Old one had reached the image limit. Fresh start, shall we?
>>47412938
>>47412938
>>47412950
>Bitter Irony
or
>Making a joke at the party's expense
>>47413267
Shattered Glass?
>>47413395
No, it in the latest comics.Megatron decided to try not being a hate filled warmonger, got stuck with Hotrod.
>>47413267
I like this Megatron, can we keep him?
>>47413487
I wish.
>>47412938
>>47413636
My brain is hurting trying to figure out how this happened.
>>47413670
Probably jilling it in the car, then they hit a bump in the road.
>still makes me laugh every time
>>47413180
Should just call it "PCs", really.
>>47413969
Is that Tom?
>>47413524
Filename doesn't make much sense when it's really just "turn back to explosion you caused to look cool, Danish edition".
>>47414041
I already have a lot of variations on "PCs" so now I try to make a funny, yet descriptive filename so I can find them later for other uses.
>>47413969
What a sad, sad existence.
>>47413670
>>47413690
More like there were already holes there and the stuck the shoes in as a joke.
>>47414213
Speaking of that file name, I remember someone making a deck based solely on getting Shaharazad and as many copies of Shaharazad activated and into play as possible in order to just atrophied the opponent. It was annoying as hell.
>>47414305
That just raises the question of how the holes got there in the first place.
>>47413609
>>47414305
I don't know if you've ever dealt with broken glass before, but you don't get two perfectly sized holes at equal distance apart that just coincidentally fit a pair of high heels like that.
>>47413380
>Taking a saying literally
or
>Trying to interact with the No Fun Allowed Paladin.
>>47413180
>tall chavvy fighting idiot of old
my sides
>>47414321
That's what I named it after, actually. I have that screencap somewhere....
>>47414961
I need an explanation of what this is.
>>47414471
There are so many more plausible ways those holes could be there than high heeled shoes getting jammed through it. Hell they angle they'd have to pierce at even possible from the inside of the car.
>>47415010
There's a story behind this that I feel like I shouldn't ask for, but I am.
>>47415095
Reminds me about that one picture where a car is bent at a 90* angle in a parking garage and another car is flat on the ceiling being held up by the bent car.
>>47415185
Those are full of unintentionally aged piss.
>>47415267
I thought they were cum.
>>47415185
>>47415267
>>47415287
on /b/ there was a guy who bottled his cum and showed /b/ on christmas every year.
>>47415185
That is Jizzus. He would post on b every December 26 with a years supply of bottled cum.
>>47414605
Is that Six String Samurai? I haven't seen that in ages.
>>47415341
Oh. I thought he sat at his computer and only drank that bottle of soda and then pissed it out back into the bottle. Thought that was why the colors were different.
>>47413670
It's probably an art piece
>>47416844
I dislike steak, and this still brings a deep, burning pain to my heart.
>>47416897
>I dislike steak
>>47416944
Hey, that's rude. Even if I dislike it myself, I can appreciate that others enjoy it, and I can spend the time to understand what you do and don't do with a good steak. Maybe it's a bit much to expect from 4chan, but I'd appreciate a bit of similar respect.
>>47416844
>stop liking what i don't like
You'll never have many friends with that attitude.
>>47416844
>well done steak is bad
Er... okay? that's a nice opinion I guess
>>47417025
>Er... okay? that's a nice opinion I guess
It's common practice to use the worse quality cuts for well done steak because it won't taste different.Order it close to well done instead and you'll get higher quality meat you can send back to the chef to burn if you really need it to.
>>47412938
my thumb started throbbing in pain when I saw this.
>>47417129
This is a genius idea, thank you.
>>47417011
>>47417025
If I wanted meat with the texture of shoe leather I'd have beef jerky.
>>47416993
I want to hear this clickety clack.
>>47417322
If I wanted meat with the texture of shoe leather I'd have tongue fucked your mom.
>>47417393
>Tonguefucking a box of ash
Disgusting, even by 4chan standards.
>>47413003
Jeez louise, you got me friend.
>>47416415
not
>where is your god now human?
>>47417194
Honestly I use to eat well done, so I know how to dodge bad meat.
I also have been moving my way up towards rare(r cooks) has left me with a happier pallette. Try eating Medium-Well every once in a while Anon. It's fantastic every once in a while.
>>47414961
Please tell me this was made as a parody of cartoons. If this was made in earnest i feel like i may be physically ill.
>>47413650
Fuck this made me laugh. This scene is a constant joke between me and the mates.
>>47417025
They ordered cuts of meat that are best cooked less than that, from animals that have been selectively bred over many generations to produce meat that is tastiest rare or medium.
Yes, personal preferences vary, but it's like drinking Dom Perignon out of an old army boot, or setting cold drinks on an antique table without a coaster. You're using beautiful things in ways that degrade the work that went into crafting them, and in almost all cases it's because you either don't care or don't understand their history beyond the price tag - otherwise you'd use a more suitable object to achieve the same result, at a better price.
>>47417411
He did say well done.
>>47413180
I am totally making 'Mickey Two Suits' into a shadowrun character.
>>47414696
>An ineffective gun design for a small mounted cannon with 9 successive shots existed a long time ago
>Therefore george washington wanted me to bring an AK to Wal-mart
>>47417592
Slippery slope tho. I always want to chow down on raw slabs of meat when I'm cooking now.
>>47417326
i looked it up too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKm9eM2BuM0
>>47417625
S A V A G E
A
V
A
G
E
>>47419072
MUH HIGH CAPACITY ASSAULT CLIPS KILLIN THE CHILDRENS
Any gun is inherently safe. Don't buy the liberal line
>>47419072
There's nothing inherently wrong with bringing an AK to Walmart if everybody is bringing their AK to Walmart.
>>47419589
No one cares about your 'feelings' on our rights or your fake Detroit cred, dude.
>>47419708
I'm not using OUR militia as an example, because there is no infrastructure for actually making sure the people buying guns are trained in their use. That's why I said like Switzerland, which forces civilians to train in the military and own a rifle.
>>47419721
Ah the "nuclear deterrent" argument, because the cold war was a really great time for everyone.
>>47419735
Actually yes, yes they do. That's how democracy fucking works, everyone gets to have 'feelings', or as adults call them, 'political views', and share them without being silenced by whoever has a gun. You're thinking of a dictatorship, that's the one where only the people with guns get to have political opinions.
>>47419802
If you don't want to be a responsible member of the militia, then that's on you.
Also, the ATF would have a collective aneurysm and then shoot millions of dogs if the government started arming every member of the militia (Including the non-citizens) with the same gear the National Guard gets. And then taxes would probably be raised to cover the cost to boot.
>>47414696
>>47419072
>>47419496
>>47419589
>>47419708
>>47419721
>>47419735
>>47419802
>>47419841
Semi-serious image. Maybe this thread could get back on track.
>>47419802
>Ah the "nuclear deterrent" argument, because the cold war was a really great time for everyone.
You know, all things considered, nuclear deterrence did prevent another major world war. Sure proxy wars were fought all over the place, but nothing compared to the level of destruction WWI and WWII brought.
>>47419894
The 2A isn't needed to stop people taking it away. It exists on the idea that either A: the government will become dictatorship and the people will need to revolt, or B: the british will kick down your door.
A: the government IS corrupt, YOU haven't and won't do shit about that with your gun because you don't want to fight, you just want to play with your toy and pretend it makes you a big man. Plus, if the government comes for your guns you COULDN'T fight them off, because your AK isn't going to take down their drones and tanks.
B: a land invasion of America is unfeasible to the point of impossibility.
There is no justification for you NEEDING your gun other than that you WANT it. Your "Right to bear arms" has lost all it's original justification and is now nothing more than the circular logic of "I need this gun in case someone says I can't have it".
>>47419900
Yeah it was liberal policies that destroyed detroit, all those liberal policies we don't have in any way shape or form. Not corrupt politicians stealing money and the decline of industry in America. You know nothing about Detroit whatsoever, don't pretend you do, and don't just lie about shit to try and bolster your argument.
>>47413180
>The ginger drunk twat called angus
My sides
>>47413969
>OP of wagecuck threads
>>47419802
>Ah the "nuclear deterrent" argument, because the cold war was a really great time for everyone.
Nobody said anything about deterrence. Rather, if something is normalized in daily life, such as people everywhere with guns, then it's no big thing to see someone else with a gun. No crime is being committed, so no big deal.
But the fact that you brought up deterrence is an additional plus, so thanks.
Can't you all kindly fuck off ?
>>47419981
What's this reference from?
>>47419945
>It exists on the idea that either A: the government will become dictatorship and the people will need to revolt, or B: the british will kick down your door.
Since we have a presidential candidate who has declared the goal of removing it, and another presidential candidate that is widely believed to be about to herd people into death chambers, I'd say the chance that the 2A will become immediately relevant is 50-100%.
>Plus, if the government comes for your guns you COULDN'T fight them off,
If the government is using tanks and drones on its own citizens, guess what, the new American Revolution is a guaranteed success and the US Federal Government will have lost all its credibility.
>There is no justification for you NEEDING your gun other than that you WANT it.
1. Its a civil right.
2. Again, democrats mostly believe Literally Hitler has a chance of being elected, and Hillary has declared her intent to destroy the 2A. Therefore, its completely justified.
>Your "Right to bear arms" has lost all it's original justification
Not at all, its more relevant than ever.
>the decline of industry in America.
Thanks unions! Even now, behind curtain #3, there's a candidate less likely to kill millions of people, who nonetheless STRONGLY believes that all Americans who earn $14.99/hr or less need to lose their jobs, and whose policies will chase more and more corporations out of America. Hillary has likewise stated her intent to close down the coal industry and who knows what else.
So yes, you and the other liberals want to see the same factors that destroyed Detroit, ruin the rest of America. Not to mention that you are against people's constitutional rights.
Are you against freedom of speech too, or just the right that ensures America alone keeps its freedom of speech?
>>47419976
>If everyone has guns nobody will shoot people
Yes, if everyone has the ability to shoot, nobody will. What the fuck kind of backwards logic is that? If you soak everything in gasoline nothing will ever burn down right? Because then it will be normalized and fire will stop existing.
I would definitely feel safer if every time someone gets angry they have the ability to shoot a fucking gun. Fuck it, why not just make everyone carry grenades too, that will stop bombing. Make everyone carry crack, no more drug problems.
I'm sure if we got rid of traffic laws then nobody would get in car crashes.
![[clapping intensifies].gif](https://i.imgur.com/41wtLzB.gif "[clapping intensifies].gif")
>>47414864
holy fuck
>>47420006
There's an obscure sci fi franchise about CIS privileged Confederates fighting against Republican clones. An evil order of space wizards sets out to destroy the democratically elected president, a guy named Sheev, who says the immortal words, "So, its treason, then." It is up to Sheev to use his spinning tactics to destroy those who threaten Space America.
>>47414864
>Beaver valley
>>47420050
It's from starwars?
>>47419945
>your AK isn't going to take down their drones and tanks.
Any sort of active resistance against the government would not come in the form of massed armies that could be safely blown away with tanks and drone strikes. It would be massed terrorist/insurgency action aimed at the government and its supporting bodies. The US army didn't exactly make a great showing of itself during its various wars in the Middle East when people used those tactics against them, so I wouldn't write off the ability of a large, motivated, country-wide civilian milita to at the very least disrupt and demoralize the government army. Especially since any action taken against them is going to be spun off as "US GOVERNMENT ATTACKS CIVILIANS" by any and all non-sympathetic press peices the world over.
Of course the problem with this is that most people are fat, lazy, and content to let the rampant corruption and abuses of power endemic to modern government continue just so long as they have a steady supply of iPads and Netflix.
t. non-American.
>>47419721
my buddy brings guns to wal-mart all the time. open carry state!
>>47420050
Forgot to mention, even though Spinnin' Sheev is a great warrior and wizard, he is among the kindest men in the galaxy, who is always there to help mentor the confused, effeminate protagonist, up to and including when his wife talks his best friend into cutting off most of his extremities, possibly including his dong, and leaving him to burn to death in lava.
>>47420100
>Of course the problem with this is that most people are fat, lazy, and content to let the rampant corruption and abuses of power endemic to modern government continue
Or maybe they have noticed what happened to Syria and what happened during the last American civil war and don't want to start killing other Americans when there's a chance of a democratic resolution?
>>47420099
Yes, Spinnin' Sheev is from Star Wars.
>>47420128
You'll have to forgive me for not remembering that quote, it's been a decade since I've seen that movie.
>>47420141
>You'll have to forgive me
A Heretic may see the truth and seek redemption. He may be forgiven his past and will be absolved in death. A Traitor can never be forgiven. A Traitor will never find peace in this world or the next. There is nothing as wretched or as hated in all the world as a Traitor.
>>47419981
SIDES ARE ORBITING PLUTO
>>47420175finding out that Palpatines first name is Sheev made me chuckle so thanks for that
>>47420249
its almost as bad as Darth Vader being calledAnnieback in the day
>>47417602
This is a reconstitution of events as imagined by an immature child fan of the main character.
>>47413031
Is that motherfucking Green Stuff ??
>>47419802
>Ah the "nuclear deterrent" argument
Here's an idea, anon. Why don't you and all your no-guns friends put out signs in front of your buildings declaring it to be a gun-free building? Wear a t-shirt that declares to everyone "I'm not armed."
>You're thinking of a dictatorship, that's the one where only the people with guns get to have political opinions.
Which is why it makes sense for only the government to have guns, right?
>>47420028
So the state of your economy is thoroughly rooted in the whim of corporations?
>>47420475
Are you in favour of more stringent background and psychological checks for prospective and current gun owners?
>>47420629
>wrongthinkers must give up rights
this is not how RIGHTS work
they are UNIVERSAL
>>47420678
Felons should have access to firearms? Iirc, prisoners can't vote. How is this different?
>>47420582
Welcome to America.
>>47420028
Your entire rhetoric is based on speculation and entitlement.
>>47420707
Rights are universally granted to citizens
Felons broke the contract of citizenship and knowingly forfeited their rights in the process
>>47420719
I don't know, buddy, seems kinda shit.
>>47420582
Welcome to planet Earth, unless you like command economies.
>>47420754
But just as a blind person cannot have a driver's license, surely someone deemed unfit should not have access to firearms?
>>47420749
Your entire rhetoric is based on memes.
>>47420756
Yeah, well, the semi-socialist guidance of the economy by the American government via subsidies and tax breaks seems all well and good until you realize that lobbyists and lawmakers are literally paid more by the corporations for special interests than the taxpayers to do their job.
>>47420768
>deemed unfit
And ya blew it.
>>47420771
I'm not the guy you were arguing with.
Just someone who calls it as it is.
Also, filename threads suck ass. Don't even know why I came here.
>>47420780
Which is why citizens united is immoral.
>>47420804
Unconstitutional, really.
>>47414605
I really wanted to enjoy that movie, but they just used "it's supposed to be a cult film", as an excuse to put no effort in.
>>47420813
I think it's immoral because it gives an elected representative two masters, so to speak, which stops him from representing his constituency honestly
>>47420678
Not if they violate another's rights. y'know, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? If someone is mentally unstable or criminally inclined, then their right to a gun doesn't trump my right to live, because giving them a gun puts other people's lives in danger.
It's not black and white, these rights don't exist without context.
>>47420028
>W-we're gonna overthrow the government if it gets REALLY bad, it just hasn't gotten there yet.
Yeah sure thing buddy. Considering the one and ONLY thing you seem to need guns for is protecting your guns, I don't think you should have guns. You're not standing up for anything. you're not actually making a statement about freedom or rights. You're never going to oppose the government or you would have by now. But you haven't, nobody has, nobody is doing a god damn thing. You're being wiretapped, Americans are getting drones set on them, people disappear when the government doesn't like what they say. When exactly are you going to stand the fuck up and do something with that gun you need so much?
Whenever the time comes to fucking stand up and do something you say "well sure things are bad, BUT AS LONG AS I KEEP MY GUN IT CAN'T BE THAT BAD". You just want a toy that makes you feel strong. And they're never going to take away your toy because as long as you get to shoot soupcans and jerk off over it, you'll let them do whatever they want.
You hide with a gun while others are willing to stand up with nothing but picket signs.
>>47420859
>If someone is mentally unstable or criminally inclined, then their right to a gun doesn't trump my right to live,
you seem to assume that "criminal inclination" - a thoughtcrime, not even criminal activity but your paranoid fear - is enough grounds to infringe a constitutional right
If you fear your right to life is under threat, but will not exercise your right to safeguard it, you surely forfeit it
>>47420853
And it's unconstitutional because it gives a single entity that cannot be held accountable for its actions beyond dissolution the ability to greatly skew and detract from the value and potency of millions of voters in favor of ideals, ideas, and issues that do not benefit anyone in the greater American populace but itself and its industry.
No sufficiently educated person thinks that fracking is a good idea or that higher base pay is going to harm the economy or that unregulated business will somehow eventually outperform the strong-arm regulations that paved the way for the widespread socioeconomic boom of the 50's and 60's.
>>47420629
There's already background checks and, for example, concealed carry require you to go through training.
>>47420768
Deemed by whom?
>>47420894
>No sufficiently educated person thinks that fracking is a good idea or that higher base pay is going to harm the economy or that unregulated business will somehow eventually outperform the strong-arm regulations that paved the way for the widespread socioeconomic boom of the 50's and 60's.
WEW LAD
Fracking is how you ecotards are going to be able to keep blogging about DUR EBIL CORPORATIONZ instead of the lights going out, wake up and smell the coffee
>>47420904
But those background checks and concealed carry requirements aren't federal law, anon.
They're state.
>>47420904
>Deemed by whom
Impartial 3rd party NGO.
>>47420913
Or we could just start using thorium for nuclear fission instead.
Oil is harmful, outdated, and only kept in practice because we as a race were so dependent on it, that taking down the infrastructure for it would result in historic layoffs and massive cuts in income streams for the world's elites.
And that's not me being a bleeding heart liberal - that's just scientific and mathematical fact.
>>47420859
>You're being wiretapped, Americans are getting drones set on them, people disappear when the government doesn't like what they say.
And this is the government you want to have all the power.
Think about that for a moment.
>>47420948
Hello Djubvik
>>47420904
>Deemed by whom
society already has a system by which honest men decide if someone has committed a crime and thus forfeited their rights and liberty
funnily enough the liberal intensely distrusts the judiciary and especially law enforcement, precisely because it deals in integrity, safety and justice
>>47420955
Sounds like a nice place.
>>47420859
>You're never going to oppose the government or you would have by now.
We got rid of conscription without armed revolt, so by any objective minded approach we're better off than in the time where the government could arbitrarily round you up and enslave youon the basis of your sex.
>wiretapped
Wow that's sure worse than the draft, and an entirely different kettle of fish.
>Americans are getting drones set on them
Remind me why I care whether a drone or a jet kills ISIS types, retard?Missiles are automated as well, in case you haven't noticed.
>people disappear when the government doesn't like what they say
Sensationalist garbage part of the current anti police fad, and as those anti police fad people are leading the call to ban guns ("you don't need guns because only the cops should have guns, the KKKOPS are RACIST and we need MORE government to protect us from the racists, so they can take away your guns because only RACIST KKKOPS who kill minorities should be able to have guns").
>When exactly are you going to stand the fuck up and do something with that gun you need so much?
Not going to kill Americans because you've sipped the BLM koolaid, sorry.
>Whenever the time comes to fucking stand up
Not going to die for your authoritarian liberal fantasies, sorry. Try again.
>You hide with a gun while others are willing to stand up with nothing but picket signs.
The "others standing up with picket signs" that I'm sure you idolize are barely restrained from murdering people for speech crimes by the knowledge that some of us have guns. So they're serving their purpose.
And plenty of gun owners do in fact protest, with or without guns, so I'm not sure what your point is.
>>47420881
If someone has committed violent crimes in the past they should not be trusted with a tool who's only purpose is violence.
If someone drives drunk they lose the right to drive for the same reason.
What are you arguing? That we should completely remove ALL policing of ALL things? After all, just because someone is a murderer, doesn't mean we can take away their rights by imprisoning them can we? They have the right to commit crimes because they want to and telling them not to would be tyranny. In fact, if someone is stabbing you, you shouldn't be allowed to shoot them because hey, they have a right to the pursuit of happiness and if you try to stop them from stabbing you'd be infringing on that right.
Fuck off with this all or nothing black and white logic. Some people cannot be trusted with guns. Babies shouldn't be given guns. Autists shouldn't be given guns. Criminals shouldn't be given guns.
>>47420953
THEY ALREADY HAVE THE POWER FUCKWIT. I don't want them to have all the power. But I'm not a fucking retard that thinks owning a gun gives me political power. You will NEVER make a difference with your gun. You are a coward, you will stand up to nobody. You claim you need your guns to stand up for the people when the government oppresses us. But you DON'T. Why do you own a gun if you're too much of a coward to use it? It's the whole reason you keep saying you need it right? If you're going to protect us from the government then FUCKING DO IT ALREADY.
>>47420927
>Impartial
>NGO
Contradiction in terms.
>>47420980
>>>people disappear when the government doesn't like what they say
>sensationalist garbage
http://ideas.ted.com/a-brief-history-of-secret-prisons-in-the-united-states/
Stop hiding your head in the sand and read. There's plenty of evidence out there.
Political dissidence is an actual crime in the US.
Surprise.
>>47420992
>Some people cannot be trusted with guns.
Not your place to decide, sorry.
>>47420920
Last I checked, purchasing a firearm from a federally licensed firearms dealer requires a background check.
What states allow concealed carry without a permit?
>>47421036
Whose place is it?
>>47420927
Who decides the 3rd party? Who makes sure they're impartial?
>>47421036
You're right, instead I should get a gun and shoot those people myself. It's my right after all isn't it? They can't NOT give me a gun, that would be unconstitutional.
>>47421059
Nobody's. hundreds of years ago some guys with muskets said so, and since they are perfect omniscient beings we can't argue.
>>47421057
Alaska, Arizona, Kansas, Maine, Montana, Vermont, Wyoming, and West Virginia.
All of them red states except for Vermont.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/06/eight-states-where-2nd-amendment-is-only-carry-permit-required/
>>47421026
Your list is off topic and shit. You have a long list of people detained not because "the government didn't like what they had to say" but because they were members of terrorist and communist organizations.
The idea that I should fight to the death for leftist terrorists who absolutely want me dead is retarded.
First they came for the terrorists, and I said nothing because I was not a terrorist. Then they came for Weather Underground, and I said nothing because I didn't want to bomb random targets. And then everything was pretty good because I'm not a cunt.
>>47421097
>It's my right after all isn't it?
To commit murder? No. Enjoy prison, and/or people shooting you. If you have the guts to institute your system of precrime, be my guest.
>>47420992
>I don't want them to have all the power.
Yet you're giving it to them.
>In fact, if someone is stabbing you, you shouldn't be allowed to shoot them because hey, they have a right to the pursuit of happiness and if you try to stop them from stabbing you'd be infringing on that right.
Well, if we lived in your world, I couldn't shoot them because you made it so that I can't own a gun. Unless it was illegal, at which point I'd be going to jail and the person stabbing me was a good boy, he din do nuffin.
>>47421104
Then don't go into those states, if it frightens you.
>>47421108
The fucking point is that these people were labeled as terrorists despite doing nothing.
You didn't even read.
>>47421144
>The fucking point is that these people were labeled as terrorists despite doing nothing.
Being members of a terrorist organization during an era where most of said terrorist organizations had ties to the gommunists is not "nothing."
Be a member of an enemy state actor that has been sneaking around killing people, get detained as an enemy combatant even though you haven't personally done so: Completely fine.
Same, but of a non state organization: ZOMG THE HUMANITY
>>47421139
If you keep moving that goalpost, we'll be kicking field goals into the Wal-Mart parking lot.
>>47421171
>the feds starting up programs to help the poor and cut down the unjustifiably rich is bad
>the feds jailing innocent people for thoughtcrimes is a-okay because terror
>>47421199
>those poor innocent members of international terrorist organizations dedicated to destroying western civilization
>they are completely innocent, as opposed to members of national terrorist organizations, which are bad even if they do the exact same things
>>47419496
Except Nambus.
>>47421235
No one said a goddamn thing about extremists.
We're talking about members of PETA that speak out against the government being put into Managed Communications Units where they can only get 45 minutes of phone calls a month. Where they get one hour of human interaction a day.
Where they are only given five pieces of paper for letters a month.
Just for disagreeing with the government and being charismatic enough to be considered a plausible threat.
And you're arguing that it's okay.
>>47421319
>PETA
lol you expect me to give a fuck for people who literally think humans are garbage
the fact they're getting what's coming has made my fucking day
>>47421319
>No one said a goddamn thing about extremists.
>We're talking about members of PETA
So, extremists.
>>47421097
>guys with muskets
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belton_flintlock
Multi-shot musket developed around the time of the Revolutionary War and even commissioned by the Continental Congress.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girandoni_air_rifle
Multi-shot air gun the Lewis and Clark expedition, commissioned by Thomas Jefferson, was equipped with.
This >>47414696
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper-box
Weapons capable of holding several loaded chambers at once and be fired consecutively.
The founding fathers were aware of weapons other than muskets existing and didn't see the need to specify that by "arms" they mean single-shot, muzzle loaded flintlocks.
>>47413524
More like Chaotic Badass.
>>47421345
>>47421360
The sociopathy is strong with these.
>>47421319
>No one said a goddamn thing about extremists.
You linked me to a page bemoaning the fate of those poor members of extremist groups (and some legitimate victims, like the Japanese, wasn't aware those were secret tho). I'm not going to be sympathetic to extremist groups, especially ones out to destroy everything I love at all costs.
>PETA
Is a radical extremist group. They are not being imprisoned "for disagreeing with the government," they are imprisoned for being a part of a radical extremist group dedicated to the destruction of western civilization and, more importantly, the death of all pets.
So lets posit 2 scenarios.
There are two organizations: PETA and RETA. RETA is the same as PETA in all respects, except its Russians for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and its financed directly by Putin and takes orders from Moscow, solely pertaining to destroying western civilization, killing all pets, etc. like what PETA wants.
The latter is a state based organization and fair game. The former is stateless. Who the fuck cares?
And you expect gun owners to not only die, but murder fellow Americans -- all so that leftists who hate us, and want us to lose our freedom, and even lose our fucking pets, can avoid facing the consequences of membership in a radical extremist organization? How about no?
>>47420331
Why else would it cost so much? GW has to train divers to collect it.
>>47421408
Nah. Again, wanting people who are members of a fucking radical anti-housecat organization to be held at bay is not "sociopathic." Cry more.
>>47421180
>If you keep moving that goalpost
Do explain.
Because I've never said concealed carry permits are a federal law, just that they exist. And I did ask what states don't require any training and testing for the permits, because I wasn't sure what info I was finding was the most accurate. If you're afraid of people with unregulated license to conceal carry, do not go to the states that have it. States that do have it in place you shouldn't be worried about, if you just want trained and licensed people to carry firearms.
If you're afraid of people from states without regulations on conceal carry coming over to your state, then you might as well be afraid of everyone, because everyone in your state can be illegally carrying a concealed firearm.
>>47421418
>all so that leftists who hate us, and want us to lose our freedom, and even lose our fucking pets, can avoid facing the consequences of membership in a radical extremist organization
Your first mistake was thinking that anyone gives enough of a fuck to actually hate you.
Right now, I don't hate you. I wonder what low-population, creationist preaching, backwater educational system you graduated from, but I don't hate you.
Want you to lose your freedom?
No. I want the rich to be accountable for unethical business practices. I want stricter gun control laws.
But I don't want you to be unable to speak out against the next King of America.
As for your pets, I bet you don't even give a fuck about native fauna because it gophers cut into your cattle raising profits.
At any rate, I bet your parents had money and consequently so do you, made almost exclusively at the expense of someone else - either other people, other countries, or the environment itself. It doesn't matter as long as you're comfortable.
It's cool, man, I get it. Being a sociopath isn't easy.
>>47421418
>members of extremist groups
To some of which we don't even have enough evidence to put them through a trial. Or things like the case of a German citizen named Khalid El-Masri, whose only crime was that his name was almost like Khalid al-Masri that the CIA was hunting, which landed him in Afghanistan for five months to be interrogated and tortured.
Or, you know, how you can be labeled as a white nationalist extremist if you think sharia law isn't the best thing ever. Or a racist if you don't want to bend over backwards for black people.
>>47421478
>Your first mistake was thinking that anyone gives enough of a fuck to actually hate you.
PETA types hate me, they hate the milk in my bowl of fucking cereal, they hate Shamu, they hate my cat, they hate pretty much everything that gives me joy. Even then, I'm probably being too generous.
>I wonder what low-population, creationist preaching, backwater educational system you graduated from, but I don't hate you.
Mmm, grew up in a densely populated city, try again.
>Want you to lose your freedom?
Absolutely. More importantly, PETA does. Remember? The guys who hate essentially everything and want to destroy essentially everything?
>I bet your parents had money and consequently so do you
I am a poor son of a poor dad and so forth and so on.
>It doesn't matter as long as you're comfortable.
Pure projection.
>Being a sociopath isn't easy.
I am sorry to hear that your life isn't easy.
>>47421532
>To some of which we don't even have enough evidence to put them through a trial.
PETA people are pretty vocal.
>Or things like the case of a German citizen named Khalid El-Masri,
Mistakes much bigger than that are made in war all the time. Not a reason to go out and kill.. who do you think I should start murdering, btw? You are clear that the best way for social change is that for gun owners should go out and commit mass murder, and desperately want us to do so until we are all gone, and anything less is being a coward.
>Or, you know, how you can be labeled as a white nationalist extremist if you think sharia law isn't the best thing ever.
Guess how white going out and shooting tons of people or whatever terrorist act you want me to perform will look.
Get fucked.
>>47421478
>I want the rich to be accountable for unethical business practices.
At which point we shouldn't have governments with laws to bail them out when they fuck up. Or subsidize their poor business decisions. Or let governments pass laws that big business has lobbied to stifle the competition.
>>47421563
wut?
All I'm saying is that "these people are rightfully detained because the government says they're part of an extremist group" without ever putting them on trial or presenting any evidence is a bit iffy, especially seeing how well the government can just fuck up.
Hey, you go out there and shoot as many people as you want, I'm not stopping you. Bet you'll go for the population least likely to be armed, though.
>>47420841
That is wrong. The film is made by two dudes on film they fished out of garbage, with clothing from their own closet and music by some random russian bros they met one day. Scenario and stunts where done by dude that plays Buddy and directing by his best friend.
It looks cheap because it is done on non existent budget and they tried to make everything possible out of it.
There is clear difference between this and say Iron Sky that looks like shit because lol cult & lol style.
Also it still looks better than Troma films.
america derailing threads with the shit-flinging idiocy that passes for political discourse there? Must be an election year.
>>47421645
Iron Sky was made to be a cult film?
>>47421673
Sarah Palin vs Moon Nazis ?
Made by memefinns ?
How is it not a cult film ?
>>47421691
Does it have a cult following? Dedicated and passionate fanbase? An elaborate subculture that engage in repeated viewings, quoting dialogue, and audience participation?
>>47417221
Underrated
>>47421640
>without ever putting them on trial or presenting any evidence is a bit iffy
You said that gun owners were cowards for not having violent meltdowns because some people who want to destroy civilization had their feewingz hurt. All you've done is convince me the government sometimes works to earn its daily bread.
There can be no peace between those who do their best to destroy the USA and those who have even a passing interest in its continued existence. Let them rot.
>>47421747
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/iron-sky-the-coming-race--2#/
Enough to warrant a second film and pay for it so i guess it does.
>>47421964
>You said that gun owners were cowards
No, I didn't. That was a different anon.
>>47422029
Do give me your definition of a cult film.
>>47415898
Of course, the most reasonable answer gets ignored.
>>47422129
camp or bad film that is liked because of it's camp or ironically by hipsters.
obviously camp or quality are subjective so it is up to you decide what makes it.Oxford definition of it is Camp = Ostentatious, exaggerated, affected, theatrical; effeminate or homosexual; pertaining to or characteristic of homosexuals
>>47413618
Jesus, I winced.
>>47422192
Is Iron Sky liked by hipsters? I mean, even if someone likes it, and it's bad, doesn't really make it a cult film. And it's not like you can really go out and plan on making a cult film, the audience is the one who decides whether or not it becomes a cult film. Without a following it's just a (bad) film.
>>47422175
Seems to be a running theme in this thread. I was wondering how the shitposting had gotten so out of hand that there were 200+ replies in a 60-image filename thread. It's like a Nigri thread on /gif/ - when you see the ratio you realise you should abandon all hope.
>>47421478
>At any rate, I bet your parents had money and consequently so do you, made almost exclusively at the expense of someone else - either other people, other countries, or the environment itself. It doesn't matter as long as you're comfortable
and here we have it
the parasite who hates that other people have what he does not, but will not work, will not justify his existence
>>47420992
wow, i didn't realise how retarded you libs actually were
>Some people cannot be trusted with guns. Babies shouldn't be given guns. Autists shouldn't be given guns. Criminals shouldn't be given guns.
gee if only I hadn't been fucking saying criminals, you know, people TRIED AND CONVICTED OF A CRIME, should forfeit their rights as punishment
but of course you don't mean CRIMINALS, do you, you mean "people I don't like" because in your world innocent until proven guilty doesn't fucking exist
>>47420992
>You claim you need your guns to stand up for the people when the government oppresses us. But you DON'T. Why do you own a gun if you're too much of a coward to use it? It's the whole reason you keep saying you need it right? If you're going to protect us from the government then FUCKING DO IT ALREADY.
the government isn't oppressing you you pathetic coddled little shit, and don't you fucking dare call us cowards unless you've fucking served your country
you are a disgrace to what your predecessors died for
>>47420276
>Darth Vader being called Annie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBrWNbjw3RA
>>47413969
he looks so happy.
>>47420006
I like big guns and I do not lie.
>>47416647
Which gundam series is this?
>>47422391
As a side note, does it matter what crime it is? I mean, personally, I don't think that a non-violent nor a non-gun related crime should forfeit your right to own a gun. I mean, if you're criminally neglecting your kids, they get taken away. If you drive drunk, you can have your license suspended, etc. But if someone embezzle a few thousand dollars, I don't know if taking away their guns is really related. Just like breaking and entering shouldn't suspend your driver's license.
>>47422530
War in the pocket.
AKA How to make hamburgers, Gundam-style.
>>47422532
Felons generally forfeit their right to bear arms and vote.
Is it fair? Well, its felons of a certain kind who singlehandedly give America its much higher than normal murder rate and confuse people into thinking America has a gun problem per se.
>Just like breaking and entering shouldn't suspend your driver's license.
Don't have much sympathy for home invaders.
>>47422672
That joke will never be funny.
>>47422763
Whether or not you have, the question is where the line should be drawn. If you commit a white collar crime and serve your time, should you get all the negativity as a person who went on a shooting rampage?
>>47416720
does he keep em or does something horrifying happen?
>>47422901
If you went on a shooting rampage you probably will never get out. Breivik could be out by now iirc, but he's too much of an autist to feign regret.
Either way's fine. Don't got any sympathy for white collar felons either, or at least enough to think they should be shooting and voting.
>>47422856
not the guy who posted it,buti thought it was,so guess you are wrong
>>47413180
This is glorious!
What is the source of this magnificence? Has this been done anywhere else?
>>47422951
Well, lets hope you never get convicted of anything in your life.
GREAT FILENAME THREAD HUH GUYS
>>47423006
I'll try to not, um, accidentally commit a felony? hurr
>>47422951
>Breivik could be out by now iirc
2022 is the earliest he can get parole.
But yeah, he won't get out then. Maybe sometime in the fifties if he learns to keep his mouth shut?
>>47416552
....I think I'm going to be sick.
>>47417612
elf_finds_tg.txt
>>47414696
The founders probably didnt know it existed though when they wrote it.
>>47416993
That's an analog calculator.
How the fuck is that even possible?
>>47423015
You do realize people commit felonies every day without even knowing, thanks to all sorts of laws, right? Or you might do something you didn't mean to and get convicted for it.
Not all crime is committed with an intent.
>>47420904
>Deemed by whom?
Corperations that will jew the fuck out of guns after EVERYONE have to buy a gun. Dont want to be columbined by an angry person who thinks you are wrong ;)
Honestly I think america should have open carry and looser gun laws, it would be a good experiment to see if a country of multiple states with several times the population and views works as well as a country as smaller than a state.
Because it really would be a definitive experiment to see if its good for the world in general. So either a new form of social liberty is reached or the americans kill themselves realising the columbine shooting was made by well liked "normies", win win I say.
>>47422914
He finally finds his one true waifu.
>>47419981
EVERY TIME!
>>47422901
White collar criminal probably did more damage than the shooter.
>>47422969
Lots of bars have ban lists. The bouncers might not know the guy's name, but they know who he is by the description.
>>47423428
>mount it on the wall as a display piece
>sell it to someone else to mount on their wall as a display piece
>worst case scenario, sell it for the gold it's made out of
I see no reason that receiving a golden fiddle would be a bad thing.
>>47423833
If I risked my soul in a wager, and it turns out the prize is actually shit, I'd be disappointed too. It's nice to look at, but you don't want something that's nice to look, or something you sell to a pawn shop, you want to rock the South with the Devil's own fiddle.
>>47423883
>actually shit
You could sell it for enough money to buy a medium sized house.
>>47423910
It's not about the money, anon. People don't want to sell off their trophies.
>>47422517
Funny thing is, that description works equally well for the goblin.
