>>8124732
>pop sci books
This is shit, OP. Shit, every book in your picture is a steaming pile of shit.

Serge Lang's Algebra is meme tier, Rudin is meme tier, your books are shit

>>8124738
yet you read all of them?

>>8124831
I read none of them.
I dont need to put a turd in my mouth to know that it doesnt taste delicious

>>8124837
yes that is actually what you would need to do

>>8124732
I'm going through Godel, Escher, Bach right now and it's a pretty enjoyable read. It will definitely give you a sense of wonder at a couple points, even if you're a seasoned scientific cynic
>>8124837
These are some rather well polished turds, then

>>8124732
Why is Shannon up there? It's a great paper.

>>8124859
So is Cybernetics. All three are a very good read in my opinion.

>>8125228
Norbert Weiner is a horrible writer he tries too hard to be eloquent. I want to scream
>There is no need to impress English majors, just write like a fucking scientist.

>>8125241
Just because you brainlet can not understand basic English doesn't mean Wiener is a bad author :^)

SICP

Anyone has a good astrophysics and/or astronomy books to recommend? Not talking about pop, entry-level baby's first steps bullshit. I mean full on scientific, hardcore stuff

>>8127015
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki/Astronomy_Textbook_Recommendations