We respect your right to privacy. You can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Your cookie preferences will apply across our website.
How do you define "increasing" or "decreasing" for a sequence of vectors? Do we use the standard norm [math]|| \cdot ||: V \rightarrow \mathbb{R} [/math] or what?
>>7745062
Considering you just made up those two meaningless terms you can apply whatever definition you want.
is length usually drawn with 2 lines or 1?
>>7745065
W-What did I make up?
>>7745068
We do it with 2 lines breh
>>7745062
You can say the sequence of norms is increasing. No need to bother with imprecise and clumsy extensions of familiar definitions to absurd contexts.
>>7745071
But breh I need to prove the following sequence is converging and I want to do it with the monotone convergence theorem:
[eqn] \lim_{k\to\infty} \mathbf{v}P^{k} [/eqn]
I already know the sequence is bounded.
>>7745077
What is P here? In any case I don't think there's any analogue of the theorem you're thinking of outside of R, so you'll need to use something else.
>>7745078
P is a matrix representing a Markov chain. However P isn't diagonalizable. If we know the sequence converges it's easy. We just call [math] \lim_{k\to\infty} \mathbf{v}P^{k} = \mathbf{x} [/math] and then say:
[eqn] \lim_{k\to\infty} \mathbf{v}P^{k} = \lim_{k\to\infty} \mathbf{v}P^{k+1} \\
\lim_{k\to\infty} \mathbf{v}P^{k+1} = P \dot \lim_{k\to\infty} \mathbf{v}P^{k} \\
\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{x}P [/eqn]
Where [math]\mathbf{x}[/math] is the equilibrium vector but first we have to prove it converges it's driving me freaking nuts.
>>7745087
I'm probably missing something but this seems obvious if you use a Jordan basis for P.
>>7745095
>a Jordan basis for P
I haven't learned this yet m8
>>7745098
Never mind, I realized that the theorem I was thinking of only works for complex vector spaces. I'm pretty sure this isn't true in general for operators on a real vector space so you'll have to use things about Markov chains specifically, which I don't know much about.