Is it correct to put into the context of freedom the fact of
You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math
Is it correct to put into the context of freedom the fact of its non-existence, via association being necessary, that it does not exist as if it were to be defined that it would be bound?
Are we living in the setting sun of the freedom of the universe's plight to define what does not bind it and by extension the means ascertain it once again?
>mfw the Yoda speak is weak with the geeks
You're like a buddhist who only uses his rational mind.
I guess the real freedom comes with not consciously thinking about these kinds of profound abstract concepts.
Also, this is philosophy. Sage.