>>7702548
take your hand

hit your face

proven

Can't.

>>7702549
well that would only be from my perspective. There is no way to have a completely objective public perception of reality because reality is consequential of individual perception. you're reality is what you perceive. there is no base line because we cannot experience exactly the same thing as someone else.

>>7702548
I heard you can't read in dreams.
So if you're reading this than it's real.

>>7702548
Fuck off to /his/ or /lit/

Metaphysics has literally no place on your board and we'd prefer you're nonsense to be spewed elsewhere.

>>7702691
s/your/our

I wish the world wasn't real
Nothing I want ever happens
Therefore the world is real
QED

>>7702548

Get into mediation bro, learn to ground urself in the moment. Then the world is urs for the taking. As long as you don't have a sub pleb tier IQ

>>7702676
This is untrue. I distinctly remember reading in a dream.

>>7702548
Hmmm if only I had pro tip of some kind...

>>7702562
Did you try it? Do it again, maybe with practice you'll see the truth.

>>7702695
This isn't vim. This is real life, you can't just substitute what you want.

>>7702548

I stink, therefore I am.

>>7702676
Not true, I frequently read and even retain near photographic snapshots of dreams and even decent spatial recollection (despite how spatial stuff in dreams tends to break what's logically possible).

I can walk around in the environment the same way as if I'd been there while awake. It doesn't seem like my brain really experiences much of a difference. Reading text included.

>>7703894
>not using based sed instead of vim

metaphysics is more important than science

>>7702548
Are you real? Are you even actually posting?

>>7702548
The only thing you can prove is real is your thoughts, real, but might still be controlled