>when u finally understand why 0.999.. =/= 1
>>7669572
Imagine what learning analysis will feel like, OP.
> >>7669795
bro... no... > >>7669572
1 is entirely subjective; any equation can sum it and the same applys vice versa
In my unpublished studies there's 16 to 34 to 41 types of 1 depending on what space scope you're using
Back to >>7669795
The real kicker is in 2=/=1.9999...9888....98.....{.9898989.}.... , and up to 10 where 9.9999....90000.....
after that it's just silly....
....No such this as irrational ;)
>>7669806
Give an example please.
>>7669808
Ah. I see you received your degree in Nigeria
>>7669572
0.999... = 1 - epsilon
0.999... is an element of the hyperreals
>>7669862
Kek
I don't get it, why is it so hard to understand? If 0.999... was the same as 1, then it would be 1, not 0.999...
>>7669808
>M. Fractals
>incoherent meaningless shitpost/baitpost
At least your name makes sense. Crackpots have a strong boner towards fractals.
>>7669572
Given two numbers a and b, if it holds that d(a,b) < eps for every real positive eps, then a = b. 0.99... = 1.
>>7670827
[math] \displaystyle
1 = \frac {3}{3} = 3 \cdot \frac {1}{3} = 3 \cdot 0.333... = 0.999...
[/math]
You people are chumps.
>>7670844
Thats a fallacy, prove this part right here:
[math]\displaystyle 3 \cdot \frac {1}{3} = 3 \cdot 0.333...[/math]
Prove the equality. Oh wait, you can't its an arbitrary axiom. Dedekind and set theory shits on your amateur mathmatics. >>7670817
This nig knows whats up
>>7669572
When will you learn to define what number set are you using?
It's true in hyper reals but not in reals. Stop being an idiot and educate yourself.
>>7669808
>this fucking guy shitposting in every thread
>>7670827
If 3/3 were the same as 1 it would be 1 and not 3/3.......
>>7669572
>>7670861
>prove this part
prove it isn't
