I understand her bridges are only a tool for geometrical theories.

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-01-13 22:41:56 Post No. 7781856
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: Olivia_Caramello.jpg (96 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]

96 KB, 1920x1080

Anonymous 2016-01-13 22:41:56 Post No. 7781856 [Report]

I understand her bridges are only a tool for geometrical theories.
Is that a big restriction?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-13 22:46:33 Post No.7781867
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-13 22:46:33 Post No.7781867 [Report]

>>7781856
>"continuous"
>"discrete"
"woman doing math"

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-13 22:49:55 Post No.7781875
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-13 22:49:55 Post No.7781875 [Report]

>>7781867
>memetext
>replies to OP
"Guy who doesn't know category theory"

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-14 00:08:17 Post No.7782054
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-14 00:08:17 Post No.7782054 [Report]

File: sisterhood.png (1 MB, 962x641) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 962x641

Okay, let me ask something related:
Why are geometric theories singled out in the first place?
Why are theories with axioms that have more complicated quantifier structure not captured as easily?

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-14 02:04:23 Post No.7782256
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-14 02:04:23 Post No.7782256 [Report]

>>7781856
"Geometric" is already an adjective; you don't have to add the "al." Same with "symmetric" vs. "symmetrical."

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-14 17:06:06 Post No.7783385
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-14 17:06:06 Post No.7783385 [Report]

>>7782256
make sense, thx