>Hey Anon, it's me, your loyal, pretty, and supportive housewife who doesn't exist because Feminism decided comfy traditional families were oppressive :(
Don't blame feminazis for not being able to get a girlfriend.
nice bait m8
sjws decided traditional families were oppressive, not feminists
feminists just want you to be able to choose. housewife or ceo, stay at home mama or international tycoon
One Day they will pay.
>>28078728
sjws are feminists
>>28078728
What are you on about? Feminists have been telling housewives and stay at home mom's that they're oppressed by the patriarchy for decades
Feminism is the radical notion that women should be free to choose how to live their lives, as long as they choose the way I want them to.
>>28078728
But women are fucking losers
>>28078728
the sjws ARE the feminists
>>28078648
>tattoo
>revealing clothing
>smug face
go away
If you had a housewife you'd have to take full responsibility for her, working to prove for her and the children, probably at your own expense, and assuming the responsibility of being an active guiding force in their lives. No more video games or 4chan. Think you could handle that anons?
>>28078728
>implying feminists giving "choices" to women didn't contribute greatly to the fall of traditional families
sjws just are finishing it off by breaking down the last few pillars that support the value of family
>>28078942
I could. I would be happy to work if I had a loyal and loving housewife to do it for. But unfortunately this world has gone to shit so I'm just going to blow my brains out.
>>28078648
Women are all degenerate lesbians, anyway.
>dressed like a whore
>>28079252
>big black cock
Im not surprised
>>28079370
Me either, Anon. Whenever I see channers bitching about Tumblrinas and progressives, they always fail to see that women are to blame for the state of western civilization.
/pol/tards and /b/tards point the finger at some bogeyman like DAH JOOZ or some dumb shit when the answer is right in front of them.
Bitch what the FUCK is that you're stirring
>>28078648
It was always a lie.
If you haven't already given up on a gf, you're part of the problem. You contribute to the system that gives women artificially high value. You empower SJWS.
>>28079441
The "women are more left wing" meme is stupid as fuck.
From 1945 until 1992 (when Labour became a centrist party.) women overwhelmingly voted conservative (right-wing) while Labour was overwhelmingly male (left-wing.) in the UK.
If women weren't allowed to vote, the UK would probably have had a reasonable stint of outright socialism. I don't just mean welfare either: state ownership and direct control of the commanding heights of the economy.
Because of swapping between Labour and Conservative, the UK used to swing between nationalization to denationalization to renationalisation, until finally Thatcher put the bullet in with privatization. (and bankruptcy, bye bye British industry, bye bye British working class!)
>>28078648
>implying the nuclear family doesn't force half the population into unpaid reproductive labor, thus freeing up the other half for more leisure time and higher wages for their productive labor
Read a fucking book, Christ.
>>28079538
Both of those parties are to the left of our democratic party, though (and that's saying something about the degree of cuckoldry in your country).
You guys vote left wing by default if you aren't voting for UKIP.
>americans are their retarded views
you all either suck black cock or want some dumb whore sit at home 24/7
>>28079634
UKIP are still generally to the left of the democrats, and many American right-winger's still suck Thatcher's cock.
>>28079634
>voluntarily defends and protects the people who are exploiting him and stealing his surplus value
>has the fucking gall to call socialists cucks
Completely delusional.
>>28078728
Feminism totally trashed the traditional family you moron.
>>28078830
Women shouldn't be free to choose anything. Women make shockingly bad decisions, especially when they're young enough to be fertile. They need men to lead them.
>>28079673
>HURR DURR LETS TAKE FROM THOSE WHO EARNED IT AND GIVE IT TO LAZY FAGGOTS AND DINDUS DURR
Venezuela sure is doing fine right now, aren't they?
>>28079681
>Jews consistently vilified, attacked, persecuted, slaughtered, tortured, imprisoned, and made scapegoats by the radical right wing
>Thinks them being left wing is a conspiracy
Maybe it's just in their self interest to support ideologies that don't literally want to exterminate them.
>>28079743
If they don't like it here they should fuck off to Israel instead of trashing our civilization.
>>28079719
>HURR DURR LETS TAKE FROM THOSE WHO EARNED IT AND GIVE IT TO LAZY FAGGOTS AND DINDUS DURR
You seem confused, because that's literally capitalism.
And Venezuela isn't socialist. They're a fairly decent Social Democratic country and, compared to their regionally and economically similar neighbors, I think they're doing quite well for themselves.
>>28079743
>Jews consistently vilified, attacked, persecuted, slaughtered, tortured, imprisoned
Maybe because THAT'S WHAT THEY DESERVE
>>28079719
The whole idea of "surplus value" is that WORKERS are having what THEY PRODUCE taken from them NECESSARILY in any capitalist society.
>>28079812
If the workers are actually producing surplus value, why don't they go into business for themselves so they can keep it?
>>28079786
>And Venezuela isn't socialist. They're a fairly decent Social Democratic country and, compared to their regionally and economically similar neighbors, I think they're doing quite well for themselves.
You are a fucking out of touch moron.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/22/news/economy/venezuela-blackouts-40-days/
http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/venezuelas-socialist-utopia-ends-up-in-the-toilet/
http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/02/16/466942128/facing-severe-food-shortages-venezuela-pushes-urban-gardens
You know who else sounded a lot like Hugo before he was elected? Bernie. Hugo started out as a rather moderate left populist that became more corrupt and radical with time as the money began to dry up.
>>28079719
>THOSE WHO EARNED IT
In the context of the UK they usually earned it by merit of their birthline.
>>28079719
>LAZY FAGGOTS
coal miners.
>DINDUS
in 50s Britain? (empire doesn't count, they didn't bring the NHS to africa.)
>>28079855
>as the money began to dry up.
literally impossible with the united states since the dollar is the world reserve currency.
>>28079743
>vilified, attacked, persecuted, slaughtered, tortured, imprisoned, and scapegoated for failing to integrate into White society
>decide to push the most subversive, disgusting, hated agendas on normal gentile society
Perfect logic. No, you Jews are just subversive little demons -- born destroyers. You all shall perish in Hitler's second incarnation.
>>28079915
>literally impossible with the united states since the dollar is the world reserve currency.
You are an economically illiterate retard.
>>28079838
If every single worker started a business the economy would collapse because its foundation is based on only a handful to people owning the means of production.
The only way for workers to NOT have their labor stolen from them is socialism.
>>28079855
Every country that isn't US, Canada or Western Europe has to deal with food shortages.
The difference is that Venezuela actually makes some sort of effort to FEED its poor.
>>28079743
Jews came to America in the early 20th century and immediately began setting off bombs and agitating for leftist politics.
The mainstream right has never lifted a finger against them.
>>28079946
There are other reasons, I just didn't want to start you strawmanning by pointing out the stupidity of the notion the "money will run out" in a country that controls her own currency.
(Protip: What happened to Greece is what happens when you don't have your own currency, not what happens when you overspend.)
>People seriously think jews are either "left wing" or "right wing"
>People seriously don't realize both sides are full of Jews
>>28079951
>labor stolen from them
Being forced into a gulag sure seems like theft of labor to me.
Face it, socialism has been tried dozens of times and, after a few million people are murdered, it collapses under its own weight.
>>28079441
There's no way we would go back to only men being able to vote in the West. The only solution is anarcho-capitalism.
>>28080011
Something failing doesn't mean it won't eventually succeed.
Most revolutions, regardless of their ideology or philosophy, will degenerate into bureaucratic tyrannies. That's the nature of social change and experimentation.
>>28080011
>and, after a few million people are murdered, it collapses under its own weight.
Or morphs into Social Democracy, as seen in Western Europe.
Bernie says socialist, but he's a social democrat. Britain's Labour party says the same thing even though it's last administration was one of the most right-wing in the UK's history, funnelling huge amounts of money into private enterprise and engaging in only the token nationalization of rail-track when the private company responsible for it died on it's arse. (the entire privatized UK rail system is a joke, but they weren't left-wing enough to renationalise it into the somewhat functional joke that was BR.)
>>28079681
Jews are over represented in all ideologies. That's because they're intelligent. Their mean IQ is 115, 15 points over that of other white people.
>>28079951
>If every single worker started a business the economy would collapse because its foundation is based on only a handful to people owning the means of production.
If anything, that's an argument AGAINST forced socialism. It seems much saner to start encouraging people to start their own co-ops, so a shift happens.
I see two answers to his "Why not" from a syndicalist perspective.
1. They're somehow prevented from doing this. I'm not sure how true this is. I think it's quite possible to start one's own co-ops, but I'm a NEET so what do I know...
2. They don't want to. This seems like the most sensible answer. They simply haven't thought it through. Sometimes progress in society is not made for this simple reason
>>28079951
>The only way for workers to NOT have their labor stolen from them is socialism.
Being an entrepreneur is risky, costly, unstable and takes a lot of work. By being an employee people don't have to invest tens of thousands and are economically stable -- they trade profit for economic stability.
>>28078728
You feminists need to sort out your contradicting semantics before you can convert me.
>>28078648
Baby you smaht
You loyal
>>28078648
>be /pol/ack
>Only loyal feminine women interested in me were black
>meh, why not
>still together 4 years later
