http://test.mensa.no/
Is this a trustworthy iq test?
last time it was posted the /sci/ average was like 130
[spoiler] 128 brainlet reporting [/spoiler]
>>8054385
This was the end result and the averege of the general population.
>>8054367
Didnt even have time to answer the last ten so I answered them randomly. Whats the deal with the answers? Are they binary or is there a spectrum of answers?
>>8054450
Pic related
Not as special as I thought I was
>>8054454
Oh for fuck sakes
>>8054456
>93 percentile
does that mean 1 out of every 10 people you've met has been smarter than you? ouch
>>8054483
I think it means im smarter than 93% of people who took that specific test
>>8054454
Don't worry, you are very special. More special than most.
>>8054483
135 brainlet here
Good test desu
I didnt' notice the chronometer until 10 minutes had been left.
>>8054494
You really mean that??
>>8054499
No. You have the same experience and memories as us. Thus your brain will operate the same kind of informartion at lower speed than high-IQ geniuses.
:^)
>tfw dummy
>>8054502
You are just plain "smart" from the POV of co-workers and obviously, your boss.
>>8054367
>>8054504
How does it feel?
>>8054504
I refuse to believe this is real. Someone with 140 IQ can't actually spend their time on a Malayan Mariachi forum, can they?
>>8054511
I'm 135 and I'm here ;^)
Is the 140 the 4chan limit?
>>8054501
Yikes. Big autistic IQs like yours?
>>8054513
Post your mensa screenshot
>>8054514
Are you retarded? You don't have the same experience and memories as the people on this board. Jesus, did you really read my post?
>>8054520
Your post? The one where you literally say the exact opposite of what you're trying to peddle now?
If you're the guy bragging about the 135 IQ I can already tell you're socially retarded.
I got 145 or more
Does your ability to spot patterns really have a significant correlation with your ability to learn new languages or understand concepts in chemistry and physics?
>>8054367
>15 point margin of error
>your iq is very likely ~100
kill yourself my senpai
feels average man
>>8054525
It was fucking sarcasm, you dumbfuck.
How can someone has the same experience and memories as another?
>>8054548
Calm down, nobody knows what you're talking about
>>8054553
Then, why did you answer me if you don't know shit?
>>8054558
To tell you to stop embarassing yourself
>>8054562
Why do you give a fuck?
>>8054564
I don't
>>8054566
Yes you do.
>>8054568
lol, are you OP? Ima stop bumping your thread
>>8054575
Nice emotional control. ;^)
>>8054367
I've never do one of this, there's some of this ins spanish? I don't want search by myself because i don't know which will be reliable.
>>8054583
You don't need to know english. Actually the test consists of pattern recognition.
>>8054580
>trying this hard to get into an internet fight
Lmao
>>8054588
Do you notice that you are actually answering my posts?
KEK
fuck off you two niggers
Well first off there are 2 errors in the test and they have managed to have the answers available in the source. Idiots...
>>8054602
So you sourced the answers and that's why your IQ is 145? I guess that's legit, welcome to Mensa
>>8054602
>Having to cheat
HEH
In general, any online IQ test is unreliable, and IQ tests really need to be administered by trained professionals.
That said, some online IQ tests are more accurate than others, and if this one is by MENSA then I bet this is as good as online IQ tests get - no one takes IQ more seriously than MENSA. The only real reason to find out your IQ (other than its original purpose, which was to identify which children were intellectually impaired and needed extra academic support) is to access the resources of high IQ organizations, which range from scholarships to grant funds, to access to networks.
>>8054596
actually you replied to him and u need to stfu
>>8054602
where are the answers in the source?
This was pretty easy.
>>8054607
It's not cheating if it's their fault...
>>8054621
Ok :(
>answered 5 questions
>clicked other 30 at random
>tfw 101 IQ genius
>>8054615
>access the resources of high IQ organizations, which range from scholarships to grant funds, to access to networks.
Genuinely interested, which organisations offer these?
>>8054606
Well, actually I did the test and got 143, meaning one wrong answer. (One error is in a board and one is in an answer.)
I then searched through the source, found the answers and lastly noted the errors.
>>8054575
He is not me.
I feel so fucking stupid.
I've had multiple official IQ tests come back in the 160+ range that were done by professionals. I can take it when I'm back from class if /sci/ wants to see its accuracy.
Not, i'm not as smart as this test say, this is serious.
>>8054655
You are.
tried to take it honestly. had to guess at the last 4 or 5, just couldn't really wrap my head around them.
brainlet banz inc
What a pathetic attempt at an IQ test, from mensa no less.
Everyone: remember to knock 20-25 points off of your score.
Now if only this number got me a gf
>>8054624
In the source is a link to an identical test. This test uses an encrypted Javascript to check the answers. Find a way around the encryption, you get the script and there you'll find an array containing the answers.
>>8054691
>mfw this is real and not bait
Bit less than what I got on an official test.
Pretty content.
Oh well
>>8054699
samefag pls no
Eh.
You know that IQ tests don't mean much, right?
![99eb94e574693948829cfd8f37f6eb52[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/tYiE4ot.png "99eb94e574693948829cfd8f37f6eb52[1].png")
>>8054367
>>8054730
They do. Do some research.
>tfw IQ has declined 17 points in 15 years.
Still in the 90th percentile but feels bad, man.
so i got bored and clicked finish at 40%
nice test
IQ tests are really inconsistent for me
I've been placed on some to be around 135, the average is around 144, and a couple have placed me at 156 and 164.
not reckon a talent 128
130 not bad. I think I could get higher if I thought a little harder
Averaging all the scores showed in the pictures posted here = 127
>>8054874
Why do you average something that is so non-linear just like that?
>>8054367
Let's compile a list of IQ exams with Raven Matrices
What are they bros?
The more I work on these the higher my IQ goes up. Most of these follow the same basic patterns ayy lmap lets crowd source these and ace them all
>>8054483
Doesn't have to mean that as you probably selectively meet people who are in your own "range" more than others since you're a small kid.
Most of the question has a similar logic to it, no?
>>8054934
Yes they are all the same basic idea, just more and more complicated things happening at once.
Did better than I thought
Didn't finish. About 80% through I think.
>>8054688
But that means I got a score of 110.
Why is this score lower than the one from 5 years ago?
123 fuck this test
138. It had many questions which were similar to the iqtest.dk test
>>8054947
Then you got a feeling for what you can do without having to expose what you really can do. Great!
>>8054367
I got 130
What fucking annoyed me was that the last 5 or so I'd seen before in an aptitude test, but I didn't have time to do anything but guess them
97.7 percentile, am I still a brainlet?
Alright, since most people here are retarded, but are getting 90th percentile+, we can conclude that the test is complete rubbish and the average is probably around 120
The problems were all the same
Meh
>>8055018
Selection bias.
You misunderstand what average intelligence is. Most people on 4chan are above average intelligence.
Someone with average intelligence thinks they're fucking BRILLIANT, if they get an A in freshman stats.They usually go into nursing/medicine, or become public sector workers, assuming they get an education at all. Something like plugging a monitor in is new and terrifying to them.
I'd guess that most of the people on 4chan are actually 110+, regardless of the ridiculous shit they say and do.
>>8054367
Not sure about the problem against scores like 120 and such.
What, to be "smart" you have to be 4 deviations from the mean?
That's like saying 6'4 isnt tall because its not 99.9 percentile.
>>8054367
Top 10 global university student here, going for a masters/PhD.
>>8054642
> Clicked every question at random
> test gives pic related
You are the usual online IQ tests are grossly inflated shill
>>8055089
weird I got the same
except, I study psychology at a state university that's not even rated. 5 years no bachelors yet
Does this mean I got everything correct?
1% of the world is smarter than me, that is like 6-7 million people ffs... How the fuck are we still drowning in this stone age primitve ape times
>>8055171
kek i can see why you got 135
>>8055181
Woah m8, I didn't even expect a 1/10
gj
>>8055171
that 6-7million people may have scored the same as you or just 1 point more, depends on the actual distribution of IQ
bellshape is the perfect scenario
>>8055186
Do you even understand what you've done wrong? What's 1% of 7 billion?
>>8055198
just read the filename before you further embarrass yourself
So what's the answer and why?
>>8055220
You don’t see the diagonal pattern?
top left is 1
next diagonal row is 2
next is 3
next is 4
>>8055225
yes but more than one of the answers contain 5 black squares.
>>8055229
Then you look at which corner the pattern occupies and notice that it cycles around
>>8055220
count them, 1,2,3,... what happens between two neighbouring vertical ? two horizontal?
>>8055220
Going from left to right, the blocks are rotating clockwise and gaining one additional block for every rotation.
The answer will be 5 blocks in the upper right hand corner.
am i brainlet?
>>8055349
MODS
what is the OFFICIAL brainlet cutoff
well...
Guessed the last 5 questions. Was running out of time. Thought itd be lower
>>8055367
a humble 120 +-5
135 for the more elitist idiots here
>>8055349
MODDSSS
>>8055427
honestly 120 seems pretty low given the average score here. 135 seems like a good point.
wtf was that last question. that's the only one that made no sense to me.
>>8055440
Why is manlet cutoff like 65%,
But brainet cutoff is 99.9%?
>>8055220
holy shit dude this was one of the easier ones
>>8055449
Because there are no diminishing returns on intelligence, but any height above 6'0 is really "good enough"
>>8055449
because average intelligence is much more hindering than average height.
you'd know that if you weren't such a brainlet.
>>8055452
>no diminishing returns
Don't laugh but I am a masters psych student studying cognition and learning.
Most of the time it's children, but we find that the amount of social/academic issues a child faces correlates with IQ. The correlation is pretty much flipping the bellcurve upside down.
>>8055454
>hindering
that's why there’s so many within average range right? because it's bad?
>>8055464
>>8055467
These were the only 3 I didn't understand, can someone explain?
i got 140 on a real test but only 119 on this
>>8055465
yes you moron, the average can be bad. in this case, the average IS bad depending on what the goal is. since we are in the science and math board, let's say the goal is to be a successful scientist. How smart do you have to be? we can agree that the average person isn't cut out to be a good scientist or mathematician right? hell, I remember in highschool most of the class failed trig and algebra which are unbelievably simple. if you're slightly smarter than them you might make it as a lab monkey just running tests all day but you won't make any meaningful contributions. Even if you're a genius you might still end up a lab monkey but at least you have a chance. that's why the cutoff is high, because most people under that would have very little chance at being successful in an intellectual field.
fucking brainlets man, need everything spelled out for them.
>>8055469
this one was a troll, the right answer was simply to hit next. you're stupid if you didn't realize that.
>>8054504
meinneggar.jpg
>>8054513
It might be, desu. Most iq tests have a stdevs of 15, and are only good to 3 stdevs. So, this test probably only spits out a maximum of 145 (perfect score and maybe missing like 1-2 questions depending on the difficulty of the question).
>>8054691
Oh shit, nigga.
>>8054832
there are different types of iq tests that give different numbers. for example, mensa has a flat requirement of 98th percentile which for stanford-binet is 132 but for catell is like 150.
also online iq tests don't count.
>>8055486
I think ability/interest in science and math has social influences as well.
I didnt have many friends growing up. No social groups. Hence I never fell victim to things like consumerism or "math is hard" meme.
>>8055471
did anyone else get a lower/higher score
did i get dumber or is it the test
Does anyone know how this is scored? Does it take time into account?
>>8055487
damn it, there's gotta be some sort of pattern. fuck, what is it?
>>8055507
I got 123 in a real test and 121 in this
>>8055553
Consider the images in each column. Flip the first image top-to-bottom and place it on the middle image. If a black line goes on top of another black line, they cancel out. The resulting image is the bottom one
do peope just really thinks that they could define intelligence by usinga number?
wake up we are not robots
>>8055545
any1
>>8055553
1) invert the figures in the first row
2) superimpose them on to the images of the second row
3) delete sections of the new image where the original two overlap
Then you're left with the images in the 3rd row. Answer was F here
am i smart
>>8055464
Tilt the middle block and superimpose it on the left.
The answer has lines on the left, top, and right.
getting bored at 43% of test
choose finish test
score 110
don't know if this is triky or i'm just that intelligent
>>8055628
I did pretty much the same thing but around 50% with like 115. Does this have to do with finishing the test early? Or do the problems just get a lot harder in the second half?
>>8055637
you are asking the wrong person
but i think that probably is bot of them
meaby I will try again tomorrow morning now it's 01:32 bye
Randomly clicked for the last 7 due to time and got 117.
>>8054367
>http://test.mensa.no/
Randomly clicked the last 3.
whats the cuttoff for brainlet
>>8055467
There is always the same three base figures.
There is obviously a circle and a triangle, the point is to figure out which one is the third.
In (Rows,Columns) (1,3) and (2,1) you can see the figures cut by half and switched each resulting portion. And now you realise that, in fact, both (1,1) and (2,3) can be the original figure nº 3. You could argue that 1 is not a figure because of it's shape but you don't need to.
Third row represents the other modification. Cut by half and the right part is fliped then mirrored.
Now, looking at the options it's only possible for the original to be (2,3) since (1,1) doesn't have the modification as an option.
I think the order of the modifications in rows 1 and 2 are random, not sure.
>>8054367
>Randomly picked 30% of the questions and I still got a 128
Kek
>>8055717
>randomly click everything
>get exactly 100
Not sure if that means they're onto my bullshit, or if's just to be expected.
>>8055717
>>8055726
of course they bump these things up, like all online iq tests do. specially when they're trying to sell you a trip to norway to take the "more controlled test" there. the average is probably around 125 so that it would be inflated as possible while still making sense since the average person still wouldn't qualify with the inflation but someone 7 points above average would. someone with an iq of 107 would still feel vastly superior to everyone else and believe it cause they're the kings of brainlets.
>online iq tests
>iq tests in general
>taking the iq test of an organization that profits off of people who think they have a high iq
i think this belongs on /reddit/
>>8054367
You might wanna confirm your results with this independent test.
I felt really good on number 33 when I didn't know what was going on and I was trying to figure it out and suddenly it clicked
>pick random answers
>100
that's bullshit but I believe it
So, now what? I finished with 7 min still left on the clock. Does time have anything to do with it? College drop out here :/
When do I get my medal?
>>8055864
Hi Jack Lamben
>>8055864
Yeah I realized a bit too late about the crop. Name is a bit longer though. But it wouldn't be too hard to find, given my toolbar icons.
>>8055877
close enough
>>8055864
married to mildred?
>>8055892
Nope... Honestly don't even know a Mildred.
>>8055886
It's alright, just go to sleep man.
>>8055897
Shall do, cheers for the conversation.
Am I seriously still the only one to have gotten 145, you guys are pathetic
>>8055614
>a fucking 4chan app
No, you're a retard.
Looks legit OP, trust me, I have a 145 IQ
>>8054730
Says the brainlet xD
>>8054367
Apparently I'm kinda smart, but the other results in this thread just make me feel retarded.
>>8054367
123 brainlet reporting in
Fml
I could probably be 135 if I slept regularly
>>8054504
My fellow negroid
>>8055574
Damn. I finished the iq test, skipped some questions, and hadn't even considered that there were patterns within each column, instead of each row.
>>8056027
haven't you read the thread? results are inflated, you're actually damn near retarded. 125-130 is normal.
>>8054794
you actually proved yourself as average by getting frustrated and throwing away the test
I got 131. I honestly don't believe it's true, due to the fact that would put me in "Very superior intelligence" when I'm really dumb as bricks. It can't be real.
Fucking broke the test with my savage intelligence.
>>8056143
That just means you clicked one of the same answers the whole way through.
>>8054367
I got 130 the last time and I am not that smart, that test is supposed to make people sign up for their mensa bs and give them money.
Got 130 and did a mensa test recently and got 99
Engineering major btw
>>8055043
>Most people on 4chan are above average intelligence
>he actually believes this
this is what i mean by most of you are retarded
>>8056173
did they not provide a formula sheet?
>>8055737
Possibly, though I would venture to say that the average /sci/entist is probably smarter than the average person. Also, there's response bias (someone getting a 90 would be less likely to post it here). I don't really know how accurate it is (I've never taken a actual IQ test).
The results of this test are normalized, average 100. Don't ask me how I know this.
>but /sci/ can't be that smart!
I'm guessing total brainlets aren't posting their results out of shame.
>>8056202
They probably are. There average 4chan user is probably slightly above intelligence, but lazy and therefore not super successful.
>>8054367
By the way, if you select all wrong answers (but do it quickly) you get a score of 90 (~40th percentile give or take).
>>8056285
someone should share this test on /b/ and some normie forum (facebook maybe?)
>>8056285
It's not really delusional to think that it's likely that a board full of science/engineering undergrads/graduate students would be smarter than average. That's also not even taking response bias into consideration.
>>8056289
>someone should share this test on ... some normie forum (facebook maybe?)
>>8056202
If you don't believe the average person on 4chan is way above average, you have literally never been outside. And if you nix the garbage boards such as /b/, /s4s/, whatever other cancerous shit the average would go up. Most people posting on /sci/ and /lit/ are in university or have a degree. I'd guess the average for regulars of these boards is about 115, if not even higher.
Feel free to walk into a Walmart and prove me wrong or just go to your local university (usually around ~110 IQ average) and see how much smarter those people are.
The fact that 4chan is 1% black is enough to boost us several points
>>8056291
>science/engineering undergrads/graduate students would be smarter than average
no, but it would be delusional to think a board full of people who obsess over the idiot tube is above average. the test is clearly normalized at around the 125 mark.
>>8056292
>iq test
>you have an below average
kek
>>8056293
probably higher iq here than elsewhere
but this is more than negated by decreased mental health
overall, it's a bunch of high-ego high-iq low-everythingelse fucking idiots jerking themselves off.
>>8054367
Only if you consider spatial reasoning as an accurate metric to derive IQ from.
P.S. You're not good at it.
>>8055469
Jesus Christ this one is one of the easier ones.
Top to bottom, perform a vertical flip on the first image, overlay the second image, where lines overlap, they negate each other.
>tfw 125
I don't think I will make it, /sci/
I'm too smart for it
>>8054543
>
Its not a margin of error, its the standard deviation. You'd get the margin of error after deciding what level of confidence you want, you pleb.
>this thread
>people still take this thing seriously
Yeah keep going like that you geniuses,Im sure you'll be the new World leader doing online quizzes :^)
>>8056406
Hey smart guy, then why does the middle bar in the center column disappear? Why doesnt the first column fit completely?
143. I did something wrong.
>>8056440
What middle bar? I'm sure it doesn't disappear because nothing overlaps it. What do you mean first column doesn't fit completely?
>>8054367
>110
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I mean I still had 15 minutes left and didn't realise that guessing wasn't penalised, but still
Well I normally get 115 on that one dutch test so this is a welcome change
it said i was outside of the range it could test
what mean?
>>8056544
It means you got a negative IQ score.
>>8055464
The same row:
Add the first and the third, overlapping lines get removed, rotate the square half a step (to the left).
>>8056544
It means your IQ < 55.
>do this test
>get 128
>have absolutely brilliant friend
>always aced everything in school and uni
>got a PhD recently
>grasps everything with ease
>more than once I'd explain a complex concept it took me a while to learn to him and he'd get it one fourth of the way into my explanation and immediately have better command of it than I do
>ask him if he ever did an IQ test
>he says no
>make him do this one
>he gets 123
huh
He only took eleven minutes too.
>>8056449
In the center column there should be two horizontal bars applying your method. Also, the first column kind of looks like it, but there are a ton of lines that arent explained by what you say.
>>8056592
>>8056578
is it good?
>>8056583
I did the test in less than 5 minutes got 145 or more. The test was very easy. However the best combination to achieve academical sucess is to have an IQ of 120 - 130, be disciplined and have good study skills.
Most things are easy to grasp what makes it hard are often esoteric notiation and terms you have not heard of before. People in general have no problem to grasp advanced concepts because at their core most concepts are very trivial.
>>8054691
>tfw half the population is literally retarded.
I'm black, my parents are from Kenya. I hate myself so much, I really try to detach myself from the general nigger culture but the low IQ will always stay
I just try to hide it as much as possible
I didn't even finish the test, got to 93%
can I be mathman now?
>>8056647
I got your same score and I'm a retard compared to most people here. If this test means anything, I'll say you're smarted than the average person but not smart enough to be a mathman.
130 here. I cannot understand this one. Help pls?
Does the time make a lot of difference? Because I stress through the ones I don't understand right away.
>>8056650
Answer is (3,1)
I missed that one while taking it, but I instantly got it right now.
You add the squares that are in the same side, and cancel out the ones that are in different sides.
>>8056650
Go right to left. If the left and middle have the same color squares on the same side, they add. If they have same color squares on the other side, they cancel out. The answer is top right.
>>8056650
Seriously? Look at the pattern that appears in the column. Same color on opposite side (subtract), same color on the same side (add).
I answered a few randomly.
R8 me
>>8056601
I got 143 but I finished it just before the test ran out of time.
I strongly doubt that you'd do it in five minutes. Several questions must be investigated in kinda tedious ways.
>>8055467
This one as an example has a lot of interpretations which needs to be checked against the answers before finding out that they can't be true.
If you did it in 5 minutes and got a score of 145, it is more likely that you just lucked on the harder questions (they are three or so with only a few viable answers, so maybe) than actually being smart.
>>8056583
To put it simple, I'm pretty sure that your friend has fast intelligence instead of deep intelligence. Fast intelligence is flashy, really impressive in conversations or dynamic envoirments. For making good decisions, developing complex understanding of situations when time doesn't matter (this test) sometimes they fall flat.
>>8056732
It's possible to do it quickly and not be that smart.
Yes, a few are much more complicated than the rest, but one can luck out and "get them" really quickly.
>>8056583
I had two people like this in my last class.
I believe they got the highest possible grades with honours.
However, on the last maths exams I scored better on them on the harder parts (but did a lot of mistakes on the easier parts). The harder parts always required some abstract thinking not previously taught.
It is weird. It seems like they have memorised very strict rules of deduction and cannot abstract or think outside of the box whatsoever.
One of them, whom I talked to a lot, always got mad at me after tests for scoring higher or equally high as him even if I didn't study for them. He studied so much his mum forbid him from studying.
I haven't studied psychology, but I think there is a difference on memorised intelligence and abstract intelligence. The IQ tests test basically abstract thinking. How to identify rules and patters common in mathematical objects.
Instead of understanding these more abstractly some people just memorise how to manipulate the syntax instead.
So ya. I found that the people who constantly aced stuff were the people only focusing on memorisation.
>>8056741
Yes. But if you lucked out and found the solutions quickly, it was still merely luck.
Anyone minimally rational, given enough time, could solve all these questions. Anyone given enough luck could accidentally find the answer.
I left out which part the luck pertained to make it sufficiently vague to include both scenarios.
>>8056746
Yes. School only test mimic skill and rarely solving new problems skill.
>>8056754
fucken /pol/ is smarter than /sci/
>b-b-but-but- believing in global warming makes me a good scientist
>>8056750
The history of tests is very interesting.
It is actually possible to see how tests are designed to segregate different groups.
In Sweden, where I am from, when we started having mandatory education, people started taking actions against the lower classes for achieving as good grades.
Firstly arithmetic and mathematics were taught as two different subjects. Mathematics followed Euclid's Elements, and arithmetic was basically just how to calculate quickly. The teachers realised that the children of the working class could solve many of the mathematical problems just as easily as others, and thus started to introduce the "harder sections." These harder sections have never been part of the actual curriculum but is rather a way to test your abstraction skills. These abstraction skills are more common in the upper classes due to academic parents etc. So this was a way to make the working class' grades worse.
Then they realised that the working class still got fairly good grades, so they started to include things like "good explanations" and "scientific language" etc.
It just progressed more and more. Arithmetic and mathematics were forced together into one subject which would primarily deal with algebra taught without the actual mathematical grounds beneath it etc.
It just goes on like this.
There is an interesting period during the 1970s, I believe, set theory and so on was introduced very early to teach children abstract thinking.
It failed tremendously.
>>8056732
No, it took me approximately 5 minutes. I usually do not need more than 10 minutes for test like these. The test was very easy. I understood all of the questions too. The answers are trivial, at least for me. If you know (understand) something then you know (understand) it, it is hard to explain. To me the pattern of all questions was simply obvious.
>>8056769
Sure.
As I've stated. It is more probable that you were lucky or cheated than randomly did that in five minutes. I retook the test and I did it in three minutes, knowing all the answers. Finding the right answers, in a calm manner, took three minutes.
You see how bullshit you sound now?
>>8056774
I don't care what you think. I have done a real IQ test and can tell you that this test is very easy in comparison. I did the test in approximately 5 minutes.
I would estimate that the hardest questions on this test is in the IQ range of 115-120. Basically if you got all questions right on this test you should be able to get an IQ of 115-120 on a real IQ test (raven matrices).
I have ADHD and can't finish these test. The problem is they give you all the easy ones in the beginning and you get tired of doing them after a while. I have a high IQ but I can't ever force myself to finish these
>>8056786
This test is no difference than what you'd see on a "real Raven matrices". I've seen lots of Raven matrices test and they're all the same. If you score well on this you'd score well on this section of an IQ test.
>>8056786
The problem isn't getting the questions right. As I stated, they aren't that hard. The problem is stating that you just happen to find the right answers.
There are usually directly 3 different ways to look at it. Vertically, horizontally, or diagonally. Then you have to analyse each row, so there you have directly 9 options to look at a vague non-intuitive matrix. If you're going to look at a matrix which represents an equation like those with boxes, then you need to look at it at least horizontally and vertically to understand that one big black box=3 small boxes (since the last such equation is done vertically and not horizontally).
Of course then there are matrices which do not care of rows/columns but have them there to confuse you etc.
Stating that you would do it so quickly is absurd.
Solving a full paper of equations isn't hard. Doing it very QUICKLY is hard. Not because it requires intelligence, but because it is restrained by other things, like writing speed.
I tried finding what error I did, apparently I did none. When /pol/ and /sci/ started taking these tests, so many have scored so high that getting all the rights answers have dropped from 145 to around 140. This just shows how much bullshit there is on 4chan.
If you would have done it in 10-15 minutes I could have believed you. But not 5.
So, sure, don't care what I think. But you are most likely a liar. And I call you out as one.
But do try this. Take an outside perspective and consider what arguments you have agreed to. First it was luck. Then it is simply easy to recognise it. You've already contradicted yourself here.
You're basically in damage control mode trying to defend yourself on the internet.
I will stop responding now because you're clearly an idiot.
>>8056802
I was talking about the experience of finding something very easy, not the logic of the pattern that appears in the questions. I have explained it (the logic) to people who have asked in this thread.
>>8056815
Haha, why do even you care? Are you retarded or what? I do not know why I can do shit like this very fast, but I can. Do you have problem with this? Do you have some inferiority complex or what? I am smarter than you, deal with it. Yes it is very likely that I am lying, this is the internet, people lie about all sort of things. However I can ensure you that I am most likely one of the smartest persons you have ever talked to over the internet. You are feeding my misanthropy right now. Do you you also think Erdős was lying when he said he could multiply 3 digit numbers in an instant? 394 times 983, is this also impossible because it would take much longer to write down all the steps? Stop making categorical errors...
I was not the first person who answered on your initial question. We are all anonymous so for all you know all your answers might be from different people for all you know. Stop being this stupid. IQ 143, not likely. As I have said, the test is not hard. It is barely in the IQ range of 120.
>>8056849
I never stated I was smarter than anyone. I never said I believed in the test. I never said that I got an IQ of 143 except the test gave me it.
Again, your autism is showing. If you are so smart you would leave it. If you would meet someone as smart as your propose you are, you would too doubt it since that person being a liar is a more plausible scenario.
So this is the end of the discussion. If you cannot prove that you're a genius, it is more likely you're pretending. You won't convince anyone. You should realise this. End of discussion.
>>8056855
Yes, I realize that but it is fun to respond. You are aware that two different people have answered you? Also you have shown why induction does not always lead to the right conclusion in this thread. You assumed falsely that I was the first one to respond, I was not.
How do you guys stay focused? I feel like I got every single problem correct that I did but after 50% completion I get bored.
>>8055106
>answered 5 questions
reading comprehension, laddo
There is a methodical way to answer each question correct once you understand what you're looking for.
I would even go so far to say that the pattern are pretty arbitrary, each puzzle had like 3 or 4 patterns which could be argued as correct.
