We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.
is it autistic notation to list the set of integers from 1 to k as Z+n[1,k] or will people accept t?
it really pisses me off when people use notation like {1,2,...,k}.
those "..."s have no place in a mathematics text you dick
>>7776986
just do
[eqn]
\bigcup\limits_{i = 1}^{k} \{i\}
[/eqn]
I've seen [n] denote the integers 1 through n in combinatorics
>>7776986
How about [math] {\mathbb{N}_{ \leqslant k}} [/math]
>>7776986
Set-theoretically, [math] n = \{0,1,2,\ldots,n-1\}[/math].
>>7776986
you can use [math] \llbracket 1,n \rrbracket [/math]
if you understand " {1,2,...,k}", then it means the notation is perfectly valid since everyone can understand it without ambiguity.
>>7777350
well shit, thanks /sci/ for the half assed tex support.
it looks something like this
[[ 1,n ]]
>>7777059
I'm honestly surprised something like this isn't common, considering how universal the notation for modular integers is.
It just seems so natural, while the whole {1,2,..,n} thing is just clunky.
