>during prehistory everyone fucks everyone else like monkeys
>early humans finally develop enough brainpower to form functional societies
>society helps dictate which man gets which woman (or women)
>usually there is a reason beyond it, like increased intelligence that led to greater wealth
>feminism happens
>hypergamy erupts
>women are now free to fuck as many men as they want
>their men are usually chosen by only a few but universal factors
>other men go without at best and end up caring for Chadspawn at worst
Why is nobody acting like this is a problem? We have given women reproductive rights and the key to the future of humanity, and they are hellbent on using it to fuel the destruction of the human species.
Going by the way women choose their mates soon humanity will be reduced to a population of 8 foot tall unintelligent degenerates with penises that drag on the ground and selfie sticks for arms. How long until people wake up and we do something about the female problem for good?
>during prehistory everyone fucks everyone else like monkeys
Probably not, try again
>>27450530
>>early humans finally develop enough brainpower to form functional societies
They had the same "brainpower" as we do. The difference is we have education. They learned through tradition and culture.
The problem is that you're a blue-pilled cuck, OP.
You're falling for the game of believing that women were 'different' elsewhere or in the past, and you're falling for the lie of male power and assuming that "men" "collectively" established some sort of reasoned distribution over sex at one point in the past.
The reality is that women have always been hypergamous, but in the past some women and men came to a sort of 'cuck agreement' whereby males were brainwashed into becoming disposable worker drones, and in the process they got married to a woman who in THEORY shouldn't cuck him but probably did. The 'marriage system' wouldn't be helping you with sex, when marriage is the norm, then you find yourself being pressured by everyone to get married to a fatty\ugly\bitch\femicunt woman or face discrimination and possibly death. The woman is in no serious way obligated to you, she can and will cuck you and can and will dispose of you or turn people against you the moment she desires.
It's also a failure to think that "men" in general have ever or will ever work in the interests of men collectively - the reality is that most men work for their own interests by working against other male interests. In the marriage system for example, you would be furiously competing AGAINST other males, and odds are you'd be one of those males who stomps on and exploits other males to enrich his own hotwife and children.
>>27450530
Artificial wombs and sexbots will soon dawn upon us.
I foresee the future to be comprised of human males and some sort of genetically modified catgirl mates that replace normal human females and are engineered to help propel our species. Such as extreme loyalty and healthy genes so that even if the weakest and stupidest males breed, the genepool will be refreshed and kept strong through an endless cycle of genetically engineered catgirls.
The smartest and richest men can already just buy model-tier ovum and get surrogates, so we already beat the reproductive game. Just not on a mass scale, which will happen eventually out of pure need.
>>27450530
20% of the men gets 80% of the women OP.
I've realized this, and I cope with it by jerking off, why can't you?
>>27450530
>>27450530
The reason women are the way they are nowadays is because our society is collapsing, giving rise to a winner-take-all mentality. In fact, you could say that all people nowadays (not just women) are acting more like their prehistoric ancestors. Or rather, our prehistoric ancestors acted the way they did because times were so shitty.
If our society were still thriving, you wouldn't see nearly as much of this shit.
Hypergamy is a symptom of a much greater systemic problem.
>>27450530
Your vagina won't be able to say much with my dick shoved in it.
