>see something I research
>get instantly excited
>see that it is a baseless question with 0 practical applications aside from fodder for armchair scientists
>fml

>>7786171
do you qualify as stupid under the Darwinian theory of evolution?

>>7786176
Have you read the work? I simply mean the fact that Darwin never touched on the evolution of our species, yet goes over in detail domesticated evolution.

Would we not qualify as a domesticated species?

>>7786176
>implying /sci/ isn't filled with armchair scientists

>>7786181
lets play this out logically
>the answer to your question is a resounding yes
practical applications when
>the answer to your question is a resounding no
>practical applications when

>>7786181
Who are we domesticated too? Are we pets? It doesn't make any sense to call us domesticated.