If you can't solve all of these you have no right to discuss physics on /sci/.
>>7683513
>Baby's first zadachnik
>>7683514
Can't find a decent translation and I don't fancy learning Russian
Is this pop sci or not pop sci?
>>7683540
No this a very good physics book for people wanting to increase their understanding of concepts. It's not really a plug and chug kinda of problem book. pic related.
>>7683513
If you can't solve all of these you have no right to discuss physics on any forum ever
>>7683546
Post hardest problem so we can make fun of you
If you can't solve all of these you have no right to discuss mathematics on /sci/.
>>7684686
good thing no one wants to
>>7683546
op wants me to solve questions with 17 sub questions? fuck no dude i'd like to do something with my time
>>7685158
I think you forgot pic attached?
>>7685416
oops, again these are conceptual questions, it's hard to say if they are difficult or not, they do show a competency of physics and an ability to apply your knowledge though
>>7683513
>If you can't solve all of these you have no right to discuss physics on /sci/.
>>7685436
i aint doing your homework kid
>>7685436
trivial
>>7685436
David Cox?
>>7685427
Those don't seem too bad, we've just been learning how to do this stuff in my E&M class. First one could be done with multipole expansion or solving the Laplace equation, second one is similar but with restrictions on theta. Not exactly hard if the methods are fresh in your mind, but not really easy either (for me anyhow).
>>7685436
>11 dimensional supergravity
Christ I'm definitely never going to try to learn string theory.
>>7685661
>Christ I'm definitely never going to try to learn string theory.
If you really love geometry it is probably the most interesting topic in physics you can learn. If not you are probably better off spending your time learning something more useful.
>>7683513
If you can't solve all of these you have no right to discuss Vietnamese pisciculture
