Post funstuff with a scientific twist
ITT:things that 13yo nerds laugh off to
>>8135250
contribute or gtfo then?
>>8135256
these pics are retarded
>>8135289
Sorry to say but you obviously don't understand all of them then.
>>8135502
>>8135508
>>8135511
>>8135515
well that would be the last one from me
>>8135518
more at http://tocrofl.tumblr.com/
Oh, HAHAHA cocksuckers sharing unfunny insider chemistry/mathematics jokes
>>8135571
>insider
>>8135571
>insider
maybe you're just born an outsider, anon.
>>8135571
>insider
where do you think you are mate
>>8135856
Kek
>>8135571
>>8135856
lol
>>8135518
C2D4? I'm no chem major but dont remember that from any classes I took
>>8135571
stick to /biz/ bud
>>8135239
how is this funny
you understand the idea behind this piece, right?
it's not a pipe, because it's a picture of a pipe.
>>8135242
this is just dumb
>>8135256
this is just dumb
>>8135502
how is this funny?
>>8135507
accurate
tbf discrete mathematics with ducks is p good for what it tries to be.
>>8135508
this is just dumb
>>8135511
it should be obvious why
how is this funny?
>>8135518
how is lacking basic knowledge of fundamental chemical reactions funny?
>>8135571
they're neither insider nor funny
>>8135856
dohohohoho
wasting chemicals for no reason sure is funny
>>8137426
D refers to deuterium
why do you not know that
>>8137454
>>8137454
The magenta colored border is visual element of Googles object recognition software.
The number on the right indicites the degree of similarity.
So seeing how computers are still so naive while most of the people who own one, don't even fully understand how they work in their current state, kinda makes me lol
Also because I'm obviously replying to one of said people.
>>8137540
I thought that 0.94 was supposed to be pretty good, i.e. the scale goes from 0 to 1.
>>8137545
The joke is that google is almost sure it's a pipe, but the caption says "this is not a pipe"
>>8137555
Oh, so my initial assertion was correct after all.
The joke doesn't work, because an image recognition bot fucking up in exactly the same way most people who don't understand anything about art or philosophy do.
It would be funny if the bot was certain that it is not a pipe.
>>8137545
the joke is that googles super duper mega uber algorithm still doesn't know what a art is, even if presented on a silver tablet...
This artwork by Magritte is commonly understood that "Ceci" is refering to itself and that it is not a real object, but rather a visual metaphor.
Though "Ceci" could also reference to something else, which could also be a valid point of view because in the end its a matter of perspective anyways.
A (sane) human instantly grasps this concept undecidability in this paradox scenario, but the computer seems to be more sure of what he is looking at, which I find funny. Why? Just magine how the 0.06% would be defined if
'NOT-PIPE' is not an option. :^)
PoS book. that's the only answer I wanted.
