What is their argument ?

>>7791642
> MUH AXIOMS
> MUH GODEL

:^)

Math is shit tier

>>7791642
It's factually incorrect.

It depends on your definition of "reality." Do words describe reality? Do pictures describe reality?

I just looked up Jeranism and they're the flat Earth people. You would get much better answers if you actually asked the question yourself instead of just baiting for replies.

>>7791642
what is their argument cuckface ?

Math doesn't describe anything, people do.

The argument is that since mathematics works in favour of a round earth, mathematics cannot describe reality.
Not making it up.

>>7791894
do they reject all math? or just complex math?
do they reject basic arithmetic?

>>7791642
It's actually still being debated.
Can morals, justice, or ethics be described by mathematics, or in other words, quantified?

I personally think that yes, but since we don't even have a theory that describes the basis of reality coherently it is possible that it's not the case.

>>7793031
I want to know this as well. Do they define the threshold where math stops working?

>people are retarded
>people made jeranism
>therefore jeranism is retarded

>>7791642
isnt that just anti-realism

>>7791642
Of course it doesn't describe reality. It merely gives us an approximation.

>>7793218
Q.E.D

Go suck an infinite number of cocks jeranism

>2016
>people still claiming that observations do not describe reality

Shouldn't this shit have died out around 500 years ago?