What is the probability of technology singularity being made in 50 years?
>>8120308
0
>>8120315
Explain why you think that?
>>8120315
50/50
It either happens, or it doesn't.
Not dude, but he's right, the technology singularity is crap.
If anything, the finite size of atoms and the speed of light will serve to impede any runaway intelligence.
>>8120399
I thought chinks were good at math.
>>8120308
Only when Ron Paul is President.
[spoiler]It's not happening.[/spoiler]
>>8120435
we're not gonna to prevent this
>>8120443
> quantum entanglement allow for FTL information transfer
brainlet detected
>>8120443
>shouldn't quantum entanglement allow for FTL information transfer.
No. No it doesn't.
That's Deepak Chopra level bs.
It's probable to happen
>>8120443
that's not how quantum entanglement works ya big dingdong
>>8120580
Bu... but, mah singoolarity!
>>8120315
Nice graph man, I'm convinced
>>8120315
Isn't it truly amazing that /sci/ was able to predict the Trump presidency all the way back in 2013?
>>8120405
>If anything, the finite size of atoms and the speed of light will serve to impede any runaway intelligence.
>neurons are considerably larger than atoms
>the fastest neurons communicate at 70-100 miles per second; light speed is well over 1000x faster
A runaway intelligence only has to be smarter and think faster than the most brilliant human and possess the ability to self-improve...
>>8120315
>disagreeing with the director of engineering at Google Ray kurzweil.
>believing you're intelligent
