pedo desu senpai.
>>317351262
see
>>317351420
In the case of an actual factual picture of CP, a real life child was victimized in it's creation, the only victim in a drawing of a sexualized child is the tree that was used to make the paper. If it was made digitally than it's a wholly victimless "crime."
>>317351093
No because that would be 3DPG.
The difference between child porn and loli images is that lolis can still be sexy where as actual 3d children are too underdeveloped.
>>317351139
CP in Neogaf is not frowned upon.
Just look at some mods there.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317351557
this guys should win 10 points across the board for mental gymnastics
>>317351301
Wrong, children don't really have concepts of sex at young ages because we don't teach it to them, they cannot consent to sexual activity because frankly a child wouldn't know what sex even is, A drawing is not a person, a person is a person, drawings cannot feel be isolated or feel used because they don't exist, Masturbating to a child can fuck with a kids head in many ways, a Drawing doesn't even have a head.
>>317351498
>>317351505
You don't experience violence from a video game, it cannot hurt you. Therfore it is not the same.
Getting a boner is a real consequence, one that only applies to paedophiles when it comes to depictions of minors in compromising positions.
NeoGaf = loves CP
4chan = loves 2D
Learn the difference. It might save your day.
>>317351557
>What if you traced it
Not only has this literally never happened in the history of the entire world, you're just grasping at straws. But no, if someone happened to trace a picture of real CP it would not be alright. it's on an entirely different level than drawing naked animes and to act like it's the same is disingenuous.
>>317351557
>So, you're perfectly okay with kids being sexualized if nobody is harmed
No, I am okay with authors doing whatever they damn please with fictional characters, emphasis in fictional. I am not okay with anything that involves real children and real abuse.
>>317351686
wow
Here's a drawing of a dragon.
That means it's a real, actual dragon that exists and hurts people.
>>317351093
You totally missed the point of The Treachery of Images as his painting was itself a drawing and not a photography.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317351591
Friendly reminder there was a mod called Opiate who threatened to ban a person who was raped as a kid because she wouldn't sympathize with pedos.
He was quietly demodded because people found his public Flickr account which had a bunch of creepy ass pictures of kids.
>>317351686
You're talking like someone who doesn't have a penis and only has a vague understanding about how sexual arousal works.
>>317351616
>>317351710
You were the ones arguing that it's only an image and therefore not paedophilia. But some images make it more explicit than others that there's a relationship between the depiction and the depicted, don't they?
Now, you're getting tripped up by the actual harm involved but ignore that for the moment and think of the effect on the viewer. If he's aroused by images of children being sexually abused, you'd say that's a paedophile, wouldn't you? Yet if no children were harmed in the production of the image, but the effect on the viewer is still the same, you would argue that that person is not a paedophile? Those are separate things, I think, the suffering and the arousal (unless we're talking sadists of course but then wouldn't they also be aroused by fictional depictions of suffering?).
I know it's shitposting but I thought part of shitposting is that you shouldn't look stupid doing it.
>>317351726
Shh. Don't tell him. He just killed his own point without realizing it. It's hilarious.
>>317351427
I remember a thread about XSEED teasing their 2015 games from a year ago where aeana and two other mods came storming in and derailed it by attacking Tom over the use of the word 'trap' in Akiba's Trip instead of irrelevant retarded shit like 'G.I.R.L.'. It came down to regular users begging them to fuck off.
>>317351557
>Okay, so if you made a drawing of it instead, would that be alright? What if you traced it?
The drawing itself isn't wrong, but it doesn't make the real photo stop existing.
>comparing the "abuse" of completely fictional characters to a child consenting to sex when they're not capable of making rational decisions
Just kill yourself Neofag.
>>317351709
It's for the sake of argument, Anon. I'm trying to discover YOUR stance but you're all being very defensive and dodgy about it.
>>317351841
If that character happens to look like a child you might well be.
>>317351837
>>317351726
Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
>>317348203
>wants to do something
>others tell him to do something
>doesn't do something because he doesn't want it to look like he's doing it because they said
pretty childish tßh
>>317351616
>win 10
BOTNET!
NeoFaggers are manchildren who can't differentiate fiction and reality.
>>317348825
God forbid people get banned for being overtly, stupidly racist!
YFW you are neofag member and enjoy all the butthurt on /v/
>>317351787
>If he's aroused by images of children being sexually abused, you'd say that's a paedophile, wouldn't you?
No.
Plenty of people get turned on by all sorts of fucked up drawings but the moment it became real they'd be horrified.
>>317351787
>You were the ones arguing that it's only an image and therefore not paedophilia
No, they said that sexualising video game characters doesn't harm anyone, because it doesn't
>>317351920
Violence arouses the player aswell and rewards him with positive hormones. Learn your biology or fuck off to NeoFag senpai
>>317351969
If that character happens to look like a child you might well be.
>>317351125
>>317351125
ha. mods on that site are all niggers. i was isual on that site, got banned for saying 'muh nigga' in a chad warden thread. If i could go charlie hebdo on that site, i fucking would. allahu akbar niggers.
>>317351961
Why come here?
Are you free to post your opinion there?
>>317351310
>>317351372
It was Opiate.
Why are all posters on NeoFag niggers? Just me who noticed that?
>>317351686
You don't experience physical violence, but a mix of audio, visual, and haptic cues can trigger certain responses. This happens in every single medium, how everything except sexual arousal managed to escape you baffles me.
>>317351769
source? i know he was demodded and i always thought that he was a shit mod. but i didn't know this was the reason lol
>>317352004
Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
>>317352009
Being "rewarded by postivie hormones" != experincing actual violence when playing violent games. Again Violence in games is an abstraction. But the sexual arousel is real.
>>317351769
On Neogaf or 4chan?
>>317351920
>Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
>(when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
no, see, you can't just say "nuh uh, th-that doesn't count" and expect people to take you seriously
>>317352128
by that logic your point is also moot because you're not fucking the child
>>317351948
You really are retarded if you think "racist" posts being banned on Neogaf are anywhere near overt.
>>317352076
come? I've always been there anon, 4chin is my first choice
>>317352178
If that character happens to look like a child you might well be.
>>317352145
You're a pedophile, nobody takes you seriously already.
>>317351920
Pulling scenarios out of your ass for the sake of argument isn't something someone who's winning the argument does.
>>317348060
Sleep tight bacon
>>317352128
Sex in game = arouses your reward systems
Violence in game = arouses your reward system
I know you hate biology but that's how it works. By your logic, you are a psycopath for enjoying civilian killing sprees in GTA. You're fucked up.
Loli thread?
>>317352258
>using assumptions as arguments
welp, there we go
>>317352185
they're also liberal-in-skin only, as they are still rooted to their conservatism, you should check out their views on Islam, it's hilarious
>>317348203
This is why everyone hates you, America.
Bless Buddha we are now a japanese website.
>>317351724
I hope so, that picture is fucking badass.
>>317352127
https://archive.is/8CG2g
That's Opiate
>>317349982
>controversial opinions
>all he did was disagree with them in an argumentative thread
Post loli
>>317352297
This. A real child being sexually abused is no where near the same as someone who thought up an underaged moeblob and drew it naked. To even imply that they're similar does a disservice to and trivializes real victims and you should be ashamed of yourself.
>>317352297
>Sex in game = arouses your reward systems
>Violence in game = arouses your reward system
Only one of these has a real life consequence of experiencing sexual arousal.
Violence in games is an abstraction, you don't experience violence from it.
>>317351984
So that's how they feed, huh. Learned something from 4chan, never thought I'd see the day
>>317352258
If the person that you're killing looks like a child, you might well be killing a child. You're making retarded arbitrary distinctions and you refuse to see why everyone is calling you out like the retard you are.
>resorting to ad hominem and petty insults instead of making a point
>In every thread on /v/ that shits on Neogaf there is one guy that tries to derail the thread with furry or webm dumps
>it never works
It's proof enough for me that Neofaggers post on /v/. A /v/irgin would never feel the need to derail such a thread, he has no reason to do it. But a Neofag user does.
>Quick, get in faggot!
>>317352403
Holy shit there really is no way to reason with someone undergone the NeoFag brainwashing.
>>317352403
But you do experience adrenaline from a close encounter with an enemy player but you managed to blow him the fuck away at the last minute. You're getting too hung up on peepees standing up.
>>317352408
>If the person that you're killing looks like a child, you might well be killing a child.
Except unlike sexual arousal, you don't experince actual violence from video games so that's a faulty comparison.
>resorting to ad hominem and petty insults instead of making a point
>everyone is calling you out like the retard you are.
>call out person for doing the same thing you are doing
wait a moment, there is a name for that kind of behavior
I think it's called hippopotamus or something
>>317352403
>you don't experience violence from it.
what does experiencing violence mean?
>>317351920
>Irrelevant, since the fact is is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real
Again you're missing the point and the context: René Magritte got shit on for this painting with everyone calling him a dumbfuck because people believed it was a pipe.
Then everyone got BTFO'ed when he explained that it was not a pipe but the picture of a pipe.
Now have some hindsight and look at your situation.
>when it comes to sexual arousal specifically
Why specifically? Do you think people are baseless animals unable to keep their pulsions in check? Do you think THAT highly of yourself that you look down on us as mere animals? Do you even have proofs of your claims?
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317352498
Adrenaline isn't violence. Sexual arousal is sexual arousal, you're still getting off on underage children
>>317352506
Do you bleed or injure from playing a violent video game? No? Then you're not experincing violence.
>>317352465
Anyone who can't see the difference between that image and this disgusting thing is literally unreasonable and has drank gallons of NeoGAF Kool-Aid.
>>317352403
What the fuck does experiencing violence mean?
>>317351093
dont get what you mean. anyway im not even a waifufag and on top of that hate moeshit, but am all against censorship of any virtual porn not referring to actual children.
>>317352592
But people don't enjoy experiencing violence, they enjoy causing others to experience it.
>>317352592
You're getting too hung up on peepees standing up.
>>317352592
I experience the pleasure of killing someone, which is part of violence.
Reminder to not speak negatively of pedophiles on Neogaf lest you get banned
so there was a mod that was a fucking pedophile and they just demodded him? It's kind of sad that you want to just discuss videogames but on the internet everyone's is sick in the head holy shit
>>317352505
>Except unlike sexual arousal, you don't experince actual violence from video games so that's a faulty comparison.
If you want to talk about faulty comparisons, maybe you should take a look at the mirror. You're comparing psychological stimulation to physical injury. The brain does become stimulated from fictional imagery of all kinds, and you're obviously too mind bogglingly stupid to realize this simple fact.
>>317352729
they actually banned a victim of child molestation
>>317351839
And those are were the 3 mods that like "anime".
They're probably the craziest of the bunch.
>>317352631
physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill you or others
>>317352719
>>317352674
You can't inflict real violence on another person using video games. Sexual arousal you feel in response to video games is real.
>>317352796
What's even sadder is that /v/ is literally the best place on the internet to discuss video games.
>>317352809
They said her opinion was invalid in a thread about child abuse
>>317352592
Adrenaline is the effect of being in a violent situation. Arousal is the effect of being in a sexual situation. They are equivalent.
The equivalent to "not experiencing violence" is not experiencing sexual intercourse with an underaged person.
You can't say that one effect (arousal) is equivalent to one cause (violence).
>>317352796
Only one of them got banned.
There's others but they are being overly cautious since Opiate's ban.
>>317352838
>You can't inflict real violence on another person using video games
And no harm is done on any children if you feel pleasure from something purely fictional
>>317352796
NeoGAF is fine with actual pedophilia but they hate the 2D kind for some reason.
>>317352838
You're retarded. You've been given multiple arguments and you're still regurgitating the same nonsense.
>muh experiencing violence and peepees standing up
Everyone, please stop responding to this guy. He's probably just baiting anyway.
>>317352808
>You're comparing psychological stimulation to physical injury.
Maybe you should take a look at the mirror because that's exactly what you're doing. I'm not the one who brought up violence to justify pedophelia in games.
>you're obviously too mind bogglingly stupid to realize this simple fact.
>resorting to ad hominem and petty insults instead of making a point
You're doing that hippocrates thing again
>>317352838
You can't really rape someone using video game, adrenaline surge you feel in response to killing someone in a video game is real.
>>317352838
>You can't inflict real violence on another person using video games.
But the hormones you feel are real, much like sexual arousal
>>317352592
But I'm not getting off with a child. That's the distinction your doublethink won't allow you to acknowledge.
>>317350430
every neogaf member will be brought kicking and screaming into the light
>>317352959
Excellent rebuttal, befitting a man of your superior brainpower.
>>317352951
So, you're perfectly okay with kids being sexualized if nobody is harmed. So its perfectly okay for you if mindless 10 yr old accept your offer of having sex on fair terms himself.
>>317353058
THANKS MR SKELTAL
>>317353104
>So its perfectly okay for you if mindless 10 yr old accept your offer of having sex on fair terms himself
No, because real children do not have the capabilities to decide for themselves.
>>317350430
>stop liking what i dont like
>>317353058
Where is this, Mexico?
>>317353004
cute
>>317353054
The hormones you feel are not violence. So again your comparison is faulty.
>>317353049
You don't need to rape in order to get sexually aroused by a child. And an adrenaline surge is not violence.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317353115
He's still harmed (statutory rape) and actually real. Kids in games are just ones and zeros. How is that anywhere near the same?
Thanks for existing /v/.
>>317353221
>an adrenaline surge is not violence
and sexual arousal is not sex
>>317353104
but to be honest, I don't have a clue who is trolling who anymore
>>317353195
If you like jerking off to depictions of little kids then yes stop liking what I don't like
>>317353221
I don't think you know how biology works.
>>317353115
>fictional sexualized children is literally the same as fucking an actual kid
My only regret is that I have so few laughing faces.
>>317353250
/v/ doesn't exist because you can't experience it
>>317353221
>The hormones you feel are not violence.
But it's not violence people want to feel, it's the pleasure of inflicting it.
>>317353192
Meant to reply to >>317353115
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350691
>can't gain traction against pixels argument
>moves goalposts
>>317351689
When is someone going to make a Kuro Simulator?
>>317353058
What am I even looking at? What causes the parts remaining in tact to be that way?
>>317353265
Good thing nobody accused you of rape then. Just pedophelia.
>>317353315
I wasn't saying that, although it is funny that everyone who was defending it is trying very hard to imply that there is and also to distance themselves from it and turn it around on me.
>>317353221
>The hormones you feel are not violence
And the hormones you feel from arousal are not sex.
Please read my post here >>317352932 to see the difference between cause and effect.
>>317353317
Experiencing anger at a shitpost is the same as having someone take a dump on you.
>>317352408
>If the person that you're killing looks like a child, you might well be killing a child.
Oh my God, someone arrest me. I've played GTAV, I'm a monster!
You do know we're talking about VIDEO GAMES, right?
>>317353115
>So, you're perfectly okay with kids being sexualized if nobody is harmed.
Now you're blurring the barrier between fiction and reality.
2D kid? Why the fuck not? We have game with actual beheading and no one cares.
3D kids? Fuck off pedo.
So its perfectly okay for you if mindless 10 yr old accept your offer of having sex on fair terms himself.
Again it's not real, it's not sentient nor physical and is at best an amalgam of 0 and 1. It's not something that can learn and will stay the exact same over time.
>>317353315
>he hasn't saved up years worth of laughing faces
Now I'm laughing at you.
>>317353371
once bestiality gets allowed on steam
What is the argument even about, anyways?
>>317353414
no you didnt get a boner from it so it doesn't count
>>317353380
>I wasn't saying that
>So its perfectly okay for you if mindless 10 yr old accept your offer of having sex on fair terms himself
>>317350824
holy shit the amount of circle logic
>>317353380
>I wasn't saying that
But you were. You made a direct and equal comparison between underage video game characters and statutory rape.
>>317353324
Which still isn't violence.
>>317353386
>And the hormones you feel from arousal are not sex.
No but it is sexual arousel, the same effect you get from looking at child porn.
>>317353380
>I wasnt saying that
neogaf plz
>>317353528
>Which still isn't violence.
No but it is an adrenaline surge, the same effect you get from looking at violence.
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317350824
>if you enjoy killing people in a video game, you enjoy killing people in real life
epic
>>317353528
I don't even know how to respond. I'm honestly speechless. You're a fucking retard, dude.
FUCK NEOFAG
>>317353528
>Which still isn't violence.
no, but the hormonal pleasure is real, and the same effect you get from inflicting REAL violence
>>317353528
>these hormones aren't real , but THESE ones are
>>317353641
And there's nothing wrong with getting an adrennaline surge, since you're not inflicting any violence.
>>317353680
I don't think you've ever been in a violent situation. Because that is not true at all.
>>317353528
how can violence be real if sex is not real?
>>317353801
You're conflating hormones and adrenaline with actual violence. All I'm pointing out is sexual arousal is the same and you're all being very defensive and dodgy about it.
>>317353804
There is nothing wrong with sexual arousal either
>>317353804
So why is it wrong to get a hormone surge if you're not inflicting any wrongdoings unto children?
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317353804
And there's nothing wrong with sexual arousal, since you're not having sex with 10 year olds.
>>317353804
>And there's nothing wrong with getting an adrennaline surge, since you're not inflicting any violence.
And just replace violence with sex and you just killed your own shit opinions. Congrstulation.
>>317353905
>There is nothing wrong with being sexually aroused by pictures of children
You sure?
>>317353221
Having a boner is not a crime and having a boner only for 2D stuff is even less of a crime.
You are equating having a boner for 2D will result in having a boner for 3D.
You're assuming that's a given.
Except it's not.
The reason people are bringing violence in vydya for comparison is because they both follow the same process for your brain.
And people are trying since forever to demonstrate that violence in vydya make people violent irl.
>>317353804
You know that it's natural to feel a surge of pleasure when you kill someone, right? How come it's different for sexual arousal if both are derived from something abstract and fictional?
>>317353902
Yes, sexual arousal is the same as getting aroused by violence. Both mean literally dick shit.
>>317353959
His arguments are based entirely on his feelings, that's why it different.
>>317352729
>>317352809
learn the difference between a pedo and a rapist plz ty
>>317353974
by picures of 2d children. Those animu moeblobs are drawn in such an idealized manner that those features are impossible to achieve in real life.
>>317353974
How about you explain what's wrong with it since that can make or break your entire argument.
>>317353938
>>317353959
>>317354018
>>317354000
So you would defend real child porn because it's not a child, it's only a picture of a child? You're not having sex with the child.
>>317353974
More like
>there's nothing wrong with being aroused by stylized drawings of fictional children
And while it's enough to raise an eyebrow at, effectively no one is being harmed in the process and frankly, that's all that matters.
What's going on in this thread?
>>317354064
>>317354170
If that character happens to look like a child it might well be.
>>317353902
Let me just say that there are a lot of pedophiles who can't control their thoughts but never act on them, and there are a lot of psychopaths that can't control their thoughts and never act on them. They are both mental disorders and nobody enjoys having them because of the stigma and real life consequences they can bring.
Thoughts and hormones are not inherently evil. What's evil is your actions, and in video games you are neither killing nor sexually interacting with a real person.
>>317354129
We've already been over this and the answer was no but you keep getting BTFO without even realizing it so you're back to strawmans.
>>317354129
I would defend someone getting aroused by that porn but not the creation of it since that involved harming a child.
>>317354129
Real CP involves actual children in the creation of the product. 2D does not.
>>317354129
We already did this, remember, it was something like one or two hundred post ago.
>>317354187
NeoFag poster dropped by. Got BTFO.
>>317354129
Take note: PURELY FICTIONAL
wherein even the character itself is not real and any resemblance with a real person is pure coincidence. Shit that makes unteralterbach illegal and imouto vn #329 legal
>>317354129
In real child porn, a child was actually harmed. If it's drawn, no real child was.
Personally, I hate loli and am not aroused by it. However, I don't think that people who are aroused by it are evil because I'm not retarded.
>>317354192
Too bad they don't. And it's still just a drawing based solely on the artist's imagination.
>>317353360
this
Please stop responding. This has been going on too long.
>>317354332
I tried to tell them that a while ago but the bait is too fresh.
>>317354297
>>317354243
>>317354309
But it's only an image, anons. Sure, it's an image of an event that happened, but it's not like that could be undone anyway. The picture itself is harmless and if anyone were to be aroused by it it's only fantasy and not actually abusing a kid.
>>317354314
Okay, so if you made a drawing of it instead, would that be alright? What if you traced it?
>>317354210
>>317354250
>>317354196
You were the ones arguing that it's only an image and therefore not paedophilia. But some images make it more explicit than others that there's a relationship between the depiction and the depicted, don't they?
Now, you're getting tripped up by the actual harm involved but ignore that for the moment and think of the effect on the viewer. If he's aroused by images of children being sexually abused, you'd say that's a paedophile, wouldn't you? Yet if no children were harmed in the production of the image, but the effect on the viewer is still the same, you would argue that that person is not a paedophile?
>>317353528
doesnt understand biology: the post
>>317354413
The picture itself is harmful if any real child was involved
Why is this retarded thread still up?
Discussion of an irrelevant forum isn't vidya.
I'm honestly surprised to know that /v/ argues based on logic and rationality as opposite to the NeoFagger poster. This is why /v/ is so much better than that circlejerk of emotions.
>>317353959
thank you for making that faggot go full circle on his own retardation, and maybe- just maybe wise the fuck up
>>317354413
Again with the traced horseshit.
Stop responding to this guy.
>>317354469
Irrelevant, since my argument is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
>>317354413
Since you're a retard that can't read posts, I might as well enjoy my anger
Take note: PURELY FICTIONAL
wherein even the character itself is not real and any resemblance with a real person is pure coincidence. Shit that makes unteralterbach illegal and imouto vn #329 legal
>>317354129
DONT MOVE THE GOALPOSTS NIGGER
>>317354413
I'm not arguing that it's not pedophilia, I'm arguing that no child was harmed in making loli.
Again, pedophilia is a mental disorder, and the more pedophiles can control their urges without supporting harm to real children, the beter.
>>317354413
you guys realise you're literally going in circles?
>>317351301
>>317353360
>>317354323
He's reached the point where he's parroting the same "arguments"
See >>317354129
>>317351093
>>317354413
>You were the ones arguing that it's only an image and therefore not paedophilia. But some images make it more explicit than others that there's a relationship between the depiction and the depicted, don't they?
Troll confirmed.
The exact same line has been used already.
>>317354289
this
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317354243
Except russel he uses real cp
>>317354595
>>317354587
>>317354542
>>317354519
I'm using the same argument in response to the same arguments that you have reguretated over and over again
>muh goalposts
>B-BUT IT'S FICTIONAL
Uh huh. Looks more like I just blew you the fuck out and you're trying to save face.
Ill just ignore you from now on since you will reply with another lame attempt to try and save face again.
>>317354578
At least this guy is willing to admit it's pedophilia
I hope to see a thread on GAF about the blind eye being turned to pedophilia in video games so long as the characters are fictional.
On this day, NeoFag got officially BTFO by a couple of bored anons. This is why they banned Tom. They can't deal with losing to logic.
>>317354695
you done now?
>>317354495
>grabbing the scroll bar
Does this nigger even know how to use a computer?
>>317354661
Has that ever been confirmed or is that just a rumour. Regardless, someone post floors.
>>317354524
>Irrelevant, since my argument is that despite the character being fictional, the effect on the viewer is real (when it comes to sexual arousal specifically).
Oh boy, that being your argument sure does show in
>But it's only an image, anons. Sure, it's an image of an event that happened, but it's not like that could be undone anyway. The picture itself is harmless and if anyone were to be aroused by it it's only fantasy and not actually abusing a kid.
>>317354524
Why is that important? I have a blast killing fictional people for hours and hours. That has an actual chemical effect on me, which is what you're arguing. That doesn't mean I would enjoy killing actual people by the hundreds.
>>317354595
He's probably used to getting protected by the mods in his safe space, so he doesn't know what to do. Usually the other guys are banned by now on neofag.
>>317352324
Hiro lives in the US you retard
>>317354524
Another copy pasted line.
Are we being raided by neofag?
Is this how they are sage'ing thread into oblivion?
>>317354695
There's a fuckton of post that would have countered your "arguments" that you ignored.
>>317354737
We can only hope.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317354794
That was for the sake of argument, Anon. I'm trying to discover YOUR stance but you're all being very defensive and dodgy about it.
>>317354695
>it's fictional
yes, it is. That's what makes it okay. The same reason war is okay on books but not in your lawn. Got any rebuttals?
>>317354820
>Is this how they are sage'ing thread into oblivion?
We're on page 1 and can keep this up for over 100 more posts.
Can we post Xenoblade loli covers instead?
>>317354695
you moved the goalposts when you changed your argument, mid-argument, from 2d/3d loli is wrong to real cp is bad mmkay
>>317354695
Please don't act like I'm agreeing with you.
>>317354695
>LALALALALA I WIN I WIN I WIN
/v/: 1
NEOFAGS: -4164816519
>>317354820
>Are we being raided by neofag?
Implying they have enough non-banned users left
>>317353804
Theres probably no better feeling in the world than punching someone in the face and then getting punched back and then realizing:
"You know, that punch really hurt, but I bet my punch hurt him way more. Maybe I'll punch him harder."
Vaginas pale in comparison to this.
>>317354836
My stance is that drawn loli wherein no real depiction of any real persons and none are real is okay. emphasis on the NOT and the REAL and them together being NOT REAL so that you won't make the stupid repetition where you're assuming that I'm okay with real cp depiction real persons
>>317354863
>>317354820
>>317354898
>>317354905
>>317354937
>>317354905
>>317355009
>>317355027
I would counterpoint your argument, but I'm above that. I know that internet arguments never lead anyone anywhere, and no one emerges the victor. So believe what you want and I"ll believe what I want. Or is that too hard to handle.
>>317355009
this desu senpai
>if you dont agree, you havent been in a good enough fight
>>317354836
>you're all being very defensive and dodgy about it.
We specifically stated our stance already, read the thread.
2D=no problem
3D=fuck off pedo
You think we're actual pedo in your mind and we will look "defensive" in your eyes until your point is proven.
>>317355060
>but I'm above that
Clearly. You haven't made a single proper counterpoint all thread.
>>317355060
>I won't read your arguments
>I have no counterargument
>I shall declare that I am a winner and, therefore superior to you by saying that arguments are worthless on the internet
>>317355060
if that was your point of view the whole time, you would never have come here to get BTFO
>>317355060
>I would counterpoint your argument, but I'm above that. I know that internet arguments never lead anyone anywhere, and no one emerges the victor. So believe what you want and I"ll believe what I want. Or is that too hard to handle.
oo I'm saving this one.
>>317355060
>I COULD TOTALLY PROVE MYSELF RIGHT I JUST DON'T WANT TO
I'm crying in real life, dead serious.
>>317354996
They have a very few number of loyal but very active dogs.
>>317355060
>I'LL take the moral high ground.
>In this retarded circle shitfest I instigated
Lie down and die Gaffer
>>317355060
I fucking love you NeoFag. Never change.
>>317355212
>>317355189
these desu senpai
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317349920
He fought till the very end.
At least I can take solace that in the sea of shitty localizers there is still some who care some who give a fuck to the point where he would try to educate the unteachable and persuade the immovable.
Thanks tom
>>317355119
>>317355121
>>317355123
>>317355139
>>317355143
>>317355180
>>317355189
>>317355212
>>317355270
I don't care what you say. I will remain tolerant to whatever you throw at me while you are stuck in that pit of shit-flinging apes known as arguing over opinions.
>>317355060
>I would counterpoint your argument, but I'm above that.
And yet all the post you quoted don't have arguments, if you're going to "counterpoint" ours arguments you should quote the post with actual argument that you ignored.
You're still ignoring the posts with actual arguments and probably didn't even bothered to read them/already forgot them because it would break your view of the world.
>>317355481
Sleep tight porker.
>>317349665
http://operationrainfall.com/2015/11/10/tom-of-xseed-mysteriously-banned-on-neogaf
>>317355481
Hahahahahaha
Quality bants m8
>>317355481
Jesus, all this butthurt.
>I-i-m not angry guys! Listen to how much I don't care about you!
>I'm superior because you're angry!
>>317355361
He's pretty autistic desu, I wouldn't argue with those faggots for so long. If you're not wanted somewhere GTFO. It's not like he's obligated to offer PR on that website.
will threads about neogaf ever get banned by mods? I'm reporting but nothing ever happens
>>317355481
>I don't care what you say. I will remain tolerant to whatever you throw at me while you are stuck in that pit of shit-flinging apes known as arguing over opinions.
>>317355060
>So believe what you want and I"ll believe what I want. Or is that too hard to handle.
It may be because we're writing and not actually speaking but you sounds a little... butthurt?
>>317355621
>literally banned for having the wrong opinion
Neogaf users are pond scum.
>>317352090
well the niggas I know hate neogaf it might be a coincidence or retarded sjw black lives matter college freshman and tbqh you can safely ignore those types
>>317355594
>>317355586
>>317355565
>>317355626
>>317355634
>>317355747
1. [argument]
2. I don't care what you say. You are nothing but a fly's buzzing from afar. Continue on with what you say, but it will be utter shit from your filthy barbarian mouth.
>>317355747
Anons love talking about gaf. These threads always get lots of replies and unique IPs.
>>317355678
>It's not like he's obligated to offer PR on that website.
hes not but he was trying to prove a point
>>317355921
If you don't care and we're nothing to you, why are you still here?
Why the sudden insults also? It's not nice to call people filthy and barbarian.
>>317356038
Not really. This thread has over 400 replies but barely over 100 unique IPs
>>317355921
Now I think the actual faggot is already gone and that this guy is just a troll acting like him.
>>317355921
*tips fedora*
>the biggest fucking lolicon I ever met
>like I'm from /a/ and was taken aback by this dude's intense depth of knowledge regarding loli hentai
>posts nonstop links to sadpanda loli stuff in irc
>is also a longtime neogaf user
the only ones who get banned are the actual retards who can't shut up and talk about fucking video games. If you want to talk about random bullshit other than video games that's what /v/ is for
>>317356124
Using memes is definitely something that a barbaric pleb like you would use. Nothing you say will make me fall. I am rubber and I am entitled to my opinion without anyone saying otherwise.
>>317356038
Not really.
neofag thread on /v/ are rather popular during eurotime but dies very fast during american hours.
Europe must be too sexual for neofag as a lot of butthurt neogaf members comes from here.
>neofag
>>317356136
>>intense depth of knowledge regarding loli hentai
memory transfer when?
>>317356063
So, autistic. It's not worth it discussing with neofag.
The only reason to go there is for the community threads and for the autistic forum posters that post news as soon as they come.
>>317356136
i know youre troll, but you sound like the kid about to be pushed down
>>317352848
This is true some people say /v/ can get bad and honestly all you fucking need is some slightly thick skin and to have enough mental function to recognize bait and falseflagging.
On a side note on the first point but I really hate how sensitive people have gotten over the years on the internet. Faggots trying to make it their safe space is a problem.
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317356136
So what's his username?
>>317356136Extollere?{/spoiler]
He's a smart, very cool guy but barely post on neofag (and I think that's the reason he's not banned actually).
He used to be very active in the loli and hentai communities.
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317349545
this picture is glorious
>>317356136
>the only ones who get banned are the actual retards who can't shut up and talk about fucking video games.
We both know that's not true.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317350489
This.
'New liberal' has become synonymous with mad fucking christian midwife from the 1920s
>>317355060
>>317355481
Its sad because you seem to be not joking. Are you not used to having a proper argument because of neogaf? You are literally retreating with your tail between your legs.
It makes sense because most controversial topics or opinions are shut down before it gets this lengthy and you clearly don't know what to do..
>>317351034
this
>>317356605
see
>>317350696
>Tyler Malka is the biggest, most evil sellout in all of video game culture. He destroyed his own forum to make a home for SJWs because they were more profitable, all while the users lick his asshole like he's fucking Jesus Christ. He doesn't even believe in their ideals, he just wants to make money of it. He gleefully sexually assaults women overseas and bans anyone who takes issue with it.
Truly an awful person.
>>317351125
this tom guy is right
why do people hate him?
>>317355060
You are a bitch and your words are lacking in merit, maybe it is time for you to reevaluate your ideologies.
>>317356716
I'm done replying to you brain damaged idiots trying to sound smart by being assholes. I shall leave you to your senseless fighting and bickering. Farewell.
>>317351903
can't stop laughing at tubby
>>317356887
Cheers
>>317356887
Don't let the browser hit your ninny bitch ass on the alt-f4 out, faggot
>>317356887
Come back during US hours, you won't be alone at those times.
>>317356887
NaCl
>>317356842
neofag hate him because he's pro fanservice and anti-censorship.
Threads like these soothe me. Knowing that pedo weeb faggots like you guys are concentrated here, mainly staying at home on weekends instead of out and about in the world.
>reading this thread and watching all these jealous faggots burst into impotent rage over video games not catering to them any longer
there is nothing more entertaining
>I browse NeoGaf
Leave Neogaf to me
NeoFAG would actually be decent if it wasn't for the faggot owner, faggot mods and generally faggotry ie Off Topic.
>>317356887
I am from NeoGAF and you are a big faggot, faggot.
>>317357239
If you're gonna take shots at people for not being out in the world on the weekend, care to explain what you're doing here now?
>>317357390
NeoFAG is down and the faggot has no where else to go.
Somebody compose this dumb niggers posts into a nice .png so his embarrassment is for ever preserved.
Preferably with reaction pics around it.
I'm not doing it because I'm fapping.
>>317357260
Hahahahaha, oh man, he used a fedora image to create a derogatory term for Neogaf members! How hilarious, original, and zany, you really are a card anon. I bet you have tons of friends and get female attention on a regular basis!
Seriously though, how much of an angry faggot does one have to be to consantly make threads bitching about other gaming fourms? I'd say something about you having a stick in your ass but clearly it's an entire fucking tree up there
>>317357239
I am glad that you feel the need to share these feelings because you fare strong, and totally not because you are trying to eschew some last desperate "burn" because it's not enough that you feel satisfied with yourself, but have to share it with a bunch of anonymous people before you close your tab.
So... what's wrong with NeoGAF exactly?
Is it because they're not muh 4chans? Because that's pretty shallow.
Yes, I can agree with the point that 4chan is a terrible place to discuss video games, due to the fact that it is so loosely moderated and almost all interaction is anonymous.
With a forum, you've got active moderation preventing shitposting, and you can know who you're talking to, to see if they're actually legit or not.
>>317357530
that's not a fedora dumbass
shows what NeoFAGs know
>>317357625
read the thread nigger
>>317357625
but the mods are shitposters and shills and the admin is a sellout who does even play vidya
>>317357572
Just proving me right with this post.
>>317348060
Sleep tight hammers.
>>317357625
Lurk more.
Examples in this one thread
>>317357239
>reading this thread and watching all these jealous faggots burst into impotent rage over video games
>btw I didn't read the thread
There's actually only one guy who raged here.
See >>317356887
>>317355481
>>317355060
And now I'm suspecting that you're him and you didn't left as you said and need to take some shot on us because of the butthurt.
>>317357716
ban this pedophile
>>317357625
>Seriously wanting to discuss video games on the internet for any reason
>>317357625
I used to go there to enjoy commentary, rumors, speculation and insider information.
A few years ago it became completely unbearable. Any halfway decent thread is saturated with posts from corporate cheerleaders (and I do not mean fanboys, I mean literal corporate stooges) being passive-aggressive. And it;s become unbearably Leftist and probably the most smug and distasteful place on the Internet, with the possible exception of the Sanders subreddit.
Everybody is constantly trying to appease everybody else or fit into some absurd corporate controlled idea of "free speech" that no discussion can take place and bans are rampant. The people kucked enough to be there longtime are super smug about anyone else being banned as well.
Place like neoGAF are holding back games as a culture.
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317358028
don't take the absence of shitposting for fanboyism and leftism.
sites like gaf and may seem like fanboy breeding places because actual moderation and the missing curtain of anonymity hold extreme reactions in place, so you won't see the usual "hate" posting you see around here, but nonetheless, much like any community, they are able to have decent discussions.
Something /v/ manages very rarely. And even some pull it off, they get stormed by shitposting faggots.
"Blatant fanboyism" or "circlejerk" are the first things people spout, when other sites are mentioned, but most of the time it simply means the absence of shitposting.
I only got to gaf when people here posted links, and usually I clicked around a bit and saw not much smugness at all. But if the absence of "this game is shit" in the first couple of posts is too much for you too handle, then I guess they're not for you.
>>317357740
>>317357572
There's something about life where when ideas or philosophies is universally detested, hated and disliked, aligning yourself with it should be backed with strong evidence and good arguments. Neither of those are featured here. /v/ is a bunch of angry teens, white trash, hopeless 20 somethings and uneducated old men circlejerking over loli and how much SJW are the root of the problem while unironically claiming that they have some deeper understanding of how things work than the average person. It's a joke. That's all I'm saying.
>>317356842
he has opinions that don't line up with the thought police
>>317357716
Do you think this is youtube or something mate?
That "argument" doesn't work here.
Here is your you, do a better job earning it sooner next time.
>>317358398
>All I am saying is tl;dr
begone moralfag!
>>317358398
>uneducated
Speak for yourself, liberal arts fucker.
>>317349982
>>317350629
This. They didn't like him so they played the pedo card to get rid of him. That's all there is to it.
Opiate is an ACTUAL pedo who told a kid who was raped that she didn't know shit because she was too close to the subject matter and he's still around.
>>317356538
>posting in honeypot threads about SJW articles
those only exist to weed out /v/ and reddit shitposters. /v/ went to shit because every second thread has to be about some tweet from anita sarkeesian's dipshit boyfriend. The retards posting in those threads are the kind that can't resist getting baited and banned on a site with actual moderation.
>wah wah viral marketing shills shills
they aren't shills they are just insane fanboys. You know, the kind that made /v/ fun before this place got flooded with 13 year old League of Legends players. Why would any company waste real money paying for something they get for free?
>>317358319
I did not say Fanboyism.
Fanboysim is childish behavior. Usually performed by teens and children. I am speaking about ADULTS pretending to be MATURE within their pseudo-intellectual hivemind and clique.
I haven't been there in a while but every time I got, like maybe once every 9 months or so, for the past 3 years, I have become enraged just lurking a few threads.
it sucks, and it made me realize I don;t WANT to socialize with gamers. Most gamers are complete and total losers. I've gamed for a long time and only had a few close gamer friends, and they are all avoiding something with their hardcore playing. I am the same, but at least I am not retarded enough to try and "identify" with soulless consumer products and company logos.
4chan allows for something mildly resembling interaction but embodying the very thing I play games for: A PLEASING, ULTIMATELY MASTURBATORY SOLITARY EXPERIENCE.
>>317358398
let me guess, you're white, middle class and live in America?
>My desktop when reading this whole thread
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
I'm looking at Opiate's post history now. The guy is a legit pedophile. How the fuck did he become a mod?
>>317358398
>uneducated
Hows that communications degree going for you? Or heaven forbid woymens studies? kek
>>317358913
Can you post it?
>>317358398
>it should be backed with strong evidence and good arguments. Neither of those are featured here
Because no one is willing to do actual research on the subject.
Violence in vydya is the closest thing we have to make assumption and comparison otherwise we would just be calling name at each other.
>SJW
It was barely mentionned in this thread and I think never in the actual debate.
>unironically claiming that they have some deeper understanding of how things work than the average person
Good for you but claiming that you have a deeper understanding is a thing but actually showing it is another.
>It's a joke
People hate us for a reason.
>That's all I'm saying.
Why did you bother with that post then >>317357239 ?
>>317358878
fuck off nigger
>>317358398
There is more to this than you realize. Most of the people bashing "SJWs" were liberal themselves at one point. It is important and intellectually stimulating to ensconce yourself in other peoples perspectives and work your way back to your original viewpoint. This is how you begin to grasp geopolitics, the concept of foreign policy, and why so much money is put into PR/propaganda.
>>317358398
I think this is that "concern trolling" NeoFAGs go on about. The reason SJWism is a joke is because, largely, the real world does not now nor will it ever care about your feelings. To give these people the idea that they can bring about any sort of societal change is just ludicrous. As we've seen in recent months, the average person is just as hateful and racist as ever, Trump is leading the polls for Christ's sake. Shouting down a problem and silencing people doesn't bring about change, only contempt.
>>317359237
>hateful and racist
>Trump
Why even type out the words if you literally have no idea what the fuck you are talking about?
Which would you rather wipe off the face of the earth, Neogaf or Something Awful?
>>317359457
>>317359457
Gaffe.
SA is about as relevant as stickdeath.com.
>>317359457
Something Awful used to be good. the goons in eve were some of the most anti pc fuckers around.
>>317359446
Let's not try to disguise it as anything more as tipping the scales back in the other direction, beause it's working. Liberals were given an inch, and they've taken a mile. Now in 2015 we have millennials thinking that it's okay to ban speech that's offensive to minorities and that's absolute horse shit. Language policing has no place on this Earth. The only reason Trump has the support he does is that he's basically anti-Obama. No one has though further ahead than taking control away from liberals.
>>317348060
Sleep tight porker
>>317359727
He's shifted the overton window.
Just a few months ago you were forced to say "undocumented migrants" because "illegal" is racist.
>>317359457
Both were good once.
neofag actually managed to become worse than SA.
>>317360032
Exactly, and I think that's great.
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
>>317360445
things are looking up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_61hzuGGJX0
New just getting started a little training whould be nice so I can help reach the common goal
>>317348060
sleep tight porker
Sleep tight porker
>>317358795
The guy who told the person to edit it got banned too.
Why did that happen?
Looks like Phil finally had enough of their bullshit
>>317359636
SA has never been good.
When I see a forum or a website full of opinions I don't like, I obsessively follow it every day of my life, make threads about it on Reddit knockoffs and develop an encycopedic knowledge of the people who post there, moderate or have any kind of relationship with the website.
Oh wait, no I don't, I ignore it.
Until next time, Dillinger48.
