>tfw you'll never know how it feels
why live?
Can't you just read about it? It's a very common and well-documented experience.
I didn't think roasties could be pretty. It looks like petals
>>29892870
I don't know.
I haven't really cared about either in a long time.
>>29892870
what the fcuk is wrong with that dick?
>>29892892
kek
Yeah. Damn that's a nice roastie...
OP do you have moar of it?
>>29892870
>why live?
Also yeah, I'm gonna kill myself at some point for sure.
>>29892870
why do you say that? just get a prostitute you fucking idiot
>>29892870
>Dry, circumcised dick.
Thank god I live in a first work country and only experience pristine, moist, smooth uncut cock.
>>29892870
>that dick
why do jews want this again
>>29892967
Nothing? It's a pretty nice dick tbqh famslam
>>29892967
Circumcised.
Backwards cultures like Islam, Judaism, and Americans cut the end off their dick leaving it raw and red.
>>29893018
no one cares what you put in your ass pal
>>29893038
>Anal
The dicks I prefer hurt too much in my arse.
I'm just visiting from lolcow farms.
i know how it feels
it fucking sucks guys
it's not even worth the effort
>>29893018
is the moistness from the smegma buildup that gross anteater dicks get?
>>29893095
You do know people are capable of cleaning their dicks right
there is really nothing you can say to defend your mutilated cock
>>29893095
Foreskin keeps it from drying out, and while growing it'll spread precum around the tip.
>>29893037
>raw
>implying my head is more raw that your uncut head
>>29893070
why are you complaining about cut dicks when yours was sliced clean off :s ?
>Reminder that you will
>Reminder not to listen to the desperate, pathetic shitposter who puts people down to try to make himself feel better
>Reminder that every single time we convince the OP of these threads to talk about themselves, they end up being bigger, sadder losers than the rest of us jammed together
>>29893132
Neo-vags are less elastic than anal.
>>29892888
>Can't you just read about it?
You are forgetting that quite a bit of footage of this event can easily be found online. OP has many options to learn more about this experience.
>>29892870
>mutilated genitalia
he'll never know how it feels either.
>>29893152
How do you know OP wasn't talking about never getting to feel having a dick split your pussy lips?
>>29892870
>why live
>implying im not going to just hang myself eventually.
Top shrugs mate, your not even in my level.
Are uncut fags the most annoying people on the planet?
>>29893225
no, we're justcomplete dicks
>>29892870
fleshlight and real dolls feel the same, if not better
source, experince
>>29893225
>he gets VERY butthurt about people [not] having damaged penises on the internet
>>29893197
My post doesn't contradict that? I don't know what you're trying to say.
>>29893239
CUT FAGS ETERNALLY AND PERMANENTLY BTFO
>>29893225
so assmad over how disgusting and stinky their dicks look they've come up with the le dry dick meme
>>29892870
>not having a dry, leathery, numb, farmers' tan jewdick
feels pretty good 2bh
>>29893278
>he thinks it's respectable to have the roastie of penises
>>29893152
Is that AVGN getting his dick wet?
I didn't know he had a sex tape.
Also thanks for the encouragement but I'm 23 and really starting to doubt it...
>>29893306
cool meme, Shekel Goldenstein. I'm glad that your parents made a life-altering fashion statement on your body without your consent.
>>29892870
can someone tell me if it's worth it to try? can i just fap with the best VR porn and get the same experience?
>>29893369
you won't get love from a VR
>>29893507
But you will get it from women?
>>29893507
>you won't get love from a VR
but what about the sex feel?
Cumming inside a woman without a condom feels great for a few seconds until you start to panic about what you've done, only to feel silly when you remember she's a pillow
>>29892870
Feels really gut but stillOverrated
>tfw I do know how it feels with dozens of women and one tranny
>>29893546
>only to feel silly when you remember she's a pillow
kek this
>>29893563
>one tranny
how would you rate this experience compared to the women?
Does fucking ass feel better or worse than fucking vagina?
was the tranny feminine? did the boipussy look feminine or was it all pimply and gross
>>29892870
Why is everything so red?
>>29893243
>someone with a fleshlight and real dolls gets laid more than you
>>29893651
I much prefer women.
I think it feels worse, because it doesn't self-lubricate like a vagina.
The tranny was kinda feminine. The boipussy was smooth and clean, easy to slide into. No zits.
>>29893665
White people apparently bleed from all their pores, it's the same reason they get red in the face when they are excited or nervous, because small amounts of blood seep out of the pores on their face. The same thing is happening here.
>>29892870
Yep, that's correct, I am uncut. :]
> when you remember that girl in hs who liked you but you were too dumb to realize
>genders are divided up about 50% 50%
>it's till 300x harder for a guy to get intimacy / a relationship
'tis a weird world we live in
>>29894115
why the fuck is it like this? I really don't understand how the gender dynamics can be so one sided if the population is equally spilt
>>29893239
Will cutfags ever recover from this?
>>29894149
Women don't need men as much as they used to and feel empowered by living alone. Meanwhile, men still have their strong instinctive urge to find a companion and reproduce. Back when we actually gave a shit about society and religion, this problem didn't exist because every man got a woman because women depended on men. We're literally useless now aside from military strength which will soon be replaced as well
>>29894207
No, we're scarred for life.
>>29892870
>you'll never know how it feels
speak for yourself, normie. I have a loving 2D waifu to have sex with all the time.
that looks like my penis
>perfect roastie image ruined by a mutilated white shrimpdick
>>29894423
you know I would be fine with blacked if they got clean cut black guys but every single guy they find looks like a thug
Do they have any with neat and clean black dudes without tattoos?
>>29894456
i think lexington steele is the closest
>>29894224
>Women don't need men as much as they used to and feel empowered by living al
you can see women in relationships all the time though, and a lot of them whine when they've been single for 3 months. something doesn't add up
>>29894115
What?
I have as much sex as any female I know. Do I work 300x harder?
>>29894815
we're not talking about chads here
>>29892870
This really grosses me out now.
Seriously the older I get, the more my sex drive is asleep, and this kind of stuff just makes me kind of barfy.
>>29894882
I suffer from serious anxiety and am a 7, 8/10 at best. There's no reason average looking guys can't have their share of sex.
Well at least I have a foreskin
>>29894934
if you're 8/10 that's hardly average and that's how you get sex
>>29894882
This is kind of circular thinking. You can't go "Women have it so much easier than men, except for chads" and then call anyone that has sex regularly a chad.
Also, reminder that the average amount of lifetime partners is like 8, and it's much lower than past generations have been. Most people never have casual sex.
>>29894270
>>29894270
kek
commnet too low in content 20402340923
>>29893239
I'll acknowledge your pun since nobody else will, anon
>>29895071
>and then call anyone that has sex regularly a chad.
but that's hardly anyone, more like 15% of men.
also "regularly have sex" is too broad of a term. there are men who are basically a walking wallet and driver for their girlfriend who reluctantly agree to have sex with them once in a while, but I wouldn't call this situation desirable or fair
>>29894934
>I'm 8/10
>I'm better looking than 80% of the population
> I'm average guys!
You're right. I'm glad I'm uncut.
>>29892870
will that girth be enough for women's loyalty ?
>>29893225
It's just the latest trend. Where it used to be all "hip" to claim that uncut is inferior in any and all ways and how uncuts are undesirable as fuck, as of late it seems claiming that of cut dicks is the way to seem "cool" instead.
It's basically just a maymay, much like the majority of things on /r9k/ nowadays.
That, and (potentially ironic) shitposters as well as trolls perpetuating it as it seems to rustle some people's Jimmies surprisingly well.
>>29893239
BTFO
Originalio
>>29893152
It is alway you you you.
Never me.
Everyone makes it.
But not me.
Never me.
I'm a wizard.
>>29895651
Now more people know that it's the foreskin, not the glans, that is the most erogenous and sensual part of the penis.
Back in the day people said, "oh it's just a flap of skin". Now we know better and the message is spreading through the internet as well as medical journals.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338602
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
Circumcisers literally remove the best parts from their victim's genitals without even getting consent from the person they're doing it to.
>>29894551
Successful/happy relationship > successful single life > mediocre single life >= mediocre relationship.
A lot of people prefer a single life over a (what they perceive as) crappy relationship even if they would love to be in a good relationship. That's why you see so many women complain when they aren't in one for a few months; they want the companionship and closeness, but not with men they perceive as below their standards. Add to that the fact that even when they feel lonely they often still don't put any effort in initializing, and what you get is women who complain a lot without taking active measures to improve their life's quality- a bit like a lot of us robots do.
An issue nowadays is the absurd high standards of some women, standards that will cater to their princess-complex or is increased due to their sense of desirability since teenage years through their twenties generally/on average.
A lot of men prefer the same thing (content single over crappy relationship), but they in general have a stronger urge to pursue sexual activities and plenty won't mind lowering their standards just to get their dick wet more easily. For them, as long as the woman puts out often enough and doesn't whine too much, he'll stick with her even if it's a mediocre or unhealthy relationship.
As women don't have this second brain thinking for them (although they can have hormonal surges that can fuck things up just as badly, but often in different ways), it skews the whole gender dynamics.
And of course add to that the fact women are the overall more passive ones than men, making men having to take the initiative if they want any reasonable chance of success - which further shifts that sense of supply vs demand.
>>29896490
I'm sure the foreskin is sensual/erogenous (as I'm uncut myself).
It's more the whole bullying mentality shifting from cut=superior to uncut=superior I'm referring to.
No 2 years ago if you were to have posted a pic of an uncut dick you'd get just as many ridiculing and trolling comments as you get for cut ones nowadays.
It's a fucked up thing they do that shit in America and some other countries, especially as basic hygiene nowadays is by far good enough to properly keep your dick cleaned even if uncut, but there's no reason to ridicule cut people - as the grand majority is cut without their consent - except to troll or be annoying cunts.
Crappy people will be crappy people, regardless of whether or not their dicks have been cut - or if they even have one.
>>29896576
that is all true, the question is what should a man do. accept relationshipless?
>>29892967
It's just small and skinny. The call girl in the picture probably never had an orgasm during the few short seconds of thrusting he provided.
>>29892870
But I do, feels good when you're really horny but tbqhwyf blowjobs are 10x better.
>>29896865
Nothing wrong with being relationshipless. Relationships are just for coasting into marriage mode anyway, which as a male you don't need to do until you're significantly older.
>>29893239
I'll bet they're getting prettycut upabout that one.
>>29896961
There are those loneliness bouts though
>>29894423
why are black dudes getting such dark colored tattoos? it just looks like they are dirty
>>29895313
Sure, most people aren't having sex all the time, but plenty of people regularly get into relationships up until their mid late twenties (When people start to have long term relationships, families and the like), and are regularly having sex.
It's stupid to imply that most relationships are just the woman reluctantly putting out, most relationships are sexually healthy where both people are attracted to each other. Driving your girlfriend places sometimes doesn't mean you're being used and pathetic, just that you're doing something for someone you care about.
>>29895428
8/10 is more than 80% of the population I'd say, looks aren't evenly distributed. Otherwise you'd have a 9/10 in every group of ten people, which just isn't true.
>>29894915
coping mechanism tbqhfg
>>29897101
black people can only get black tattoos
>>29892870
I came a thick load of deep inside a vagina this afternoon.
>>29892870
Being circumcised must be hell
>ive been with only 3 women so far at 21 and pussy is always different, thats the best way to describe it, but to the virgins here, just imagine the most comfortable place to pump your dick, its warm, wet and tight, the sound of moaning and the smell of her juices, sweat and precum makes your experience better.
If you're super lucky she'll let you cum in her and that in itself makes you feel raw and primal.
It feel just feels right if that makes sense. Like you were meant to endure everything you have so far just to do this. Its just amazing.
>>29897196
maybe, but there are a lot more men who fit in the category of "never had realtionship / sex or had one girlfriend as a teen" than there are such women. lonely women are more often the "had 5 exes but it didn't work out" kind
>>29892870
Why did she stick pepperonis in her snatch though
>>29897364
> but there are a lot more men who fit in the category of "never had realtionship / sex or had one girlfriend as a teen" than there are such women
Nah, it's pretty equal honestly, women don't have more sex than men, and they don't lose their virginity earlier on average by much at all.
It's important to remember that what /r9k/ says is often memes, and doesn't usually relate to what's really going on, it's a forum full of people who pride themselves on being socially awkward and sexually inexperienced acting like they know the ins and outs of sexual interactions (no pun intended).
>>29893225
>Getting angry that other people have better parents.
>>29892870
You early AM shitposters do know that it really doesn't fucking matter when you post cancer, you're just going to be banned when the mods get on, right?
>>29897384
>Nah, it's pretty equal honestly,
I hardly think so. go to every engineering faculty, the women there have mostly normal social/romantic life while the men are often perpetual virgins / no relationships. there are those "perma-virgin" men (don't like this term as it's quite dehumanizing) who I have no doubt would have no such problems with relationships, were they born as females. male loneliness is a sad truth
>>29897384
>women don't have more sex than men, and they don't lose their virginity earlier on average
>it's a forum full of people who pride themselves on being socially awkward and sexually inexperienced
how can someone be so retarded and delusional?
you are not even making any sense in your description of r9k as one person you are too dumb for this
>>29893239
Fucking kek
origami
>>29895313
>fair
find someone who is attracted to you idiot
alternately, learn to use your fingers
>>29897506
get out lolcow
>>29897196
>It's stupid to imply that most relationships are just the woman reluctantly putting out, most relationships are sexually healthy where both people are attracted to each other. Driving your girlfriend places sometimes doesn't mean you're being used and pathetic, just that you're doing something for someone you care about.
but somehow it's always the man driving the women, the man buying something for the woman, it's always the woman calling for "emotional support", etc
>>29897518
doo doo + pee pee = you motherfucker
>>29897421
which engineering faculty anon i'd fuck them all enginerds are hottttt
>>29897539
Hey, faggot: Doo doo got farted out of your butthole. You gonna pick that shit up?
>>29897547
get out fake female
p.org
>>29893239
feels good man, can cutfags ever recover?
>>29896865
>>29897018
As >>29896961 said, being relationshipless isn't inherently wrong. The loneliness bouts can be damn annoying especially if you feel like you're craving the intimacy and companionship that comes with a (keyword:) good relationship.
There's still a lot in life one can do to enjoy oneself, a relationship is just one of many potentially nice things. You can focus and invest some time and energy on hobbies, interests, self-improvement if you're into that, even socializing and spending (more) time with friends.
Those things helped me during my bouts of loneliness, something I haven't really had in a year or so because of it.
What also helps is keeping in mind the not-so-great potential aspects of a relationship. Of course happy couples exist and all the power to them, and it's a pity we won't experience that any time soon if ever, but I personally am glad I also am not in a beta provider position, or raising someone else's kids, in a sex-less and emotionless relationship, one with constant verbal and manipulative abuse, a cheating woman, one who's constantly craving drama, or one or several of many other negative traits a potential spouse could have.
Being able to do what I want whenever I want to is nice as well, plenty of relationships require significant limitations in that.
I don't believe in complete happiness (much like how perfection doesn't exist), but I'm genuinely content with my relationshipless life. It works for me, even if a "perfect" relationship would be even better. So would being a multi-millionaire.
>>29892870
>tfw you'll never know how it feels to have girly parts
>>29892870
>arranged marriage
>destined to know this feel
>still won't stop being a complete retard when it comes to women
>won't be happy anyway
>>29897421
>I hardly think so. go to every engineering faculty, the women there have mostly normal social/romantic life while the men are often perpetual virgins / no relationships
Most engineers I've met have happy relationships or have been in ones in the past.
>>29897432
>how can someone be so retarded and delusional?
How can someone be so new? It's the most obnoxious thing here how thread to thread, people go from "I'm a hopeless virgin, I don't understand this at all" to "I'm a sex master and know more than you". Don't go the whole "It's not all one person" way either, because no-one believes that you're sex masters.
Oh, and statistically speaking, I'm right.
>>29897536
>but somehow it's always the man driving the women
I've known plenty of cases where the gf's have driven places, or even female friends drove.
>it's always the woman calling for "emotional support", etc
This is honestly more the mens fault. It's hardly fair to blame women for men feeling like they shouldn't need emotional support, that's pretty much a behaviour men try to instill into other men.
>>29898396
let's be honest here, you're a lulcow. I know because you're completely delusional regarding the typical male love life
>>29898396
Do you mean when they're 30? girls don't go for nerds, they study engineering and go out with a business major
>This is honestly more the mens fault.
not really, men just don't expect others to accept their emotional baggage and drama, because they're considerate.
>>29892870
>>tfw you'll never know how it feels
Unfortunately, I do. Being cut really sucks.Sex is still great, though.
>>29898470
>let's be honest here, you're a lulcow.
And you're paranoid. No-one from that forum cares about this site.
>I know because you're completely delusional regarding the typical male love life
Says the person ignoring statistics to support their own personal theories. Isn't a belief that exists no matter how much evidence you show that contradicts it?
Oh, and to prove that the average age of virginity loss and amount of sexual partners isn't that different, here's some sources
>http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/s.htm#sexualactivity
>http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
>Do you mean when they're 30? girls don't go for nerds
Let me guess, they go for those asshole chads instead? Real life isn't a high school drama movie. Though you're right, if someone spends all their time inside and is very introverted they're less likely to be in a relationship, they just don't fucking know anyone. But most engineers aren't this way.
>not really, men just don't expect others to accept their emotional baggage and drama, because they're considerate.
You just completely contradicted yourself. It can't be not mens fault but also mens decision to act that way.
>>29892870
is this actually an okay girth ? can a woman be loyal to me if i have this girth ?
>>29893127
>implying your keratinized glans that constantly rubs against your underwear is as sensitive as one protected by the foreskin
Cutfags in charge of understanding biology or having common sense.
Have fun with your friction burns and mutilated or nonexistent frenulum, not like it's the most sensitive part of the dick.
>>29892870
Well thanks to my older sister I do.
>>29898561
>is this actually an okay girth?
Yes.
>can a woman be loyal to me if i have this girth?
Yes.
>>29898561
>woman
>loyal
My fucking sides.
>>29893239
All cutfags on suicide watch after this, no exceptions.
>>29892870
>tfw u will never get footjob with stockings and cum on high heels
>>29898633
I'll admit it. That one hurt a little ;_;
>>29898637
I once had my ex give me a footjob just to give it a try. It's by far the worst sex related thing I've ever tried.
>>29895651
>people actually claimed that damaged, less sensitive dicks are superior because women might like them more
>it's ok to feel less pleasure if your woman prefers it like that
Amazing logic, the epitome of cuck mentality, not to mention that cutfags foreskins were used to make facial creams for women to add insult to injury.
Also
>being a forever KV
>can't even enjoy masturbation properly
I'd just kill myself.
>>29894207
>>29898052
No, just like their dicks sensitivity and ability to masturbate without lube or friction burns.
Who /waitingforforegen/ here?
>>29898673
anon, my dick gets harder by watching at legs (some cases feet), especially with stockings and fucking gold bonus if with heels than looking at vagina
>>29898528
>Let me guess, they go for those asshole chads instead? Real life isn't a high school drama movie. Though you're right, if someone spends all their time inside and is very introverted they're less likely to be in a relationship, they just don't fucking know anyone. But most engineers aren't this way.
Actually this is because women accept to be assertively hit on, so the nerdy guys with no confidence have no chance. notice if they were women it wouldn't be an issue. (shy girls are cute ^_)
>You just completely contradicted yourself. It can't be not men's fault but also men's decision to act that way.
I think it was implied that demanding constant emotional support is childish and inconsiderate and that's why most guys don't do that
>>29893239
I keked
T. Cutfag
>>29898781
I'm just saying that it's not for everyone. But it's important to be open-minded and try things out.
>>29898796
>shy girls are cute
As are good looking shy men. Even regular looking guys get hit on a lot by girls.
>>29893239
What did he mean by this?
How can cutfags even compete with this?
>>29898528
>hurr durr women are as lonely as men
>the waifu c industry is 99% directed towards males
why don't we see more women with those weird sex dolls and body pillows? aren't they as lonely?
>Oh, and to prove that the average age of virginity loss and amount of sexual partners isn't that different, here's some sources
biased data based on surveys, where people constantly lie: women make themselves look less whorish and men make themselves look more sexually experienced
>>29893033
what is the jew god going to DO with the ever increasing mountain of foreskins?
>>29898822
>Even regular looking guys get hit on a lot by girls.
the delusion is real. good looking men rarely get hit on, regular looking guys get completely ignored
>>29894456
the thug look is part of the fantasy they're selling, anon
if you want interracial sexy times between two model-like people look up herge-art massage videos or something.
>>29898851
I tend to get hit on by women I've had as friends for a long-ish time (like six months to two years).
>>29898807
maybe your gf wasnt really good at it, needed experience
>>29898796
>Actually this is because women accept to be assertively hit on, so the nerdy guys with no confidence have no chance.
It's not about their confidence in this case, it's that theyre completely unavailable. This happens with women too.
>I think it was implied that demanding constant emotional support is childish and inconsiderate and that's why most guys don't do that
Women who do this are needy and annoying too, admittedly. But the whole "boys don't cry" sort of shit is perpetrated almost entirely by other men, you can't blame women for that one.
>>29898836
>why don't we see more women with those weird sex dolls and body pillows? aren't they as lonely?
For one, there's an extremely small amount of people who do that. And secondly, women own all sorts of toy dolls, and a sex pillow literally couldn't work for a women, though sex toys are more common amongst women than men.
Also, look at tumblr. The whole fandom thing is pretty much the same as the waifu thing here, and that's mostly women.
>biased data based on surveys, where people constantly lie: women make themselves look less whorish and men make themselves look more sexually experienced
Kek, You can't just ignore data with "It's all lies" anon, that's a complete copout and impossible to prove.You could use this same logic to deny that a flu can cause a cough, by saying that everyone who has a flue and coughs is just faking it to look sicker. It's stupid and a copout reason to avoid having to admit you're wrong.
women prefer cut over uncut, that's just a plain fact. go ahead and post how you're a "woman" and you think otherwise but we all know the truth.
>>29898901
>It's not about their confidence in this case, it's that theyre completely unavailable. This happens with women too.
yeah it is, confidence and being ugly (ugly for men is about 6/10 and below).
> theyre completely unavailable
what does that even mean. don't try to bullshit yourself out of an argument, not on muh r9k
>Kek, You can't just ignore data with "It's all lies" anon, that's a complete copout and impossible to prove
it's obvious that everyone lies on those surveys. only someone with an agenda like yourself can ignore this fact
>>29898908
>women prefer cut over uncut
Women prefer whatever the guy they love is. You'd know if you'd been with a number of girls.
And even if they preferred one way over the other, who gives a shit?
Every girl I've been with loved my dick the way it is but I fucking hate being cut.
>>29898908
>>women prefer cut over uncut
women prefer whatever's most common in the place they live
in the US that's cut, in other places it's not
>>29898931
>yeah it is, confidence and being ugly (ugly for men is about 6/10 and below).
That explains all the people under 6/10 who have partners, right?
>what does that even mean. don't try to bullshit yourself out of an argument, not on muh r9k
Are you dumb? You're unavailable because you simply don't socialise, and are caught up with study or other investments nearly all of your time.
>it's obvious that everyone lies on those surveys. only someone with an agenda like yourself can ignore this fact
Or, you know, the qualified researchers themselves, who I'm absolutely sure know more than you or I about what constitutes reliable data.
As I said "They're obviously lying", with no actual proof that they're lying isn't an argument. Don't call me delusional when you're acting like a delusional person trying to justify their beliefs in the face of contradictory evidence.
>>29898934
Did you get a tight cut or a loose one?
>tfw tight cut
>>29898866
Shes 2 years older than me. As a teenager I was hugely attracted to her because I didn't see her often - I went to a boarding school, and an all boys boarding school in that which probably accentuated my attraction towards her. She was (at the time when I rubbed my dick on her labia like OP's pic) 5'9, 7/10 face, pretty thin, 17 years old and wasnt through puberty completely. We only see each other during the midyear holidays and the summer (Christmas) holidays, in the other two holiday sessions I stay at school or sometimes hop into a friends house. Anyway I was 15, Christmas, grandma died a month ago, sister's boyfriend broke up and she was extremely depressed and diagnosed herself as an insomniac. Went to see a GP, got prescribed zolpidem, I suggested to her (without any intentions at the time) that taking a lot at once might knock nightmares out. She did it so an hour into her sleep I just pinched her, rubbed my hands against her body and even put fingers in her mouth, with no response I just took off her shorts, autistically fingered (with only the tip hinge of my middle finger) her asshole and put it close to my nose to smell it. I decided to escalate it and just rubbed my dick against her general vaginal region and asshole, but didnt actually penetrate because i was scared she might suspect something from bowel pain to come or the random smell of air refreshner. I eventually just came by jacking off while looking at her ass but I like to think that said contact was intimate enough to warrant as a loss of virginity
>>29899027
Tight as hell here too, mate. Long erections kill me at times.
>>29898986
well then lolcow, let's do a little social experiment:
say we have two nerdy shy 5/10's, one male and one female. they want a partner of the opposite sex.
Let's try to give them a way to do that. here's my tip for the lady:
1. exist
2. sign up on a dating site, put your real picture, write whatever you want about yourself, even outright stating your flaws.
3. wait a couple of hours
4. sign in, make your pick from 100's of messages, and get your bf.
no please write tips for the guy. I want it to be just as effortless as it is for the girl (no "just hit on 100 women!") seeing as, as you've said, it's just as tough for girls as it is for guys.
I suspect that you won't comment on this post.
>>29898908
this is true, i'm scotland and all men are uncut and i think it's gross. I want to find an american bf.
>>29899080
not the guy you replied to but sheesh this is fucking depressing
>>29899080
Not the person you're talking to but every guy who is at least average looking can easily get a gf if they socialize enough.
>>29899092
Are you going to get circumcised as well?
>>29899113
the above mentioned lady claimed "it's just as difficult for girls as it is for guys!", so logic dictates that if a woman can get a relationship effortlessly, so can a man
>>29899131
>can get a relationship effortlessly, so can a man
Many men actually can. Some do have to put more effort into it. A few will have a hard time for various reasons.
>>29899092
you think this is gross?
uncut with a fully retractable foreskin is vastly superior to cut
>>29899146
moving the goalposts I see. the original claim was "it's just as difficult for women as it is for men"
>>29899080
>well then lolcow, let's do a little social experiment:
>If you disagree with me, you must be part of this other group so I can mock you easier!
>no please write tips for the guy. I want it to be just as effortless as it is for the girl (no "just hit on 100 women!") seeing as, as you've said, it's just as tough for girls as it is for guys.
Well when you've made up an unrealistic hypothetical situation (no-one's getting hundreds of messages which they can just pick from unless they're exceptional in all ways), I can't.
But actual studies on matching theory show that even on dating sites, though the most attractive people do get the most messages, people of equal looks are far more likely to hook up with each other than those above or below them So that 5/10 girl is more likely to hook up with a 5/10 guy than anyone else, and their relationship would also be happier.
Your challenge is fucking stupid though, because it's comparing a false premise and going "How come reality can't measure up?". It doesn't prove anything.
>>29897344
I barely felt anything with 3 different girls. With/without condom. Just a loose barely there sensation
>>29893239
HAHAHA HOW CAN CUTFAGS EVEN COMPETE
>>29899152
Man, I'm so jealous because his erection actually looks comfortable. I'm cut and you won't see a single crease in my skin when I'm hard. It's just too tight ;_;
>>29899163
That was actually never my claim. The original claim was this
>Sure, most people aren't having sex all the time, but plenty of people regularly get into relationships up until their mid late twenties (When people start to have long term relationships, families and the like), and are regularly having sex.
And then followed up by this
>Nah, it's pretty equal honestly, women don't have more sex than men, and they don't lose their virginity earlier on average by much at all.
Which I provided citations for. Your arguments however, have been appealing to the emotion of the reader, strawmen, just dodging things completely and creating hypothetical situations.
>>29899169
>Well when you've made up an unrealistic hypothetical situation
lol. hundreds of tinder / okcupid have proven this. can some lad post the infographics?
you don't need a "study in matching theory". just open up an account, wait a day and see.
Sorry honey, but reality is indeed cruel and unforgiving, and does not cater to your tumblr fantasies. I wish you a safe trip back to lolfarm
i'd rather have a cut huge cock than be an uncut dicklet
life is literal suffering with a 4inch phimosis dick
>>29893239
cutfags on suicide watch ;)
>>29892870
the actual physical sensation is highly overrated
>>29899221
>lol. hundreds of tinder / okcupid have proven this. can some lad post the infographics?
>infographics
wew lad
>you don't need a "study in matching theory".
Kek, you are really bad at this anon. A professionally performed study on the topic is always going to trump some shitty infographs.
>Sorry honey, but reality is indeed cruel and unforgiving, and does not cater to your tumblr fantasies.
>reality
If it's reality, why don't you post even a single source supporting it? Seems like it would be extremely easy to do if this was undeniable reality. Because as far as I'm seeing, I'm the only one that's actually pointed towards any evidence supporting my claims.
>>29899173
>>29899173
That sucks, dude.
originalio
>>29899236
I actually disagree but to each their own.
>>29899240
direct experience, i.e you actually opening a female profile and getting hundreds of messages, as others have done and documented in infographics, is obviously superior to some theoretical studies which are based on god know what. if that's your only point you obviously lost the argument, which makes sense, because it's obvious for any person with half a brain that men have it much harder in the romantic department than women
>>29899298
>direct experience
>anecdotes trump scientific studies
tiptopkek
>>29899236
With the vast majority of women yes.
Although back when I was in high school I took a girl's virginity, and I must say the tightness and the feeling then was anything but overrated. I don't know though maybe it's the fact that it was my first time too, or maybe it's just nostalgia goggles.
>>29893239
>my parents had MY dick mutilated because they were concerned about the aesthetics and hygiene of MY penis
>cant feel anything down there
should i kill them?
>>29899315
>the sky is obviously clear of clouds, just look up and see
>NOO you have to perform a STUDY before you can know that for sure!
>>29898799
>da joos have the knowledge and skills to take over the world
>they partake in a certain ritual which they are not trying to get the rest of the world to partake in
>somehow peopleappropriating their cultural traditionis good for da joos or part of their plan
>>29899298
You are clearly delusional. Not only are you criticising the methodology of a study you've not even seen, but you're acting like some essentially anecdotal pieces of evidence are superior to proper peer reviewed studies.
You can't claim victory when you've yet to provide any compelling arguments, let alone a single piece of evidence. You seem to be convinced that your feelings equal reality.
>>29899343
Well yeah, you do, because how the fuck could you possibly know those are water vapour unless you can study it and prove that they are?
Going "Ugh, it's just obvious that I'm right" isn't an argument.
>>29899035
>posting this
>with no attached pictures
r u fukn srs pics
>>29899272
Could be a combination of expectations and or cock condition,
Sort of like Breaking Bad ,,,, ITS THE BEST SHOW OVER OMG GOTTA SEE IT TOTALLY THE BEST )))))))))
Then you watch it and it's pretty good but it doesn't match the hype.
DESU I wish it did (for me)
>tfw know how that feels
>still depressed
I'm 99% sure majority of this website is just sexually frustrated and not actually depressed. It seems majority of you guys could be cured with a cute girlfriend and some good sex
>>29899355
but I offer you an experiment: open a dating profile and see if you get hundreds of replies. I would do it myself If I had time. it has nothing to do with "feelings". those infographics are based on people who've done this experiment. if you want you can replicate it yourself and get the same result.
>>29892870
>youll never know what having a mutilated dick feels like.
Good.
>>29899376
Taken about 2 months or so after the incident.
>>29893239
phenomenal work. that's /pol/ tier banter right there.
>>29899374
I see, so if you're about to go out and you can see from your window that it's raining, you're going to listen to the forecast before you decide to take an umbrella because you obviously can't trust your eyes.
you lulcows are funny
>>29899385
that can't be the case, because it's just as easy for men to get sex and a girlfriend, as those studies that cow posted clearly demonstrate!
>>29899397
You can't go "conduct your own experiment and you'll see I'm correct" as proof either anon. Stop relying on emotions and anecdotes and point to a single study supporting what you're saying if you're going to call it reality.
>>29899419
Wow yeah that's totally not a false comparison at all, is it? Because complex societal and psychological differences between genders is the same as "Is it raining?"
>>29899433
>he's still strawmanning
How mad are you on a scale from 1-10 anon?
>>29892870
>dat tights
>tfw no gf to wear tights while i fuck her
>>29899451
I don't get your point. I can open a female account, get 100 replies and pick a bf. how can your surveys disprove that? it's not "anecdotal" as I can repeat the same experiment 100 times and the result would stay the same.
>>29892870
desu I know how it feels but haven't done it for 2 years kek
>>29899092
Scotland here also and cut is gross to me. I've had one partner be cut and it was just weird to me.
>>29899480
Because that's not the reality for most people. If you make an account with an exceptionally attractive person of either gender you'll experience that, but a 5/10 won't get messages from people above a 5, or responses from them generally, no matter what gender. This is supported by
>Shaw Taylor, L.; Fiore, A. T.; Mendelsohn, G. A.; Cheshire, C. (1 June 2011). ""Out of My League": A Real-World Test of the Matching Hypothesis". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
And yes, you going "In my personal experience this is the case" is anecdotal evidence.
>>29899515
Also, I'd like to add how important it is to mention that most people don't meet their partners via online dating.
>>29893239
ORIGINAL ROBOTO
>>29899515
>but a 5/10 won't get messages from people above a 5,
that's false. too bad I don't have the time to open an account of a 5/10 woman, get hundreds of replies in a couple of days, and show you (as people have done, and posted in infographics)
too bad your studies won't help the misery of millions of single lonely men who know first hand who has the upper hand in the dating scene, as anyone without an agenda / delusion would admit
>>29899152
It looks fine when pulled back but not when the foreskin is up, it's also way less hygienic and it grosses me out. I want a nice smooth one to suck on and play with.
>>29899572
<that's false. too bad I don't have the time to open an account of a 5/10 woman, get hundreds of replies in a couple of days, and show you (as people have done, and posted in infographics)
I just posted proof of it, retard. As has been said multiple times by multiple people now, your anecdotes do not count for more than proper published studies.
And infographs aren't a reliable source, at all.
>too bad your studies won't help the misery of millions of single lonely men who know first hand who has the upper hand in the dating scene, as anyone without an agenda / delusion would admit
Kind of ironic seeing as you've spent this whole debate showing the clear nature of your agenda, and refusing to change your beliefs despite evidence proving them to be incorrect, which is typical of delusional people, don't you think?
>>29899572
Not anon you're replying to but it makes me so sad how gullible everyone on r9k is. Like you believe other anons telling you that because they didn't match with people, that you shouldn't be able to match with people so you don't even try. But when you see scientific proof disproving your argument you can't actually accept it because MUH FEE FEES.
If we're going to take personal anecdotes into account, I have a male friend in a wheelchair, never really leaves the house so is pasty as fuck, he has some kind of muscular deficiency so his wheelchair is electric. His parents have to help him shower, shit, piss, dress, get out of bed.
He gets matches on tinder.
Maybe not as many as an able bodied male would, but he gets matches and rejects them for not being up to his standards. He meets these girls and goes for dinner, and then decides they're not what he's looking for so he rejects them.
Literally leave this stupid circle jerk and actually try to get dates rather than using these mental gymnastics as reasons your life is so tough.
>>29899329
No but you should tell them you wish they hadn't done it and consider protesting MGM.
The movement against it is picking up more and more steam every year.
>>29894456
The idea is that it's degrading. Most IR black-on-white porn is based off of the loss of purity. It's why I don't understand the whole cuck=left thing, you have to be a little racist to enjoy it.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=168948903
there you idiots
>>29899663
>implying this is about me
even if I have no romantic troubles I'll stand for all the lonely bots out there. I don't believe anything being said here, I see daily how skewed the social and romantic dynamics are in favor of women. again, as would every person with half a brain (if the man is the one who has to hit on someone, obviously he's in a disadvantage; otherwise he could just wait and get approached, as the vast majority of women do)
>>29899706
but it's not peer reviewd!!111 my biased tumblr scholars do not approve of this!
b-but we have it as hard as you guys
>>29899743
You're really angry over this, aren't you? A reliable study will always be worth more than any number of easily faked, easily biased anecdotes on random forums.
And what does "tumblr scholars" even mean? Do you think the cdc is a tumblr institute? Or any number of other reputable psychological journals these studies have been published in?
Why are you so desperate to avoid admitting that you might be wrong, despite the fact that you can't provide any sort of study at all to support what you're saying? Is it just what >>29899663 said?
>>29899812
I don't need studies for something which is as clear as "rotten tomatoes smell funny".
>And what does "tumblr scholars" even mean?
biased sociologist with a clear "feminist" agenda who nitpick results that fit their narrative and disregard the rest.
>>29893152
Sauce? Google search didn't gave me any.
>mfw friend was convinced to get cut by his gf
>mfw he said his penis now feels like a finger except when he is fully erect, when it feels like it's being rubbed on sandpaper
>mfw they broke up like six months later anyway
i was gonna feel bad for him, but it's what he gets for being a cuck
>>29899864
>I don't need studies for something which is as clear as "rotten tomatoes smell funny".
Why are you so obsessed with using these false comparisons?
>biased sociologist with a clear "feminist" agenda who nitpick results that fit their narrative and disregard the rest.
Mate, you haven't even read any of the sources I gave to you, have you? Let alone understand basic scientific methodology or what exactly peer reviewed means.
The only person nitpicking results and refusing to acknowledge anything else here is you. All that I've been doing is asking for you to provide a single piece of non-anecdotal evidence that supports your claims. Which you haven't been able to do.
What is it about this argument that makes you feel like you need to be right, despite you clearly not being so?
>>29899883
>mfw friend was convinced to get cut by his gf
that's maximum cucking, like a higher degree of cucking than actually being cucked. what the actual hell. why is the thirst so real
>>29899721
I never said anything about how conversations are initiated, I'm pretty sure it's a fairly even mix of some girls messaging him who he isn't into as much, and him messaging girls he is into.
But the point is (incase you don't understand tinder) he's getting matches. That means he is in demand as the women he is "liking" are "liking" him back, thus creating a match. Therefore your whole point is totally disproved through personal anecdotal information and also scientific information as provided by the other anon who actually has sense.
>>29899898
The argument is that if an average lonely man goes to a pub on a Sunday evening, he probably won't get approached by a single broad. But if a female does the same, she'll get approached by a lot of different men. your surveys or whatever won't change this fact
>It's another r9k argues about penises thread
faggots
>>29899913
alas there are hundreds of tinder threads being posted by average males not getting any matches or barely getting some (with the girl not messaging back). are they all wrong? is your weird, unusual case (as it's an unusual guy) representative?
>>29899955
Is a board full of grown men who collect anime figurines & watch foreign cartoons whilst simultaneously claiming THEY'RE NOT CARTOONS representative of the entire male population?
I've seen a fair few threads on r9k about guys speaking to girls/arranging hookups etc.
>>29899932
But that was never the argument, you've moved the goalposts twice now, and been wrong even when you moved it.
Though sure, in this situation the man is expected to approach. But that doesn't mean the dating game is somehow rigged against men.
>>29899955
>literally been studies in this thread proving that his case is in fact representative
Come on anon.
>The average age that men loose their virginity is x
nobody ever asked me
not even normies think that dating or having any kind of romantic relationship isn't easier for a woman
if a woman is lonely or a virgin or anything it's by a choice >>29899802
many men never had any chance
>>29900031
>Though sure, in this situation the man is expected to approach. But that doesn't mean the dating game is somehow rigged against men.
>the man is expected to do all the work, face rejection, spend money (buy drinks) etc.
>the dating game is not rigged against men
hm..
>>29900068
but.. the studies.. the surveys....
lonely men, loneliness is the cross that a man must carry.
>>29900079
you see that's the way it is and it's normal for them
despite never had to approach or initiate anything, woman can't apprehend that it can be difficult or impossible for some
>>29900079
I have one small quick question.
Anon, have you ever done the fieldwork for this? Have you ever gone to a bar, put in all that hard, tiring effort of speaking to a female for all of 5 minutes and been rejected? And can you safely say you've never ever in your whole life been approached by a female?
If you're NEET like many on this board take pride in & stay home all day, don't really leave your house except for shopping or other mundane things which don't give you much leeway for meeting people, then how can you possibly be mad that women aren't dating you and your comrades on here? They need to be given the chance to meet you. Tinder at one point in time counted but it's just a game. No-one takes it seriously, it's something you use to pass the time when you're taking a shit. It's also dated and was just a phase - not a lot of people actually use it anymore.
>>29900079
How did you go from "You should approach them" to "You have to buy them stuff, and do all the work (as if there's somehow more or less work involved based on who initiates)"?
You've moved the goalposts again now, and it's pretty fucking pathetic mate.
But it's pretty clear that absolutely nothing anyone posts is going to convince you, so I'm going to stop bothering. I've posted more than enough evidence to completely disprove all of the points you've brought up about overall gender differences in amount of sex being had and who's getting it, yet you still keep posting screencaps from forums as if this somehow is more credible.
Should I take revenge on my parents for getting me cut without my consent?>tfw already making them suffer by being a disappointing NEET
>>29900174
Even if some or most people are neets here (which I don't think it's true) they still went to school and they're best and easiest years to socialize.
But we still didn't get any attention from any female whatsoever, wonder why is that? If ratio are 50 -50 it should happened, right?
>>29900174
>le ad hominem
>And can you safely say you've never ever in your whole life been approached by a female?
I did, but that was when I was better looking. now I'm average and average men don't get approached, that's the way of life
even if I become super handsome and get thousands of girls to go out with me It won't change my opinion, because it is based on knowledge on how the world actually words, not on my personal frustration or tumblr ideology like the lulcow ITT.
>>29900269
There's a difference between going to school and socialising at school. I go to university and then I also participate in clubs, societies etc. I put myself out there to make friends & socialise with the people on my course. However if you're already socially awkward and do not put yourself out there, merely go to lessons then straight home, keep to yourself during lectures etc how are people supposed to give you attention?
Anons always complain about not getting attention but never put themselves in a situation to receive positive attention. It's mental gymnastics to the fullest degree.
>>29898528
Men need to be considerate because of the dating dynamic you dense motherfucker. Women can be complete emotional drains and do nothing but bitch about things constantly and still have tons of guys hitting on her. A guy who acts like that would just become a complete pariah. We only tolerate that sort of bullshit from women because we want to fuck them.
>>29900333
>. However if you're already socially awkward and do not put yourself out there, merely go to lessons then straight home, keep to yourself during lectures etc how are people supposed to give you attention?
I've seen women do exactly that and get approached by random men in class etc, who talked with them even though they're obviously reserved / socially awkward. men in the same situation just get ignored
>>29898851
in a cold-approach context this is true, because women don't have the "benefit" of preselection to go on in these cases and the default opinion of an unknown man by any woman is that he's a potential risk that they aren't willing to take
but you do realize most relationships start out as friendships via social circles, right? most girls do absolutely end up going for "average" guys from their social circles, as they've established the three necessary ingredients for human bonding (proximity, repeated unplanned interactions, and a safe environment that allows people to drop their guard and confide in each other) and end up finding these men attractive because of it.
the dating game is rigged against literally everyone because of those three simple rules not being met in a majority of cases.
the real reason so many anti-social manchildren of r9gay are lonely virgins is no secret. it's because they have no social circles and are too socially incompetent and/or unwilling to join or form them, thus no genuine human bonding, thus no girls find them attractive or even know them at all in the first place.
>>29900305
I really don't get how you managed to convince yourself that statements backed up with scientific citations are somehow based on my personal frustrations and tumblr ideology. I also find it very ironic that you've clearly just been arguing based off your own emotions and are accusing me of that.
What >>29900371 said is really true, too. People don't usually start relationships with random strangers.
>>29900359
>Women can be complete emotional drains and do nothing but bitch about things constantly and still have tons of guys hitting on her.
This isn't even slightly true unless she's exceptionally attractive, in which case there'll be someone willing to put up with her shit to get laid regularly. But this is true for guys too, there's always shallow people.
>>29898576
Honestly, if my dick was any more sensitive, sex would be borderline painful. Also I'd probably cum extremely quickly. I don't know how you uncutfags can handle that much stimulation.cut dicks are better looking
>>29900426
>People don't usually start relationships with random strangers.
men do.
algorithm:
1.sit in a pub
2. wait
3. get approached
I'm still waiting for a similar algrotihm for men
>>29900333
Funny how when talking about any relationship, a person that have some problems with them, need to do something about it. I need to take initiative, I need to approach, I need no to by shy. I spend 5 years around 20 woman in 30 people class and couldn't make a single female friend, despite being able to befriend rest of the males. I always treat both sexes exactly the same and look what I got from it.
>>29900459
>men do.
They really don't.
>I'm still waiting for a similar algrotihm for men
1. Sit in pub
2. Spot attractive person
3. Approach
How was that difficult at all?
>>29900478
hmm.. I thought gender dynamics are not skewed... how come a woman can just sit and wait, while a man has to take action and approach, and even risk rejection?
>>29900510
Because not all situations are equal. This doesn't mean dating is general is skewed one way.
Also, why do you act like rejection is some huge deal? If a girl's at a bar alone, she's pretty much just going to hookup with whoever once she's had a few drinks, people generally don't drink alone unless they're alcoholics or going through shit. Worst case scenario they go "No sorry, I'm waiting for someone". Getting turned down by someone who you'll never see again is hardly a big deal, and there's not really much work involved talking to someone for a few minutes to see if they're interested.
>>29900590
>another person don't want to have anything to do with you
>no big deal
Maybe for people with supportive family, normal childhood and past success with various relationship, not for robots who didn't have any of it.
You've been rejected you entire life? Yeah risk it again, you certainly won't kill yourself after more and more.
>>29900447
>Honestly, if my dick was any more sensitive, sex would be borderline painful.
Different types of nerve endings transmit different sensations upon reception of stimuli.
The nerve endings in the glans are almost entirely free nerve endings, which are essentially pain receptors. The few encapsulated nerve endings in the head mostly are those that still resemble a tangled skein of free nerve endings under the cap, and likely function similarly--i.e., their stimulation can trigger pain.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3697758
The other types of encapsulated nerve endings, like Meissner corpuscles, are very sparse in the glans.
The mucocutaneous zones of the foreskin, on the other hand has a very different pattern of innervation. The foreskin has ten times more corpuscular sensory receptors than the glans, and the majority of those are Meissner corpuscles, which are incapable of transmitting painful sensations. Instead they transmit a pleasant tingling sensation in response to stretch or gentle touch--not the sandpapery or scratchy or overwhelming sensation given by direct stimulation of the glans's FNEs.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/pdf
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-mcgrath/
So essentially, no. Having a foreskin would not make sex more painful for you. It would give you whole interfaces of specialized nerve endings that would serve to sense pleasure, not pain.
>Also I'd probably cum extremely quickly.
Premature ejaculation rates are the same between cut and intact guys. But cut guys are more likely to suffer delayed ejaculation, and their partners are more likely to report frequent orgasm difficulties and frequent pain during sex.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947
>>29900661
Sounds like the issue is you having a fragile ego then, not how dating works at all.
>>29900669
My word uncut men are insecure.
>>29900692
but if he were a women he wouldn't have a problem, because he wouldn't need to do the approaching, which is the whole point of this thread
>>29900720
I'm cut. I just know a lot about what was stolen from me.
Dr. Cold (co-author of two of the reviews I linked to in >>29900669 ) is also cut, his sons are cut, and he used to do circumcisions. Of course, he no longer does them.
>>29900371
Coming from a failed normie, It's extremely difficult to actually do shit with the girls in your social circle because they're always doing shit with and talking with eachother.
The guys are all cool with eachother but things always turn into a sausage fest
>>29900510
you're free to complain about it all you want, but that isn't going to change how human mating has worked for hundreds of thousands of years.
men are the initiators. women are the selectors. that's just how it works m80.
and you're a fool to think this doesn't give men all the power.
you get to go out and choose who you want. you don't always get your one-itis, but you grow from it and learn to not be a faggot who has a one-itis.
a woman on the other hand is limited only to those pursuing her.
think of it like choosing dinner. you want a steak? you cook a steak. a woman wants a steak? well she's only being offered some bread, a bunch of grapes, or a fish sandwich. she doesn't get a steak.
>>29900733
then the thread serves literally no purpose, and everyone complaining about women not approaching men are fucking retards who deserve their misery.
>>29900855
women don't initiate because they don't need to, not because they can't.
That's one ugly, mutilated flesh rod.
>>29900855
not really. for most men it's more like: you want a steak? you can rejected by a steak. then you get rejected by the fish. till you're left with a bunch of grapes.
a woman may start off with graps, but without all the effort, time, money and rejection men face to eventually get the same thing
>taking pride in being screwed by nature in that sense (I agree it's better to be a man in other senses)
don't do that
I don't know what people on here are going on about. I'm less than average looking and even I've get approached by completely strange women regularly. It is true; often women prefer giving you a sign, hoping that you'll do the actual approaching. But at times they start talking to you out the blue on public transportation, asking you out for coffee, or come and dance with you if you're alone on the dance floor, doing your thing.
>>29900881
and they don't need to because normal men want to.
if you don't want to, if you think this is unfair, then you're a broken man, and your genes will die out with you, solving the problem.
>>29900936
yea, I'm gonna take advice about women from someone who's scared to talk to them and has never had sex before. while I'm at it maybe I'll ask my dentist how to fix this plumbing issue I'm having at home.
>>29900855
Checked. Robots can't initiate so we are powerless
>>29900979
>le ad hominem because I'm wrong mayme.
>>29893239
BTFO
too good
>>29900963
>I'm less than average looking and even I've get approached by completely strange women regularly.
no, you're not.
