Does anyone know of a somewhat reliably accurate online IQ test? I've done 6 in the last week and the results vary from 113-140. I know i'm nowhere near the higher end of that, but i'd really like to pinpoint my score with maybe 5 points. Any resources appreciated. Thanks. Pic unrelated.
>>7967767
Fuck off with IQ threads, you brain dead moron.
Inb4 hur dur brainlet XD
>>7967774
/thread
>>7967767
Let me guess the first one was 113 and the sixth one was 140?
>>7967774
Why so insecure? Did you score low?
>>7967800
Why the obsession with IQ? Do you have no achievements and need to feel better about yourself?
>>7967807
> People who score high IQs don't have any other achievements.
Nice strawman brainlet
>>7967807
Thanks to my high IQ I have a lot of achievements. Stay envious.
>>7967816
People with achievements don't care about IQ. Only insecure losers like you do.
>>7967800
>implying only those who score low have a problem with IQ
There's a brainlet in this thread all right, but it ain't him.
>>7967823
> constantly cries and incapable of admitting hes a brainlet
> tries to call someone insecure
I'm glad im not a brainlet like you. You have such a sad life full of repressions lol
>>7967831
>overusing the word brainlet
Calm your ass, he is dead.
>>7967835
> he is dead
such a shame. he would have been a great burger flipper
>>7967827
But anyone who has a problem with IQ scored low.
A => B is not equivalent to B => A
Thanks for proving you failed the logic section of the IQ test.
>>7967831
Spotted the loser with no achievements that hasn't even completed an intro to statistics class.
Once you understand stats, you stop taking IQ seriously.
>>7967838
>But anyone who has a problem with IQ scored low
Not necessarily.
Congrats on being dumb.
>>7967838
>>implying only those who score low have a problem with IQ
>But anyone who has a problem with IQ scored low.
>that pathetic retort
>>7967842
calm down brainlet
>caring how intelligent others think you are
>>7967850
>>7967851
Losers can't handle the fact they're losers. Go take a stats class and stop plaguing the board with this cringey nonsense.
>>7967869
I've taken better stats classes than you because I'm smarter than you.
>>7967872
>i'm smarter because i am!
KEK
>>7967877
Observational facts need no justification.
>>7967878
>believe me!
TOP KEK
>>7967872
Then you're either lying, didn't understand it very well, or flunked it.
You probably didn't understand it very well because of your low intelligence.
This whole thread is a cancerous dick-measuring contest.
Saged.
>>7967893
>Don't project your own ineptitude onto others.
The fact you still take IQ as anything more than a mild curiosity tells me you either failed stats or you've never even studied it.
Stay dumb dummy.
>>7967893
>Facts need to be believed.
>>7967901
>Facts can be denied
kek
>IQ
>Fact
MY FUCKING SIDES
>>7967901
>Stay envious. Only thanks to my superior IQ I'm such an outstanding academic intellectual.
The levels of autism are unreal. Can't tell if trolling or serious at this point.
>>7967919
Sure you can't tell, with an IQ that low.
Ok guys you can carry on arguing but please can someone actually refer me to what I asked for?
>>7967920
>Psychology
>Science
KEK
>>7967926
>hurr durr human behaviour is too complicated for me
>I can only operate with formulas and my calculator
Autism speaks.
>>7967935
>brainlet memer
>doesn't understand what is the scientific method
KEK the irony
>>7967920
The level of IQ 'science' wouldn't be taken seriously if it was in any other field. IQ studies are irrelevant and the people doing the studies are cranks, nobody cares about the field. That's why there's studies published with low r values and shitty methodologies every year.
>>7967935
>psychology
>hard
>psychology
>science
jesus top fucking qwok
>>7967941
>limiting yourself to a pop sci misunderstanding of the scientific method
>not thinking out of the box
>not being a polymath
truly a brainlet
>>7967954
You can have 1000 studies. If they're all shit, they're worthless.
Stay mad brainlet.
>>7967961
>brainlet in charge of assessing the validity of a scientific study
my sides are in orbit
>>7967999
>scientific fact
It doesn't matter how many times you repeat it. It will always be pseudoscience. :(
>>7968011
>defends pseudoscience
>links the occult board
KEK the irony
>>7968021
/x/ is where you belong, given that you fail to understand science and prefer to deny it.
IQ doesnt matter.
Use your SAT or ACT scores and convert it to IQ if you really want to know.
WHY CAN'T MODS FUCKING BAN THE SHITPOSTERS WHO POST ABOUT THESE SHITTY ONLINE IQ TESTS? IS IT REALLY SO HARD?
Online IQ tests are NOT SCIENCE. ONLINE IQ TESTS ARE SCAMS, and /sci/ is about talking about SCIENCE, not SCAMS.
>>7968023
>psychology
>science
It won't become true :(
>>7968049
Doesn't need to "become". It is already true.
>>7968025
>amerifat standardized tests are equivalent to iq
>>7968028
> why don't mods ban the things i dont like
X is not science won't magically make it NOT science brainlet. Go cry elsewhere
>>7968053
>it's true!
kek
>>7968059
>it's not true
kekek
>IQ of 160
>Smart but lazy
any other anons know this feel? upboat this comment please!
