What would be the consanguinity of Christ, who was the only begotten son of himself.

>>7700763
Weeeeellllllllllllllll
>only begotten son of himself
let's be honest here.

File: 1442558637203.jpg (27KB, 480x329px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

27KB, 480x329px

>>7700770

I see the green text but cant tell what your implying. Can you be a bit more frank?

>>7700783
Oh, Jesus's father wasn't himself. Humans don't reproduce asexually.

>>7700783
Jesus is both God and the son of God, but the two are not actually the same entity, any more than one side of a coin is the other. God doesn't even have DNA, so consanguinity would be 0.

>>7700792
>Oh, Jesus's father wasn't himself. Humans don't reproduce asexually.

>john 14:11
>Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father is in Me;

Pretty sure Jesus is his own dad. Like 98.5% of Christians think so too. You gotta be non trinitarian to think otherwise.

Christ is god become man. That's what Paul teaches isn't it?

File: 1262759496711.jpg (70KB, 200x207px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

70KB, 200x207px

>>7700796
Is this a troll thread? I think this is a troll thread.

File: 853px-Shield-Trinity-Scutum-Fidei-English.svg.png (100KB, 853x768px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

100KB, 853x768px

>>7700796
>Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else, believe because of the works themselves.

>>7700763
>>>/x/ or whatever

Jesus was an alien hybrid. So he actually had parents/ genetic source.

File: 1449168470374.jpg (125KB, 626x557px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

125KB, 626x557px

Isn't there any bio fags that can work this problem out for us?

>>7700862
"Is" is clearly nontransitive here and hence not an equivalence relation.

>>7701329
Yeah, take bio 101 or bio 102 at University and you'll have your answer -- whether or not you believe it is up to you.

>>7701329
I don't see the problem there.