/cfb/ which one of you assholes made this edition
- Home
- Board: /sp/ - Sports
- Reading: /cfb/ which one of you assholes made this edition
>Houston keeping Herman
>USC hires a nobody that actually wins
>Les Miles to retool offense
>Richt is no longer recruiting
How many 5-7 teams will play in bowl games?
What might those teams be?
>>63921993
>OSU
does oklahoma state really refer to themselves as this? dont they realize there is an extremely more successful team with the same initials?
>>63922032
apparently its gonna be based on academics and graduations rate
>>63922036
>dont they realize there is an extremely more successful team with the same initials?
just because ohio state is An OSU doesnt mean theryre the only one
>>63922036
Only in the state of Oklahoma, just like in Oregon OSU is Oregon State
>>63922036
everyone calls scar USC in SC
Bama. (11-1)
2. Oklahoma (11-1)
3. Iowa (12-0)
4. Clempson (Very insecure about their school and their ranking btw) (12-0)
5. Northwest Missouri St. (12-0)
6. Jacksonville State Gamecocks (10-1)
7. Harvard (9-1)
8. Slippery Rock (12-1)
9. Houston (11-1)
10. aOSU (11-1)
>>63922036
I mean, Ohio University is often called OU in the state of Ohio. I don't think anyone loses any sleep over this
>5-7 teams in bowls
WE MADE IT LADS
Clemson shouldn't be 1
Alabama shouldn't be in the top 4
Iowa shouldn't be in the top 6
>>63922128
FUCK YES
CHIEF ILLINIWEK IS DANCING FROM ABOVE
>>63921993
>40 bowl games
>80 bowl teams
>out of 129
These execs are making millions and not a single one of them saw this coming
Friendly reminder
tOSU: Ohio State
OKSU: Oklahoma State
OSU: Oregon State
Who G5 non-babby bowl here?
>not so fast pooston
>>63922128
>coach loses 7 games and gets a bowl bonus
>>63922039
so we can rule out SEC "schools"
>>63922184
reminder that you can figure out who it means regardless based on context
>>63922156
Why shouldn't Iowa be in the top 6?
>>63922184
>OKSU
I went to OU and lived in Oklahoma my entire life. Probably half the people I know went to Okie Lite and I have never heard of OKSU
>>63922070
Which is incorrect desu
>>63922156
>Alabama shouldn't be in the top 4
>>63922226
>Michigan state that low
what the fuck am i reading
>>63922184
i recommend that Oregon State be known as wORST
>Gameday going to B1GCG
Nice "bias" you got there SEC
>>63922235
Nebraska/Purdue trolled big 10 hard this season dragging everyone down
>>63922269
doesnt explain why theyre so far AND behind tOSU
>>63922263
No one wants to watch Florida get bootyblasted.
Also, I'm not sure what other ship games will be enjoyable. Pac-12 maybe?
Pictured: the worst QB florida has had since 1979 when starting a 6th string WR at the position
I hate him so much family. He's lost 2 games so far and tried his hardest to lose 3 others. Can't wait to be done with his shit. Florida has so much potential but this fucker is the loudest reminder of Muschamp football.
>>63922226
>YFW Alabamas SOS is number 5 even after considering FCS opponents
>nobody else in the top 10 is higher than 16
>>63922193
he already got his extension
to which the interim AD said
>"It's not ideal but for now, I don't think it'll put a dagger in the heart of the program,''
FIRST FOR MONTANA
GO GRIZZ
>>63922226
They havent beaten anyone with less than 3 losses and their SOS is that high even though they played an FCS team and only 8 conference games? Do really think the SEC is a deep conference
So when MSU wins the natty this year we all agree that it will make them officially a blue blood right?
>>63922036
I thought Ohio State was all about calling it tOSU
Who /5-7andgoingtoabowlgame/ here?
>>63922463
it's based off academics, m8
>>63922282
Florida just stole LSU's top QB recruit. He's 6'5".
Treon will start next year though. At slot receiver, where he'll actually be decent. The only reason he went to UF in the first place is because Muschamp promised him he'd be a qb, whereas Jimbo told him he didn't have the jib for it.
>>63922501
nebraskas APR is tops in the country
>>63922501
APR:
1. Nebraska
2. (tie) Missouri, which has since announced it's not interested, and Kansas State
4. (tie) Minnesota and San Jose State
6. (tie) Illinois and Rice
>>63922421
KEK
>>63922375
I agree they didn't have huge top 10 wins but pretty much every team they played is bowl-eligible. Look at their record vs the top 30. The SEC isn't necessarily real deep but this year it was essentially Bama then about 8 other good teams beating up on each other.
>>63922542
that is the exact opposite as I would have guessed
SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT.
THE CFP DOESN'T ALLOW TEAMS TO SMASH 3 FCS TEAMS AND BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.
SO TEAMS STOP SCHEDULING FCS TEAMS TO SMASH.
NOW 80 TEAMS CANT GET WINNING RECORDS BECAUSE EVERY TEAM DIDN'T START 3-0?
DID THEY THINK ONLY BLOO BLOODS WOULD SCHEDULE FBS GAMES AND EVERYONE ELSE IS CONTENT NEVER GOING TO THE PLAYOFFS?
EVEN IF THEY WANT THAT TO BE TRUE IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
How long before the entire team turns on this guy? He seems so unlikable, I don't know why a young high school stud in Florida would play for him over a Saban Alabama team or even FSU.
>>63922622
you know its bad in UF, FSU, and da U when a team like clemson is getting the best FL recruits
>>63922186
>implying temple has a chance
On a serious note I hope the winner of our championship game doesn't get Notre Dame. Pitting the g5 team against the independent team takes away from it desu.
So now that PAC 12 has 83% of its teams with at least 6 wins, can we say definitively that it's the deepest or best overall conference?
>>63922633
I have zero doubt Temple will beat the bootyblasters if we got a rematch. We should've won the first installment but we got refball'd hard
THIS JUST IN!!!!!111!1!!!!!
FLOOD IS FIRED!
FLOOD IS FIRED!
THE ENTIRE STATE OF NEW JERSEY IS REJOICING!!!
YEEE HAW!!!!!!!11!
>>63922673
literally who
hahahhahahhahah fuck you flood
fucKING FAGGOT LOL
http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/127814/nebraska-officially-will-get-a-bowl-invite-after-ncaa-decision-on-5-7-teams
GO BIG RED /cfb/!!!
Fuck it, we did it! Get in here bros! Etc.
>>63922036
I call Mississippi State MSU because I'm literally never talking about Michigan State unless it is broship related.
>>63922622
He was Cowherd's roommate in college.
Connect the dots.
I am not making this up either.
Also, Alabama players really seemed to like him
>>63922707
>>63922738
nice 8 point win you got there!
How does it feel to finally have an undefeated season?
>>63922588
Didn't you have to beat 6 FBS teams to be bowl eligible?
>>63922673
>>63922693
Week old news you fuck
>rutgers
>rutgers fans
>>63922622
Lol what?
>>63922210
This. I lived in Oklahoma until I was 22 and never saw/heard anyone there use OKSU. It was always either just OSU or Okie Lite.
>>63922226
>>63922156
>bama shouldn't be in the top 4.
REMINDER: that in all but 2 mainline statistical breakdowns of the NCAA College Football System, Alabama is ranked number 4 or higher.
REMINDER: that the Crimson Tide has the best (#1) ranking by average position in these statistical breakdowns.
REMINDER that this means UNEQUIVOCALLY that Bama is UNDERRATED by being placed at #2 in the coaches poll and the playoff standings.
IT'S GONNA HAPPEN. OHIO STATE WILL MAKE THE PLAYOFFS AND BE THE ULTIMATE PLAYOFF VILLAIN. PLAYOFFS 2: THE RETURN OF #4
WHO DO YOU WANT IN THE PLAYOFFS? UNC OR A BIG GUY?
>>63923010
REMINDER: to put pictures in post.
>>63923013
Keep dreaming kekeye
>>63922794
I don't think so.
But it would be fucking impossible to do with 128 teams and 80 teams needing to be at or above .500
Now, 8 teams do have an extra game. But it is a near impossible scenario to have enough eligible teams.
>>63922036
New idea
>Ohio State, Oklahoma State, and Oregon State play each other in OOC
>Winner of round robin (and tiebreaker if needed) gets the right to refer to themselves as THE OSU for the rest of the season
>mfw this becomes tradition for eons
>>63922284
Doesn't matter. Everything about Bama gets shit on harder than any other team. They haven't played anybody, the SEC is a circle jerk, FCS cupcakes. Someone even said that they shouldn't be allowed to substitute defensive players in here. Seriously.
Nick Saban could win championships every year until he croaked, and people would still find ways to invalidate him.
>>63923153
>Nick Saban could win championships every year until he croaked, and people would still find ways to invalidate him
NA NIGGA, I HATE HIM CUZ I AINT HIM
>>63922263
Isn't that the third gameday for Michigan State?
nth for autists not being able to accept iowas success
>>63923210
Lol no, it's the fourth
Oregon
UM
tOSU
Iowa
>>63923210
NO ITS THEIR "FIRST"
ONE WAS IN OHIO AND ONE WAS IN ANN TREE CITY
>>63923153
We all know bama hate is mostly irrational. I'm not talking about the people who hate our team, like Auburn. I'm talking about the people who resent our success. The people who try to argue in circles why Bama shouldn't be in the playoffs, despite having every marker of success. It's a logic born out of jealousy of >our team, that >their team can never aspire to the heights that >our team reaches so easily.
Little do they know that the Process is an open source idea. They just need to find a coach willing to devote the time and effort teaching and selling it, like we have with Bama.
Roll tide, and thanks for tryin yall.
who /gvsu/ here
>>63923240
GOD DAMN, I AM SO SICK OF THE MSU MEME.
CAN WAIT FOR THEM TO GET BTFO.
>>63922588
>we should encourage teams to play cupcake schedules
are you kidding me bruuuuu?
>>63923245
>>63923261
This salt lmfao
>>63922463
I know it will be good for the team to get some more practice time and another game, but going to a bowl at 5-7 just feels wrong. If I was a fan of any other team I would be irate that Nebraska is probably going to a bowl.
>>63923097
between ohio state and oklahoma, bama has no chance of getting to the championship game. you shook?
>>63923268
CHARLESTON SOUTHERN PLAYS THE CITADEL IN THE FCS PLAYOFFS THIS WEEKEND.
IF CHARLESTON SO. WINS THEY WILL BEAT THE TEAM THAT BEAT SOUTH CAROLINA. THAT SAME WEEK SC LOST BAMA PLAYED CHARLESTON.
FCS GAMES ARE FIXING THE CUPCAKE SEC AND FORCING BAMA TO PLAY BETTER TEAMS.
>>63923308
Don't watch then
>>63923314
>(t)THE (t)OSU
>relevant at all anymore after (t)THE LOSS.
Nope. ohio state is done. there is absolutely no way they get in over a 1 loss SEC champion.
>>63923308
Mizzou is declining bowl invitations
Kind of sad really
I know they're 5-7 but do they really want Gary Pinkel to end like this?
>>63922772
A wins a win, m8
BASED HARVARD FULLBACK PLAYING FOR THE RAVENS.
FBS BABBYS BTFO
>>63923378
>implying the nigger players care about what that old white racist muhfugga thinks
>>63922512
I hope that Mac redshirts Franks to work out some of his kinks while the offense improves to await him. At that point, the team would probably have a solid enough squad to make several championship runs when Franks assumes the lead role. I'd like to see a depth chart like:
1. Luke Del Rio
2. Kyle Trask (first half)
2. Will Grier (second half)
3. Kyle Trask (second half)
...
54. Me
55. Treon Harris
It wouldn't be ideal, but it'd be serviceable. And although we probably wouldn't have as good of a record as this year, I'd rather take a hit next year than blow a year of Franks' eligibility when he's not ready and our offense isn't up to par.
>>63922184
okie lite is OKST desu
>>63923375
You realize Florida has two losses
>>63923788
Florida also isn't winning the SEC championship.
>>63923804
Well, true, but there's theoretically a window for OSU if a lot of crazy ahit happens. I don't think we get in even then but I'm not 100% on that.
>>63922772
Hey dumbass, that was Nebbys SECOND worst loss of the season...and they did it in omaha. As in only one otger team beat Nebraska by more than eight points.
It is also the only game anyone has held a lead or tied nebraska the entire game. That includes Michigan State, Wisconsin,
BYU, Northwestern, and Miami.
Jesus this boards hate of Iowa is overboard. Michigan State is not exactly blowing anyone out, they upset OSU, that is it....and yet they are fucking favored?
Iowa is going to keep winning, all of yall can suck it.
>>63922226
>6 Florida State
>7 TCU
>9 Mississippi
>11 Michigan State
>12 Southern California
>14 Iowa
>16 Tennessee
>20 Florida
holy fuck this is retarded
>>63923844
>Jesus this boards hate of Iowa is overboard
it's because you act like this:
>Hey dumbass, that was Nebbys SECOND worst loss of the season...and they did it in omaha
is a fucking accomplishment.
jesus christ I didn't know cockeye fans were so delusional
MSU SUCKS ASS
YOU MAY BEAT IOWA. BUT EVEN YOU KNOW THAT DOESN'T MAKE YOU GOOD.
SOONER OR LATER YOU WILL BE BTFO
>tfw what could have been
>tfw no high scoring trick play-owl
>tfw we have to watch Bama stomp a depleted Florida instead in a game that'll be over before the half
>that fucking feel when
>>63924325
It's a good feeling.
Old man football is the best football.
>>63923395
>>63924325
>Alabama would be undefeated and the unanimous #1 if Ole Miss hadn't gotten away with an illegal pop pass or a flukey tipped pass for a TD
We can play this too
>>63924516
Play what? I was saying Bama going in dry on Florida isn't going to be a ballgame, I didn't imply anything about "Fairness" or anything. I just used the tweet to illustrate how much different things would be had a single play changed for each team.
>>63924475
If it's an actual game. The title game this year won't be.
>>63924516
>we
>>63924121
Hopefully everyone agrees with you, MSU plays better when people doubt them.
>>63924121
>YOU MAY BEAT IOWA. BUT EVEN YOU KNOW THAT DOESN'T MAKE YOU GOOD
This is what people always say
>lol you have 5 11 win seasons in the last 6 years, big time bowl wins and absolutely wreck your rival, but you ain't good xD
Go jack off to your ND posters faggot
>>63922032
GBR!!!
>>63922235
>I haven't watched a Mishitgan state game all year
They're clearly overrated. They haven't beaten anyone good all year and they lost to fucking Nebraska. They also almost lost to fucking Rutgers.
>>63923258
i used to live in GR and my roomie went there. went to live 5 games one season
>>63925077
good lord i did not realize that. and in all that time only 2 good bowls... what gives?? lose the conference championship the other years?
>>63925522
they got keked by michigan the one year in teh sugar bowl
>>63926175
...
Alabama basketball has beaten more ranked teams than anOSU
>LSU basketball lost to College of Charleston
>They're 3-3
Hasn't been a good year for Aussies athletes, has it?
>>63926618
Why did he go to LSU in the first place? At least he'd be able to impact the history of a school with a decent coach and supporting cast. At LSU he'll just be a blip. Just thinking SEC he should have gone to A&M, UF, Tennessee, Alabama, or Vandy if he didn't want Kentucky.
>>63922626
Dabo and the recruiting coordinator have some pretty serious connections in Florida. They were pulling people when they were still good.
>>63922626
They've been doing that for a while
Spiller, Ford, Watkins
>>63926618
>4netyards touted as heisman hopeful
>team gets propped up to #2
>btfo by bama
>immediately turn to shit
>les miles gives almost every indication he was not wanted anymore
>beat a depleted and lost tamu team
>oh les we're so sorry pls stay
>meanwhile basketball program hypes up their own big shot player
>talked about as a worthy competitor to Kentucky and possibly getting the SEC title
>lose three straight games
damn lsu get your shit together
>>63925522
You honestly think they suck? That is hilarious.
Bo schembechler was 5-12 in bowl games.
>>63927382
bowl games are meaningless unless youre playing for the natty
post you team and yfw how your team did in the regular season
>Tennessee
Was kinda disappointed we choked some games away but hey atleast we have a decent record. Go Big Orange!
>>63923947
>Winning in memorial stadium is easy.
>>63922626
>getting the best FL recruits
Uhm what? FSU has had top 5 classes for like 6 years straight. Miami even out recruited Clemson last year.
>>63929007
>Ole Miss
I'm disappointed that we're not going to Atlanta, but if Freeze keeps up his current course and we get another good recruiting class, the future is bright, and I could see the Rebs going to Atlanta either next season or the next.
>>63929007
I was disappointed when be choked on a Texas tube-steak but now we are the only garantee for the cfb
>>63922081
>8. Slippery Rock (12-1)
>>63922282
i honestly feel bad for the kid; he's not a bad athlete, just an assbad QB
>>63929007
>Ohio State
fuck Tim Beck
>>63929178
petition to change the ole miss mascot to the klansmen
so who are the canes going to hire?
there seems to be a pretty good selection of coachs all of a sudden
which job is better then the canes job right now? lsu and maybe south carolina?(hell no only the trojans are called USC)
>>63929007
>OK State
10 wins but got destroyed by OU. If we had the second best defense in the conference then there's a PRETTY FUCKING HUGE POWER GAP.
OU is pretty much in position for winning the CFP if they don't choke. Bummer has a defense but Coker ain't gonna do jack shit.
>texass schools btfo
HERE'S TO HOPING WE GET A DEFENSE LIKE THE LANDSHARK UNIT NEXT YEAR.
>>63929550
>mfw they hire Chump Kelly and he still doesn't win a Natty
>>63929577
lol this guy.
do you remember how well nick saban did at the dolphins then he went to bama and made the program elite once again. Chip did great in a place where you had to go a long way to recruit. If chip comes he will have the nations best recruiting right outside the door
>>63929638
But there's just one glaring problem, Chip Kelly never one a National Championship before going into the NFL. Saban did with LSU.
>mfw Chip runs that meme offense
>mfw Chip sink Miami's once great program even lower
>>63929705
Could you imagine Kelly's meme offense with 4-5* players at every skill position?
Kelly would win a lot of football games in Miami
>>63929850
>buuuuuuuttt no Natty's.
>>63929572
OU's defense didn't do all that well, your offense just kept fucking themselves. That being said I feel like Baylor's defense is better despite all the numbers.
>>63929864
Just saying, Oregon has always lacked the talent and were the biggest scheme babbys in college football.
>>63929705
>Chip Kelly never one a National Championship
>one
also,
>implying al golden is a better college football coach than chip "meme" kelly
>>63929906
Yeah I know bro. I'm just love making fun of Chump Kelly and Oregon.
>>63929912
are you kidding right? al golden is being outcoached by his TEs coach right now.
>>63929850
can you imagine that offense with all that speed?
I am pretty sure even he can luck into a natty with the talent down here. seriously I just checked the rosters of all the top teams and there is at least one person from broward or dade on all those rosters. I always said the biggest problem is that miami couldnt keep talent home
>>63930005
>I always said the biggest problem is that miami couldnt keep talent home
Yeah, Miami doesn't even need to leave south Florida. I say bring in a good coach and hire Butch as an assistant or head recruiting coach.
Chip Kelly's offense would definitely be scary man.
Can you believe Miami is an adidas school now? Lol.
>>63930005
Wouldn't they just be Baylor, then? Baylor actually has talent and speed and they run a meme offense nearly to perfection, at least until people start getting hurt.
>>63930100
Miami is already out recruiting Baylor
>>63930005
>are you kidding right? al golden is being outcoached by his TEs coach right now.
yeah, no fucking shit that's why I said IMPLYING, because the retard I replied to said Chip Kelly would sink Miami's program even lower
>>63930100
>>63930148
*not this year but last year they did
>>63922036
When i lived in oregon for school, i lived in oklahoma and everyone there called ok st as osu. Everyone in oregon calls or st as osu as well. Its all about context
The next defensive player to win the Heisman
https://youtu.be/nFPYlR5kCNM
new Bowl idea, week before the Super Bowl, take the statistically worst NFL team, and make them play the All-Americans, if the NFL team loses they have to fire their entire staff, and move cities.
>>63929007
>Michigan
where did it go wrong
If Alabama struggles with Florida are they actually in danger of missing the playoff?
>>63923838
Why did the Buckeyes give up?
>>63930499
/Wolverine/ Bro, don't be too hard on yourselves. Atleast you'll get a pretty good bowl game.
>>63926175
Oh god, are they really considering him? Pls no. I think I like him.
>>63930625
yeah chin up kid and ill take you to a bowl game and we can destroy some shitty overrated sec team. Florida, Ole Miss, Tennessee, hell LSU if you really want a blowout
>the future's looking bright
>>63930724
>mfw I'm a Tennessee fan.
This just got awkward. But I wish you well /Wolverine/ bro.
>>63930755
honestly you're cool Tennessee, i always saw us as 90's bros on the up and up
i was just trying to lift this fellow wolverine's spirits
also you guys would probably be the only team on that list to beat us seeing as we can't stop two good backs, three would literally murrder us..
we would bootyblast the rest of those teams tho
>>63930804
90's bros for life man.
>>63930827
>>63930804
>>63930755
>>63930724
>>63930625
this is the gayest thing ive ever read
>stealing LSU's top QB prospect cause Milesgate
>just need some O-Line help and a kicker and this is a guaranteed 10 win season next year
>UGA and SCAR are rebuilding and Tennessee is Tenneesse so should win the SEC Least again
who /cautiousoptimism/ here?
>>63922226
Saragin is trash
>other schools trying to start a broship
>>63929007
>UGA
rip in pieces nick chubbs knee
I made eye contact with him today tho so theres a bright side to everything
>>63930625
They are getting a shit bowl game.
Ahead of them are:
Wisconsin
Northwestern
OSU
MSU
Iowa
>>63929550
How is there a better selection of coaches when so many positions are open? That means the applicants have many options, some probably better than a has been with a shit stadium
>>63931615
>implying sparty isn't still our bro
It's pretty much completely one sided though, but I still root for them.
>>63933143
>barners latching onto superior teams after their season is trashed and bands beats them.
Loving every laugh.
>>63933211
Literally what. I'm clearly referring to 2013. I'll root for them as long as it doesn't negatively impact my team.
>>63922195
5-X teams with best APR (Academic Progress Rate)
985 -- Nebraska (5-7)
976 -- Missouri (5-7)
976 -- Kansas State (5-6)
975 -- Minnesota (5-7)
975 -- San Jose State (5-7)
973 -- Illinois (5-7)
973 -- Rice (5-7)
>>63932894
because recruiting is a lot more meaningful than a stadium. I love how people actually think a stadium matters to kids.. The recruiting base is the best in the nation. that matters a lot more to coachs
>>63931496
>Saragin is trash
>Saragin
Nigga, you don't even know how to spell that shit. Thanks for the hot-take, though.
>UCF Knights hire Oregon OC Scott Frost as coach
Funny how UCF got a better experienced coach than USC.
>>63933211
Is bama the only blueblood obsessed with a non blueblood? Fucking pathetic.
>>63921993
mich state or iowa
Oklohombros, can I bandwagon you guys through the CFP?
I'm a Baylel grad and my bro played at Nebraska and you guys have always been bro-tier in all the games I've gone to in Norman and when you've come to Waco/Lincoln. I just want to root for a winning team for once.
>>63930804
>honestly you're cool Tennessee
Just shut the fuck up. Don't know Michigan-Tennessee is the most heated rivalry between two teams that have only played each other once (in the 90s it was the most heated rivalry between teams that never played)?
>>63933716
Sagarin is trash though, and the stupidity his formula resulted in is one of the biggest reasons we moved away from the computers
>>63934199
Just looked this up. It's gotta be a joke. A rivalry over Peyton not getting the Heisman?
>>63934095
Through the CFP? Yeah sure. I assumed Baylor would be in the CFP all year and was planning on rooting for them once the CFP came around anyway. Just don't shitpost too much.
>>63934268
You mean the BCS when we actually found the top two teams every year?
That's right! The BCS found the two best teams ever year except for once or maybe twice.
>>63934397
Nope, not a joke. That's what started it - being so butthurt about Woodson getting it over Peypey, but fans from both sides drew it out and took it to the next level. Possibly the weirdest and definitely the stupidest rivalry of P5 teams, but we still hate them nonetheless.
Ohio State should be in the playoffs over a one loss Clemson or one loss North Carolina.
>>63934095
I don't know. My current hatred of all things Baylor (seriously, your program under Briles and all the new "fans" you picked up since RG3 are probably worse than Texas) makes me want to say no but the Nebraska connection makes me want to give you a pass since they're bros.
>>63934465
TOSU IS DA BOMB
>>63934500
That's not how the meme goes you dip
>>63934465
'no'
>>63934517
Prove me wrong nerd
>>63934514
NOTRE DAME
WILL
BOOTYBLAST
THIS
MEME
CAP IT
What does /cfb/ think of Colin Cowherd's rant against the SEC?
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football-news/4662467-colin-cowherd-sec-alabama-college-football-playoff-rankings
>>63934552
Doesn't Alabama have like one win over an opponent ranked in the top 25, like number 20something?
>>63934552
AS I SPEAK FOR ALL OF /CFB/
/CFB/ DOESN'T THINK OF COLIN COWMAN. BUT DUE TO THE ANTI JERK WE SAY THE SEC NEEDS TO STOP GETTING ITS DICK SUCKED. FUCK DA AGGS
>>63934535
non-conference champs will never make the CFP. last year not even a co-champ got a bid even tho TCU or Baylor would have been a better bet than Oregon or FSU. ND will never get in unless they join a conference. as much as i want to see clemson fail hard, they probably will handle UNC and get one of the three remaining spots. bama is pretty much a lock because muh eec. the big10 winner gets the last spot. there is now way ohio state gets in
>>63934557
Yep, LSU crept back in. Florida will likely still be like #24 after they lose.
>mfw I won't be able to watch the games saturday because of a birthday party
>mfw I won't get laid either
>>63934487
From what I've heard from people down there Briles is a real piece of shit. Supposedly he ran a high school team down there and had pretty much every kid on roids. Had local doctors and authorities involved. Was a big deal on a local level, I think. When he moved up he left a shitstorm in his wake and a lot of people went down. Fans of other Texas schools have plenty to say about him.
For the record I don't give a shit either way and I'm a Bama fan.
>>63934487
If it makes it any better, I was at Baylor when we were absolute dogshit under Guy Morriss and graduated the year he was fired. So well before the shit storm of the newfag Baylor fans.
>>63934578
Ohio State is a lock if Florida beats Alabama (lmao), and Stanford loses. They won't put a two loss Alabama over a one loss Ohio State.
If UNC beats Clemson (possible) then it'll be close. I think UNC and Ohio State should both be over Clemson, so the debate would be down to UNC and Ohio State. UNC's schedule is hilariously bad, much worse than Ohio State's, feature two (2) FCS teams. It's a tossup tbqh
>>63934636
ok assuming this does happen, will osu posters finally stop shittalking about how LSU matched up with bama in the NCG then? after all it was a major reason for the CFP in the first place
>>63934636
They'll both have one loss and the same number of wins against ranked teams, except UNC's win is much better, plus UNC will be a conference champion.
>>63934682
No, that will never not be abhorrent. Two teams in the CFP isn't nearly as bad because other conferences are at least allowed a chance.
>>63934682
mfw da Big 12 has all 12 teams in da playoffs
>>63934717
Kliff's looks are worth at least two wins so congrats on the 9-3 season
>>63933849
as a knights fan I am so fucking excited for this
I don't even know how the fuck that happened
>>63934682
yeah sure
>>63934693
Granted, but didn't they put an emphasis on tough out of conference scheduling? If they put UNC in there, it just says that all teams should just go back to putting FCS teams on the schedule. Plus the ACC sucks ass.
>>63934751
pretty sure conf. champ >>>>> everything else
>>63934758
If Stanford wins do you put them over UNC/Ohio State? What about Florida
>>63934751
Recall that Ohio State lost their big OOC game last year.
SCAR and Illinois isn't really all that worse than VTech and Northen Illinois.
Any team that would lose to midmajors but beat an FCS team will not be in contention for the playoffs, so it's completely irrelevant.
>>63934798
Michigan State lost to a below .500 Nebraska. Teams get upset all the time. Michigan State wouldn't lose to an FCS team. Plus UNC lost to SCAR.
>>63934618
Baylor's whole athletic department comes across as incredibly sketchy. The whole basketball murder coverup ~12 years ago nearly got them the death penalty (the only thing that saved them was the basketball team cleaning house and a voluntary ban on nonconference play one year) and then they had another program involved in a coverup with the whole Sam Ukwuachu thing.
Supposedly Peterson told Briles about why he was kicked out at Boise and Briles let him in anyway knowing that he had a history of violence toward women. While sitting out during his transfer year he raped a female soccer player. The school never looked at the rape kit and conducted a token investigation that almost immediately cleared Ukwuachu. Their response was to reduce the soccer player's scholarship to the point where she couldn't afford to stay there and withdrew. They were still going to let him play last season until he got indicted. They were going to let him play this season until he got convicted. It's pretty clear the school's hope was that they could sweep the whole thing under the rug.
Frankly, if I was Bowlsby I'd be pushing Baylor real hard for them to give me a reason not to kick them out of the Big 12 considering that this was their second attempted coverup of a major crime by one of their athletes since 2000. Having that happen once is a horrible tragedy that you should learn from. Having it happen twice is a permanent black mark that says a lot about what you value as an institution.
>>63934708
I know people were somewhat rightfully pissed about that game, but do you honestly believe those weren't the two best teams in the country? And after all, isn't that what the BCS' stated goal was?
>inb4: shit-tier offenses
Those fucking defenses were both legit as fuck. There were like 42 NFL draft picks that PLAYED that night.
>>63934789
MSU/Iowa
UNC/Clemson
Oklahoma
If Alabama loses Ohio State probably gets the fourth spot. Stanford's resume really isn't that impressive. If MSU wins tOSU's would have lost a razor close game to a playoff team. I think they would get the nod.
>>63934833
I AGREE, WE SHOULD KICK THEM OUT OF THE BXII.
NOT FOR COVERUPS THOUGH. FOR SUCKING ASS FOR SO LONG.
>>63934833
I've actually seen some people post fairly legit evidence that Brittany Griner is really a guy and that Baylor helped cover that shit up so they could win.
>>63934758
So you're saying if USC wins the Pac-12 they deserve to be in the CFP, even with 4 losses?
>>63934853
yeah, I was forgetting a large part of Ohio State's playoff chances rested in Michigan State winning vs. Iowa. If Iowa wins, then I think UNC/Stanford would get the nod. If Michigan State wins big, I think you've gotta go with Ohio State.
>>63934870
>>63934833
WHAT HAPPENED IN 2008 THAT MADE THEM DUMP ALL THIS MONEY IN ATHLETICS AND TRY TO CHEAT TO WIN?
WHY DIDN'T THEY JUST CONTINUE SUCKING ASS?
>Navy's helmets for the army navy game
Swag as fuck tbhfam why does Navy get the coolest uniforms
>>63934847
"Best team" is subjective. Best RESUME is not.
Oklahoma State won the best conference. Alabama didn't win anything.
>>63934825
>Plus UNC lost to SCAR.
see
>>63934825
>Michigan State lost to a below .500 Nebraska. Teams get upset all the time.
>>63934877
UNC/Clemson is going. Ohio State has to make their case against Stanford.
>>63934926
You're missing my point. I'm saying if UNC scheduled two mid-majors instead of two FCS teams, UNC's chance of losing another game skyrockets.
UNC will not lose to an FCS team. They could lose to a mid-major
>>63934912
OK St. lost to fucking Iowa St. which was a dumpster fire at the time. BCS never said anything about conference championships. Their goal was to find the two best teams, not choose the two best resumes.
>>63934970
>BASED CHAMPIONS SERIES
>>63934618
>>63934833 here
I also forgot about Tavin Elliott. He was convicted of raping a freshman twice while three others claimed he raped them when he played for Baylor. Those rapes occurred in 2012. That's less than two years before the whole Ukwuachu thing started. So, yeah, Baylor basically has a serial rapist football team.
>>63934940
>UNC/Clemson is going
tbqh that's up to the committee, and I'm not sure they see it your way
>>63934954
Two power 5 opponents is comparable to one P5 and three G5 IMO.
>>63934970
>implying the week before the game didn't count
>>63935011
Sure, but the big problem were that they weren't even G5 teams. They were literally in the FBS.
>>63934397
peyton deserved it tbqh
>>63935050
>FBS
FCS*
>>63934970
>Their goal was to find the two best teams
Where are you finding this? It was a formula consisting of computers and human polls. The human polls literally have no criteria.
>OK St. lost to fucking Iowa St
Ohio State lost to Virginia Tech.
>>63934940
I'm very strongly of the opinion that the pecking order outside of the top 4 should Clemson/Bama lose is:
1) Stanford
2) Michigan State if they lose the B1G championship
3) Ohio State
4) 1 loss Clemson
I strongly doubt UNC can get in over Clemson with a head to head win. Their resume is just that bad. I actually don't think they would be in even if they were undefeated.
I base my opinion on the committee's tendency to heavily value SoS and multiple marquee wins
>>63934199
nigga that was like 100 years ago
although I think it makes sense that these two teams would be naturally antagonistic as they're basically the same team in different conferences.
>>63935025
Are you talking about the plane crash or whatever? It was the girls basketball team, dude. I've heard people play this card in the past. All I know is if Bama tried to use an excuse like that for losing a game you would probably shit yourself trying to contain your laughter.
>>63935074
>two loss Michigan State over one loss Ohio State
>One loss, conference champion, head to head winning UNC under Clemson
nigga
nigga
>>63935050
>>63935065
Read my post again.
>>63935074
We'll find out tonight. The AP moved UNC up to 8th, we'll see how much credit the committee gives them. If they move them up that far it's hard to see them not jumping into top 4 with a win over the team that's always been #1.
>>63935114
I was agreeing with you, then emphasizing my point
>>63935096
>basically the same team in different conferences
they are both shit teams that are perpetually one year away from not being bootyblasted by both of their "rivals"
>>63935067
>Ohio St. lost to Va. Tech
One was in week 1 and one was in fucking November in the second to last game of the season, I believe, to the 8th best team in the Big 12.
>>63935190
And Alabama lost a week earlier. Big woop.
THE SEC SHOULD GET 5 SPOTS IN THE CFP
If youre from a state with more than one team in the same conference, is it acceptable to root for both teams (except when they play each other) throughout the season, even if theyre rivals? I feel like state pride supercedes team/university pride.
OFFICIAL CONFERENCE RANKINGS:
B1G
SEC
PAC-12
POWER GAP
AAC
POWER GAP
ACC
MAC
POWER GAP
Ivy League
Southwestern Conference
POWER GAP
Big XII
I've got a hypothetical for you /cfb/. Your favorite team, College University (CU) just went 11-1. Given the following schedule, who would you prefer the loss to be to to maximize your chances to be in the College Football Playoff?
Team A(11-1)
Team B(10-2)
Team C(9-3)
Team D(8-4)
Team E(7-5)
Team F(6-6)
Team G(5-7)
Team H(4-8)
Team I(3-9)
Team J(2-10)
Team K(1-11)
Reminder, you played all of these teams.
>>63934970
Iowa St is always a dumpster fire there's never any excuse for a good team to lose to them
>>63935314
No. Completely unacceptable. If they are in the same conference, then they are almost always rivals, which is makes you a faggot nigger cuk jew
>>63935109
Simple. MSU had a much tougher SoS than OSU, and has 3 wins over top 20 opponents. OSU has 1 and lost head to head. That probably outweighs the additional loss. It's why FSU was below Bama and Oregon last year.
As for Clemson over UNC, Clemson had a far more difficult schedule. There's had 0 FCS opponents, was in the harder ACC division, and includes two wins over top 10 opponents. UNC would have just one win ove a top 20 opponent. Head to head probably won't cover that difference between their resumes. It's the same reason Stanford is ranked far ahead of Northwestern despite having identical records and losing the head to head.
Again, based on what the committee has done, I don't think the head to head win will put UNC above Clemson. A win over likely #8 and #9 in final rankings is much better than just a win over what would have to be at best over #5 were UNC to get in over them, so the resume just doesn't seem to be enough, based, again, on what it looks like the committee does.
>>63935114
That's BCS/AP logic which the committee doesn't really seem to follow. UNC could beat Clemson and not move up a single spot if the committee doesn't think it makes their resume better than someone already above them.
>>63935324
Team K, they've got spirit
Can't fucking wait til USC gets good again and fucking dominates all these poser schools, especially those in the SEC who always get the help from refs and the NCAA. Fight on!
>>63935324
>CU
>>63935312
>the SEC will never not recruit at that highest level
>years like this will happen occasionally but the SEC will always be the default best with the best palyers
>>63935324
The worse the team, the better, because it improves the quality of the wins as much as possible. Quality of loss is irrelevant, so maximize strength of wins
Tbqh tOSU should be in before bama.
>>63935376
SO TEAM K?
THEY'VE GOT SPIRIT?
>>63935332
Thank you.
>>63935390
Yes. The committee would prefer that over any other loss
>>63935333
What if theyre in different conferences then? Like Iowa-Iowa St
>>63935413
No way dude. The committee would prefer you beat a 1-11 team and lose to a 6-6 team then be upset by a winless (except for you) team.
If Alabama had lost to UCF they would be where UNC is right now.
>>63935413
LETS SAY A SHITTY ASS NEBRASKA TEAM BEATS MSU AND IOWA.
DO THOSE 2 BIG HOLD MORE THAN SHIT WINS AND SHIT LOSSES?
DO THEY DRAG IOWA AND MSU DOWN. OR DO THEY COME UP INTO TOP 20?
>>63934750
Same. I was surprised O'Leary and the team collapsed so quickly. Hopefully Frost will pan out and the school will cough up enough cash to keep him around for a while.
>>63935451
Look at Oklahoma and Okie State going into this past weekend. That alone should tell you that the committee prefers quality wins and doesn't give a shit about Quality of Loss.
UNC's ranking has nothing to do with the SCAR loss.
>>63935499
I've got another hypothetical for you. Say a team plays every team in the top 13 (excluding themselves) and goes 9-3. Do they make the playoff, based off of 9 wins in the top 13?
>>63935499
There's a line somewhere. Texas has 4 wins and SCAR has 3. But I don't believe for a second the committee would overlook a loss to a 0-11 team.
>>63935459
Those wins would put Nebraska much higher than teams with similar records. Total number of losses has a large effect, though. The loss to Nebraska, however, would not have been as bad as a loss to Northwestern would have been, because Iowa gets the resume boost that beating a 10-2 team with a win over the Pac 12 champ gives you.
>>63935499
It's got to do more with the fact their schedule is so shit it makes Iowa's look like a NFL schedule in comparison
>>63935324
E or F probably. Losing to one of them makes it look more like a "fluke" or an off-day as opposed to losing to team A or B would look like you were outplayed by a better team. Wouldn't want to lose to I/J/K because that would just be embarrasing.
>>63935390
>>63935376
>>63935346
>>63935324
FIGHTIN K's WILL BOOTYBLAST EVERY TEAM NEXT YEAR
>>63935645
So they wouldn't become higher ranked than 8-4 teams without quality wins.
They would just become the best 6-6 team?
>>63935547
The SCAR win was also an absolute implosion. Texas look like they legitimately outplayed OU all day, but Marquise Williams literally giftwrapped that win for SCAR. Not sure if the committee takes any of that into account or not.
>>63935678
lmao
>>63935534
I wouldn't know what the committee would do with that, since we haven't seen anything like that before. My guess is it would be similar to how the SEC West was treated last year at the beginning of the rankings. Probably, that kind of a resume would get you in, but the dybamics of conferences and schedules prevent that from being a possible hypothetical.
>>63935547
The difference between Oklahoma's ranking and UNC's is not at all Texas v. SCAR, you realize this right? If the committee is willing to overlook a loss to a 4 loss team due to strength of wins, they'll overlook a 1-11 team. There's very little difference between the two at that point.
>>63935678
I think the K's will be better next year, it's a good thing they got rid of that no count coach of theirs. Chad Chaddington did great things as an OC of College University.
They'll be rebuilding but I could see 8 wins with a bit of luck.
>>63935720
I get this. But Texas is probably something like the 60th best team while UCF is the 128th best team. I wouldn't call that very little difference, and if the committee was deciding between two one loss teams for 4th place it's hard to believe that losing to the 128th best team in the country wouldn't be a factor, especially if the other team's loss was a close Thursday night road game to an 8-4 rival.
>>63935324
People don't take the Sooners seriously becuase they lost to "H" or "I" but everyone thinks Bama is #1 because they lost to team "C"-"E"
>>63935810
What, everyone takes Oklahoma seriously. Aren't they number three?
>>63935744
kek thats what you fags say every time you fire your coach
enjoy losing to the A's for the eigthth time in a row next year
>>63935810
Are you kidding? Oklahoma is clearly the best team right now, and that's not an unpopular thought.
>>63935810
>NOBODY CARED WHO WE WERE UNTIL WE TOOK THE QUARTERBACK
Sooner fans are by far the worst fanbase I've seen in person since attending sporting events. Only Cleveland Browns fans come close
>>63935794
How about Baylor and TCU last year, then? TCU lost to the #5 team in the nation, and Baylor lost to a middle of the pack team somewhere in the 50s. Baylor was ranked above them, because Quality of loss has functionally no impact. What about Ohio State compared to TCU last year? TCU had a much better loss, and two wins over ranked opponents, but OSU had 3 wins over ranked opponents and didn't lose to one of the ranked opponents they played.
It sounds sort of wonky, but you want to lose to the worst team possible if you have to lose because you want as much quality to your wins as possible.
>>63935856
Yeah. Keep playing K's all year. Can't wait for this whole A meme to be exposed once they play a decent fucking team.
>>63935837
>>63935857
>>63935858
In comparison to Alabama, most of the public, and evidently the committee thinks OU is significantly inferior despite having the same record and better wins. I didn't state that very well.
>>63935914
THE COMMITTEE DOESN'T MAKE POWER RANKINGS.
TELL HIM NUTS IN THE WIND.
AND NO TEAM IS EVER FAVOURED OVER BAMA.
NUTS WILL TELL YOU THAT TOO
>>63935879
Losing to a 0-11 team would mean way more than beating a 6-6 team. A win against a 6-6 team is not a relevant win, but losing to UCF would damn well be a relevant loss. Therefore, lose to the 6-6 team and beat the winless team.
Middle of the pack loss is best because you still beat all the best teams while your slip up was at least to a decent team.
>>63935914
are you seriously whining that you're not ranked higher when you are literally guaranteed a playoff spot.
this is why no one likes you okies
>>63935914
Wait til tonight for the committee's opinion.
Cite some poll or something, you might just have an inferiority complex about this. Cowherd for example puts Oklahoma 1st or 2nd and Bama 5th.
>>63935879
Ohio State had more than UNC does
They have more now UNC does
>>63935952
Im not whining, its an observation of perception. I was addressing this question >>63935324
C O N T E X T
>>63935900
ill be laughing when the A's destroy College University in the championship anyway
>>63935879
gotta lose early, and show progression since your loss. that's why losing late fucks you
tOSU did that last year. lost early, continuously showed improvement, culminating in the absolute bootyblasting of Wisconsin
>>63935879
they were also co-champs, as opposed to champs, which was the tiebreaker between the 3
and let's not forget, a 59-0 win against a great team with the best run game in the nation was quite the stamp on the resume, you got a real picture of their ceiling potential
>>63935962
Good lord, I don't care where Oklahoma is just as long as they are in. See >>63935974
>>63935976
>Rematches in the championship game
>>63935856
i know this is just a ripoff of the packers, but thats a pretty dope helmet ngl
>>63935994
Yes, now cite a poll to give your perception some substance, or it's just an inferiority complex.
>>63935879
Ohio State had two wins over teams who went 10-2
>>63935976
>implying they with lose to the B's in the first round of the playoffs
>>63935940
You're basing this on what?
I believe that the committee falls back on specific numbers to choose which team gets in over others, and the most important one seems to be combined strength of all the teams you beat. The committee seems to rely on metrics and numbers far more than other polls do, and to have six additional win in what I assume is a Power 5 conference added onto the resumes of the opponents you beat is a much bigger advantage than losing to a bad team hurts you. If there's a line in the sand, we haven't seen it, and Oklahoma unironically lost to Texas this year. I have to believe that line doesn't really exist, because there has been no evidence that it does
If miraculously Florida beats Bama and Iowa and Clemson win, who gets 4th spot? (in b4 Stanford meme)
>Possibility of a Iowa/Ohio St Nat. Championship game?
So let me get this staight, Nuts doesn't want tOSU in the playoffs?
>>63935995
this is why we need to get rid of protected rivalries, im tired of watching fucking CU and the A's play twice every fucking year. either put them in the same division or fuck their rivalry, im tired of this shitty conference ruining the Bees chance at an NY6 every season
>>63936036
The AP and Coaches? Michigan State should be above them aswell using my logic. It doesn't really matter because once bama beats Florida, they'll jump OU in my hypothetical "this-is-what-it-should-be" rankings anyway.
>>63936067
I want us in, obviously. I just don't think that the committee operates that way
>>63936065
Probably whoever is #6 tonight
>>63936089
OSU gets in if
>Florida wins
or
>Florida wins and UNC wins
if UNC wins and Bama wins they will probably jump OSU (which is kinda bullshit because anyone with sense knows OSU is better but whatever).
looking pretty unlikely
also I will be beyond buttmad if Stanford jumps OSU in any scenario. I will lose my fucking mind
>>63936092
No other team will be 6th tonight except OSU, unleas they troll OSU like they did TCU last year .
1-4 Clemson,Bama,OU, Iowa in whatever order.
5th MSU
6th OSU
7th Stanford
8th UNC
There save you some time, go to sleep early tonight.
>>63936170
>Florida wins
or
>Florida wins and UNC wins
That's redundant
if a team as shitty as UNC gets in simply because MUH CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP, then they're opening up a can of worms in future. big slippery slope.
if conference championship games matter that much then make them mandatory to win in order to make the final 4. be consistent.
>>63936212
Then Notre Lame with never be able to bootyblast their way into the playoffs.
>>63936212
imagine how bad UNC will lose to Bama if it happens
I don't even want to think about it
>>63936170
If the committee actually operates how I think they do, we need Stanford, Alabama, Iowa and Clemson all to lose. That being said, I don't exactly know just how much they weigh an additional loss in an additional game, so it's possible that we would be in over MSU should Iowa win and possible Stanford never jumps us. I don't see UNC jumping us under any scenario, though.
>>63927314
i'm not who he was responding to, i was just a passerby who saw 5 11 win seasons in 6 years. i actually like michigan state, i'm from ok but my brother used to always play with them on ncaa
>>63936247
I'm really curious to see where they have UNC tonight. The AP and coaches as usual overreact to the fact that they won their division and boosted them up to 8 for absolutely no reason, I doubt the committee will do the same
>>63936271
I would expect to see them out of the top 10, behind
>Oklahoma
>Alabama
>Clemson
>MSU
>Iowa
>Ohio State
>Florida State
>Stanford
>Notre Dame
>TCU
>Baylor
>Okie State
And possibly,
>Northwestern
And
>Michigan
>>63936054
There's bad teams (for a P5 conference) and the literal worst team in the country. The committee hasn't dealt with anything like that. That's just my guess. Would you really rather Ohio State lose to UCF than, say, Nebraska?
>>63936088
You said popular perception.
People tend to hate the polls so I don't take Bama's #2 to mean that much for people generally.
>>63936348
If that means OSU beat Nebraska and lost to UCF, or lost to Nebraska but beat UCF, then yes the first option that involves a loss to UCF is better.
>>63936383
Weird.
I just don't buy it. Upsets aren't rare. Ohio State to Virginia Tech. Oklahoma to Texas. Florida to Ole Miss.
But no best team in the country has ever lost to a 0-11 team.
I still don't get why so many athletic directors schedule shitty schools when their team is a legit perennial playoff contender. I'd schedule a tough out of conference team within the first 4 weeks. If you win, good, if you lose it's 1. a tough opponent and 2. early enough that the committee can excuse it so long as you do well the rest of the season.
>>63936420
Because these schedules where made I the BCS era, in which winning out was really all it took to make it to the championship.
>>63936419
True but I also don't think teams that end with 1 or 2 losses have the capability to beat one of the best teams in the nation no matter how bad they play in that game.
>>63936420
that's how I play Dynasty mode in NCAA14 desu
>>63936420
a lot of schools are getting better about that
the fact that you have to schedule 5-10 years in advance certainly doesn't help, and some schools like Baylor just refuse to accept that they need to schedule tougher now tho
>>63936420
Who does this?
Michigan State and Oregon scheduled each other.
Ohio State scheduled for Virginia Tech when they were perennially very good.
Alabama scheduled Wisconsin, who won three straight B1G championships.
Notre Dame has Clemson, Stanford, Texas, and USC.
Texas has Notre Dame.
Oklahoma is weak right now but they have Ohio State the next two years.
Florida and FSU play every year.
Auburn and Clemson have each other next year.
LSU is doing a home and away with Wisconsin.
The only ones I can think of is Michigan and Baylor. Michigan's OrSt, Utah, and BYU isn't that bad though.
>>63936455
rephrase
>>63936420
Most everyone besides Baylor is moving towards that. The cupcake schedule that allowed you to rack up style points were favorable in the BCS era because 1) the retarded media won't stop stroking the cock of a team that laid 100 points on an opponent, even if that opponent was Southern Illinois University, and 2) the computer formulas like Sagarin were all broken and results like that would reward that type of silly game.
>>63936527
Michigan's OOC was Greta this year. Two p5 teams and BYU, which is in a small ground between mid major and power 5
>>63936553
Baylor is getting left in the dust in the near future until they stop doing that shit
their non-conference schedules are literally worse than some FCS teams' schedules
Reminder: teams that schedule FCS schools or play Kansas during the season should be excluded from CFP
>>63936553
AND 3) 80 FUCKING BOWLS
>>63936544
Meaning mediocre 6-6, 5-7 teams typically still have enough talent on the roster to beat Ohio State or Alabama on it's absolute worst day.
A 1-11 team, however, is so bad that they could never pull off that upset.
>>63936593
JACKSONVILLE STATE IS LITERALLY BETTER THAN 70% OF THE SEC
Which is better: judging a team's wins/losses based on the ranking of their opponent at the time they played or the ranking of their opponent at the end of the season?
>>63936616
always end of the season
>>63936616
End of season, I think we definitively answered that question back in the 60s
>>63936584
*great
>>63936616
Both are imperfect. You have teams unjustifiably over or underrated at the beginning of the season and you have teams that were legit good at the beginning but after major injuries start collapsing.
>>63936616
RANKING ALL IVYS 1-8 IN PRESEASON AND REQUIRING THEM TO BE BEATEN FOR OTHER TEAMS TO MOVE UP.
>>63936616
Judging them at the time played is so retarded, does anyone do this?
>>63936616
Rankings shouldn't even be taken into account until...right now
>>63936689
Pretty much all casuals and sports shows - at least before and right after the game. The sane ones reevaluate the quality of wins at the end of the season.
>>63932504
>Wisconsin
>Northwestern
All same # of conference losses, same total # for Wisconsin as well. Plus Northwestern got BTFO by Michigan
/sp/ which job would you rather take:
>head coaching job of random SEC team that pays $3 million a year. Wins/losses doesn't matter for first year, you need at least 6 wins in 2nd year or you're fired. You need at least 8 wins in 3rd year or you're fired. You need to be in at least 1 SEC championship game by 5th year or you're fired.
Or
>head coaching job at random AAC school that pays $1.5 million a year. Wins/losses doesn't matter for first year. You need at least six wins thereafter and be in at least one AAC championship game by year 5 or you're fired.
>>63936824
>Vanderbilt or East Carolina
Sign me up for the SEC.
>>63936824
The $3m SEC job
Even if you got fired year 3 it would take 9 years to make as much money at the AAC job, during which you could be making nearly as much working as a top coordinator somewhere else big
>>63936904
Nevermind I read 1 million not 1.5. Still, six years v 3 years and I'm still taking the SEC job
>>63936824
Statistically the SEC job is better
>>63936527
UF's noncon schedule besides FSU next year is North Texas, UMass, and Presbyterian.
Presbyterian.
>>63936824
>coach in AAC
>dominate shitty teams and win some conference championships for 2-3 years
>get paid $7 to leave and go coach UCLA
>profit
>>63936824
Can I just coach in the PAC for 3.5 mil and make a championship game my second year with 6 wins?
>>63936973
>leaves an additional $2 mil on the table
You could always suck in the SEC and go backwards and end up coaching Cincinnati after getting fired
>>63936361
b/r and espn comments sections have only warmed to the sooners after they drubbed Ok Lite, before recently it was "lol texas"
>>63936997
Gotta move to Tech first and make air raid look as shitty as possible.
>>63937013
They're slow and filled with casuals. We've been harping Oklahoma's chances since before they played Baylor over here
>>63936965
>They have not left the State of Florida for an OOC game for 25+ years.
Expecting any decent P5 team to not want a H2H series. Also being these new to Gaytor football scheduling farce.
>yfw gary patterson could've put the nail in memelahoma's coffin if he wasn't retarded
>>63937013
>Bleacherreport
>Espn Comments
you have no one to blame but yourself
Can't wait for Alabama, Clemson, and Stanford to all lose and then have Clemson get in ahead of aOSU for a two ACC playoff.
MMmmmm.
Srsly tho aOSU is just never getting in. It's Clemson/UNC/Stanford. That's it.
>>63937013
Yeah faggot you've been crying about how they were bad since I claimed OU would beat Baylor.
Now you cry they they're not ranked high enough.
Shut the fuck up and go find a QB to steal. Webb is probably free.
>>63936553
People have to remember that before Baylor enjoyed thier recent succes they had 11 conference wins in 12 years, Art briles had that in 4 years, and since then has been a "contender." Baylor was so used to scheduling crap teams so they eek out at least 1 win a year. Its gonna take time for them to get used to it, also they have tons of old connections to shitty texas football teams like rice and smu
>>63936601
Exactly, so how could this be ignored if it actually were to happen?
>>63937039
I'm not new, I'm just pointing it out to those who don't know. The stupid thing it's only football. Basketball noncon includes #11 Purdue, #3 Michigan State, and #21 Miami. I'm just asking to replace a FCS or Sun Belt team with a team that looks slightly better. Doesn't have to be like, Notre Dame or Michigan or whatever.
>>63937036
>filled with casuals
ie public perception
>>>63937055
I was addressing his statement but fair enough
>>63937066
kek
>>63937122
The reason a loss to a mediocre team doesn't hurt so much is because your opponents that you beat still have lots of wins. The same logic applies to a 1-11 team.
In other words, beating a 6-6 team mathematically helps your team much better than beating a one win team does, and the impact of who you lose to seems to be almost nonexistent, so I think in the hypothetical the loss to the 1 win team still hurts the team less. The reason it seems hard to comprehend is because it doesn't ever happen, not because the logic is inconsistent
>>63937130
They will never do that.
They play in the easiest division of the most over hyped conference since they Ivy league.
If they dare play a mid tier BXII or B1G team they will probably get beat.
>>63923378
Even Pinkle knows this team is bad. we would end up losing. better to just let it be what it was...
>>63937202
this line of thinking only applies if that is your only loss (to the 1-11 team), right?
>>63936965
Yeah, if they weren't playing FSU they wouldn't be bad.
And if worms had machine guns birds would be afraid of them.
>>63923378
I kinda respect that though
>>63937013
We were supposed to trust TCU and Baylor before that?
>>63937225
Yes, obviously. The number of losses you have matters a lot. Who those losses are to, however, hurts you less if they're weak teams because you can still salvage your resume with top 20 wins.
In other words, in a vaccuum losing to a 1-11 team isn't better than losing to a 6-6 team, but beating that 6-6 team and losing to the 1-11 team is better than beating the 1-11 team and losing to the 6-6 team.
Make sense?
>>63937202
The impact of who you lose to seems to be nonexistent because championship caliber teams only lose to decent teams we're both putting around 60th best in the nation. We don't have any data for what would happen if an otherwise undefeated team lost to an otherwise winless team. We're both guessing here, I just cannot believe that even the committee wouldn't laugh that team out of the top 4.
Personally I feel like ANY FCS loss would knock a team back significantly. NOW realize that a 4-7 FCS team beat the worst FBS team. And we're talking about the winless team that a losing FCS team beat... beating a supposed title contender. I don't see that having no weight.
>>63937292
True story. You can't not-lose your way to the playoff.
>>63937292
I think the scores matter a lot with this theory though.
Getting BTFO by a 10-0 team looks bad.
Losing by 1 to a 10-0 team doesn't look bad and shouldn't hurt you.
Getting BTFO by a 1-11 team looks really bad.
Losing by 1 to a 1-11 team looks bad, but maybe just a fluke.
And any loss to a 6-6 average team could be regarded as a fluke, as long as you show improvement and prove that it was a fluke.
All assuming that loss is your only loss.
>>63937216
I'm sure UF could beat West Virginia or Texas Tech next seaosn.
GO TO HELL OLE MISS
>>63937262
Only as much as LSU t-b-h
>>63937251
This.
Is wanting only teams without losing records in bowl games old fashioned now? I know the purpose of it isn't so everyone gets a trophy, but the value of bowl game is now almost nonexistent.
>>63937052
>OU absolutely dominating the game
>TCU breaks Mayfield
>get to within an extra point from winning, but take the 2pt gamble for the win and lose
so the only way to beat oklahoma is to get Trevor Knight in, unless your team is Alabama?
>>63937390
Nice, so they'll be 11-1?
>>63929178
GO TO HELL OLE MISS
TO
HELL
Friendly reminder with a National Championship Michigan State will have been the best program in the Big 10 since 2010
>>63937292
>in a vaccuum
In a vaccuum that makes sense but an 11-1 P5 team will typically have several ranked wins. Beat #8, #15, and #20 and no one will be looking at the win over the 6-6 team to prove your worth.
Now place your loss. Worst team in the country or 60th best team in the country? I think losing to a 0-11 team and beating the 6-6 hurts you more than the alternative.
>>63937439
Based Michigan State comes through for the broship.
Don't worry, we'll BTFO of Michigan in a bowl game again
>>63937418
if the offense isn't utter shit yeah
Also officially at least one bowl game has been officially confirmed
Dec. 24
Popeyes Bahamas Bowl: Middle Tennessee vs. Western Michigan
Nassau, Bahamas | Robinson National Stadium
Noon on ESPN
>>63937470
wasn't that the one last year with the crazy fucking ending?
>>63937381
You're thinking about it too qualitatively, and my theory has been since last year that the committee has been falling back on quantitative measures to determine between the teams. Among those include SoS and strength of wins, while quality of loss does not seem to have much impact. My theory is the committee relies more on those numbers than trying to determine if a win or loss was a fluke.
>>63937368
I gotta agree that we have no evidence as of yet to where that starts mattering due to the fact that teams capable of beating Michigan State or Ohio State or Oklahoma or Alabama don't ever lose to bottom dwelling teams. If you have a loss to 1-11 Kansas on your resume, then you always have several other losses on that resume as well.
Even still, do you think it would hurt Alabama if they lost to their FCS team, but gained a win over top 20 Ole Miss? That might cancel each other out at worst
>>63923245
oregon was in east lansing you smelly redneck
>>63937470
I think UF will have a good record next year.
But I will still continue to think that division is shit and Florida's as good as an 8-4 team.
>The 5,000 seat Bahamas bowl
>>63937494
Yeah. Central Michigan vs Western Kentucky
>down 49-14
>mount amazing comeback
>score potential game tying TD on last second on crazy ass play
>go for 2
>don't get it
>lose 49-48
>>63937533
>watching PACshit
Fuck off c_uck, you're inferior to even the AAC
>>63937539
Actually it can seat up to 30,000
>>63937459
I think it helps more than you think it does. Notre Dame thus far is my reason why. I think total number of wins your opponents that you beat have is a significant statistic for the committee, which is why wins over Temple and Navy were still valued so high despite their extremely suspect resumes.
Maybe I just have been giving the committee too much credit in assuming a method to their madness, but that's the pattern I see.
>>63937556
can't whip the Grip
>>63937570
>Thomas Robinson Stadium is a multi-purpose stadium in Nassau, Bahamas. It is currently used mostly for football (soccer) matches. The stadium currently has a capacity of 15,000 people, but has the ability to be expanded to hold 30,000 people
NEAT
>>63922512
What about Will Grier?
>>63937602
Suspended a full calendar year. He will not be there intil halfway through the season
>>63937461
my sides
MSU broship wins again
>>63937626
I know, so what about when he comes back?
>>63937602
He's out for the first 6 games of 2016 cause he lost the appeal, which means he won't be able to return until the Gators play until the Missouri game. Not sure what the plan will be at all to be honest, but as long as Harris doesn't start I'm okay with it.
Also UF plays Michigan in 2017 so lol
>>63937626
>Grier will be gone for the Tennessee game
can it be? can we, dare i say, win?
>>63937470
Do these games actually get ratings?
>>63922226
>LSU ranked
Literally how?
>>63922512
>Florida just stole LSU's top QB recruit
How is Miles so damn bad at getting qb's?
>>63937660
>but as long as Harris doesn't start I'm okay with it.
Why? Because he's black?
>>63937504
That's a bit different now. Ole Miss is a 9-3 team and I agree that beating a ranked team will usually help you more than any loss would hurt you.
Let's say Alabama beat Ole Miss and lost to (now 6-6) Missouri. Would beating Missouri and losing to UCF improve their resume?
your team
>preseason ranking next year
Tennessee
>#18
>>63937770
>tamu
>hopefully we stay unranked so when we lose to other sec teams it doesn't prop them up
>>63937576
Those wins were valued because they were ranked wins. A 6-6 team won't be anything close to this.
>>63937770
>UF
>#22
>>63937770
>Auburn
>#25
>>63937770
TTU
>#5
>>63937770
superior state of michigan football program
#6
>>63937770
>Oklahoma
>#2
>>63937770
tOSU
>#3
>>63937948
>implying gayker stays.
Have fun with whatever that other faggots name is
>>63937965
this. assuming he isn't a dumbass and listens to his coach like a certain aOSU qb did after winning a natty, Mayfield will make a big draft splash
>>63937985
>>63937965
>6"0 tall
>Running QB
>meme offense
He will be a 6th round pick.
>>63937770
So far:
1. ???
2. Oklahoma
3. The Ohio State
4. ???
5. Texas Tech
6. Michigan St
7. ???
8. ???
9. ???
10. ???
11. ???
12. ???
13. ???
14. ???
15. ???
16. ???
17. ???
18, Tennessee
19. ???
20. ???
21. ???
22. Florida
23. ???
24. ???
25. Auburn
keep em comin
>>63937832
>>63937763
Again, I'm of the opinion that the committee is simply using a few simple metrics to determine who is better, one of strongest of which is the combined # of wins of all the teams you beat, or # of wins of opponents you beat + number of wins of opponenta those teams you beat also beat. Near as I can tell quality of loss only comes into play when comparing teams where that particular measure has them rated very close. Why else would Alabama with one ranked win have been so high going into this last week? All those wins made by all the 7 and 8 win teams they played weigh heavily on that statistic.
As such, five additional wins to those measures is actually pretty helpful.
I can't identify a way they quantify losses, and as such I'm not entirely sure that they do other than the obvious impact of not being able to add additional wins to that metric.
I could be wrong but I strongly suspect this is how the committee has been operating.
>>63938018
Michigan
8
>>63938018
Auburn should be #1
>>63938007
>voluntarily staying an extra year and not going for big money with the browns or some other team willing to give you millions of dollars
>>63938038
pls no more top 10 rankings
>>63938018
obviously UNC at numero uno
>>63938007
He is the same exact fucking thing as Manziel and had the same coach.
Someone will bust on him. It's not like gayker has loyalty to his programs.
>>63938065
I respect your optimism
1. North Carolina
2. Oklahoma
3. The Ohio State
4. ???
5. Texas Tech
6. Michigan St
7. ???
8. Michigan
9. ???
10. ???
11. ???
12. ???
13. ???
14. ???
15. ???
16. ???
17. ???
18, Tennessee
19. ???
20. ???
21. ???
22. Florida
23. ???
24. ???
25. Auburn
>>63937770
>Michigan State
>Top 6
>>63938080
thanks pham
>>63938044
That's the point
There are a crap ton of QBs that will be taken ahead of him including but no limited to
>Connor Cook
>Jacob Brisett
>Jared Goff
>Paxton Lynch
>Carson Wentz
>Kevin Hogan
>0+2015
>not having elite recievers
>>63938080
bootyblasters
>#7
>>63938080
alabama at 4 after they get bootyblasted in the playoffs
>>63938080
honestly while we're at it put arkansas at 23 and Miss State at 24 so the eec fans are appeased
>>63938089
>Drafting ESPN meme QB's
You're discounting that Baker can out meme them by the time this all said and done.
So we all agree this is the last year Michigan State has to win a natty, right?
>>63938148
recruit for shit and you too may see your conference's teams in a preseason poll
>>63938154
Na, O'Conner is better than Cook.
I think they have a better chance in the next few years.
>>63938154
>4 years left on Dantonio's contract
nope i do not
>>63938080
Where would Based /GripNSip/ be?
>>63938148
you're probably right tbqh fame
1. North Carolina
2. Oklahoma
3. The Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Texas Tech
6. Michigan St
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan
9. ???
10. ???
11. ???
12. ???
13. ???
14. ???
15. ???
16. ???
17. ???
18, Tennessee
19. ???
20. ???
21. ???
22. Florida
23. Arkansas
24. Mississippi State
25. Auburn
>>63938018
Clemson at #1
Regardless of what happens, everyone good will return or will probably return on offense
Defense is a little iffy, but they showed this year they can easily reload
>>63938188
wherever you want
>>63938154
Yeah probably, with Michigan back on track and tOSU likely winning the majority of Big Ten championships for the forseeable future. This is it
>>63938188
TOP 20
O
P
2
0
>>63938214
too late brosef stalin, I can still fit you in at #9 if you act now
>>63938214
How the fuck did you not win a Natty with Bryant, Hopkins, and Watkins?
>>63938234
North Carolina won't be number one with Fedora bound to leave for a bigger job
>>63938248
>clemsoning
>>63938255
can i put stanford at #9 while Clemson is still coming to terms with himself
>>63938278
>I still don't know what clemsoning is
>>63938248
Bryant sucked at Clemson
Watkins was non-existent most of 2012
Garbage fire of a defense
>>63938291
sure thing sweetie
1. North Carolina
2. Oklahoma
3. The Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Texas Tech
6. Michigan St
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan
9. Stanford
10. ???
11. ???
12. ???
13. ???
14. ???
15. ???
16. ???
17. ???
18, Tennessee
19. ???
20. ???
21. Western Kentucky
22. Florida
23. Arkansas
24. Mississippi State
25. Auburn
>>63938226
>tOSU likely winning the Big Ten championships for the foreseeable future
I wouldn't say that, tOSU looks like they'll take a step back for at least a year. Their team is going to get gutted by the draft this year and they have a shit OC. And now their DC whose hire basically led to their natty looks like he's going to take the head coaching job at Syracuse. They still have some of the top recruiting classes the next few years but they still need more lineman which is crucial. I'd next year looks like the year Michigan has a chance to step up if they ever will
What's the most you ever rekt a team in NCAA?
>>63935324
Lose to K at the beginning of season, and win out.
>>63938314
>You could have drafted all 3
>Someone could have rebuilt the Chick-Fil-A bowl champs and Owl'd
>Instead chip rebuilt the 2008 national champion runnerups
Legitimate examples of Clemsoning:
2012 Orangeb Owl
2013 Florida State game
2014 Florida State game
feel free to add
>>63930310
>When I lived in Oregon for school, I lived in Oklahoma
>>63938402
None of those fit the definition
>>63938369
they've got spirit desu
>>63938413
>giving up the greatest number of points in the history of bowl games isn't clemsoning
Clemsoning isn't a real thing
>>63938314
>>63938248
There's another one
Andre Ellington
He was pretty good but he wasn't one I'd think anyone would hear from again
Somehow Clemson had all of this NFL talent and the players just sucked
>>63938432
The fact they were in the Orange Bowl is proof that it wasn't
>>63938457
That's precisely why it was. You expect a certain level of quality from teams who make it to that game. Just like you expect a certain level of quality from the #3 team in the country, not to be beaten by 37 in their own stadium.
>>63938457
they actually clemsoned twice that season. once to get into a shitty non championship game bowl and another when they got BTFO
>>63938496
>>63938501
Clemsoning was having high expectations and losing to some low level team like Maryland that ruins the season
Clearly not the same thing
>>63938552
So it's a synonym for choking?
You're an idiot.
>>63938339
IOWA AT TEN
>>63938339
Georgia at #11 obviously
>>63938691
top 25 preseason poll wouldn't be the same without hurrgia
>>63938578
No
A certain type of choking
See, Clemson fans don't expect this type of season every year
But we should at least be top 2 in the ACC
Now that we're miles ahead of everyone but FSU it's great
But when we couldn't it was a problem
That was "Clemsoning"
Failing to reach the realistic fan's expectations
Committee rankings for tonight (In no way reflect my based true rankings)
Clemp
2.OU
3. Iowa
4. Bama
5. Mich St.
6. Stanford
>>63938708
2 tru
1. North Carolina
2. Oklahoma
3. The Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Texas Tech
6. Michigan St
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan
9. Stanford
10. Iowa
11. Georgia
12. ???
13. ???
14. ???
15. ???
16. ???
17. ???
18, Tennessee
19. ???
20. ???
21. Western Kentucky
22. Florida
23. Arkansas
24. Mississippi State
25. Auburn
>>63938731
Flip Bama and Iowa and I agree. #7 will be Ohio State, #8 will be FSU, and all the way at #11, maybe #12, will be UNC
>>63938722
>we
That explains it. You don't get to decide what the hilarious terms you earn for yourself mean. Go ahead and read it again.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/early-lead/wp/2014/09/21/against-florida-state-clemsons-clemsoning-was-the-most-clemsoning-clemson-ever-clemsoned/
>>63938774
>jawja not in top 10
Their fall would be less funny without that.
>>63938803
Read the truth
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/college-football-week-5-wrap-now-and-gators/
>>63938774
19. Baylor
20. TCU
>>63938799
I don't think they'll have OU and Bama play first round.
So I think they'll move Bama to 4th this week, then OU there on Sunday while Bama goes to 3 if Iowa wins, and 2 if they lose.
We'll see in an hour. But I really dont think they'll make Bloobloods play again without a heisman meme game to fill the other slot.
>>63938774
northwestern
>#12
>>63938774
gotta put clemson in there so why not lucky number 13. also meeechigan at 14 and rice at 15 for the lulz
>>63938774
Badgers #20 ayyy
>>63938799
I'd probably put Bama in the mid teens senpai. >We are losing a lot of key players and will have another new qb. I don't know if there is another freak athlete to hand the ball off to that can carry the team if he has to.
>>63938881
sounds about right, man they must have been destroyed by Natty winning UNC to drop that low
1. North Carolina
2. Oklahoma
3. The Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Texas Tech
6. Michigan St
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan
9. Stanford
10. Iowa
11. Georgia
12. Northwestern
13. Clemson
14. ???
15. Rice
16. ???
17. ???
18, Tennessee
19. Baylor
20. Texas Christian
21. Western Kentucky
22. Florida
23. Arkansas
24. Mississippi State
25. Auburn
>>63938774
Slippery Rock at 12
>>63938895
I can give you 14, 16 or 17 senpai
>>63938925
This will probably end up more accurate than the AP's preseason poll that is actually before the season...
>>63938946
sounds good
>>63938956
I couldn't have done it without you bro
>>63938925
bold pick: UCF at 17
>>63938925
Swag Kelly for 14
>>63938859
I think after Conference Championships
#1 B1G champ
#2 Clemson
#3 Bama
#4 Oklahoma
They won't care about that type of thing this week, that's something for next week
>>63939014
that'll do her
OFFICIAL /cfb/ PRESEASON PREDICTION
1. North Carolina
2. Oklahoma
3. The Ohio State
4. Alabama
5. Texas Tech
6. Michigan St
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan
9. Stanford
10. Iowa
11. Georgia
12. Northwestern
13. Clemson
14. Ole Miss
15. Rice
16. Wisconsin
17. Central Florida
18, Tennessee
19. Baylor
20. Texas Christian
21. Western Kentucky
22. Florida
23. Arkansas
24. Mississippi State
25. Auburn
>>63939041
Why would Clemson drop to two?
They'd have more impressive wins than Iowa and would be undefeated unlike Michigan State
>>63939047
suck a dick AP. we /pollsters/ now
>>63939047
capped for next September
>>63939041
>They won't care about that type of thing this week, that's something for next week
I would agree, But I think they'll want to punish OU for not playing this week.
>>63934636
If Alabama and Stanford are out, UNC would get in if they beat Clemson.
But if MSU beats Iowa then Iowa gets in over aOSU
>>63938255
>implying North Carolina won't be defending champs next year
>implying North Carolina success has to do with Fedora and not based Gene Chizik
>>63939047
I love it.
>>63939047
>1 PAC
>2 ACC
At least we're realistic.
>>63939088
can we do a non meme version that could actually beat the AP
>>63939135
They won't get in
Go ahead
Let Chizik ruin your offense like Auburn did
>>63939169
I dont know, ours is pretty solid considering we didn't overrate TCU, Baylor, or Georgia. And overrated UNC
>>63939047
i'm trying to figure out what this implies
UNC beats Clemson
Alabama beats Florida
Michigan State beats Iowa
Stanford beats USC
1. Alabama
2. Oklahoma
3. Michigan St
4. UNC
UNC beats Bama
Oklahoma beats Michigan St
UNC wins the Natty, and then tOSU wins a bowl game well enough that they get 3 anyway,
Clemson loss by a lot in the ACCCG and the NY6 Bowl
I think that this is actually possible
>>63939047
Breakdown by conference
>SEC
8
>Big Ten
6
>Big 12
4
>ACC
2
>Conference USA
2
>PAC-12
1
>Bootyblasters
1
>AAC
1
>>63939148
8 SEC lol yeah
>>63939069
Eh, I think their resume is extremely similar to Iowa's after the title game, could go either way. MSU I think has a really damn strong resume after beating Iowa and I think it's enough to jump Clemson
>>63939207
ah damn we completely forgot about houston. they will be the next team in when one of the 22-25 sec teams lose
>>63939207
Needs more SEC
>>63939220
the AP had 8 SEC this year.
The bar for us to beat has been set really low
![tumblr_nox3m5VZO81s71q1zo1_1280[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/qL5xcmr.jpg "tumblr nox3m5VZO81s71q1zo1 1280[1]")
post yfw Oklahoma gets blown out of the playoffs by the first real team they've played this season
>>63939243
others recieving votes
>his team only has one first rounder
>>63939312
>bosa at number 1
seems like he's been pretty quiet this year relative to their natty season
>>63939312
welp
we'll never hear from ole miss ever again
>>63939312
>Pats no pick in the first
Twas truly the year to tank
>>63939088
>implying this shit won't get discussed again before next September
>>63939312
Jared Goff to the Cowboys at 3, this year proved they are desperate for a backup qb and their OL is still really solid and young
>>63939370
yah but this is the official prediction
>>63939312
Also Kubiak would never draft an RB earlier than round 6
>>63939395
>making the "official" 2016 cfb preseason rankings on Tuesday December 1, 2015
>>63939456
mad at rankings? :^)
>Clemson head football coach Dabo Swinney announced the athletic department will host the event that's expected to feed thousands of fans in Memorial Stadium following the ACC title game on Saturday night. Said Swinney: "Win or lose, this team deserves to be celebrated."
if UNC somehow does manage to win the game that is gonna be the saddest pizza party ever
>>63939456
>yfw everything comes true
also
i didnt know Lorde went to Louisiana State
>>63939324
because he's drawing double and triple teams a lot more. He's still been disruptive as fuck even if he hasn't had quite as many sacks. I still don't think he'll go #1 though, definitely top 5 though
>>63939512
>sad pizzz party
can't have a sad pizza party senpai
i'm 287 i would know
>>63939572
NEW
