Are you the 14%?
Do you have the statistics for female virgins?
>>29817172
>Emma
why the fuccckkkk do theyyyy type like thisssssss xx
>xxx
what did she mean by this?
>>29817185
Its like 2.1% by 26. By 30 its like 0.09
>>29817213
It's a British thing. I don't understand it either.
>>29817172
I kek every time I see "geeekyyyy virginnssss who look at planetss"
Baby brains. Dude I love women.
>>29817172
>tfw looked at planets instead of fucking girls
>>29817172
>geeky virgins who look at planets
what did she mean by this?
>>29817224
Did you make that number up? Link?
someone needs to go go REEEEE Emmas shit up
>tfw you're a geeky virgin who looks at planets
>>29817172
I dont even like looking at planets. Most of my time I spent making circuits.
>>29817250
>who look at planetss
the fuck does this mean
>>29817172
>who look at planetsss
astronomers?
>Robots will listen to 3 underage facebook sluts instead of manning up, ignoring it, and trying to hit on girls anyways.
>>29817298
I prefer stars, they way hotter than any girl i ever saw
>tfw you look at planets
>not a virgin
>>29817354
EE?
original engineer
>>29817172
>virgins who look at planets
Holy shit, she actually goes after the ones who are doing things with their lives. Women know nothing.
>>29817216
She wants that there moonshine boy.
>>29817393
Well, I cant speak for whole board but I have had my share of tries.
Ages 24-32. Only 3 % of men have not had sex. Asians are most likely to be virgins. Whites have the most heterosexual sex partners on average. Blacks have the most homosexual partners on average.
>>29817393
>underage
>overage
Makes no difference with attitudes like these. Women well into their 30s behave like this.
>>29817423
I dunno how to describe it in english, but I mean those green circut boards like in radio or digital clock.
I know my english sounds retarded sorry.
>>29817172
I will be, I'm only 20 though.
>>29817435
It won't let me post the source because it says its spam.
>>29817479
your English is fine, I think you mean that you were assembling kits. or were they original projects?
>>29817172
Yes, yes I am and I've failed at my attempts to change that.
>>29817172
i looked up these statistics for another r9k thread yesterday and it is closer to 5%
It ain't easy being wizardly.
>>29817172
few more years and I'll probably be a part of those 14%, yeah.
>>29817532
I read somewhere it' actually 4%
Pretty depressing. The indomitable, unbending will of mother nature is taking its course in weeding out the inferior DNA from the gene pool, and as humans we are intelligent enough to realise that it is happening but unable to actually do anything about it.
I wonder if this is why soldiers rape. Because if their blood is up and they know they might die tomorrow, they will want to impregnate somebody, anybody.
>>29817172
WARNING: You may only look at this image if you are a virgin
>>29817586
I'm turning 24 in November and I'm still a virgin so I know I'll probably be apart of it as well, I literally don't believe I'll be having sex in the next two or three years. But, you never know when the right person or chance might come along.
>>29817626
I love astronomy, I'd rather study the planets than go to a club full of sweaty sluts grinding on Chad.
>>29817398
underrated dad joke
>>29817172
>askmen.com
that's some credible information
(25yo virgin here, 5 years to become serious)
Holy fucking shit. This is pretty huge
.
someone make a wojak sitting at his computer looking at planets please
I'd do it but im fucking lazy and i need to take a shit
No I'm not, however, that stupid cunt making fun of astronomers...I would knock her fucking teeth out...
>>29817464
TRUST ME, I FUCK GIRLS ALL THE TIME
>>29817398
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sC75aU47GRk
>>29817172
>14%
It's more like 3.4%
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
>>29817224
They don't count oral as sex tho
>>29817172
9 months and I will be
>>29817868
Most surveys now split vaginal virgins and no contact at all virgins. The no contact all virgins are much lower in number than vaginal virgins.
>>29817257
>>29817298
>>29817354
>>29817382
>>29817385
>>29817398
>>29817426
all these people moaning about the planet comment. I am more annoyed by the 'who are they asking' comment trying to pretend women arent just inherently shallow, and that men are just asking outliers.
I wish I had zero interest in sex, it's a waste of time when there are so many other things to achieve in life
>>29817172
If you're not the 14% you need to leave this fucking board. Fucking normies, seriously.
>>29817626
non-virgins who look at that image will become virgins anyway
>>29817840
>mfw in 1 year I will appear in that statistic
>tfw I'm part of the few for simply not doing something
>>29817644
i took this picture in my astronomy class (just used my phone looking through a telescope) and it fucking blew my mind. seeing that much detail on the moon from here was amazing to me.
i have nothing else to add but i thought someone might like this picture.
>>29817479
Printed circuit boards, I think you mean that. Google on those three words and confirm.
>>29818008
and another one because i like the better lighting on this one.
>>29818008
That's amazingly good detail for an earth based telescope!
The sun facing side of the moon is around 250C whilst the dark side is around -150, if it wasn't for our atmosphere and oceans then it would be the same deal on earth.
>>29817626
this is horrifically off scale
lmao looking at plantes
I can't imagine it's actually 14% by that age.
Other figures I've seen have been in the 2-3% range, which seems more likely considering how hypersexual the west is.
>inb4 normie reee
I'm a 22 year old KHHV.
that's a big planet.
what is you guys' favorite planet?
>>29818063
Holy shit what kinda telescope do you have
>>29817172
the 14% are the men raised by feminist
>>29818331
I'm from stable traditional family but still virgin.
>>29818338
What hindered you then?
>Virgin at 23
>Have completely halted any maintenance of hygiene or fashion
It doesn't matter now. Nothing matters
>>29818293
this was in my astronomy class at university. all i remember is that we had 10" Losmandy telescopes, nothing more specific than that. sorry.
On one girl and her memory of the young Lovecraft
>"Clara Hess, the same age as Lovecraft, supplies a telling and poignant memory of Lovecraft's devotion to astronomy [...] "Howard used to go out into the fields in back of my home to study the stars. One early fall evening several of the children in the vicinity assembled to watch him from a distance. Feeling sorry for his loneliness I went up to him and asked him about his telescope and was permitted to look through it. But his language was so technical that I could not understand it and I returned to my group and left him to his lonely study of the heavens."
p.46
>>29817840
Thanks for making me look through it asshole
>>29817794
I certainly don't fuck them, just work with them. But you can't know a person's character until you dig the dick in, right? Cunt.
>>29817172
>who are they asking
I really don't understand what she means by this
She could either be saying that the men are not asking the right women, or the survey wasn't asking the right men
>>29817172
>geeeeeeeeeeekyyyyyyy virgins who look at planetssssssss
>Stacies think astronomy is a fucking meme
I wanna die
probably going to be a virgin at 26
I dont really care tho
>>29818538
Source?
OROGO GINAL.
>>29817913
this
Why put your wee wee in a bitch that will cuck you when you could belooking at planets[/spoiler[
>>29818575
I didn't remembered exactly but the image still grossly wrong...and the female one isn't that different
/r9k/ is just overreacting
OK, I'm assuming Emma was a mobile user, and 'planets' was an autocorrect from 'porn.'
>>29818008
>Implying the moon is a planet
I doubt this number. People in the UK fuck earlier than people in the US, and the US has far fewer virgins than 14% at age 26.
2002 numbers for US. Follow up with later data from same researchers.
>>29819127
More recent data from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
So, yeah, virgins are really rare in the US and therefore should be even more rare in the UK, where more sex happens.
>>29817840
>>29818575
The female virginity stat for that same 20-24 agegroup is 12%.
>/r9k/ overreacting based on selective, male-bashing reporting and vapid stacies on facebook
It's almost like the society is geared to triggering conflict between various sub groups
![image_2029_1e-GJ-832c[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/X3E4gMW.jpg "image_2029_1e-GJ-832c[1].jpg")
women bad, plante good
>>29818672
Search the cuckchan archive
>>29819240
1- in the 25-29 bracket goes to 3.8 versus 3.4
2- even the bigger difference in the 20-24 bracket is smaller than the deviation
and it's just a random facebook photo based on a webpoll, it isn't reporting, and it's you that are triggering conflict by calling people "stacies" when they just made random commentaries (which were probably just to hide their own insecurities) on a facebook photo
>>29817172
>Are you the 14%?
Well, according to this chart here >>29818575
I'm actually one of the 1.3%.
Putting aside for a moment how miserable it is to rank among that tiny number, I do find the radical decline in the percentage as the age rises to be interesting. It does give credence to the whole "late-bloomer" idea. Sure, it may take longer for some men than most others to become human. Those men may have challenges that those others don't face: awkwardness, lack of social grace, aesthetic qualities that are less than ideal. And yet, given time, it seems that for most of even these disadvantaged souls, Nature finds a way to intervene and rescue them from the pit. There's a lot of talk on this board about how impossibly particular the sexual desire of women is, and yet these numbers suggest otherwise. Sure, Nature may be cruel, but she reserves that cruelty for only a tiny number, that 1.3%. For all others, she proves herself to be incredibly generous, almost as if she is loathe to leave anyone behind.
And this is one of the things that makes the wizard life so painful. To be treated cruelly by a sadist may be unpleasant, to be sure, but to be reviled by a saint hurts infinitely worse.
>>29818260
i like mars
lmaooo geeekyyyy virginnssss who look at planetss
>>29817281
he didn't. for women it's around 15% at age 20, and it slowly falls off to virtually 0% at and after 27.
>>29818538
yap, autism is much more prevalent in men.
>>29817230
I'm a Britbong and I still don't get it. I guess some women lengthen the last syllable of their sentences so might be that
>>29817432
I hit on girls for a few months and learned I don't enjoy it
>tfw researched Neptune a lot in middle school instead of talking to girls
How did they know
>>29817172
Let's be honest that # is at least double
>>29817974
maybe not anon heheheheh just bee urself bro eheheh xD
>>29820364
>still no link/source
Guess I'll take your word for it
>>29817626
There's one missing in your pic #teamPluto
>>29817509
Post it as an archive or pastebin, those usually work.
>>29817606
Soldiers rape because they know they can get away with it most of the time if it's some foreign woman in some shithole you're invading
See: Nanking during WWII
>>29820096
Whores, the actual kind, are a lonely man's savior. He may not be loved but at least he can be satisfied.
>>29820929
>tfw no qt prostitute gf
someone asked for a cosmic wojak, here is one in wallpaper size.
>>29817398
>in 5th grade
>reading book on solar system
>try to impress Stacy with my new knowledge
>tell her "your body is hotter than mars"
>she laughs at me and calls me a loser and tells the whole class what I said
>realize then that she thinks I hit on her
>kill me
Ever since then, I was labeled a virgin loser faggot that followed me through high school an college. Virgin loser today.
>>29817172
It has to be more than 14%
>Who are these guys that are virgins at 26?
>They're probably virgins
I think we've all learned something here today.
>>29820607
There's one in the thread, can you not read?
>>29819240
You guys act like you're somehow special and oppressed for being virgins, when it's not even that uncommon, more than one in ten people at any university will be.
>>29819240
>>29818575
>ratio of female/male virgins are roughly the same
That gives me hope, actually. Feels good.
>>29821615
The difference is that the 3.4% of females who are virgins 25-29 are the 3.4% ugliest
Whereas the 3.8% of men are the 3.8% with the least social skills.
>>29821694
Those are some impressive mental gymnastics there friend. Just keep on making excuses for why life is hopeless and unfair against men, evidence doesn't matter when you can just handwave it away.
>>29819240
This screencap is really bad, the statistics for women are actually lifetime partners, not the same as for guys.
>>29820929
>Whores, the actual kind, are a lonely man's savior.
Really? And what is a prostitute saving the lonely man from? A lack of orgasm? A man can achieve orgasm without a woman's assistance, or at least so I've heard.
I use the term "sexual affection" in these types of conversations. Honestly, I'm not overly fond of that term. It strikes me as kind of awkward, but it's the very best I've been able to come up with when trying to describe why the idea that:
>He may not be loved but at least he can be satisfied
misses the whole point on a fundamental level. If you use the term "love", people's minds instantly move to that romantic, all-encompassing love that belongs to the realm of fairy tales and daydreams.
However, a man's urge to have sex with a woman who actually wants to have sex with him isn't the stuff of fantasy. After all, the vast majority of men experience it at some point in their lives. And paying a woman to restrain from vomiting as she submits to your disgusting touch doesn't satisfy that need for sexual affection. Quite to the contrary, needing to resort to a prostitute is confirmation that the aforementioned desire to be desired will always be frustrated.
So no prostitutes. A monster has nothing but the authenticity of his damnation. A prostitute would take from him even that little dignity. The whore offers nothing but the cruelest kind of lie, telling the monster he's glimpsed Heaven even as he continues to burn.
>>29817172
Only six more years lads
>>29821970
I'm inclined to agree with your post but that trip-code prevents me from wholeheartedly supporting you
luckily the users of 4chan are here to help...
>>29819127
>>29819240
>guy: I-I-I-I'm n-not a virg-g-g-g-gin, I-I-I-I fucked a girl, I'm not lying, my feet hurt, you too
>girl: yeah, blowing chad in the toilet and anal totally isn't sex, right, I'm still a virgin right
Self-reported """studies""" are the biggest meme of this millenium. I've personally lied to at least several of those in uni, including for penis size and virginity.
>>29817172
>tfw can't stop looking at planets
HELP ME /r9k/
>>29822109
Indeed
It's safe to assume that women are always more promiscuous than they report, and men less so
Simple psychological bias
>>29820929
what if you can't be satisfied without love or at the very least the semblance of intimacy you didn't have to pay for?
>>29817172
YOU just made it 15%
weirdo
>>29822109
>>29822126
Phew, lucky we could get out of that one, right guys? I almost fell over I was bending over so far backwards trying to find a way to discredit it!
>>29817398
DAD IS THAT YOU
fuckin dad
>>29821898
>That's some impressive mental gymnastics there friend
The only mental gymnastics are how you are interpreting my comment as complaining about the world being unfair to men.
Those men can improve their social skills. The ugliest 3.4% of women in their mid to late twenties can't.
>>29819108
Lmaooo geeekyyyy virginnssss who look at natural satellitess xxx
>>29822208
>The only mental gymnastics are how you are interpreting my comment as complaining about the world being unfair to men
I wasn't really interpreting anything, I was just mocking you honestly.
But as to your claim, source?
>>29822171
>self
>reported
>study
>>29817172
>Geeky virgins who look at planets
I don't care if i'm a virgin but don't hate on astronomy, bitch
>>29821145
That's gettin' saved.
>>29822240
As opposed to what other sort of study?
Also, why exactly do you believe this data is unreliable? Evidently it's considered reliable enough to give accurate conclusions, so you must know more than the researchers who believe that to be so.
>>29817393
You mean two Facebook roasties
YEPPERS!!!!! !!!
a
!!
!
>>29822222
Just like I was mocking the guy who I was replying to, who was imagining his QT virgin waifu out there waiting for him.
There's no data for my claim, it's just obvious to anyone who has experienced life that only a truly, truly ugly woman would be a virgin at 25+. Whereas a man could be psychologically fucked up and socially withdrawn as opposed to just being ugly.
With socially withdrawn but reasonably attractive women, there will always be some man who takes the initiative and manages to fuck them. Socially withdrawn but reasonably attractive men aren't going to experience the same thing, because women don't do the approaching.
These pathetic fuckers should just get their shit together.
Nice quints btw.
YASS QUEEN! VIRGINS UNITE AND TAKE OVER!!!
>>29822278
>As opposed to what other sort of study?
None
>Also, why exactly do you believe this data is unreliable?
Because everybody can lie. As I've mentioned above, i've done it several times.
>Evidently it's considered reliable enough to give accurate conclusions, so you must know more than the researchers who believe that to be so.
That's why nobody takes psychology and anthropology seriously. Something that can't be measured objectively cannot possibly pretend to be accurate.
>>29822360
>Just like I was mocking the guy who I was replying to, who was imagining his QT virgin waifu out there waiting for him.
He's dumb too, but the data does show us that virginity isn't super uncommon in women around the age group most common here.
>There's no data for my claim, it's just obvious to anyone who has experienced life that only a truly, truly ugly woman would be a virgin at 25+. Whereas a man could be psychologically fucked up and socially withdrawn as opposed to just being ugly.
Going "It's just obvious" isn't actually proof. There's many reasons someone could be a virgin, looks aren't necessarily it, and neither is psychological damage. Also, most people here aren't psychologically messed up, they like to play pretend, but if you look in any of the mental illness threads it's blatantly obvious that they're doing so.
But that's off topic. I'd argue that you're overly simplifying the topic by implying that something must be wrong with you if you're a virgin at that age. It seems unlikely to me that what's overall around 13% of the population would be so messed up that they're incapable of socialising enough to meet a partner, let alone to imply that they're all so repsulsive no-one can find them attractive.
It's just as easy to believe that they didn't pursue relationships, or that they simply hadn't met a person they felt like they should sleep with.
It's likely the case that both examples do exist, though we can't really say how common either is definitively.
>>29822408
>Because everybody can lie. As I've mentioned above, i've done it several times.
No-one's actually given a reason why anyone would lie. You being a retard and lying in studies for no reason doesn't mean that everyone else is too.
>That's why nobody takes psychology and anthropology seriously.
The only people who don't take those fields seriously are retards on the internet, with no actual credibility. See pic related.
>>29822602
>a valid """"study""""
>has to rely on human honesty
>bruv one guy told me to fuck myself when I asked him if he was a virgin, is this accurate
>well ppl dontz ie so dat's de 100% objective rezult bruv, don't argue :^)
Ayy lmao
>why anyone would lie
Illusions, conformity, social status, self-deception etc.
>to girls walk to you and ask you if you are a virgin
>you answer yes
Happened never ever in history
>>29822792
>Ayy lmao
Haha dude you pretending that I spoke in a retarded fashion sure showed me, hahaha, epic meme!
>Illusions, conformity, social status, self-deception etc.
Did you intentionally leave this as vague as you could?
>Happened never ever in history
Read the source provided. That's not even how the data was gathered.
>>29822602
>Also, most people here aren't psychologically messed up
If you are 25, and you can't get laid, and you aren't obese or deformed, then you are psychologically fucked up.
At 20 it's a different story
>>29822849
>http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf
>audio computer-assisted self interviewing (ACASI), in which the respondent
enters his or her own answers into the computer without telling them to an
interviewer
pic related
http://www.nature.com/news/first-results-from-psychology-s-largest-reproducibility-test-1.17433
>psychology
>science
>>29822892
>If you are 25, and you can't get laid, and you aren't obese or deformed, then you are psychologically fucked up.
Not necessarily, as I said, there are plenty of other reasons why you might not want to. Being a virgin doesn't necessarily imply that you're an incel.
>>29822929
Funny epic meme pic, haha!
Also, did you even read your source?
>But Daniele Fanelli, who studies bias and scientific misconduct at Stanford University in California, says the results suggest that the reproducibility of findings in psychology does not necessarily lag behind that in other sciences. There is plenty of room for improvement, he adds, but earlier studies have suggested that reproducibility rates in cancer biology and drug discovery could be even lower
>From my expectations, these are not bad at all
Fuck off.
I've got 3 years to go before I get there but yeah, I probably will be.
>>29817224
That cant be. My girlfriend is 35 and a virgin
>>29822360
>who was imagining his QT virgin waifu out there waiting for him.
Nice projection, nigger. If anything, that shows that I at least should not be bitter. 90% of being disappointed is pretty high still, but far more optimistic than the previous 100% assumption.
>>29823012
>some other fields are poorly developed "might" be as retarded as mine, so me being retarded is ok
Also
>could be even lower
>could be
>suggested
Any proof?
>these are not bad at all
>3/5 of my field is a meme, but that's not bad
Epic
>Tfw when about to enter 25+ still virgin
How did it come to this?
>mfw I am the "14%"
>>29823130
*fields that are
Lost it at 22
>>29823130
>Any proof?
Maybe the fact that a respected professional in the field stated it? He has no reason to lie about this.
And could be even lower is referring to the fact that these studies aren't completely accurate. Read the source you provided, a whole heap of tests weren't even properly replicated, they were in different situations completely, or just different tests.
>3/5 of my field is a meme, but that's not bad
>my field
>studies bias and scientific misconduct at Stanford University in California
Doesn't sound like he's a psychologist anon.
Not to mention, you've pointed to one source with questionable reputability, and then tried to use it to discredit an entire field. The image I provided linked to many, many different ways in which the field is valid.
Can I ask, do you also think that therapy in general is useless and that only medication can treat any disorders? That SSRI's have really severe possible side effects by any chance?
>37
>virgin
loll steve carell got nothing on me
>>29823206
>Maybe the fact that a respected professional in the field stated it?
He stated that it "could" be.
>Doesn't sound like he's a psychologist anon.
I was attacking psychology, not him
>questionable reputability
>the Nature journal
Don't do this to yourself
>Can I ask, do you also think that therapy in general is useless
yes
>only medication can treat any disorders
yes
Higher than I thought it'd be.
>>29823012
Notice I said
>Can't get laid
Not
>Choose not to get laid
>>29823337
>He stated that it "could" be.
You ignored the part where I explained this already.
>I was attacking psychology, not him
Then why did you say "my field" instead of "the field". This guy's job is judging this stuff, and he thinks psychology is doing okay, though it could be better. You don't know more than him.
>Don't do this to yourself
The quality of the publication doesn't necessarily relate to the quality of the study. They also are just talking about the study, and the article itself says it isn't particularly reliable.
>yes
Kek, of course you do. Do some cursory research into the topic before you start spouting shit, because you're objectively wrong, exercise and therapy are both highly effective.
>>29823361
Yes, I do, but the issue is you're implying that everyone who's not getting laid, can't get laid.
>>29817393
>JUS MAN UP BRAH
>That kid who could name more planets in our solar system than the amount of girls he banged
Seriously fuck that loser.
>>29817257
man i wish i studied planets growing up instead of video games. id be working at nasa instead of being a neet.
>>29823384
>Yes, I do, but the issue is you're implying that everyone who's not getting laid, can't get laid.
I wasn't. But let's be honest, we're on r9k, that's the audience we are speaking to, isn't it?
I doubt there is anyone here who has taken a religious vow of chastity. There might be the odd asexual here and there, but for the most part r9k virgins would love to get laid but lack the social skills.
>>29823454
>I wasn't
Well then I suppose it's my fault for interpreting it that way. Sorry.
>But let's be honest, we're on r9k, that's the audience we are speaking to, isn't it?
You're exactly right there, I doubt that there's very many volcel's here at all. But most people here are quite young as well, it's 18 year olds acting like not having gotten laid by now makes them a robot, despite it being really common for 18 year olds to be virgins. Even 20 year olds it's quite common.
If you look at some of the other chans dedicated to older male virgins, I think that people start to show more signs of just not really being interested in sex.
>>29819244
>Gliese 832 c is one of the highest in the Earth Similarity Index
>only a mere 16 light years away
>tfw won't live until the day we explore and colonize it
>>29823571
>>only a mere 16 light years away
I don't think you understand how far 16 light years is
>>29823604
Closer than 20 light years
>>29823604
Relative to a lot of other crap that we'll most likely never visit, it's really not that bad. It obviously is relative to current technology.
that will be me in about a month.
>>29817393
>obese
>diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic
>just man up!!! xD
lol
>>29823837
Paranoid schizophrenia is one of the easiest psychotic disorders to treat, as it's mostly based around the delusional side of stuff, they can still be okay socially in a lot of cases.
And as to obesity, eat less fatty.
>>29823761
>It obviously is relative to current technology.
That's what I'm pointing out man
>>29818672
Joshi's biography of Lovecraft I Am Providence.
I really recommend it.
>>29823916
how paranoid schizophrenia feels like?
it can't be really worse than overthinking
>>29817606
So some nerd who went to a good school and makes 6 figures but can't get laid has inferior genes. Is biological fitness in humans only an aggregation of superficial qualities i.e. "MUH DIK"? Having big dicks or big muscles isn't what allowed civilization to flourish. But that's what women want.
>>29824202
big dicks and big muscles dominated the primitive world, it's just rooted on women to search for those
>>29824253
Which is why giving women rights and free choice is a sure way to destroy civilization. Women primarily act on instincts and emotions that predate civilization and have no place in the modern era. Pretty much every major internal issue the West is facing can be attributed to giving women power through the various feminist movements.
>>29824349
I kind of agree, but on modern society, you can't really strip women off their stupid rights and free choice without causing a massive shitstorm
>>29824372
It wouldn't be easy and will probably never happen (maybe if Islam overtakes us). We're doomed either way then.
>>29824402
>maybe if Islam overtakes us
lol, no
literally just a matter of time until some ISIS enthusiast takes a shot striking in america, giving USA an excuse to drone the shit out of those asshats
>>29820096
>not just becoming volcel
tfw 24 year old virgin who loves his Newtonian Reflector telescope...
>>29818538
>feeling sorry for his loneliness
>said person is enjoying one of his moments of unutterable fun
Man, normies are ridiculously stupid. Why did this pretentious bitch have the idea that he even cared about her presence or that he felt the need to have her imbecilic self around? He probably spoke in difficult terms on purpose to cast away that negligently unused mind of hers. Seriously, fuck normies.
>>29822217
This requires text but you know I don't know what else to say. Good one, bro.
>>29824035
It's much worse than over thinking, though over thinking is a major part of delusional thought patterns.
>>29825086
ik man
just fucking with him
must be harsh
>>29824202
>So some nerd who went to a good school and makes 6 figures but can't get laid has inferior genes. Is biological fitness in humans only an aggregation of superficial qualities i.e. "MUH DIK"? Having big dicks or big muscles isn't what allowed civilization to flourish. But that's what women want.
A woman lusting after what is beautiful and healthy isn't some sort of vice. It's natural to desire what is desirable and, for all of the distinctions that may divide men and women, they can at least agree on that very basic point. We can discuss what elevates or debases society, but we all have to admit that whatever lofty ambitions society may aspire to, those aspirations will come to naught if the people who compose it are sick. Our appreciation of beauty and hatred of ugliness has carried our fragile little species this far; and that impulse warrants reverence by virtue of that.
Don't get me wrong. As a man who does not share in the beauty that Nature values, I resent the fact I'm not given license to participate in the human experience in an authentic sense. I wish a monster like myself could live like a man; if that was the case, I probably wouldn't drink myself to sleep each night. But if things like me were allowed to live as humans do, only a few generations would pass before there were no humans left. There would be nothing but ugliness and degradation. No philosopher's dream, regardless of how sublime, justifies crowning a monster's head with an angel's halo.
And so I could never fault a woman for desiring what is beautiful. I desire the beautiful myself. It just so happens that I'm one of the few who has no right to it, even in its most humble incarnations.
Only the most delusional devil would hate a human being for not sharing his damnation. After all, unlike a real person, the devil actually deserves it.
>>29825246
You really should stop using such overdone prose to get across a simple point, you could have said that in a much more straight forward way.
>>29825246
>appealing to nature
>>29817626
>>29818008
>>29818063
>>29818248
>>29818248
>>29819244
>>29819244
>>29821145
>>29821145
Could've used a trigger warning, now I'm gonna be a virgin forever
>those who want to progress humanity at all costs are at war with people who are stupid
this actually is why we won't ever have peace. America's education and social system has been neutered so badly.
>>29817172
I don't give a shit. Fucking stop with the stupid virgin shit. Virginity is just another brilliantly market add by the condom industry. I'd rather masturbate with my onahole for the rest of my life than ever having to risk talking to normie girls who say "geeekyyyy virgins who look at planets xxx".
>>29826744
lmao check this guy out postinggggg a picture of Otako, literally means "otaku girlllll" hahah what a looserrrrr
Seriously though, it seems to be more than just the condom industry. If men in general didn't give as much of a shit about sex with a vagina then women won't hold as much power over us and thus can't get away with the shit they do now. It's obviously not in their best interests so virginity became a way to exert peer pressure.
>>29820490
I like to research Neptune too.
Girls get sold hard in the "lol u no sex yet?" meme and then are surprised when they learn a lot of guys are virgins and they were all fucking the same Chads.
>>29827142
Bet you like to 'research' Uranus too you fucking weeb.
>>29817172
14%
suprises me to be honesto
>>29817216
x x x
kiss kiss kiss
>>29817172
Not yet but I will be in 7 years
Don't care though
>>29827178
this is an interesting point.
>>29825402
Fuck off his writing is god-tier and wasted on you
>>29823081
Are you retarded? Do you think 0.09% of women is anywhere near zero?
>>29821145
>The planets aren't even to scale
Fucking dropped.
>>29817393
>manning up
Kill yourself anytime senpai
