>Book only gives answer to pair problems
>course uses no book
>just lecture slides
>hand-out of problem sets
>no solution to problem sets
>no syllabus
>no errata
>have literally no fucking clue what the fucker wants me to know
>Professor obscures everything to make his course seem harder
>Professor puts in question not covered by the course claiming "if you read the book you'd know"
>>8081604
nothing says "I can't think for myself" more than that last thing you said.
You don't deserve a degree if your only competence is to rewrite what's in a fucking book.
>>8081562
>"I majored in Bio* because I'm not good at math! :^)"
>>8081650
>>8081641
hmmm...
Definitely not a shitposter.
>the professor wrote the book
>you have to buy it online to view it
>the book is 10 paragraphs
>for 80 dollars
>the test covers obscenely obtuse shit not covered in class or the "book"
>professor complains about current state of medical school applicants
>>8081687
>>8081579
that's my circuits class right now
>>8081687
my current digital signal processing teacher wrote what is in their opinion the best book in the field and they sent us a free pdf and told us not to tell anyone
>>8081650
I just have to ask, why are you so butthurt about biology
you're taking shitposting to new, idiotic levels, anon
>>8082552
what DSP book was it?
>>8081562
> here is an interesting and central theorem
> I'll leave the proof as an exercise
>>8082564
Thank god for proofwiki
>>8081638
It's not covered in the spec, he expects you to read the book cover to cover but doesn't list those topics as the syllabus
>>8082560
I'm not supposed to say
>book is full of exercises at the end of every chapter
>there are no solutions, there is no answer key
>>8082701
>a third party answer key exists, available from some shady and obscure Indian publisher for twice the price of the original book
>>8082709
>shady and obscure Indian
REEEEEEEEE
Why can't Indians be normal people?
