Are there any studies about how Attractiveness correlates with intelligence and ability?
>>7694797
Yes, but it's shitty science
>>7694797
Why do people start these threads instead of using Google Scholar?
Please explain. Couldn't be arsed?
>>7694797
The more intelligent you are the more money you make, the more money you make the hotter chicks you can get, the hotter chicks you can get, the more attractive your children will be coupled with your intelligence.
>>7694805
Is this that alien fag from the gatchaman anime?
>>7694803
I've never heard of google scholar, m8. Sorry
>>7694813
Now you have.
There are tons of other similar sites such as arXiv too.
Attractiveness is determined by LMS (looks, money status).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V7TcSr9GiM
Looks are genetic and largely independent of intelligence. Intelligence might help you to optimize your looks, but overall aesthetics (in particular facial bone structure, hair texture, height) are something you either have or you don't.
Money is in some sense also genetic. You can't become a multimillionaire if you're not already born rich.
Status requires you to engage in a lot of anti-intellectual activities, e.g. partying, club nights, entertainment, and thus means actively lowering your intelligence.
>>7694970
>tfw you look like the one night stand guy
>>7694970
This guy sounds like he's about to rape someone/ is a total large-lipped sperg.
The genes aren't correlated at all.
Although I know many attractive geniuses. Speaking of which, Oppenheimer's pretty sexy.
>>7694979
Wittgenstein and Becket are handsome as shit men. Joyce isn't a bad looking guy either.
>>7694980
You think Wittgenstein's sexy?
>>7694797
high left right symmetry correlates with attactiveness, and also intelligence
I think that's the extent of it
>>7694970
>LMS
Not for males it ain't.
>>7694984
Not that anon, but he is. I could fap to the pic where Wittgenstein poses before messy the blackboard.
>>7695107
Bump
