Here's a question which I'm sure will get many opinions /sci/.
How does one go about understanding something that is not intuitive?
If it is intuitive, then that something would be easy to understand.
If it is not, then a certain series of steps must be taken to read the point of understanding.
How do you in particular do it /sci/?
>>7779786
reach the point of understanding*****
>also pic unrelated -- logic gates
Run through a few examples to see the result. Try some outliers to see how intuitive case would necessarily have to fail. Ref. UV breakdown and QM: the classical approach would simply be wrong and intuitively be wrong.
You just keep studying it and deal with it. Most things in life are this way.
>>7781075
UV and QM?
>>7781111
Yes yes but the question here is, how does one deal with it?
Not undermining anyone's efforts, just curious to see if the process can be improved, and maybe new perspective can be gained along the way.
>>7781246
>and maybe new perspective can be gained along the way.
Yes, along the way of studying and dealing with it. The more time you spend with something, the more intuitive it becomes to you.
Is there anything un-intuative about learning un-intuative things?
>I realize how this question sounds
