[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
This board is full of shitty threads so I am going to try to
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /sci/ - Science & Math

Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 1
File: fbVEMLV.jpg (715 KB, 3686x1843) Image search: [Google]
fbVEMLV.jpg
715 KB, 3686x1843
This board is full of shitty threads so I am going to try to make a not shitty one.

ITT: We teach /sci/ something science or math related.

I am going to go through a basic explanation of what a Quantum Field is because I am pretty sure a decent bit of /sci/ is familiar with the basics of QM but not so much QFT.
Ok so a Quantum Field is essentially a sum of operators and wavefunctions.


Say we have a theory where the state vector [math] \left| {n\left( p \right)} \right\rangle [/math] represents the nth energy level of theory with momenta p.

Then we can define an annihilation operator, [math] {a_p} [/math], of the theory as an operator which lowers the energy of the state on which it acts.

i.e. [math] {a_p}\left| {n\left( p \right)} \right\rangle = c\left| {n\left( p \right) - 1} \right\rangle [/math] for some constant c.


A creation operator can be defined as the hermitian conjugate of the annihilation operator.

i.e. [math] {a^\dag }_p [/math] such that [math] {a^\dag }_p\left| {n\left( p \right)} \right\rangle = {c_2}\left| {n\left( p \right) + 1} \right\rangle [/math] for some constant c_2.


Creation and annihilation operators, of a bosonic theory, obey the following commutation relation. [math] \left[ {{a^\dag }_{{p_1}},{a_{{p_2}}}} \right] = \delta _{{p_2}}^{{p_1} [/math]

So for a simple wave function [math] {e^{ipx}} [/math] we can roughly define a quantum field: [math] \Phi \left( x \right) = \sum\limits_p {\left( {{a^\dag }_p{e^{ipx}} + {a_p}{e^{ - ipx}}} \right)} [/math]


Quantum Fields have the important property that they are an operator, or an observable.


A more accurate definition that fits any real scalar field, would be in the form of a momentum Fourier transform. i.e. [math] \Phi \left( x \right) = \int {\frac{{{d^3}p}}{{{{\left( {2\pi } \right)}^3}}}} \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2{E_p}} }}\left( {{a^\dag }_p{e^{ipx}} + {a_p}{e^{ - ipx}}} \right) [/math] where E_p is the energy of the field at momentum p.
>>
this is shit

poo in loo faggot
>>
how much maths would i have to know to take a quantum mechanics book and breeze through it
>>
You fucked up your latex OP. Besides, I don't understand any of the notation you're using whatsoever. But I have been looking for that pic for awhile it used to be my wallpaper but my computer broke so thanks for trying I guess.
>>
>>7728301
Lin Alg, PDEs, Complex Variables
>>
>>7728269
kek
>>
>>7728315
>You fucked up your latex OP.
Yes I did. Here are the corrected equations.

[eqn] {a^\dagger }_p\left| {n\left( p \right)} \right\rangle = {c_2}\left| {n\left( p \right) + 1} \right\rangle [/eqn]

[eqn]{a_p}\left| {n\left( p \right)} \right\rangle = c\left| {n\left( p \right) - 1} \right\rangle [/eqn]

[eqn]\left[ {{a^\dagger }_{{p_1}},{a_{{p_2}}}} \right] = \delta _{{p_2}}^{{p_1}}[/eqn]

[eqn] \Phi \left( x \right) = \sum\limits_p {\left( {{a^\dagger }_p{e^{ipx}} + {a_p}{e^{ - ipx}}} \right)} [/eqn]

[eqn] \Phi \left( x \right) = \int {\frac{{{d^3}p}}{{{{\left( {2\pi } \right)}^3}}}} \frac{1}{{\sqrt {2{E_p}} }}\left( {{a^\dagger }_p{e^{ipx}} + {a_p}{e^{ - ipx}}} \right) [/eqn]
>>
Okay, so what does this tell me about the cat? Is it dead or alive?
>>
>>7729585
It's an analogy to my dick in your mom. Is it in or out? It's both. Bitch.
>>
>>7728266
wasting your time OP, this board is full of egotistical pseudointellectuals. Likely no-one will understand this so they will try to save face by making fun of you.
>>
>>7728266
so how does this relate to the partition function / action picture where one considers a path integral over quantum fields which are actually just functions rather than operators?
>>
>>7729734
The functions are eigenvalues of the field operators w/ respect to some basis.
>>
>>7729728
Keep projecting, fagshit. I'm >>7729585 and everything OP posted has been known to me for a long time.
Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.