>he doesn't have an Imax Home Theatre
anon why the fuck not. it's only 2 million
>>71286220
how big is it? as big as the real one?
>>71286257
minimum six metres tall and approximately 4.5 metres wide
>>71286334
You could probably build a home cinema just as big or bigger for 40-50k if you're not a retard and can build it yourself.
2 million sounds like a scam.
>those chairs
>>71286419
Not with imax technology
>>71287669
why pay for a brand, that brand alone is meaningless.
>>71287750
The brand has technology that is patented and therefor can't be achieved by yourself.
>>71287480
What's wrong with them? They look comfy.
>sitting so close to a huge screen
Dumb 3D watchers.
>>71288141
Sitting in a chair watching a movie is the worst. Should of put couches or a massive bed.
>>71288364
I disagree, but leg rests would've been a good idea.
>>71286419
This.
OP is an idiot.
A 4K digital projector on a decent size home theater will look better than an Imax setup on an oversized home theater. You don't have to blow $$$ on a decent sound system either.
There's no point if it is your home theater and only a handful of seats in the room.
>>71289378
>You don't have to blow $$$
This is the mindset of the poorfag.
>>71289378
you don't even know what you're talking about.
>>71289378
>home theater
>more than one seat
>It's a retards don't understand how hard it is to get floor to ceiling pictures
go look at all those "cool" home theaters that people make and fucking none are floor to ceiling screens
>he doesn't have dubs
>>71286220
lel half those seats have a shitty view
i got a hd tv, a surround system, kodi on my pc with 7 TB of content and I don't have to work, I think I'm good
>>71289608
Floor to ceiling takes a certain physical layout. There is nothing special about IMAX over any other projector that does this better. You just have to build the room properly.
how would i actually do this >100k
