What is your opinion of Photoreading?
Basically this guy says it's possible to read and comprehend pages of word by taking a mental picture of it, basically flipping pages and looking at it.
http://www.amazon.com/Photoreading-3rd-Edition-Paul-Scheele/dp/0925480533
is it tested in any way ?
>>7973098
None that I found, but there is a group of people who say they can do it.
>>7973096
http://bookzz.org/md5/243A0C0F68C66EF6035795A3BA4D92C9
Just get the book here, for free, and try it yourself
>>7973096
It's all Neuro Linguistic Programming thihit
>>7973107
>there is a group of people who say they can do it
Oh really
There is a group of people who say they can project force fields, too
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWVKzaJc9GE
>>7973096
If you page through A Tale of Two Cities in 30 minutes you'd know that it involves some British people in revolutionary France, that doesn't mean you'd be able to write an in depth essay on the themes of the book on memory alone.
If this was possible, everyone would be doing it already dude.
Please be true pleaseeeeee
>>7973096
The bullshit factor is that you can't "read" at that speed AND comprehend it.
I think I read somewhere that to do this you have to be in a "prepared mental state," and then once you finish you bring the memories up to the surface or some bullshit
>>7975967
Its possible to break bricks with your hand, most people just don't have the disciprine
