rank these individuals in order of increasing IQ
Clock boy>barno>rest
Who are first and fourth in right column?
>>7731895
edward witten - unified all 5 superstring theories
christopher langan - came up with cognitive theoretic model of the universe
>>7731898
Thanks.
The latter is obv smarter than most of the others. I'd only rank Barnett and Einstein above him. Clock boy might be on par with him, not sure tho.
>>7731901
Clock boy is definitely up there. engineering a clock more accurate than NIST-F2 in his garage is no small feat
>>7731889
>only posting men
Are you afraid of intelligent women?
smart | gay
gay | smart
super gay meme jew | just a dumb meme that made it because of political correctness
obv smart | a grown ass meme man
mixed feelings | smart meme man
Aristotle
Aquinas
Everyone else
Me
OP
Shit
That kid with the clock
>>7731904
Yeah, I mean how many 12-year-olds can solder a CPU? In fact, how many adults can do that? I'd bet my monthly allowance on that only a very small part of NASA's top engineers could at least begin to imagine how to perform such a feat in a real-life settings.
>>7731908
Why do you think Aristotle and Aquinas were dumb? You're also pretty hard on yourself if you think that shit is smarter than you.
>>7731906
Off the top of my head I can only think of Emmy Noether, but yeah, she'd be top tier.
>>7731889
From dumbest to smartest:
Allah Akbar boy
Helicopter Mom boy
IQ Man
Bald guy with beard
IDK the difference between the two asian guys
Einstein
Witten
Poo in Loo
Newton
>>7731907
>Ed Witten
>gay
>Samurai-san
>smart
Nicely meme'd <I:^)
>>7731889
>Muh IQ
How about I rank them in order of decreasing genius.
>Newton, Einstein
>Witten, Ramanujan, Mochizuki
>Tao, Pearlman
>[math]\cdots \mathcal{ POWER ~ ~ GAP} \cdots [/math]
>Barnet
>[math]\cdots \mathcal{ POWER ~ ~ GAP} \cdots [/math]
>Clock boy
You'll notice that Langan doesn't rank at all. Also sage.
>chink
>kike
>chink
>neckbeard
>autist
>another autist
>designated shitter
>fuck head
>super autist
>another kike
wew lad.
>>7731934
>Implying he wasn't
Oh wait I forgot, I'm on /sci/.
>>7731889
How can we actually rank Mochizuki? The only thing we know is that he's absolutely mental.
>>7731889
Why is Christopher Hirata missing from this list?
>>7731939
He's a mental chink who publishes math, he's clearly a genius.
>>7731939
Dude, he wrote IQ84, one of the best erotic novels of the last decade.
>>7731927
Tau's the smartest in the group. Einstein, oddly enough, ranks in the bottom three.
>>7731937
>muh highschool calculus is hard math
Can you please come back when you took some real math course?
>>7731941
Are you trying to be sarcastic? Mochizuki is absolutely a genius.
>>7731945
>Einstein, oddly enough, ranks in the bottom three.
Care to justify that? The revolution that special and general relativity caused was phenomenal.
>>7731947
You're retarded. Calculus is pretty simple, now that it's known. The point is it first had to be discovered, that is why Newton is a genius. On top of that you have his work in optics, his other mathematical works and his of course his formulation of mechanics. That's also why Newton is better than Leibniz.
>>7731898
Langan is probably stupider than clock boy. Pseudo-intellectual. No qualifications. Creationist.
Now, rank them in terms of aesthetic appearance.
>>7731959
not to mention a lack of falsifiability to his model. Full of buzzwords. It's not that no one can understand it because he's smart. It's that no one can understand it cuz he makes shit up.
>>7731950
Being influential and revolutionary doesn't equal being maximally smart.
>>7731939
why is he mental?
>>7731950
Many've surmised his IQ to be in the 160 range.
>>7731966
His intuition was on point, IQ being irrelevant.
>>7731889
Langan number 1, all the other brainlets in distant second.
>>7731965
In the good way, totally above all human concerns.
>>7731967
How is IQ irrelevant in a thread ranking geniuses?
You're all awful people.
>>7731966
>Many've surmised his IQ to be in the 160 range.
I honestly can't tell if you people are trolling when you stay stuff like this. Either way, get fucked.
>>7731973
Langan:
>Published fuck all
>Done fuck all
>Helped fuck all
>Studied fuck all
>Written extensively about some pseudo-scientific topic he developed
>Has the one of the highest IQs on the planet
That's why
>>7731968
Tao's 225. Langam's ~200.
>>7731974
I lold when I read this.
Then I realized you are absolutely correct.
Langan is 195-210 IQ master race
Tao has 225 IQ (learned from the above post)
Ramanujan would score 240
Einstein, Newton and Ahmed "day 1 I'll see if I can smuggle a briefcase in" Mohammed have imagination rather than superhuman brainpower
>>7731976
No, not trolling. Just stating facts.
>>7732002
Tao's pruportedly super cool.
>>7732002
>disrespecting Interuniversal Teichmüller theory
Do you even Frobenoid?
>Da Vinci
>What ever order these people are in
>>7731943
underrated post
>IQ
what about william james sidis?
>>7731934
Obvious bait, but Newton's IQ is estimated to be the second largest that have been seen until today. He shares the second place with Wittgenstein, while the first is occupied by Goethe.
>>7731889
>that cult of personality
sure is reddit here
>>7731889
1. Terence Tao: Like Einstein a few of his mistakes does lead to interesting discoveries; especially in fields like Analytic Number Theory, Functional Analysis, and DE's. I've read some of Mochizuki's work and it's pretty good he's as gifted as Tao (perhaps unknowingly more?)
2. Mochizuki: The Japanese Mathematician that created his own field of mathematics to prove the abc conjecture. Other mathematicans are skeptical and are heavily readingthrough his papers; he is upset that they won't read 500 pages and are slow to catching up to his level. Seemingly, he is the only person in the world that understands the new maths he had developed.
3. Grigori Perelman: A Russian Jewish man that proved the poincare conjecture which played a huge part in differential geometry and topology; whom turned his prize and a million dollars. Money doesn't win his love, but loving maths/finding the conjecture his obsession to discover it; too bad having his foresight set on fame and money lead to his departure and him living with his mother. He is a natural genius as well.
4. Ramajuman: An Indian Mathematician that's known for being on the hardest working mathematics in the world. He sat down his desk and dabbled with a lot of numbers to discover his work in Number Theory. He is often praised by Tao with his great work ethic.
5. Isaac Newton: A co-founder and developer of calculus which he developed from trying to the gravity and the planet attraction problem. He's up there and will be forgotten for his true work.
6. Albert Einstein: A Jewish physicist that founded the photoelectric effect and special relativity. A lot of his mistakes did lead to interesting discoveries; nowadays some physicists and mathematician are founding some faults in his tensor formula. He isn't a big fan of Quantum Physics as well.
7. Jacob Barnett: A self proclaimed intellectual Autistic teen that's readily into DE's, Linear Algebra, and Quantum Physic.
>>7732352
Ahmed:
Genius whose revolutionary clock technology so terrified his school officials they had him arrested. Praised by president obama for his intelligence and ingenuity. Widely acclaimed for soldering skills, skin color.
>>7732352
Jacob Barnett has some potential to do some good things in the mathematical physics world; if he could drop string theory, quantum field, and concentrate more on Condensed Matter Theory and Statistical Mechanics; maybe some other areas in statistics and linear algebra.
8. Ahmed the clock kid: Whom supposedly got an unfair arrest and unfairly sued some place for 15 million dollars. He's parents may have played into that greed. He has potential in electronics and engineering. Hopefully, someday he will get his resolve for some other way.
9. Christopher Langan: A self proclaimed highly intellectual genius with his IQ measuring at 190 whom supposedly lives in the south; he believes he could of achieved great things and very much seems out of touch in reality; very unrealistic. You can't take this man seriously, I've met idiots like this in maths, and physics course I wish they would go away. He deserved this bottom ranked for clearly being an idiot and he does not contribute much all to the science world. He'd make a great sci fi writer, but nothing else. We should stop mentioning him on /sci/.
>>7731889
Clockmed at the bottom
Newton at the top
1. Rasputin
2. Judd Hirsch
3. George Takei
4. Shigeru Miyamoto
5. Nigger Guy
6. Brilliant Mind
7. Barbra Streisand
8. Dr. Willey
9. Mario
10. Jamal Malik
>>7732441
Are you the one who thinks Perelman may actually be Rasputin?
>>7732444
There's someone that thinks that?
>>7732446
I believe so.
1) Tao
2) Ramanujin
3) Mochizuki
4) Perelman
5 and below) Retards
>>7731898
lol so basically physics pleb and pseudoscience man.
>>7731910
kek
>>7731934
>Looks at the night sky and realizes from nothing that the thing moving the planets is the same thing that makes apples fall to the earth
>not smart
where do you people come from?
>>7732352
>Obviously some plebby physics fag wrote this.
Terence Tao has won a fuckload of awards and does work in a fuckload of branches of mathematics. In a given field he doesn't have the level of intuition of a god tier specialist like Ramanujin with Number Theory, but he's still head and shoulders above his peers across the board.
Mochizuki isn't upset that people won't read his papers he often downplays them on the premise that he can't guarantee that IUTeich will lead to any more large fruitful endeavors. He also didn't create the branch of mathematics solely for the ABC conjecture, in his words:
>Although many individuals appear to be interested mainly in the numerical aspects of the inequality of the ABC Conjecture, in fact it is more natural to regard the theory that constitutes IUTeich as the main object of interest. That is to say, the inequality of the ABC Conjecture is best understood as simply being one barometer of the depth of the mathematical content of the theory
There are a small handful of people who understand his work now and they are in the process of trimming it down to the essentials and writing a survey paper that covers the core content (much of the material in Mochizuki's earlier publications was not only non-trivial but it didn't end up being useful or it ended up being way too generalized, so it's stayed around as theoretical cruft).
(cont.)
>>7732490
Perelman built on theory that another mathematician was already working on as a plan to proving the Poincare conjecture. He attended talks by the other guy describing unpublished work and wanted the other guy to also get credit. The real problem was that Yau (as in Calabi-Yau manifold) who was one of the people put in charge of reviewing Perelman's proof found a flaw in the proof and tasked his team of research students with fixing the proof. Yau then coauthored a paper with his research team and stole the credit for the proof within the mathematical community (though Perelman was still in line to receive the prize). The whole thing pissed off Perelman, the fact that he wanted to credit a guy who had spent years developing theory leading up to this but instead the guy who was put in charge of checking his proof ended up stealing credit for himself. He turned down the prize and left because "fuck the mathematical community". Yau also tried suing newspapers for publishing interviews where Perelman talks about this.
Ramanujin wasn't just really hard working and entirely self educated but he had amazing intuition for number theory. He was also depressed from having left his wife behind, not having access to vegetarian food which he often had to prepare in his office between math, and being treated as a second class citizen in England (due to being an aboriginal subject of a British Colony). After making a lot of totally insane breakthroughs in number theory (that seemed to come out of nowhere) he quit mathematics and moved back home with his wife.
Archimedes developed calculus with infinitesimals 2000 years before Newton, except Archimedes understood that infinitesimals were bullshit and thus only published his research as intuition but not legit math. Newton a shit.
>>7731898
i was reading the langan works as some man i respect reposted it... but it looks like shit
where are my microtubules man
>>7732492
>Newton a shit
Amen. Genius at PR that's all. Libinez was way smarter.
>>7731889
IQ ranking:
Langen>Witten>Tao>Einstein>Einstein>Ramujan>conjecture guy>Newton>Barnett>Clock maker
>>7732275
>second largest
First largest is me I assume
>>7732517
einstein iq was 160. That must be the third lowest iq on the list after meme clock guy and autist barnett.
>>7731889
Why are the two kids even included in this, they are irrelevant.
Clockboy especially.
>>7732551
>Clockboy especially.
All of physics essentially boils down to some pleb taking a body of mathematical work, putting it inside a box called special case, and claiming they invented it. Clockboy is a pure unapologetic physicist.
>>7731959
this.
also you can train the IQ tests just like anything else
>>7732566
With exhaustive training you can increase your IQ scores by 5-10 points. AT BEST.
>>7731889
Tao is wildly overrated. Mochizuki is the most intelligent on that list.
-1.Gauss
0.Cauchy
1.Newton
2.Perelman
3.Einstein
4.Rama
5.Witten
6.Barnett
7.Langan
8.Achmed
>>7732603
you can train TAKING IQ tests and you learn all the patters they're based on which gives you much higher unjustified score
>>7732002
>Actually does science tier
>is a mathematician
I fucking hate this board.
0. VON FUCKING NEUMANN
1.Ramanujan/Newton (Newton was probably a lot higher in IQ than people realize, because his most brilliant achievements (calculus and modern physics) required creativity more than brainpower, however he did a lot of work in mathematics besides calculus that was overshadowed that seemed to require a lot of brawn (some of the work he published under pseudonyms was immediately recognized as his because no one else had the pure mental force to do it.)
2.Terry Tao
3.Langam (and maybe Barnett- I don't know enough to rank him)
.Since someone complained that there are no women in this list Noether- would probably be somewhere between 3 and 4
4.Mochizuki//Perelman/Witten (probably in that order)
5.Einstein (I'd guess still around 160)
Einstein ranking lower on the list doesn't mean he's a lesser genius.
Obviously when we stop comparing their Brain Specs and start talking about the things that matter the most Einstein will rank higher than nearly anyone. Leibniz would also probably rank pretty low on the list- which shows IQ is just one factor amongst many.
Mochizuki may be up there with Langam- who knows?
I could very well be underrating Mochizuki or Witten- if there's a mistake on the list that's where it'd be.
Shit- forgot I just posted that
>>7732018
>Yokozuna of math
Every time
>>7732444
No, thats me, but I'm glad to see that someone remembered me
>>7732446
Everyone has their crackpot beliefs, don't judge me
>>7732002
>Renound by G.H Hardy as being one of the greaest mathmatician.
>Troll tier
>Most accomplished mathmatician alive today
>autism
Clearly you are an idiot or a troll
>>7732548
How the fuck do they have his IQ when it wasnt even the concept of IQ invented at time he was alive.
>>7733138
Retardation. That's how.
>>7732002
So wrong, so so wrong.
>>7731889
Why did you only post men?
>>7733191
>Why did you only post men?
He didn't.
The third one in the second column is not a man--it's a boy.
>>7732489
Dumb pop sci underageb8 detected
>>7731889
1. all the mathematicians
2. all the physicists
3. everyone else
done
>>7733191
fuck off
>>7732769
I see, so you think real IQ test are like internet IQ test. That´s why you are confused.
>>7732769
That´s false. But let me understand. So you are retard with average IQ who wants to feel better about himself, right?. You think all of those geniuses, physics and mathematics trained years just for IQ tests? Delusional.
>>7731889
Newton>Perelman>Rada>Tao>Michizuki>Witten>Einstein>Bernett>Clockmemeguy
>>7732275
Think those estimations are in anyform reliable ...
GTFO of /sci you poser.
>>7732275
Aaaand Von Neumann ?
>>7733138
First IQ test was dated about 1917. You dont know what you are talking about. Faggot.
>>7733530
Show me one intelligent thing Newton ever did. Every 14 year old nowadays is supposed to be able to derive all of Newton's work on their own.
>no von neumann
>>7731889
Clockmed is highest, he soldered a fucking cpuu. I study ee right now. No fucking idea how he did this still.
>>7733720
>Probably in 600 years all kids should be doing most advance math
In 600 years humanity will have become so dumb that they can't even communicate even more. Welcome to idiocracy.
>the great creativity and intelligence
Surely the chimp who first figured how to throw a stone was also a genius of highest intelligence. Your argument is ridiculous and your worship of someone who only discovered trivialities only underlines your own lack of higher education. Please stick to your high school homework and don't shitpost on /sci/.
>>7731889
Serious answer (in order of increasing intelligence):
1. Ramanujan
2. Newton
3. Einstein
4. Grisha
5. Tao
6. Ed
7. Mochizuki
8. Barnett
9. Langan
10. Clock
>>7733729
Newton did one of the biggest contributions a human could do in his time. His IQ is one of the biggest according to profesional estimations. But... >I can do calculus and shit, i must be more intelligent than newton.
You are autistic.
>>7733729
>In 600 years humanity will have become so dumb that they can't even communicate even more
All right, typical pop sci faggot who thinks he knows more.
>>7733747
I'm a stupid fuck. Flip the list upside down.
>>7733729
>In 600 years humanity will have become so dumb that they can't even communicate even more.
Beta autistic and pesimist piece of shit. GET THE FUCK OUT!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
GET THE FUCK OUT!
>>7733753
>Newton did one of the biggest contributions a human could do in his time
So did the monkey who throw the first stone. Is his IQ also in the 190 genius range? Calculus is trivial and no achievement worth mentioning.
>>7733763
Yeah probably the monkey was a genius compared with his mates. Newton was a genius in his time as well. But the people in Newton era wasnt like monkeys.
>>7733759
Moore's law and the Flynn effect will both come to an end, you deluded pop sci kid. Due to limited resources technology cannot eternally grow exponentially. And due to the current rise of anti-intellectualism in our society, we can expect the next generations to be significantly dumber. Stupid people are reproducing all the time while intelligent people are excluded from reproduction, being despised as "boring nerds". Academic ambitions are frowned upon and our society values actors and musicians - idols of anti-intellectualism - more than scientists and engineers. Every year the school curricula is dumbed down further and further, with an emphasis on teaching less and less STEM contents.
>>7733767
>But the people in Newton era wasnt like monkeys.
He lived in the 17th century. The people in his time were fucking retarded. The majority of them was illiterate. By today's standards Newton is only of average intelligence. It doesn't take more than basic literacy to discover calculus.
>>7733771
>, being despised as "boring nerds"
Lol someone is mad because is an ugly nerd and girls dont like him.
>>7733771
he told you to fuck off and you should do it
>>7733784
>Newton's IQ is 190
Source?
>>7733540
>Think those estimations are in anyform reliable...
I take the estimations more seriously than IQ tests, primarily because of the fact that are deduced from their actual work throughout several fields instead of a series of logic/linguistic tests that determine the 'potential' of success in academic tasks.
>>7732518
First is Goethe, even for his time, the extension and deepness of his knowledge in each field was absurd. He wrote pretty much about everything, although for most anglo-speakers he just known as the writer of Faust.
>>7733759
/sci/'s has filled with teenagers during summer....
>>7731889
IQ is a meme
>>7732469
Dude, Witten and Newton did a lot of maths too.
>>7732492
So Yau is the evil flaw correcter. Perelman is the theory user and lecture attender . But who was the lecturer and theory developer you mentioned?
>>7733759
Moore's laws will end matey. The super small transistors are at the limit of behaving classically. We literally can't get much smaller than 7nm
>>7733778
>It doesn't take more than basic literacy to discover calculus
Ah, you're the third discoverer of calculus. But why be butthurt when Newton still discovered a ton of other shit?
>>7733784
>newton IQ is 190
Sure that's why everything he did is trivial to someone with an IQ of 100.
>>7733842
WHEN WILL THIS MEME FUCKING END
>>7733838
What about quantum computing and quantum tunneling? Also, pic related
>>7733840
>Ah, you're the third discoverer of calculus.
More like the 100 millionth. So many children discover calculus nowadays. Nothing special anymore.
>>7733842
oh gad,,,,
>>7733847
discover =/= learning... lol
>>7733778
>It doesn't take more than basic literacy to discover calculus.
It takes a lot more than basic literacy to formulate math and physics that wasn't there at the time. Of course, once people see the solution everyone claim 'it was obvious, everyone could do that' despite of being unable do it themselves.
>The people in his time were fucking retarded.
No really. In fact there is a big difference in terms of intelligence between now and then. And the academic community was fairly large as well.
>>7733849
It's definitely bait. The autism can't be that strong.
>>7733846
A different issue really and a Quantum transistor is not likely to actually process most things faster. There is also a fundamental limit which is limited by entropy.
>>7733852
I meant constructing on their own. Calculus is trivial.
>>7733853
>It takes a lot more than basic literacy to formulate math and physics that wasn't there at the time
Then what's so special about something as trivial as calculus? Why not worship the man who invented quadratic equations? Or some modern mathematician who found something actually high level?
>And the academic community was fairly large as well.
Lol, it was dependent on very few people who contributed to it. Not comparable to today's globally connected scientific community.
>>7733857
There is still a long time before we hit the computational limit.
>>7733864
Because calculus wasn´t newton´s only contribution... lol. And i think calculus was leibniz´s contribution mostly.
didn't someone have a predicted IQ of 250-300.
he ended up being fluent in 40 language
>>7731950
He failed math in school
>>7733771
i remember reading this post on /pol/.
>>7733873
No he didn't.
>>7733865
20-40 years by some predictions, total upper limit is 600 years.
>>7733919
Yeah.600 is about right.
>>7733919
lol u wot m8???? before we become a type 4 civilization (universal) millions of years must pass, not 600 lol what a retard.
>>7733945
>seriously using terminology from a fiction book for children
underageb& pls go
>>7733947
lol pls use arguments, before we can substract energy from black holes, make computers with size from planets and develop warp system thousands of years must pass, not "600" you are too positivistic.
>>7733945
What? I'm saying that in 600 years if mores laws continues as predicted we will reach a limited of computing power dictated by entropy. Meaning if we don't have the computing power then we never will
stop with IQ, that's stupid
>>7733964
What about substracting energy from black holes and warp drive, we should do it in 600 years too?
>no training in mathematics
>debunked andrew wiles 7 year proof after a quick look
this is what 200+ iq lets you do
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_vos_Savant#Fermat.E2.80.99s_last_theorem
>>7734034
>10/10
This is honestly how I believe a lot of the media and the general public sees scientists/engineers/mathematicians
>>7734048
did you even fucking read this?
>>7734034
Finally an algorithmic ranking
"greatest scientist" threads (most embarassing thing on sci) can be bannable now
>>7734034
hahahahahahahaahh
>>7731927
>those fonts
First time posting here...how?
>>7734048
just finished reading that. This is why women shouldn't do sciencce or math
>>7734577
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether
>>7734577
I'm a girl and I'm better at math than you. Idiot.
>>7734705
>I'm a girl
I'm a boy and I think that you are fucking autistic for having to begin every single one of your posts with your gender.
Why do women do this? Why does every woman feel the need to start their post with
>btw I'm a grill!
is it for attention? Is it because you think that you are cool because you are a girl in a supposed 'boys' club. News flash, you are not special.
At least you are not a tripfag, I'll give you that.
>>7734705
I could not help but notice your png was not optimized anon.
I have optimized your png.
Your png is now optimized.
>>7734738
13KB to 13KB...
I guess even magicians have their limits.
>>7733964
The guy is right, at least 2 thousand years before we hit the technological upper limit.
>>7731889
IQ was not even invented when some of those lived.
Inshallah his genius will one day be recognized by the devils in the West.
>>7734923
Well, at least he's got dem dicksucking lips going for him once people laugh him out of every science ever.
>>7734935
>Looking at teenage boys
>Evaluating if they have dicksucking lips
Anon. You know that to make that conclusion,you had to imagine him sucking at least one dick, if not your own.
Everyone knows you, no matter how limited the extent, imagined him sucking dick.
>>7734948
Dear sir or madam.
In response to your earlier message pertaining to the inner workings of my mind, in particular the realms of sexual fantasy, I can naught but snort derisively at your remarks.
Firstly, I fully acknowledge that I did indeed conceive the image of his lips wrapped around the girth of my member, of which there is plenty I can assure you, however this is beside the point as there is nothing wrong in receiving fellatio, as you imply. In fact it is the one performing the fellatio, to apply the vernacular "giving head", who is frowned upon by society, especially so if the person in question is male.
Secondly, I should like to point out, applying your logic, that in order to call me out on my sexual deviancy, you yourself have had to trace my thought patterns, calling into your own imagination the scenery which you describe. I might go as far as to assume, that you have not only imagined the boy sucking a dick, but my dick. Perhaps, in your perverse inner world we have gone "all the way"? I should point out that this makes you what the pornographic profession labels as, a "voyeur". Although I am flattered, I do also feel obliged to ask, what other degenerate deeds might you have envisioned he and I indulging in? Does he deepthroat my entire length? Does he maintain eye contact? Perchance he swallows or perhaps he prefers to receive my generous bounties of nervous fluid all over his bespectacled face? No one knows but You alone.
In conclusion, as per your own words I can only declare, that
>Everyone knows you, no matter how limited the extent, imagined him sucking dick.
Yours sincerely, >>7734935.
>>7734522
latex, check out the sticky
>>7735009
I more or less just built a rough conceptual understanding of their lips, which involves mostly geometry and my understanding of what lips are, how they're structured, what they're composed of, etc. It mostly fills in automatically.
What was then generated was a flickering spatial idea of this thing wrapping around a rounded cone shape. Their picture, as the other anon posted, flashed through my head a few times. Most of my thoughts were occupied with how gosh darn clever I must be, constructing that post. And then, what you might say in response. I hit "post", kept scrolling, and largely forgot about the whole matter. The recollection however was swift upon glancing over your prompt reply.
Fortunately you have matched my cleverness tenfold. I yield to your raw intellect, fine sir, and wish you an enjoyable remainder of your current wake cycle.
>>7731939
Did people not notice that the clay institute workshop on his papers just revealed they are nonsense?
>>7735046
>weeklong workshop
>expecting to come out understanding IUTeich
Nigga please
>>7735050
Just go look up some of the Skype transcripts
The number of "I don't know why that is there" and evasions is horrifying
>>7733873
He got the highest possible grade.
>>7735059
>some of the Skype transcripts
Got a link to these or something? Can't find it.
all of them>sci>op
>>7731959
He looks like Paul Blart Mall Cop
>>7734048
the whole IQ circus is so sad
>>7731889
I don't know about IQ, but I believe Witten and Math Samurai to be the most intelligent.
Einstein and Newton don't deserve to be compared with any of those other jackoffs.
>>7736371
>brainlet can't handle the banter
>>7732275
t. Heinrich von Stadtwaldburger
A thread where we guess how "smart" people are. True genius. I'm at the top fwiw.
>>7732622
>cauchy
guess plagiarism gives you +100 meme test points
>>7738887
Witten is probably at their level.
>>7734034
Why are Asians so godtier.
Literally super human.
>>7735059
>Just go look up some of the Skype transcripts
Please post this!
>>7731889
Why is Muhammad Ali in that picture?
>>7738887
Those are the most popular, but far away of being the most intelligence, Einstein IQ is even low for a nobel laurete.
