>The hairy ball theorem This is why no one takes theoretical
You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math
>The hairy ball theorem
This is why no one takes theoretical math seriously
>>8042489
>theoretical math
as opposed to concrete math?
>>8042498
Yes, anything that doesn't include negative numbers is concrete math.
>>8042505
What about opposing vectors
>>8042505
>negative numbers dont real
>>8042786
Can you prove that every single negative number is also a read number? Oh, what's that, you can't even count to 1 because your stupid made-up set is dense? hahahahaha, ok, whatever you say realfag
>>8042786
You can't have a lack of something. Otherwise, you, sir would owe me an infinity's amount of money.
>>8042566
They never stopped arguing about who was being negative.
>>8042933
who's "they"?
>>8042971
The opposing vectors. It's a pun on the word negative.
>>8042505
>Implying subtraction isn't just the addition of negative numbers
>Implying that negative numbers don't have applications in real life, thus making them real concrete math
>Implying you aren't just in high school.
>>8042489
Ξ€here are very simple proofs of the theorem.
But if you pair this theorem with the Banach Tarski Paradox, you get two hairy balls.
>>8043281
Someone watched Vsauce.
>>8043314
no, fuck off
>>8042869
No sir, I have a lack of owing you an infinity of money. Check and mate.
>>8042489
Don't forget about the Cox-Zucker machine:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cox%E2%80%93Zucker_machine
>>8042505
Negative numbers are required for subtraction.
>>8042505
>guaranteed replies
>>8043518
I genuinely kekked at that