So what is the hardest equatation you ever had in your opinion
Pic not really related but try it
Nice homework OP
>>7919757
Lol it isnt
I never had an equatation.
>>7919743
>engines had to deliver a labor of ....
Labor?!
What the fuck kind of scientific standard SI unit of energy using fuck is that?
>AMERICANS
I'm so fucking mad right now
>>7919743
>do my homework
Sure, it's 12412 kg
x^2 = -1
its the hardest equation, theres no solution so how can anything be harder?
>>7919808
>gif
>>7919783
This is an autistic outburst, it's quite obviously work done
why is /sci/ so obsessed with "hard"? what has this go to do with science? science is about making discoveries, how hard it was to make this discovery is relevant only to your ego.
>>7919813
Yea sorry, I didnt change the format. I promise that its nothing bad
>>7919743
how much of the labor ends up as altitude?
>>7919941
>Ignore air resistance
>Assume a single point particle object
>Disregard gravity
>disregard gravitational field strength
>disregard friction
>just have the answer
>>7919968
lol, the question is lacking like 99% data necessary to find an answer. im sure its satire of some sort
>>7919968
>disregard gravity
No, if he used work-energy theorem, def. Accounted for gravity.
I came across the most tedious one I've seen a while ago. It continues for 2 more pages but I can't into taking screenshots like that.
>>7919743
easy
[eqn] F=ma [/eqn]
[eqn] 2.00\times 10^{4} = m \cdot 1020 [/eqn]
[eqn] \implies m = 0.051kg [/eqn]
That's a light aircraft op.
Standard model of a particle is the longest I've seen, never used it, I don't think anyone really does
>>7920159
Here's an example, it carries on for another 5 pages or so
It's very easy to make up complicated equations: Try to solve a diophantine equation or a nonlinear PDE chosen at random and see if it is not the hardest problem you have ever seen.
Now, given the fact that our time on this earth is limited, we might as well spend our time on interesting questions.
>>7919743
That's a tough one! Anyone got solutions yet?
>>7920163
>length means difficulty
>>7920163
Is the L the lagrangian?
Did they find whatever can affect the particle and turn it into one giant ass equation?
>>7919809
I imagine there is a solution to this.
>>7919809
X=i
>>7920153
It's change in potential. W=m*g*h
m=20008kg
It's a gross understatement of calculating change in altitude. No standard atm, no nothing
my gf did hard equitation at our school
>>7919808
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>7920270
Underrated.
![[caffeine] Koufuku Graffiti - 11 [720p][DED201A0].mkv_snapshot_16.09_[2015.12.29_01.18.21].png](https://i.imgur.com/s7dXcGB.jpg "[caffeine] Koufuku Graffiti - 11 [720p][DED201A0].mkv_snapshot_16.09_[2015.12.29_01.18.21].png")
>>7919808
>no ghost terms
>no gauge fixing terms
Yeah enjoy your non-renormalizability and anomalies you cuckolds.
[math]
h_t(x) = \Psi^{-1} ( s^t \Psi (x)),
[/math]
This is basically the generalized form of every equation ever
>>7919743
What is the meaning of life? In my point of view is the mother of all equations. Prove me wrong.
>>7922256
Hah, nice.
19988kg
it takes the aircraft 20 minutes to climb to this altitude
what is its rate of labour?
>>7919743
Drake equation
Prove me wrong by solving it
>>7920153
Close but no...
KE=PE
Here PE can be stated as gravity.
PE(grav) = M*G*H
So...
2.00 x 10^8 J = M*(9.81m/s^2)(1020m)
(2.00 x 10^8 J)/(10006.2) = M
M = 19987.6 kg
>>7924226
It should be noted this turd does not include drag, atmospheric pressure or a boat load of other fun stuff.
>>7923040
1.667 10^5 kW
>>7924261
1.667 10^2 kW, not 5
>>7924264
Power = Work / Change in Time
2x10^8 J / 1200 s = 1.667x10^5 kW
>>7924278
broski, get out of school for sec
166,000 is either 1.66 x 10^2 kW
OR OR OR OR OR
1.66 x 10^5 W
