Why are normies on this site so rude?
If you disagree with them on anything they start calling you an autist, virgin etc.
Why are they like this?
>>29545674
Because they're from reddit and think that's how the cool edgy 4channers talk based on those epic /r/4chan posts.
>>29545674
Same reason robots get mad, they don't like their views being challenged. If you try to tell a normie that casual sex is bad he will deny it so that he can convince himself that he's okay. It's that simple, it's just a coping mechanism.
>>29545674
>If you disagree with them on anything they start calling you an autist, virgin etc.
probably because you disagree with them about things that only an autistic virgin would disagree with.
i don't see "autistic virgin" thrown around as an insult much in the political threads, for example; only in threads regarding women or sex, when robots claim to know how things work while having zero real world experience.
>>29545674
Well are they wrong?
>>29545674
Kill yourself sperg.
Oregono
>>29546149
>probably because you disagree with them about things that only an autistic virgin would disagree with.
That's essentially peer pressure.
>>29546205
not really. like i said in the rest of my post it's mostly when robots try to argue about women or sex, which they have no real world experience in, that they get called out on being socially retarded virgins.
think about how much you reee whenever a normie comes in and tells you the secret to not being a loser is just being yourself, despite them having no experience in being a loser themselves.
>>29546306
Statistics > Experience
Since experience is just anecdotes. And you don't need to have exprience with women to look up statistics.
>>29546189probably not
why is the image limit so small?
>>29546346
Statistics. About life. Greater than experience.
Top kek.
>>29545674
>ROASTIES
>KILL ALL FAGGOTS
>Hey guys who's your favorite mass shooter?
>We must cleanse the niggers and the jews in fire
>beta cuck did you enjoy sucking tyrones sperm out of your girlfriends vagina, i bet you don't even think muslims should be tortured
>POO POO PEE PEE ON PRETTY LITTLE PRINCESS
>>29546346
What statistics are we talking about? Most of the time you throw out the same dumb four Okcupid studies with no regard for causation/ correlation, caring about analyzing the situations in which the numbers came about. Literally the first lesson in the statistics class I took was that you aren't looking at the factual world, but information gathered from studies.
>>29546456
one last greentext to follow all that
>Why are normies so rude?
Don't like the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
>>29546402
They are. You can laugh all you want.
>>29546456
For example divorce statistics and who initiates divorces. How short men earn less and are less likely to get into leadership positions. There is loads really.
>>29546456
Statistics are the products of marketing and academics with an angle.
If you have the money you can have statistics 'prove' whatever you want.
>>29546346
>statistics are more important than experience
>even when it comes to complex individual human behaviors and emotions.
and you wonder why people call you autistic.
>>29546480
just because you're socially incompetent and have low self esteem doesn't mean you're wise, homie.
>>29546511
I know. It's unbelievable. The autisim on display on r9k is no meme.
>>29546511
Just insults? Nothing more? Typical for a normie. You do know that insults don't prove me wrong, right?
/r9k/ is not even that bad, you can easily distinguish polfags and summerfags and just ignore them
out of the boards I lurk, /ic/ is the worst bunch of edgy teenagers
Why are robots so delusional?
If you try to help them, they utter such things as "normie", roastie" or "muh depression".
Why are they like this?
>>29546495
this. every statistic that r9k quotes is a result of research done with the purpose of proving an agenda or selling a product.
the most oft quoted are shit like divorce rates and "female ability to pair bond", which are regurgitated from some "family values" website and unsourced from that point back, and the infamous okcupid data showing that women rate 80% of men as unattractive, ignoring several factors like the types of people who use online dating to begin with, or the conveniently overlooked fact that despite rating 80% of men as below average on those sites they still talk to and date those same below average men far more than the 20% that they rate as attractive.
>>29546622
They're losers. Experience has taught them they're going to loose. Given that, delusion and excuses become an attractive option.
>>29546556
is it an insult to call a rhinoceros a rhinoceros? why do you consider it an insult to call you autistic when you display all of the signs and characteristics of an autist?
>>29546634
>or the conveniently overlooked fact that despite rating 80% of men as below average on those sites they still talk to and date those same below average men far more than the 20% that they rate as attractive.
If anything this fact is VERY bitter. It proves women will commonly talk to men they don't consider attractive essentially lying to them. There is one thing worse than being ignored and that is being used.
>>29546660
You can call me autist all you want, but the things I've said still stand, you haven't disproven them. That's all that matters.
>>29546667
a women talking to you = being used
R9k. Smh.
>>29546526
>implying i'm not a verbally abusive egotistical asshole and the only reason i'm not shilling my cult is a self-induced negative feedback loop of existential panic
>>29546684
You wouldn't by chance be up for a long pointless debate would you?
>>29546667
So you just read his ENTIRE post and proceeded to ignore his whole fucking point to utter the same typical confirmation of bias you always do when looking at data?
It's like you enjoy setting yourself up as the loser.
>>29546692
Woman talking to you pretending she is attracted to you even if she really isn't. Gee why should she do that? Tell me.
>>29546840
Whatever normie.
>>29546865
>Whatever normie
So you just acknowledge that you're a fucking idiot and you're just gonna passively accept it?
Boy it's like you, in real life, when other normies humiliate you. It's clockwork.
>>29546921
>Boy it's like you, in real life, when other normies humiliate you. It's clockwork.
Except in real life I can't choose not to be humiliated. Normies always humiliate the inferiors. If you fight back, suddenly you are the bad guy. Normie society truly is a scam.
>>29546865
>she is LITERALLY pretending that she is just waiting for you to get alone in the same room so you can mash genitals
you see, 90% of robots aren't just ugly, they're also untalented, timid, and their sense of humor revolves around hate crimes and the death of society. that's someone giving you a chance. the conversation dying is you, not good enough.
>>29545674
Because normal people just come here to feel better about themselves and laugh at us.
Why would they try to be nice? why wouldn't they insult us? the just don't give a shit, they enjoy the power trip they get when they see someone in a less favourable social position.
>>29546684
you're the one making claims to begin with. you're basically just being the exact same type of person I mentioned in >>29546306
you're claiming to know how people, women and relationships work while having zero experience with them, all based on something you read in a blog written by a guy who claims to be everything you aren't and makes money off of angry, inexperienced people like you clicking through.
information, even if accurate (and yours isn't) is not a replacement for personal experience, and the fact that you're looking at people, living, breathing organisms, strictly in terms of information and numbers, without having ever interacted with any of them, very clearly suggests autism. this is an observation, not an argument, not an insult.
>>29546949
>what is banter
>what is a power struggle
if you're not already working harder than the socially well adjusted clod you're doing the robot name a disservice.
>>29545674
BECAUSE FUCK YOU AND OUR MUNDANE DIFFERENCE OF OPINIONS
People don't like having their views challenged.
>>29545674
To be honest, if you can't handle being called a sperg or a virgin you should go to a site like Wizchan.
I'm not even trying to be mean becuase I'm a virgin loser too, but you should expect that kind of comments when you're in 4chan.
>>29546667
it's almost as if physical attractiveness to women isn't the be all end all like it is to men.
that must be something your numbers didn't teach you about women.
>inb4 "not me i'd love an ugly girl with a great personality"
>>29545674
calling you an autistic virgin is just stating facts. it's not about being rude, autistic virgins just don't know what they are talking about often. if you started a conversation about anime porn and a normie tried to make a comment, you'd call him a normie and that he has no place in the conversation.
>>29546972
What are you talking about? She is doing it just to use the resources you can provide.
>>29547004
I get it. You want me to go out there and socialize. Because let's face it, us inferiors trying to communicate with people makes you look better. And even if we try and inevitably fail (failure in social situations is something I know all too well) you will just say we didn't try hard enough. You can never with with normies.
>>29547007
Work hard for things that he gets easily? No thanks.
Normies like to think they're good people, but they don't want to help robots. They also like to think that their social success is due to their hard work.
So they make the robot the villain. It is the robot's fault he is alone because he is just lazy. Yet when a robot exits his comfort area and tries to enter the normies world, he is ridiculed and mocked for it.
>>29546622
you forgot "REEEEEEEEEEE"
>>29545697
Honestly this. Probably 90% of people on 4chan acting like assholes are people that think "this is how 4channers talk so I'm gonna talk like this"
>>29547097
>conversation is a precious resource to be hoarded
>the only reason to work hard is for pussy
fucking millenials, man. i know it's wrong but i'm kind of glad we're all going to get wiped out in WW3.
>>29547097
>What are you talking about? She is doing it just to use the resources you can provide.
Stop pretending that you know what happens in people's lives you know nothing about.
>I get it. You want me to go out there and socialize. Because let's face it, us inferiors trying to communicate with people makes you look better. And even if we try and inevitably fail (failure in social situations is something I know all too well) you will just say we didn't try hard enough. You can never with with normies.
Stop putting mouth in people's mouths, he never claimed such things
>Work hard for things that he gets easily? No thanks.
So this is your definition of life? Things happen because of fortune and if you suck at the RNG game you are 100% doomed to misfortune without having the singlest of power to chance the slightest thing?
No wonder you stick to your loser label so much, it's like you fear being a winner because being the typical loser you've always been is more comfortable.
OP here. See what I mean lads?
I ask a simple question and the condescending normies come in to argue over nothing.
Can't make this shit up tbqh
>>29547097
>Work hard for things that he gets easily? No thanks.
The neckbeard mantra. They really think this one piece of sophistry validates their miserable existence.
Her dee durr things come easier to Tom Brady than they do me. Unfair. Nothing left to do but become a full time underachieving manchild drop out.
>>29547097
>You want me to go out there and socialize.
I don't give two shits what you do. I just want you to put up or shut up. Nobody likes a woe-is-me complainer with dumb as shit excuses to never try anything, and that's all you do all fucking day is shitpost, complain and make excuses.
>>29547113
>They also like to think that their social success is due to their hard work.
Exactly. It's due to genetics and upbringing. That's it.
>>29547155
But you are an anime poster, though.
>>29547155
you're not the good guy here, friend :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQfWzKTOE74
>>29547199
>i read about a handful of examples of genetically fortunate successful people, therefore all success is due to genetics and lucky upbringing.
>>29547223
What?!?!
That isn't true stop lying you fool
>>29547151
>conversation is a precious resource to be hoarded
Dumb fucking retard. Or maybe you're just playing dumb.
>>29547154
>Stop pretending that you know what happens in people's lives you know nothing about.
I know some. I know that women spend a large chunk of what their husbands earn.
>So this is your definition of life? Things happen because of fortune and if you suck at the RNG game you are 100% doomed to misfortune without having the singlest of power to chance the slightest thing?
You can change things, but why should you? It's not fair. And by working hard to change it, you are supporting the unfair game.
>>29547182
Yes exactly. Now you get it.
>>29547199
Nigga plz. If i stopped eating right and going to the gym, I'd be a fat fucking loser soon enough.
All success is work. And maintaining that success is even more work.
>>29547155
Artificial Human 17 is a fucking jackass.
>>29547256
>I know some. I know that women spend a large chunk of what their husbands earn.
Okay, cite source.
>>29547155
I sometimes ask myself why were still here...
>>29547256
>You can change things, but why should you? It's not fair. And by working hard to change it, you are supporting the unfair game.
you're completely right. i don't condone suicide, but perhaps you should look into it. the only way to win is to not play, and you'll always be forced to play as long as you're alive.
>>29547256
>You can change things, but why should you? It's not fair.
i don't think you understand the amount of effort that 99% of people put into accomplishing their goals. which is understandable since trying and putting in effort is a foreign concept to you. yet another example of robots pretending to be experts on something they have no experience with.
>>29547199
>work hard
>genome releases genetic information that binds to adapt to hard work
>be a lazy piece of shit
>genome sequence releases genetic information that adapts to surviving famines, being sedentary, etc...
it's not your fault. if you were like me you were lazy, you didn't go outside, you didn't do your schoolwork, and now your neuroplasticity is slowing up, your testosterone has peaked and is falling, and you're flabby, stupid and weak. the genetic predisposition for being lesser is going to haunt me for the rest of my life, but that doesn't change that functionally i should've worked harder in the first place so i didn't put myself in this situation.
maybe some of you are inherently genetically fucked. but putting yourself in a situation where you are going to be lazy and depressed all the time, jerking off and playing videogames all day, is almost guaranteed to ruin your life, and you'll have noone to blame but either yourself or some big bad looming conspiracy like the guy in welcome to the NHK.
>Villianize robots
>There, now I can ridicule them without shaking my morale views
It's that easy. Everyone does it, probably you included, though most dont even put any effort into minimizing it
>>29547291
https://hbr.org/2009/09/the-female-economy
>Globally, they control about $20 trillion in annual consumer spending
>Their $13 trillion in total yearly earnings
>>29547312
True. But before death there is one more thing to do. Obviously :^)
>>29547335
Genetically gifted people put in less effort and get better results due to halo effect.
Also your post is a great example of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis
>>29547349
Depression isn't a physical illnesses. And adding words like 'severe' 'clinical' or 'crippling' in front of it doesn't change anything. It's the result of poor behaviour.
>>29547256
>calls people dumb fucking retard in a thread asking why people are so rude to robots
>calls people dumb fucking retard, wastes money on women who don't put out
unless you're talking about $20 for a dinner date, which is mostly a formality for successful adults
>>29545674
The ego is by nature an oppositional thing. The "I" can only be "good" if it can compare itself to something else which is "bad." Every ego wants to be strong, smart, sexy, loveable, etc. so it must find others who are NOT these things to compare it to.
>>29547439
I don't date women. I don't even try. Your post about formality is as retarded as you.
>>29547365
>He sources context less statistics in the argument.
Why can't anyone on this God forsaken imageboard understand why this tactic only shows one thing and it is just how fucking ignorant the one posting the numbers is since he shows that he knows nothing about stats analysis and interpretation.
>Hurrr here look at the numbers I will not mnake any efforts to explain and just acknowledge that I won the discussion!
Fucking dumbass, I'm out of this shithole for today.
>>29547390
Another anonymous here.
I agree there is the luck factor, but I also think with enough willpower one can achieve anything.
The world is unfair, yes, because unlucky people need to do more effort, but that does not justify giving up on life.
>>29547481
And you haven't disproven shit. Enjoy your...whatever you're planning to do.
>>29547494
>I agree there is the luck factor, but I also think with enough willpower one can achieve anything.
Retarded normie platitude.
>The world is unfair, yes, because unlucky people need to do more effort, but that does not justify giving up on life.
It does. When a game is rigged, you stop playing it. Actually when it's rigged you should stop as many people as you can from playing it.
>>29547494
Not anything, but most things.
ie: I could try all I want, but I'm not playing center for the Lakers.
>>29547365
>Women make the decisions in the purchases of 94% of home furnishings... 92% of vacations... 91% of homes... 60% of automobiles... 51% of consumer electronics
>Food represents one of the largest opportunities. Women are responsible for the lions share of grocery shopping and meal preparation. Food is also one of consumers' most important budget items, one that can be adjusted but never eliminated.
Yet another case of internet autists using their MMO-inherited number crunching abilities to misinterpret data to suit their purposes.
>>29547524
>Retarded normie platitude.
I am a 22 years old virgin college drop out. Really not a normie, but ok.
>>29547524
Life isn't a game though anon.
>>29547477
why are robots so rude?
>>29547524
>And you haven't disproven shit
the same way you failed to prove anything in the first place?
>>29545674
>why are they like this?
have you seen this site?
>implying robots are not rude and bitter to boot
wew lad
>>29547524
>It does. When a game is rigged, you stop playing it. Actually when it's rigged you should stop as many people as you can from playing it.
Fucking retardwed.
By your logic, only one person in the world should be putting in effort.
I mean, I'm successful by most people's standards. Do things come as easy to me as they do to Tom Brady. nope. Does that mean I throw up my hands, say life is unfair, take by ball go home, and fester in my Mom's Basemednt?
OF COURSE NOT.
Why do you neck beards think this line of nonsense logic is legitimate or validating in any way? It's pure nonsense.
>>29547524
you see an unfair reality where there is no point in trying. i see an unfair reality where true greatness is fought for, tooth and nail, day in and day out. you can spout all the bullshit you want to drag other people down into your self-pitying, liberal narrative swallowing mire of whining and passive aggressive threats of mass murder all you want. you spend hours and hours practicing the same thing over and over, you'll get good at it. most people coming here, like me, have nothing for you but stale platitudes you've already heard and ignored. i can't help you.
>>29545674
Normies don't dispute what you say they just use insults based off of societal norms because the mere thought of not conforming to their normie ways is terrifying to them
>>29547717
He says in a thread where several 'normies' have shut down robot nonsense using sound reasoning.
>>29547619
Actually I don't it's only one person. I would say being about top 5% of the population is actually a life worth living. But that's just my arbitrary measure.
>Why do you neck beards think this line of nonsense logic is legitimate or validating in any way? It's pure nonsense.
It's not. We are the bottom. Personally if I would have to rate my looks, I would say I am a 3/10 (and people tend to overestimate). So don't give me that bullshit about just one person. Majority of people I see every day are superior to me.
>>29547657
>you spend hours and hours practicing the same thing over and over, you'll get good at it
And then someone with talent will come and put you to shame in 10 minutes.
>you see an unfair reality where there is no point in trying. i see an unfair reality where true greatness is fought for, tooth and nail, day in and day out.
True greatness is hard work + great starting position. Otherwise you can be just a little over average (maybe).
>>29547741
>95% of human life is worthless
>why are normies so rude
The cognitive dissonance....
>>29547741
Why are you trying to compete with the whole damn world? Haven't you ever created something just for the sake of it? Crafted a recipe that tasted good? Gone for a bike ride down a steep, winding hill? Written a guitar riff that you feel really expresses your emotions? It doesn't matter that some other dickhead can play 80x better than you with way more variation, or it's probably found in eight bars of Stravinsky or Beethoven. I don't know man. It seems like people have watched too much TV, played too many videogames, and now they think they have to be the main character of goddamn REALITY and the only way to be satisfied is with the same dopamine they get that has been installed into them by mass media. It's silly.
>>29548056
>Why are you trying to compete with the whole damn world?
Because that is the point.
>Haven't you ever created something just for the sake of it?
I did but it was useless.
The main characters have MUCH better lives. I want that. I want to have the best life possible. But as it turns out my starting position is limiting me quite a lot. Not to mention my age. I can never get a life that would be satisfactory to me. I will always know I am inferior and hate myself for it.
>>29547390
It is just as stupid to assume that everybody who is better off than you is only there because they are lucky. There are MANY people that give up all of their leisure time to work towards their goals, and people that delay gratification for decades.
>>29547732
>They're on my side so they shut them down!
You are both idiots bickering over world views neither of you will agree on, but im sure your side is the good one, just like every other side.
>>29548099
thats not knowledge its just a pathetic excuse. if you believe your life is better now than it would be if you made significant progress socially and physically, then you wouldn't be complaining in the first place because your values are elsewhere.
>>29548332
And if it was unlucky people working hard they likely wouldn't succeed.
>>29548431
Unrelated to yalls discussion, but its a fallacy to believe that because something would be beneficial to someone, they would do it. Humans dont always do the right thing
>>29548477
unrelated to your point (was there one?), but morality is subjective.
>>29548431
Objectively my life would be better. I would be more miserable though.
Once upon a time, a man decided to climb a mountain. He took a nasty fall, badly bruising himself, and landed in the woods next to a shaggy-haired dog. Despite his injuries, he limped back to his house, where he left the dog, then to the nearest hospital, where he got some x-rays. When he got home, the dog looked hungry, so he made a steak just for the dog, and turned on the television. He was just about to call the pound when he heard that a wealthy couple, on vacation in the vicinity, had lost a very shaggy dog, and were offering a very large sum for his return. He bought a plane ticket, but fell short on funds. Being a thrifty man, never wanting to live in debt, he sold a chair from his house to pay for the ticket. When he got on the plane, he found that he couldn't take the dog without preparations; the airline, however, was willing to transfer his ticket for a nominal fee. He was forced to pay this fee, and the veterinarian's bills, with a credit card, which irked him even though he knew the reward would offset it. Then he flew to the city in question, but since he was only twenty-four (too young to rent a car), had to walk ten miles through the woods, going in the general direction of the manor. When he arrived, he found he had missed the front gate entirely. He walked directly up to the door with the dog and rang the bell... when he and the dog were shot dead by a guard.
>>29545674
cuz u a little bitch :^)
>>29548659
Did you feel like that story was pointless? It was. Sometimes an author will go one step beyond a Shaggy Dog Story, and Shoot The Shaggy Dog. They won't just Kill 'em All; they'll make the characters' accomplishments a moot point and their deaths completely senseless. They won't just have the protagonist die an agonizing death; they'll trap him in a grim cycle of reincarnation, and make him a failure in every incarnation. Sometimes they won't even Kill Em All; the protagonists won't even get to bring the Villains down with them. All in all, the only thing that's changed in the last 400 pages is that a few ineffectual people have died... some of whom were the protagonists.
>>29548685
Occasionally part of An Aesop, to show just how crappy the world becomes when you violate the lesson; frequently used to try and show a 'gritty', cynical world. Sometimes, it's an attempt at tragedy that makes the mistake of nullifying itself by making it impossible to care. Depending on the particulars, it can overlap with Diabolus ex Machina, and is a frequent cause of Angst Aversion. In short, this is a story where at its conclusion you have to ask "What the hell was the point?"
>>29547717
>Normies don't dispute what you say
because you don't actually say anything to dispute. r9k is literally a bunch of autistic manchildren pretending to be experts about things they know nothing about.
>they just use insults based off of societal norms
if by insults you mean labels for common socially incompetent behavioral patterns and the cause behind them, yes. i take it you get called autistic basically any time you open your mouth? maybe if every "normie" you try to instigate an argument with calls you autistic, it's because you are actually autistic.
