Which celebrities do you think visit /tv/?
- Home
- Board: /tv/ - Television & Film
- Reading: Which celebrities do you think visit /tv/?
Which celebrities do you think visit /tv/?
>>71175491
Charlie from Sunny seems like the kind of guy that would sit around bored in his downtime shitposting on /tv/
I just watched the JRE with Trevor Moore and he said a bunch of stuff that was obviously alluding to being on 4chan.
A lot of people go on there and flat out talk about 4chan, he's the only one that kept it secret.
>>71175491
Anton Yelchin used to ;_;
Tila Tequila is queen of /pol/ apparently. Wouldn't be weird is she visited /tv/ a couple of times.
I don't think he browses /tv/.
I know.
Confirmed.
>>71175679
A lot of the alt-right celebrities browse /pol/ and have said as much. Tila, Milo, Coulter, etc.
>>71175737
Dick Masterson has as well.
>>71175737
>>71175771
>Celebrities
>>71175737
>Tila, Milo, Coulter, etc.
アブンチオfィテラlウォセ
Hi, I'm Hollywood director Joss Whedon.
>>71175737
>alt-right celebrities
lolwut
>>71175835
prove it write a quip
John Cusack here... b.i.o.n
>Trevor Moore
Yeah, he seems like a /b/tard. Then again who doesn't hop on /b/ every once in a while? Its super popular even with people who don't normally use 4chan.
Bailey Jay probably still lurks
>>71175642
Link/exact timestamps?
Dane Dehaan is all but confirmed
>>71175856
Uhhh
>Cpt. America throws his shield at Spider-Man
>"did you just throw a ginormous frisbee at me? the fuck... i'm supposed to be a spider, not a dog!" t: Spider-Man
>>71175491
Alan Alda. Not telling you my source.
>>71175877
https://youtu.be/ZGKqw9lu158
I don't have the timestamps, but it's in here.
His knowledge of varying topics makes it pretty clear, and he talks about browsing "forums" to learn those things.
Pretty fun interview too, if you like the guy. I didn't know much about it him but he was funny on This Is Not Happening, so I checked it out.
https://youtu.be/5HnslJrk09k
Check this out too.
>>71175737
>alt-right
>celebrities
also great list of /pol/ supporters there. A paranoid delusional porn star with substance abuse problems, a raving faggot whose only value is creating drama, and a has-been Fox correspondent who thrives off controversy like a parasite
can't wait for the alt-right to make it big in 2020
>>71175805
>>71175808
>>71175816
>>71175856
>i dont know them because theyre not kardashians
>ergo they're not celebrities
How many television programs have you fags starred in? How many NYT bestsellers have you written? How many news articles have you headlined? How many movies have you appeared in?
Yep.
>>71175925
She mains /toy/, though.
>>71175925
>celebrities have to have pristine reputations to be celebrities
I guess you must think there are what? Four famous people in the world? Less, maybe?
>>71175491
80% of fappening celebs, anthony cumia, shatner (pic related), chlomo in 2010 after that anon spammed her twitter with the cum tribute pics
Marlon Brando lord of the Shitposting
>>71175943
12 as a guest, 4 and no idea.
Next question?
I'm a celebrity but I don't live in murrica, does that count?
Hey guys AMA
>>71176017
Roleplayers back to >>>/x/
>>71176009
>lying on the internet
alicia witt i know your here i love you i just want to pleasure your pusy whily i pleasure myself
>>71175925
It's fascinating how much Milo leaves from stirring up drama, yet the alt-right always presents him as the anti-faggot that is free of drama.
wew
>>71175908
>"did you just throw a ginormous frisbee at me? the fuck... i'm supposed to be a spider, not a dog!"
mfw i was the one who originally wrote this
thank god this... thing died, im never sharing anything with any of you ever again
>>71175491
What is this picture talking about Taylor Swift on 4chan for?
Also, a couple of authors haunt /tg/ from time to time.
>>71175969
I'm not saying they have to have good reputations, I'm saying the only people associated with the alt-right are people who have made a career out of being controversial and getting short-term attention from saying dumb/crazy things.
they're click-bait incarnate, which is pathetic considering how butthurt /pol/ is over gawker and SJW's doing the same thing
>>71175662
He was the original green oval poster.
>>71175491
What's his name again?
>>71176066
>haunt
a couple of deceased actors used to haunt /tv/
Hey guys, Brendan Fraser here. AMA!
I know for a fact that Gaiman and Gatiss browse. One of them posts occasionally.
>>71176104
Timestamp faggot
>>71175491
Me.
>>71176118
I remember one comic book author who deliberately wrote on his blog or something to /co/ saying to stop lusting over his daughter.They didn't.
>>71176140
I currently cannot afford a phone with a camera so I'm afraid that's not possible
>>71176118
Gatiss is a shit writer desu. How do you know for a fact?
>>71176165
kek
>>71176176
Through conversation.
>>71176165
celebs don't speak like that
>>71176200
True. It really must be Brendan.
>>71176165
It really is you!
>>71176066
/tg/ also used to have based Brad Neely back in the day
>>71176069
Coulter and Tila have both been famous for around twenty years. Not exactly flash in the pan.
>>71175585
around the waitress? i doubt
>>71175491
>WKUK like /b/ humour
to the surprise of absolutely no-one
>>71176087
He is the cunnybot who posted the wisslpb threads
>>71175686
100%
>>71175943
Go to sleep Milo, no one but /v/ and Reddit takes you seriously
>>71176064
>thank god this... thing died, im never sharing anything with any of you ever again
thanks, it was a horrible meme attempt
i would bet that both refn and gosling are on here by now
>>71176565
>..........I shitpost
>>71176064
i feel you mate. i made a tv trope shitpost about a guy trying to get rid of his anvil and mentioned it happened in the anvil hoarder (1930) and i come back a month later and it was cancer
>>71175737
>/pol/
Yeah but we're talking about /tv/
>>71175737
>Tila, Milo, Coulter, etc.
Who, who, who and hell, maybe etc. is also some form of "alt-right celebrity" so again, who?
Can't post proof but I'm Sir Patrick Stewart. Excellent thread fellows.
Mike Stoklasa & Jay Bauman
>>71175704
Whoa, spoiler next time, I'm completely spooked
Dick Bush
>>71176674
i love you
>>71175875
Ignored, just like in Hollywood
>>71175491CLASSIC
>>71176674
>tfw i read it in his voice
>>71175875
You were the bomb in Grosse Point Blank, yo.
>>71175491
No screenshot of Trev paying that /b/tards rent who was about to get kicked out?
Jared Leto
>>71175491
I can imagine Malick shitposting about kino/cinema. He is a recluse and fits right in here.
>>71175491
Josh Trank posted a few times here telling people about his failed movie
>>71175943
You can do all of the above and none of it could be substantive in any way.
>>71175491
I don't even know who that is. Nor care.
>>71175704
Go away Ms. Skellington.
I wonder if Laurie was a /b/tard to study for House
>>71176021
How did you make that piece of paper stand like that?
Is it movie magic, like Inception?
>>71175925
>has-been Fox correspondent who thrives off controversy like a parasite
You clearly haven't heard of Adios America. Where do you think Trump got the wall idea? You belong at her feet, plebeian.
Vin Diesel
Does anyone have that Taylor Swift collage?
>>71175737
>alt-right celebrities
>>71176048
Unless you're Rachel Nichols, I think I'll pass.
>>71176064
Why do you type like a redditor
>>71175925
losers tend to latch on to greatness cuck
its pretty much understood that if the celeb doesn't lurk
then their agent does
>>71177714
You're giving too much credit to agents.
>>71176048
*puts on brunette wig*
What a forward young man!
Justin Roiland and Dan Harmon have admitted to coming to 4chan. Justin would post in /co/ and /tv/ shit talking Rick and Morty in hopes that people would defend it and boost his ego. He also talked about wagecucks in the Rick and Morty season 2 commentary.
>>71175983
he did not post, i guarantee it.
i even doubt he came here
I know some of the cast of Broad City have 4chan week-ends. They smoke weed, drink and shitpost for a few hours.
>tfw they never invited me to be a part of that
I FEED YOU! WHY ARE YOU SO MEAN?
>>71177824
Man that puts so much into perspective about rick and morty threads
>>71177824
>and Dan Harmon have admitted to coming to 4chan
Seriously? Anybody got screencaps or something?
>>71176118
/who/ is leaking
>>71178874
Roiland shitposts on /co/.
>Harmon: I can’t believe this guy gets on 4chan to look for opinions about his show. That forum’s opinion on humanity will –
>Roiland: You have to have a full working knowledge of 4chan because there’s a lot of different boards, and some are horrible and offensive and terrible. Some are very moderate. The cartoon one is the one I troll on the most. I should not say this but I’m going to: Early on when the show first started to air, I would go on and I would go through the board and I would find a "Rick and Morty" thread that someone started, and then I would be like, “Man, fuck this show! I hate the fucking voice of Rick.” I would be the most aggressively angry anonymous voice on the thing. And then of course, as it happened, so many people did eventually have that opinion, and I was like, “I was meaner to myself than that guy was, and it doesn’t even bother me.” It’s so weird.
>http://www.hitfix.com/news/dan-harmon-and-justin-roiland-on-rick-and-morty-burping-for-work-and-trolling-4chan
>ywn be a famous celebrity
>ywn unexpectedly pop up in a 4chan thread and gain the adoration of several anons
>ywn become a bro-tier /tv/ celebrity that everyone loves
Plenty of us visit 4chan, trust me. Though I hang out more on pol than tv. You fuckers never talk about my show anyway so fuck you.
>>71179648
calm down nathan fielder
>>71179739
You are a terrible person and should feel terrible, sir.
My podcast isn't well liked on here anyway and you all hate Jews so fuck you all.
>>71175491
zelda williams visited once
>>71176118
If gained does, you know she does. Suprised she isn't a /soc/ camwhores showing her hairy parts for attention. Not like she doesn't already
>>71179774
Marc Maron? If so fuck off you're not funny
Plenty of us visit 4chan, trust me. Though I hang out more on lgbt than tv. You fuckers never talk about my show anyway so fuck you.
>outting yourself on /b/
What a pleb.
At least Taylor Swift tried to be kind of subtle, were it not for the autists keeping tabs on her.
>>71179884
caln down nathan fillion
>>71179837
O-ok
>>71178944
>Some are very moderate
What a puss, nearly scared away by le epin gore threads on /b/
>>71177208
I also have wondered about that. House always seemed kinda /b/ mixed with /r9k/
>>71176220
oh whaaaaaat.
link?
>>71176752
>do celebrities browse 4chan
well isn't that what everyone is asking at the moment?
>>71176639
The only thing one can possibly understand from this post is you're a jizz gargling retard who can't speak English.
>>71179774
>podcast
>celebrity
choose only one
>>71180007
That freckle isn't even close to being in the same spot
>>71179774
Quite a few of us are chauvanistic jew lovers, so you needn't feel so insecure, you dirty rat-faced kike.
Donald Glover and Michael B. Jordan seem to always know when someone calls them an untalented nigger, so they must lurk here often.
Cameron mitchell's ghost
>>71175491
James here.
Guess the last name
>>71179935
That's fake. Moot confirmed
>>71181127
Corden
>>71181168
>trusting a traitor
>>71181127
Bible?
>>71175943
I mean, being in those headlines becayse you are a disagreeable asshole aren't really the same types of celebrity status as say, being in the headlines because you have talent or contributed something.
So sure, Milo is famous in the sense that the asshole Pharmaceutical dude was when he hiked up that life saving medication
Am I supposed to be respectful of that "celebrity"? Or even care?
that fat guy who was on britains got talent a few years back posted on /r9k/
>>71176054
The alt right is fucking cancer, I'm surprised anyone actually takes them seriously. The entire premise IS to be shocking and say stupid/crazy shit
It is the Enquirer of politics since The Right wont fucking adapt to the 21st century
I would almost be shocked if he didn't come here.
>>71175925
/pol/ literally on suicide watch kek
>>71176242
Tila
>had one show that was moderately successful
->was literally forgotten about for nearly a decade
>people remember her again only for her batshit online about dimensions and earth being flat
Coulter
>was a minor political correspondent and pundit until going batshit
>says stupid shit about jews and 9/11
>says race baiting shit
>disappears for years because sane people ignored her
>LOL now she's supporting Trump, woahhh
"Celebrities" for "decades"
>>71175491
>Anthony Fantano: confirmed
>Filthy Frank: confirmed
>Tila Tequila: confirmed
>Stefan from Death Grips: confirmed
>Duncan Jones: VERY likely
>Taylor Swift: very likely
>Eminem: very likely
>Ethan Klein: probably
Tila if you are watching this, please turn your internet off and get some sleep. Maybe call some friends and family and make sure they know you are okay.
>>71181127
Franco?
>>71181952
i literally only know 2 people from that list
>>71181952
When was Stefan confirmed?
>>71181952
Asain Blood elf man visits 4chan? Doubtful. It seems like Night elves could all be asian if he wanted to go that route.
>>71181461
>implying it wasn't our fault
He endured as long as he could
>>71175491
Not joking, Aiden Gillan and Tom Hardy have almost certainly been here given how much we've memed at them. They'd never acknowledge it as they probably didn't get the joke.
>>71182071
Do you honestly think this guy does not browse 4chan?
For real tho, he said he used to shill his albums on /mu/ to gather people's opinions back in 2011
>>71182061
You don't know who Taylor Swift is? Or Eminem? Or Tila?
There, three. You say you only recognize two...so you must not know all three of those mentioned, right?
>>71182196
Seems more of a Zack or Flatty thing to be involved in if they really were shilling. You need to remember that DG got huge buzz in their local scene when Exmill dropped due to Zach's previous projects.
>>71175908
ITS HIM
>>71181127
Gandolfini back from the dead and shitposting on /tv/. what a time to be alive
>>71175679
>>71175679
>Tila Tequila is queen of /pol/ apparentl
kek
she's truly the queen they deserve: she's semi-retarded
>>71182263
Only TS and Eminem, this is the first time I've ever heard about this Tila. I'm not american tho, maybe that's why.
>>71182355
This
When your posterchildren are a retard and a gay hating gay who believes in Jesus, you know there is something wrong
>>71182412
Well you arent missing much, had a dating show and I guess modelled a bit then went full tard thinking the Illuminati was after her and that she is a multi dimensional being
I am not being hyperbolic...she really believes that
I missed out on doing HS theater with Dane Dehaan by being just a few towns over.
>>71182346
Anon, SHUT DOWN THE DOOOOOOOOR
>>71176064
I wrote the:
"You have already died. This is hell." post that is seen as a banner every now and then. I cringe every time I see it. It was a joke about le typical self deprecation channer xD and now you niggers took it seriously.
>>71179951
To be fair, he's trying to explain the appeal to Harmon, who is your average pussy redditor.
>>71181952
>>Eminem: very likely
Why the fuck would a wealthy, 40+ year old man post on 4chan?
>>71181127
Rolfe?
Your movie sucked, by the way.
>>71175585
more like /s4s/
>>71182169
Aidan Gillen? nah.
Tom Hardy? after the reddit wreckage? yeah, he even said "he's not that much of a big guy" in an interview. He knows.
Emma probably does.
>>71175923
Still sad I missed that thread. WKUK was my jam for such a long time. I know most episodes by heart.
Kinda still hoping we'll ever see that movie.
Dano
Mark
>>71176097
Like Anton Yelchin
>>71181837
truth
>>71183897
Fat fucking chance. There really arent that many people who come to 4chan in comparison to other sites, and even less who browse /tv/
>>71179935
remove the cat shit
a site posting it on that date doesn't mean that's when she fucking posted her cat
>>71181127
Gunn
>>71181837
God, that picture is the best
>>71181127
McAvoy
>>71179935
Not the same kitten look at the coloring
>>71184442
Sure you are.
Apocalypse was garbage.
>>71181127
Bond
I wonder if renowned Hollywood director Max Landis goes on /tv/
hey guys did you read his fanfics? they're pretty good
>>71184487
Does 4chan actually hate Landis?
>>71175491
lol that was my thread
Marky Mark.
Hasn't Mr. Robot been on here?
>>71184487
lol fuck off Max
>>71184667
In the show, sure. I doubt any of the actors visit 4chans.
>>71175704
Is that Nat Portman? She looks screwed up m8s
>>71176021
Why are you so Goddamn pretentious
>>71184223
>even less who browse /tv/
Please... /tv/ is one of the most visited boards out there. It's up there with /b/ as the newfag board
>>71176021
>.jpg.png.gif.jpg
>>71184524
only clinical retards and tumblrinas don't
>>71184836
Are you calling /b/ a newfag board?
>>71184881
Jesus, anon. Did Landis rape and murder your dog?
>>71184886
It absolutely is
>>71184907
I wish because that would be better than what he really didHe exists and continues to make movies
Gerard Way
>>71184886
Are you saying /b/ isn't a newfag board?
>>71184836
isn't /tv/ like the 5th most visited board?
i know that 1 is /b/ and 2 is /v/
>>71184886
/b/ is everybody's first board
>>71175704
Who is this meth head?
>>71175491
didn't Dane Dehaan stop by once?
I have a vague memory of that
>>71185134
is this real?
>>71184886
newfag containment board
>>71185274
gerard is notorious shitposter
>>71185197
I would say top 5 in no order are /tv/, /b/, /pol/, /v/ and probably some turbofag board like /a/
>>71176159
Figured this would have been Geoff darrow, met him and his daughter at a few shows and she is hot as shit and pretty young
>>71185073
His last movie was dumbed the fuck down by the studio...other than his films and their quality, he doesn't seem like that shitty of a guy
>>71185058
>>71185180
>>71185215
>>71185324
Can confirm. /b/ was my first board back in '06.
Now I only visit the best boards. /v/ and /tv/ ;^]
>>71185324
Idk anon, if that were true,/b/ would be scaring all the newfags to other boards
/b/ does not seem like it is honestly a newfag containment anymore, but I havent honestly been on it in a few months so that could have changed
We know Tom Hardy comes here right? And so does Gosling or Evans, one of the other handsome tv meme guys. I remember the one epic thread where the Evans/Gosling replied with a pic right away, someone said it would be the most perfect thread ever if Tom Hardy showed up and then he posted a pic saying "consider it perfect" or something, and images from both guys were new images. Totally awesome.
>>71185510
I legit hope and believe you're just trolling me
I posted my nudes on here back when I was just a c-list. Now I'm worried it'll come back to haunt me since I just appeared in several big movies. I've seen those detective pics with mole comparisons and it scares me.
>>71181739
like urgh.....I know right
I can't even XD
>>71185267
he browses /a/ because he has superior taste in media
>>71185581
I go there occasionally, its just traps, porn, ylyl and sometimes rekt/gore
its all shit and boring
>>71185672
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.
>>71185538
>Now I only visit the best boards. /v/ and /tv/
>>71185642
No, I dont have assburgers, im not triggered by every director and have the ability to seperate a film from the people who make them
Sorry your autism prevents that
You have rational reasons for why Landis is terrible? Or why I shouldnt think hes just some dude?
>>71185666
Cool story satan
>>71185366
>>71185331
kek this is so stupidly funny
>>71185672
You literally offered nothing faggot
>>71175943
>>71175737
Why are they so easy to trigger?
>>71181952
Taylor Swift has not been here. I mean look at the OP pic, even then anon is pointing out 'we've been over this' as in 'that was fake'
>>71175491
>believing Taylor Swift uses 4chan
>believing Lorde used 4chan
>believing anyone but z-list celebs like trevor moore care about 4chan
this is the most gullible website on the planet
>>71185787
erm? i was agreeing with you
>>71185841
Because they either dont honestly believe the shit they are peddling and get angry at themselves for being provacative shills
Or they are super insecure about their own beliefs so they rage really fucking hard about it and are defensive
Honestly, pick one
>>71179935
Fake. Taylor named her cat after the Grey's Anatomy character like the first one was named after the Law and Order character.
>>71185750
I've read some of his tweets and saw couple of interviews with him and he's so obnoxious i want him to die in a helicopter crash. He likes himself way too much and all his movies suck beginning from the writing. Also he looks like a faggot
And I think you have both assburgers and autism if you can't see obvious exaggerations in an anonymous image board
He tries to find comfort in discussing his "movies"
Doug TenNapel posted on /v/ one time
My father works for Nintendo and posted on here once
>>71186027
"Anon you are exaggerating"
>I want Landis to die in a helicopter crash because of his tweets and interviews
>he looks like a faggot
>I want him to just die
Wew, and I have autism...
>>71181127
Woods
>>71186231
*cant see exaggerations
I should have written
>>71186027
Sounds like you are covering up
You probably just want to fuck him
>>71186231
what
>>71186314
I aint never said that sex wouldnt be an option but i still think hes feces in a humanoid form
>>71181739
>The Right wont fucking adapt to the 21st century
>It is the current year gosh,if you dont agree with my ideology based on feelings ,you live in the past because you know, it is the current year/decade/century
You fuckers are dumb as fuck.
>>71186027
>anon is asked to provide rational reasons for disliking Landis
>is told he seems triggered
"Im not triggered"
>"Landis looks like a faggot and I want him to die"
Def not a triggerd autistic, nope
>>71185933
I'm glad you were finally able to apply your authoritarian knowledge on the conception of the names of Taylor Swift's cats
>>71186371
>cuckservative
>has the audacity to call others dumb
>>71186371
I never even said what my ideologies were, but if the majority of your party is refusing to change, and even goes as far as openly fucking denying global scientific consesus on very obvious shit, then I dont know how else to label it
Do you have a better word than regressive? Do you have a better term for "blatant disregard for modern science"?
This isnt about whos ok what team, The Right as a political entity legit wont change their policies... Sometimes a vase is a fucking vase anon
>>71186395
LDF in full force
Why does someone not liking him trigger you so much?
>>71186371
Here we go with the conservative special snowflakes who get triggered
Countdown to when you start calling everyone a liberal starts now
>>71175491
Larry David obviously.
>/b/ - Trevor Moore, Taylor Swift
>/tg/ - Vin Diesel, Fëanor
>/pol/ - Tila Tequila
>/tv/ - Larry David
>/v/ - Todd Howard
Vin Diesel browses /tg/.
>>71181952
If Jones is anything like his father he must be the king of shitposting.
>>71186485
It doesnt.
>>71186482
Both the left and the right are anti science dummy. The left opposes transgenic food for example. So has the left failed to adapt to the 21st century?
>>71186525
So it's ok for non-conservatives to get triggered then >>71181739?
>>71186540
What ?
>>71186534
>/tv/
>Not Shane Carruth
>>71186584
I wasnt talking about the Left though, thays deflactionary. You cant deflect a point by saying "well, why are you talking about (B) who does that too?
Sure, but wait till that comes up in a fucking conversation. It doesnt make me any less correct to talk about the regressive right...
>>71185197
Hell no, my threads have lasted hours without replies at times.
>>71186462
Can you tell me a success comparable to Singapure's or South Korea from your dumb ideology?
>>71181952
add Dane DeHaan
>>71177280
no it's just a bad angle and shitty phone camera
>>71184813
my next movies will not be pretentious at all I promise
>>71186482
if you are going on about global warming maybe you should actually read the 'scientific' papers making the 97% claims
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024/pdf
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/#3e8562c85909
>>71186584
The difference is magnitutde, frequency and willingness to change policies
For its faults, the Left manages to change slightly more than the Right... The magnitutde of allowing policies to change and platforms to evolve are not the same between parties
They arent.
>>71186647
My point is that both sides have very antiscientific stances. Conservatives like Ron Paul,which I didnt support,believed in climate change. You are the one cherry picking examples
>>71175491
Adam Sandler or Josh whats his face
>>71186591
Calling the Alt right cancer is being "triggered"? Even the right hate the alt right faggot
>>71186659
>frogposting
Jesus fucking christ
>>71186746
So it's only triggering if people who you don't like insult things?
>>71186766
damn you sure told him.
>>71186734
Both sides have antiscience stances, but their frequencies and magnitudes are clearly not the same
Why is it that if one party is clearly being torn the fuck apart and becoking dated and someone points that out, they are being partisan and then I have to be equal and assume both parties are always the same?
Why cant the actual truth be that right NOW, one party is failing more at adapting than other parties? I dont need to be a dem or a republican to see that
>>71186713
>The difference is magnitutde, frequency and willingness to change policies
Literally what?
> For its faults, the Left manages to change slightly more than the Right
Change for the worst. Things like affirmative action or allowing transgenders to compete in female competitions is just dumb crap.
> The magnitutde of allowing policies to change and platforms to evolve are not the same between parties
It depends on the platform. For example antiFed or pro-state rights people will find the republican platform way more appealing for the change that they want.
>>71186776
I clearly said that...
>>71186879
You don't get how childish that thinking is?
>>71179935
dont forget the update
>>71186829
What is it that you think they need to adapt to? Political systems are made based on human psychology & technology. Neither have changed significantly recently.
>>71186829
>Both sides have antiscience stances, but their frequencies and magnitudes are clearly not the same
Because you say so? Things like "gender is about identity" ,"nuclear is bad"or "anti-transgenics " are the most anti-scientific stances in the current political spectrum. Way more than the anti-climate change lobby.
> Why cant the actual truth be that right NOW, one party is failing more at adapting than other parties? I dont need to be a dem or a republican to see that
No. Both parties are failing hard. And the democrats with their anti-fracking campaing(Sanders say an extremelly unscientific thing about it) or the nuclear shut down proposals are totally moronic. You are just influenced by sheer ideology,that blinds your judgement
all of them
How did you find 4chan anons
>Be me
>Hear about the hacker known as 4chan and anonymoose
>Find myself on /b/ when cp was barely regulated
>wtf.jpg
>Been here 5 years now
>>71186674
Lol nice bait...
Well, you must be right, it isnt like the entire global community has done any recent research on climate change
But oh man, no more climate change, anon produced two articles, one from Forbes...they have NEVER been biased about climate change. OBVIOUSLY their findings offset all the new data and resesrch since that article was written or any information that was compiled before that article
Anon just cracked the case.
>>71177824
Only Roiland does and all he does is start shitpost threads on /co/.
And one of the storyboard artists was a /fit/izen
>>71186990
If you actually bothered to read them you would see the scientific paper is by john cook who is pro climate change, and the reason I posted it, is becauses it's the source of the 97% bullshit. If you read it it's obviously blatant statistical fraud and manipulation.
But hey you are entitled to your >feelings.
>>71186965
The gender thing people get confused with biological sex, they arent scientifically wrong about that. Gender is not sex
As for nuclear, last time I checked the left was moderately split with it and the concerns have been not that "nuclear is bad" but that nuclear is something that can easily go out of control unless regulated and we dont have the money or infastrature right now to go dependent on it
None of this is denying science, but then compare this to the right who vehemently deny, despite the entire globe reaching a consensus, that humans have a massive envionrmental impact on the planet
From the examples you mentioned: one side isnt denying science, they are debating economic usages and how that would effect the market and the enviornment
The other thinks you can straight up disregard enviornmental science completely.
>>71175771
Evidence?
I just started listening to Biggest Problem in the Universe podcast and love that guy. I can see him on 4chan but idk about /pol/.
>>71187090
Dont expect any reasonable answer from reddit tier pseudo-intelectuals.
>>71187090
Again, it doesn't offset all the new data...it doesnt make all the new data (of which is considerable) void.
The consensus is still in that 90ish percent range, even after minor statistical fraud is factored out
But I guess that doesnt matter to your own "feelings" and confirmation biases.
>>71185134
WHEN I WAS A YOUNG BANE
>>71187147
Anti-Transgenics aren't just denying science? And the antifracking comment of Sanders is as unscientific as it gets
>>71187219
You think fracking is good for the enviornment? Despite the scientific community saying no, it isn't?
Im not sure what your argument is... Because fracking isnt a positive thing, but Bernie being anti fracking, is anti science?
>>71187196
Cool source.
>>71187219
Also, where do you get that the left is "anti transgenetic" science?
>>71187255
Bernie anti-fracking tweet was ignorant as fuck, and if you know geology you would acknowledge it.It is funny how you keep ignoring transgenics
>>71187307
Is this a formal discussion now about climate change?
Are we really debating its existence now? Do we need to? Im not turning this into a /pol/ parade
>>71187324
Because they have been opposing them for a while
>>71187364
But him being anti-fracking isnt "anti science".
The comparison you made only works if Bernie outright denies that fracking exists. He isny denying the science, hes denying the practice.
The right denies there is even any actual science to begin with.
There is clearly a diaconnect here anon.
>>71187376
It's whatever you want it to be cupcake. It's a moot point because the majority of pollution isn't from the U.S. so regardless of how minute global warming is you aren't going to effect it.
>>71187394
Okay, what does that fucking MEAN though? What specifically are you referring to?
>>71186462
>tu quoque
Why is every liberal "argument" just an obnoxious fallacy? I've literally never seen a liberal try to debate without immediately resorting to ad hominem, strawman, ad lapidem or trying to shout their opponents down with some other childish bullshit.
That's when they're not just crying that everyone else should be censored or running away to a "safe space."
If you're spouting "progressive" shite and you're not a shill or a child then I have bad news for you: You're an idiot.
>>71187448
His assertions are very ignorant he contradicted the EPA, about the impact of fracking on water, with no evidence. Bernie just ignores the science behind it and spews totally ignorant comments
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/hf_es_erd_jun2015.pdf
You seem to know very little science, for claiming to defned it anon
>>71187476
That statement was retarded. You dont have to be the ONLY big producer of pollution, to produce pollution... The US is still one of the largest producers of pollution and trash. China doing it more doesnt magically make it better for us.
Jesus fuck..why is /tv/ becoming /pol/? You have to go back
>>71181952
>>Eminem: very likely
Marshall literally doesn't even know how to use computers beyond music.
>>71187489
They oppose the commercialization and development of transgenics, which is just unscientific.
>>71187530
Dont know how you got the idea that I dont underatand science bc I said that there is a difference in saying that Bernie being stupid about fracking is not the same concept as if he was ignoring that fracking was real...
>>71187577
You are still being vague.
>>71187604
No. Bernie said that "Fracking is polluting US water reserves" which has been proven wrong by the EPA.That is unscientific as fuck.
>>71176159
It was Warren Ellis.
>>71187632
Transgenics producing cancer, for example, that is a l claim of the anti GMO collective
>>71187519
Maybe you are projecting that everyone who acts like that is a liberal? Maybe you are projecting a shit ton?
If anyone uses the word "progressive" it is automatically retarded or wrong?
Wee, lad.
>why cant I argue with liberals without fallacies
>produces fallacies and generalizations of those liberals
Anon, I think I know where to start fixing the problem....
>>71181952
>Eminem: very likely
No.
She lost all the weight after all the bullying on tv
>>71175491
One would think coming to this place would be career suicide what with all the shrieking overly sensitive types calling for holy war against websites like this.
>>71187674
I lived near a place where fracking fucked up the water...
That shit literally does happen, which the EPA also says...they never said "fracking is perfect". Are you saying that dirty fucked up water we couldnt drink was all in my head?
>>71179475
Even if a celebratty posted a timestamp he could never be bro because people are assholes.
The famous person will be called an attention whore etc..
Just like when a girl posts.
>>71183852
>yeah, he even said "he's not that much of a big guy" in an interview.
Post the interview.
>>71187707
Majority of dems arent anti GMOs, they just want proper labelling for them.
>>71187782
The EPA report clearly states that there is no evidence about Sandres' claim.So it is pretty much unscientific.Quoting the report; "did not find evidence" that fracking has "led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States."
>>71187545
U.S. is 1/7th the worlds co2 emissions, do you really think even if you could ban 50% of that it would be worth the economic downturn? Do you even have alternatives or do you think you can just ban/tax corporations/factores and force them overseas?
>Jesus fuck..why is /tv/ becoming /pol/?
because one of you tumblrettes got triggered that someone mentioned the alt right
>>71187756
Good lass. Can't win an oscar if you're dead from a potato and cupcakes overdose.
>>71187674
The EPA has changed their statements on fracking at least twice publically, they say on their official site that they are undergoing a new study, supposedly more comprehensive after what happened out west a few years ago
https://www.epa.gov/hydraulicfracturing
When you have real world events that happen where fracking legitmately fucks up an ecosystem, you cant say being anti fracking is "unscientific"
>>71187870
But then they did, a year ago...when fracking did the very thing you think fracking doesnt do.
>>71187895
Are you implying that nothing should then be actually done?
>>71187715
I'm a moderate. I'm not in any way racist or misogynist or homophobic, I love all groups (except adult followers of certain ideologies) and I have a diverse group of friends and family.
I've tried debating liberals all over the internet as a moderate and have only ever been banned from the forum for questioning the narrative, or been dismissed as another bigoted stereotype without a single point being fully addressed. On the rare occassion someone does address one of my points and receives a response, they soon resort to the aforementioned bullshit tactics and avoid any further debate.
I've tried to be respectful and open-minded, but have yet to hear any argument in favour of "progressive" policies that didn't quickly collapse into insults, lies and avoidance.
I'm not making assumptions based on projections or bias, I'm speaking from direct experience over years of discussion in forums all over the internet.
>>71188048
Oh man...this is too good to not be bait
>>71188073
Case in point.
Rather than address my points you go directly to spouting ad lapidem bullshit. No attempt at reasoning, just flat dismissal.
There's no evidence you even read my post at all.
>>71187963
No they didnt.They say that they would study the isolated cases, but the study conclusion as whole was that it didn't.>>71187916
M8, I alredy posted the 2015 report,which is the final draft.
>>71188006
No I am pragmatic, if you want to do something first
>show problem
>show solution
>show projected benefits outweighing costs
>>71184886
/b/ is a gateway board.
>>71188214
Well, the benefits of keeping your planet clean and livable seem blatantly obvious, dont they?
Being pragmatic is not fucking up the only livable habitat in the solar system and having that as your species' priority.
If that seriously isnt first on your list, then we deserve to go extinct
>>71185274
Yes.
https://twitter.com/gerardway/status/691639232993951744
https://twitter.com/gerardway/status/691643897970167808
Can't find the good morning one though mainly because he tweets it almost every day
>>71188145
You dont know if im liberal, and your post was somewhat a pander...to yourself, and hoe cool, calm and collected you think you are. It must be the majority of liberals who are wrong. Youve had discussions over years, why cant they see you for the rational and wonderful person you are?
Indeed, it is the entire liberal agenda at fault.
>>71188048
Besides talking about yourself, what exactly are your points?
>>71188276
You skipped the first 2.5 steps and added just a hint of muh guilt. Protip you cant just replace everything with wind and solar.
>>71188276
M8 fracking has done more to reduce CO2 emissions than wind and solar combined.
>>71188426
The problem is destruction of our natural enviornments and ruining our limited resource of air and water
The solutions are not easy...that doesnt make this any less a priority.
You cant replace everything with wind or solar? Oh, you have been to the future? I suppose we can never go to the moon too? We will be using horses forever?
Im not quite sure what your argument is
>>71188470
Source?
>>71188470
I dont think the EPA has a long term relationship in mind for fracking
>>71188426
I think you are confusing pragmatism with a dash of light defeatism
Source: coming from a pragmatist
>>71188554
https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2016-Main-Text.pdf
It has reduced CO2 emitions by a lot.Only nuclear and hydro has reduced proportionally more emissions of Co2.
>>71188398
Follow the reply chain. My point is that whenever I see someone challenging conservative or moderate political views, their attempt at arguing is never based on evidence or reasoning, only on bullshit debate tactics.
>>71188359
I'm not asking anyone to see me as anything, only for someone to approach a single political debate from the so-called "progressive" point of view with a reasoned argument based on facts.
I don't want or expect that ITT, maybe I'm just venting, but the more I see people try to challenge conservative views the more I'm convinced there is no substantial argument being presented.
>>71187756
Was she fat or just thick?
>>71188594
The change from coal to natural gas, has redcued CO2 emissions by a lot
>>71188721
Which is great. Right?
>>71188713
you decide
>>71188515
>Im not quite sure what your argument is
my argument is that you have no solutions and havent even proven there is a problem.
>You cant replace everything with wind or solar? Oh, you have been to the future?
I guess we should just hope for solar and wind to magically become efficient and useful in the future.
>>71188688
There are plenty of progressives that are debatable. You are projecting as if someone being progressive or conservative effects their ability to articulate their beliefs...it doesnt.
Bad personal experiences are not definitive examples for facts.
>>71188799
Can't really tell from that pic.
>>71188788
yes
>>71188359
If the liberals are right then why can't one of them produce one single convincing argument?
Their debate methodology is religion-tier. At the White Privilege Conference actual professors claim logic is racist. At XOXO, Sarkeesian claimed people should "Listen and Believe" when women claim they've been harassed or abused in any way. It's ridiculous that adults are swallowing this crap.
>>71188801
Okay you are shitposting a bit now, carbon emissions are a problem..the human race does produce far too much of it. I dont think there is a single reasonable government body that argues this in the 21st century. That is the "problem". The obvious dummy answer is "produce less", but this is difficult...nobody is saying the solutions are easy to attain. But you need to change SOMETHING. You cant just wallow in your own feces and pretend the feces doesnt exist and act like you dealt with the problem.
You also dont need immediate solutions to state there are problems that exist.
>>71176118
Catpiss is probably melanon
>>71188801
Are you retarded? Wind is already useful...so is solar. It becomes increasingly more useful every year...
>>71189005
if co2 is the problem why dont you just plant more trees?
>>71189038
Do you want a serious answer to your autism tier question?
>>71188836
I never said political views affect the ability to articulate views, only that progressive liberals, in my experience, have always refused to debate or present an argument rationally.
If there was a reasonable argument, wouldn't I have seen it presented by now? I can only conclude that there isn't one, yet people still insist on pushing these apparently unfounded views using bullshit fallacies.
Where can I go to have a polite, reasoned debate about politics where progressive liberals will listen to my argument and present a reasoned counter-argument? I've looked everywhere and found only censorship, abuse and childish fallacies.
>>71188937
Oh sorry, I didnt realize you were full blown trolling now. I was just going to rationally point out that you are still generalizing and how generalizations are not indicative of a whole group...plenty of solid left arguments that make sense, you probably even subscribe to most of them yourself.
Facts arent inherently left or right, but if you twist them into an agenda then you are doing yourself and everyone around you a disservice
>>71188470
Natural gas is great but actual Fracking is all but indefensible.
>>71188195
dude stfu already godamn kill yourself
>>71189079
Concluding that there isnt one based on a party line or ideology line is your first error though.
>>71189137
>but actual Fracking is all but indefensible
What?
Where do you think that the surplux of gas that has allow the transition to happen has come from?
>>71189033
Can you show proofs? I looked it up and its at 0.2 and 4.1 percent of national energy production
>>71189134
>full blown trolling
More ad lapidem.
>generalising
Observing an unswerving pattern is not generalising.
>>71189191
>dude stfu already godamn kill yourself
Nice argument
>>71189061
yes but only if you are the one I was replying to.
>>71188195
Did you read the full report though?
>>71189192
If I'd concluded there wasn't one I wouldn't still be looking for one (see my last line).
>>71189226
wind and solar in the US are less than 1% of the energy produced.
>>71189264
I was...
>>71189235
Unswerving pattern?
You are legit generalizing based on nothing except your own range of limited experiences, and using THAT to determine your beliefs for entire demographics of people
That is exactly what a generalization is.
>>71189199
I know where it came from, not commenting on that. The process of Fracking rapes the water table. Smog probably won't matter as much when there's fuck all clean water.
>>71189374
So because somewhere out there, there MIGHT be a reasonable progressive argument, it's wrong to assume there isn't one?
There MIGHT be a unicorn out there, but we assume otherwise based on observation.
>>71189226
So if we produce very little wind energy, we should stop trying to use wind, and ergo fulfill our self fulfilling prophecy that wind will never be useful?
>>71189412
EPA says otherwise
>>71189499
>ask for proofs
>did not recieve proofs
>>71189484
Do you not get the logical fallacy you are producing?
>>71189540
EPA are fucking dumbasses then.
>>71189548
Please enlighten me.
![1458140843953[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/1jsR5df.jpg "1458140843953[1]")
