Learning from textbooks or learning from open courseware (such as MIT's proper courseware)
Which is better?
inventing your own methods like a fucking genius instead of being some fuckboy lapping up the genius of others
>>7779993
Textbooks
>>7780008
This. If you can't independently derive the laws of motion and thermodynamics and quantum mechanics using nothing but a 1kg block and the Calculus, you'll never get anywhere in science.
>>7779993
It's all text. Fucking, just read it all.
Why not both?
>tfw no qt blitz bf
Use a textbook with the course dummy.
You know you can just go to lectures at a university, right? If you ask the professor if you can sit in their class and learn for no credit, they most likely wont have a problem with it. They might not even care if you're a student at the school or not.
Education is completely in the hands of the student. If you fail to take advantage of it, it;s on you.
>>7779993
both
>>7779993
Best is to use both. Use the lectures/course notes/problems from OCW and try to use the same textbook recommended for the course as a reference or for extra problems.
>>7779993
both, but sadly there's no lectures for advanced courses. you're going to have to transition into just textbooks / articles eventually
>>7780092
For physics there is.
https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/training/perimeter-scholars-international/lectures/2014/2015-psi-lectures
>>7780109
>https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/training/perimeter-scholars-international/lectures/2014/2015-psi-lectures
Good thanks
Doesnt matter at your level. Just make sure you have an abundance of practice problems
>>7780038
wrong board m8
>baffled
