[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

New /tv/ manual


Thread replies: 24
Thread images: 10

File: maxresdefault.jpg (42KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
maxresdefault.jpg
42KB, 1280x720px
>100% - Everybody thought it was good, came out at right time but years later appears average
>70-99% - Very pleb friendly flick with the odd patrician speaking up stating its the same old shit they've seen before
>40-69% - Genuine mixed opinions. Either a Marmite film or just a pleb friendly flick with too many gimmicks
>20%-39% - Niche Masterpiece hated by the plebs because of low intellect. Years later becomes recognised for its accolades
>0-19% - dogshit
Prove me wrong
Pro-tip: you cant
>>
>>>/reddit/
>>
File: Capture.png (249KB, 980x363px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Capture.png
249KB, 980x363px
>>70666230
...
>>
>>70666486
but thats correct
>>
>>70666230
Hello Duncan and Zack.
>>
>>70666486
>average rating 9.4
Do you know how to read rotten tomato scores?
>>
>>70666230
>paying this much attention to RT
You might be the pleb.
>>
>>70666511
What are you saying, that the RT score is correct because it accurately reflects the quality of the movie, or that OP is correct because Citizen Kane was considered good at the time but now appears average?
>>
>>70666486
>every single review is "it's good because that's what I've been taught to think without actually realizing WHY the movie is good, even though it's not really that good, just groundbreaking"
>>
>>70666618
the latter, as most old films will appear average after time
>>
>>70666230
I think the funniest thing about /tv/ finally realising that Rotten Tomatoes is not indicative of a films quality is that it's a response to critics trashing Batman Vs Superman, ironically, a movie that actually deserves it low score.
>>
File: 1459641575492.png (255KB, 770x711px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1459641575492.png
255KB, 770x711px
>>70666230
>>
>>70666646
But that fucking wrong, you retard. Citizen Kane is, many years later, generally considered to be a masterpiece.
>>
File: youre serious.jpg (50KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
youre serious.jpg
50KB, 1280x720px
>its a terrible forced meme episode

keep oversaturating it so it burns out badly by the end of the week, please
>>
>>70666486

too be fair this is childish quipshit.
>>
>>70666486

I'm going to be real mad if you basement dwellers start shitting on Citizen Kane.
>>
File: 1461897335416.png (33KB, 917x1186px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1461897335416.png
33KB, 917x1186px
>>70666710
I hate this place.
>>
File: Capture.png (404KB, 975x425px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Capture.png
404KB, 975x425px
>>70666230
>>70-99% - Very pleb friendly flick with the odd patrician speaking up stating its the same old shit they've seen before
>>
File: Capture.png (481KB, 989x397px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
Capture.png
481KB, 989x397px
>>70666230
>20% to 39% - Niche Masterpiece hated by the plebs because of low intellect. Years later becomes recognised for its accolades
>>
File: masterpiece.jpg (51KB, 750x319px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
masterpiece.jpg
51KB, 750x319px
>>70666230
>20%-39% - Niche Masterpiece hated by the plebs because of low intellect. Years later becomes recognised for its accolades
>>
File: flawless.jpg (50KB, 749x312px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
flawless.jpg
50KB, 749x312px
>>70666230
>Niche Masterpiece
>>
>>70666694
for you, perhaps
>>
>>70667074
>>70666964
>>70666832
>>70666773
all correct
>>
File: pleb friendly.jpg (47KB, 749x345px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
pleb friendly.jpg
47KB, 749x345px
>70-99% - Very pleb friendly flick with the odd patrician speaking up stating its the same old shit they've seen before
Thread replies: 24
Thread images: 10
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK