This was given to 10 year olds.
Can you answer it?
>>8128664
the top is 44
I dont' know how to do the bottom unless that 2cm label is labeling the small vertical length. In which case the answer for the bottom one is also 44
>>8128664
First one is 44cm
Second one is also 44cm
[eqn]P=44[/eqn]
>>8128664
Both 44cm
I'm actually getting 43.84cm, did you guys use paint or a different program to measure the lines? I can put a ruler up to my screen if it will help.
t. every first year mech eng opening this thread
>>8128840
Pictures not drawn to scale. Use maths alone to figure it out.
>>8128941
I think you missed a bit of sarcasm there, kiddo
Not enough data for second shape
>>8128664
you cant answer because the lengths of all the sides arent given
>>8129075
Yes there is
How do you work out the first one?
t. Brainlet
>>8128664
Even if it's not to scale, how are you supposed to solve this? I'm stumped.
>>8129110
Nevermind, thought it was area the question was asking for
These aren't solvable. I hope that's obvious..
>>8129115
For the first one, think about what the two unlabelled vertical lengths must add up to, likewise with the horizontal.
>>8129056
think what happens if you start moving the lines.
>>8129115
Vertical lines add up to 24 (12 + 12)
Horizonal lines add up to 20 (10 + 10)
Total, 44cm
>>8129120
you cant know what the unlabeled sides are unless you measured them retard
>>8129128
As the title says, they're "rectilinear shapes" so the 2 unknown verticals will equal the known vertical, retard.
>>8129128
If all the angles are right angles, which they are obviously supposed to be, then you can.
Wouldn't the second one be 42?
>>8129138
You gotta add the 2cm twice dawg
>>8129146
You're right, I'm dumb.
>>8129152
Pls don't bait
>everyone assuming euclidean metric
Plebs get out!
>>8128664
i must apply monte carlo method and hope for the best
No matter how we cut rectilinear shape, we always get the same perimeter as it was full
>>8128664
i didnt know so i wanted to read whole thread to learn how and im even more confused. fuck you 4chan. fuck you math
>>8128840
I know people who actually do this.
they disgust me
>>8129250
It's just 9 and 11 twice plus 2 twice for the extra bit
44
Literally primary school level
>>8128664
I didn't read the question correctly and tried to solve for area. . .
Am I retarded /sci/?
