http://yournewswire.com/stanley-kubrick-confesses-to-faking-the-moon-landings/
http://blackbag.gawker.com/did-stanley-kubrick-fake-this-video-of-stanley-kubrick-1747558774
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/626119/MOON-LANDINGS-FAKE-Shock-video-Stanley-Kubrick-admit-historic-event-HOAX-NASA
This got me thinking.
How can we here right now find things left on the Moon from those missions? There's still a Rover up there and landing
What size telescope do I need to actually focus in on objects left behind and see them for myself? My shitty one I bought for $50 just isn't going to cut it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artificial_objects_on_the_Moon
The largest object on the moon seems to be "Apollo 15 S-IVB" located at 1.51°S 11.81°W is it even on the Earth side of the moon?
It's too small. You would need a telescope about 200 meters with sophisticated Adaptive Optics in diameter just to resolve the LM as a pixel.
>>7716671
You can't because its all fake and Earth is flat. Don't believe their lies!
>>7716694
Damn it anon. Can't I just make a radiotelescope array from old sat dishes or something?
>>7716671
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings#Retroreflectors
>>7716749
I'd rather use a telescope to visualize it personally.
>>7716756
then you're gonna need a huge telescope.
>>7716671
Only idiots believes in hoaxes as you linked.
Its a coincidence that Stanley Kubrick's confession came out and NASA rushed to get a shot of one of the lunar modules from a Lunar Satellite.
Also its impossible to zoom in on the lunar landings from any telescope on earth.
Lastly, the military has a huge budget. To think that they cant fake a moon landing is underestimating the capabilities of people staffed that are sworn to hold confidentiality.
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1281.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Power_Facility
>>7716901
>Op doesn't even believe this.
The reason OP posted this is because his wife just announced that the interview never happened, and it was a complete fabrication.
http://www.snopes.com/false-stanley-kubrick-faked-moon-landings/
>>7716901
A few questions:
Why would our military bother faking the moon landings? By 1969 and certainly by the time the last landing occurred, the military simply didn't care all that much about manned space exploration. Unmanned satellites were about the only things they gave a shit about and if anything, the manned spaceflight program was a direct competitor to that in the funding department. Ever since Gemini Blue tanked, the Air Force gave less than a fuck about people in space. Read Mike Mullane's book "Riding Rockets". His own superiors in the Air Force basically ignored him as an astronaut.
How would our government have faked a moon landing? Do you see the dust the astronauts kick up with every footstep? Notice how it doesn't fall at the gravitational constant? So, even if our government built a fake moon landing set in a vacuum chamber (not that there was one big enough), did they turn down the gravity, too?
And most astounding: How did we get the Soviets, our most hated enemies and direct competitors in everything, to cooperate? The entire launch was watched by the Soviets. The landing was watched by the Soviets. They not only had the radio and radar equipment to verify that we either did or did not land on the moon, but they doubtlessly had a shitload of spies all up in Nasa's ass. Not to mention all the pinko commie filmfolk in Hollywood, hundreds of which would have been necessary to fake a landing.
>>7716941
>Why would our military bother faking the moon landings?
not the military, they are the grunts of the operation. usually its the cia that are heavily involved. You clearly dont know anything of what has happened in the last 100 years of intelligence operations that can employ staff from the military. Disinformation and propaganda is a big one.
Here are some examples:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_influence_on_public_opinion
Also there was a few on board that wanted to whistleblow the operations NASA was taking at the time of the moon landings. Particularly the safety precautions and detail. Some examples are Gus Grissom's criticism on the Apollo Mission:
"I said, how are we gonna get to the Moon if we can't talk between two or three buildings?"
Grissom expressing frustration with the Apollo comm system
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/2610tothemoon.html
Also, Russians to this day still question the legitimacy of the moon landing.
http://www.ibtimes.com/pulse/moon-landing-hoax-russian-official-wants-apollo-mission-investigation-wake-us-fifa-1973640
>How would our government have faked a moon landing?
There is a movie called Capricorn One that does the job perfectly in explanation and almost a how to guide to faking NASA missions in the 1970s.
Air bubbles have been caught during China's and ISS space walks. Some people have put the time and effort in investigating how they are filmed.
>Do you see the dust the astronauts kick up with every footstep?
vacuum chambers and film techniques.
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1281.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Power_Facility
> How did we get the Soviets, our most hated enemies and direct competitors in everything, to cooperate?
solviets didn't see anything. NASA showed up with a radio and told them to listen to this broadcast and didnt show them telemetry data, ballistics or anything else.
>>7717000
Wow. You literally dodged the central point of every single question.
You're not that guy who got knocked the fuck out by Buzz Aldrin, are you? Because if you aren't, you really should be.
>>7716675
You're an idiot. The S-IVB was the TLI injection stage. It was smashed into the moon to analyze the seismic shocks produced. If it was to be looked at, all you would see would be a crater.
>>7717010
im not here for your shit test anon. What part of my reply did you not get? I can answer them.
>>7717000
>Disinformation and propaganda is a big one.
Why specifically did the CIA want to do this?
>Also there was a few on board that wanted to whistleblow the operations NASA was taking at the time of the moon landings. Particularly the safety precautions and detail.
So?
>Also, Russians to this day still question the legitimacy of the moon landing.
So?
>There is a movie called Capricorn One that does the job perfectly in explanation and almost a how to guide to faking NASA missions in the 1970s.
So?
>Air bubbles have been caught during China's and ISS space walks.
They aren't air bubbles, they are just floating debris.
>>7717015
> what part of my reply did you not get
The part where you actually answered the questions instead of tossing out movies and one bullshit Russian website as "proof".
>>7717024
Disinformation to create a superiority of space would benefit the image of America, in particular the space race.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_propaganda
http://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-the-soviets-extremely-intense-space-race-propaganda-posters-from-1958-1963-2012-4
The cia uses techniques adopted from the KGB for persuasion or agenda, some incites include the Afghanistan/Iraq War, Barrack Obama's birth certificate, The capture and burial of Osama Bin Laden, and today the ISIS/ISIL rebel groups.
Air Bubbles are caught during space walks of affiliated space programs of NASA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBL98p0wZ7g
