/Hypergamy/
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001
You are currently reading a thread in /r9k/ - ROBOT9001
Why the fuck is this allowed?
even with my shitty genetics I still deserve a half decent bitch and yet I get nothing
also Chad/alpha hate thread
>>27791965
>deserve
You are entitled to nothing
>he actually thinks he is entitled to another living human being's sexual attention just because of his genetics, something he didn't choose or work for
My sides.
>>27792026
Yes he is. He is entitled to a woman, as all women are entitled to a man.
>>27792299
No one is entitled to another person. It's called bodily autonomy, dingus.
>>27791965
its allowed because people like you deserve nothing.
>>27792299
Newsflash. Nobody is entitled to anything.
>allowed
Noone allowed it, it just happens. I have to say though it's always a suprise for me to consider that, given the amount of tail I get, I must logically be in the top percentile of men. Can't wrap my head around that though.
>>27792026
>>27792313
>>27792336
Allt these anons shitposting
Why does anyone automatically deserve anything?
>>27792373
Answer the question.
Why does anyone deserve someone?
Otherwise this is exactly one of those feel good stuff r9k screams bloody murder about
>>27792345
I'm entitled to your boipussy faggot
>>27792420
Like OP's pic related states, before the sexual revolution everyman had one wife/gf, after sexual revolution, women were allowed to fuck whoever they wanted and they all want Chad's dick. This leaves 80% of men with no gf/wife and this hurts humanity because it narrows the gene pool.
This is literally how all species act due to the biological nature of inseminated and inseminating sexes.
Monogamous pairings fixed it from being one in twenty men getting all the bitches, but it's still pretty extreme.
This is pure speculation, but...
The unleashing of hypergamy at this point in history may be the single best thing that ever happened for men. It means many men, who would otherwise have been hunted down and trapped by a women into slaving their lives away for her, are free to do as they please. Just look at the pure evil that you see being produced by women in open society today - a contempt for basic procedural law (ex. attacking Ghomeshi even after his accusers were clearly exposed as liars who actually ENJOYED being sexually brutalised), a willingness to throw away fairness when it comes to jobs (women stealing billions of dollars worth of job opportunities from men through 'wage gap' initiatives), divorce when it suits them and the insistence that it's their right to skin a man financially. Just imagine having to live with a woman like that! She would resent you every day for not being Chad, she'd attack your self esteem (Nice guy[TM]), she would possibly beat you, possibly get other people to beat you - and you'd never have recourse.
Seriously, none of those hot women were ever going to be good for you, they were never going to be cute, loving wives. They were always destined to be bad people.
Celebrate your freedom, enjoy your life.
Because the world isn't just unless we enforce that with a strict moral system.
In today's capitalistic, sexually deregulated society, the brunt of the reward for your contribution go to Chad (sex) and Shekelstein (money).
On the other hand, if you manage to play the system right you can hoard big money and a harem of bitches while not ever having to spend a day working again unless you choose to.
Have fun.
>>27792469
>before the sexual revolution
>he thinks sexual mores were a static entity for all human history before a magic whore revolution
You aren't qualified to talk on anything ever again dum-dum.
>>27791965
That chart is so wrong I don't know where to begin. Someone actually wasted time creating it.
>>27792469
Those 'men' have shit genes though
Theres a reason for women not wanting them
>deserve
Back in school, what you deserve meant everything.
Helicopter parents and spockian influenced teachers made sure everyone got what they "deserved". Everyone was equal. Nobody had to work for anything. The kid who had more had his things taken and given to the kid who had less. Everyone got a trophy.
And now the kids who were raised with this poisonous mindset are out in the real world.
Still holding on to the belief that what you "deserve" means anything.
Shaking their fists at the kids who have more i.e the wealthy successful "chads" of today, and hoping some benevolent authority figure will come and give them the equality they falsely believe they are entitled to.
But this isn't school, friends. This is the real world where men who are strong and driven enough take what they get, regardless of what they deserve.
This is how it has always been. The world is harsh, but in the old days, people knew that.
That's why in the old days, men who were wealthy, charismatic or more masculine were held up as objects of admiration, people to emulate. Nowdays, they are just dismissed as "privileged" and hated for their individual success.
The world didn't change. You did.
>>27792482
>>Celebrate your freedom, enjoy your life.
you can't since you have no jobs because women steal them
>>27792513
You can still get a job. Technically a fair amount of your labour is going to be redistributed to women because of women's lies, but women and the various Chads they get with are also producing some small amount of value. Just don't become a "shovel" for women by taking a job that's hard on you. Find a low-level job, earn enough to get by, and find a way to be happy.
>>27792482
>The unleashing of hypergamy at this point in history may be the single best thing that ever happened for men. It means many men, who would otherwise have been hunted down and trapped by a women into slaving their lives away for her, are free to do as they please. Just look at the pure evil that you see being produced by women in open society today - a contempt for basic procedural law (ex. attacking Ghomeshi even after his accusers were clearly exposed as liars who actually ENJOYED being sexually brutalised), a willingness to throw away fairness when it comes to jobs (women stealing billions of dollars worth of job opportunities from men through 'wage gap' initiatives), divorce when it suits them and the insistence that it's their right to skin a man financially. Just imagine having to live with a woman like that! She would resent you every day for not being Chad, she'd attack your self esteem (Nice guy[TM]), she would possibly beat you, possibly get other people to beat you - and you'd never have recourse.
Seriously, none of those hot women were ever going to be good for you, they were never going to be cute, loving wives. They were always destined to be bad people.
I think you're describing fat ugly feminists. The only thing hot girls want to do is suck Chad's cock not take away your rights
>>27792548
Was it really necessary to quote the whole paragraph?
>I think you're describing fat ugly feminists. The only thing hot girls want to do is suck Chad's cock not take away your rights
Well, go find some normal women and try telling them the wage-gap is a myth, and policies used to "counter" the "wage-gap" are unfair to men. See how they respond.
The cock carousel costs money, the feminists since Wollstonecraft and before always recognised this and explicity stated that the 'male provision' system and marriage had to be overthrow to get to Chad. The women in Aristophane's play "The Assemblywomen" were led by the stereotypical 'female chauvinist' or 'feminist', but they were happy to get behind her and support the move for socialising the economy (so they didn't have to rely on their husbands), and socialising sex so they could chase "Adonises" (literally the Ancient Greek way of saying Chad).
>>27792507
>Those 'men' have shit genes though
Eugenics is not a real science you retard
>>27792618
>natural selection is eugenics
k m8
>>27792638
>natural selection is eugenics
You fail biology forever. Kill yourself
>>27792373
>believing hypergamy is real in 2016
>not shitposting
>telling someone he doesn't deserve to have a gf is
>>27792469
nah before the sexual revolution all men had 20 wives and 20 jobs and worked less than 20 hours a week. 80% of the men had 120% of the women. shut the fuck up retard.
>>27792469
The argument of it narrowing the gene pool falls apart considering that you yourself state that women want the best of the best, which means that women's biological wiring are suited that exact pairing.
The argument of it narrowing down the gene pool also falls apart when you consider whether or not the 80% of men are even capable of passing down healthy enough genes to diversify the gene pool.
If you're broke and can't afford the best nutrition, your genes will alter to survival mode and pass on just essential's necessary to pass on more gene's.
Basically, when a species has no resources (80% of men), the gene's alter itself to survive on only the most essential basic so that life can survive. As you can imagine, when you break down things to just the basics, it's not very wide and diverse.
On the other hand, when a species has plenty of resources, the gene's mutate at a much more rapid speed, thus creating a much more diverse gene pool.
>>27792663
>80% of the men had 120% of the women.
Yes, now only 20%(A.K.A Chads) get 100% of women while 80% never get pussy
>>27791965
>implying your waifu wouldn't cuck you with your friendly neighbor chad
>>27792654
Your rage says more then any argument could
Lrn2biology
>>27792688
>clearly never read a book in his life about biology
>writes a wall of text anyway
your intuition is there but it's nowhere near reality.
>>27792706
>tfw i am a chad because i have a girlfriend
>tfw 99% of men are or have been chads, while 80% never get pussy
sucks to be you, loser.
>>27792688
Ok you got me I only want to play God by altering evolution. But hear me out, who died and made evolution queen? Why does she decide what species lives or dies?
>>27792741
>who died and made evolution queen
Jehova
All these arrogant pricks using social darwinism, eugenics and "evolution" to justify the unfairness of the system and not help the non-Chads because "they aren't meant to pass on their genes" Get rekt fags
>>27792793
if you wouldn't have died of disease or in combat or enslaved before 1960, then you are not a robot.
>>27792718
I have read many books about biology.
One of the basic facets of biology is that life needs resources to survive. Each life has gene's suited to the resources it has access to. When life has a more diverse set of resources or even just simply has more resources, it's gene's sense that and mutate. Thus, the gene pool of a species diversify.
But, of course I haven't seen an argument from you against this. Just claims that I'm the one who can't see reality.
>>27792469
I have no clue why you think all men always had a wife, or even that all women had a husband, ever since the dawn of marriage as a concept, there have always been and will always be men and women who will not attract a mate. And your lack of ability to attract a mate is your problem, no one is entitled to anything.
>>27791965
I don't get where this meme comes from. Every man that I know has had a couple of gfs or at least casual sex with a small number of women. In reality, it's only a very small percentage of men who struggle a lot with girls.
I am entitled to everything.
>>27792821
>It's gene's sense
LMAO you sure read your biology books
is this the dumbest thread i've ever seen on 4chan?
i think it might be. gratz all, you are destined to die alone with your insanity/stupidity.
>>27792706
Dude most men have had sex at least once and if you haven't that is your problem. Don't get me wrong society can be shallow but this is feminist levels of bitching and pushing your problem on to other people
>>27792741
Evolution itself isn't a bio (life). Evolution is a law of nature not nature itself. Nature was the one who started the mechanics of evolution.
>>27792026
>Frank Underwood
>3edgy5me m8
I'm an ok looking guy with a steady career and numerous interests. I can hold conversations and don't have any issues speaking to women yet they consistently blow me off for some 6'5 230lb ripped Chad. How the fuck is that fair in any way?
I can barely even find a 5 or 6/10 to get into a relationship with that hasn't had her pussy blown apart by dozens of apes.
All because my parents didn't make me 6'4 with a 10/10 face.
>>27792276
>things he didn't work for
I worked for all the other shit that's gotten me success in life. Why should it be so hard for a regular guy like me to get a good gf
>>27792313
>>27792336
>>27792828
>siding with fucking Chad?
Get the fuck of this fucking board right now you stupid piece of shit
>>27792844
This guy gets it.
To the rest of you fags, you wanna fight? THEN FEED ME YOU HATE!!! Even if eugenics was right, the fact you're posting on /r9k/ means you're not part of the top 20%
>>27792821
>facets
autism
>gene's sense that
0/10
there's no argument. you just pulled some random words out of your ass. literally all i can say is 'no' because there's nowhere to begin here. your understanding of genes and how genetic diversity is defined is just made up.
>>27792688
>He thinks evolution works in modern society
KEK
Civlization made evolution redundant, retards are allowed to breed, there is health care which means even the most sick can pass on genes, the disabled and so on.
Evolution has probably stopped working in humans after we invented the wheel so stop spouting bullshit.
>>27792897
Not siding with chad, I am telling you blatantly, getting laid is not hard and no one, male or female, is entitled to a mate.
>>27792890
Even I can have sex semi regularly. The problem is that a huge section of the female population is going to a select few men when in reality there's enough for everyone. Most women would probably be happy with a regular honest hard working man if they actually stopped to think about it.
I wouldn't call my genes inferior by any stretch of the imagination but they certainly aren't the perfect bordering on unrealistic standards people seem to have today.
What the fuck are normal people supposed to do when we live in an age where women will unironically put "Must be 6'4 or taller" in a dating website profile
>>27792828
Not that guy, but when robots talk about a right to a girlfriend, they're talking about a moral\social right.
If you live in a western country, then the odds are the entire culture, the laws, etc were all build around the notion of marriage - one man and one woman for life. Now religion for the most part is dead, and that may or may not be a good thing - everyone has a right to abandon that morality.
The issue is that in many ways the morality of 'marriage' is still a big part of society and law. It's a huge part of the many moral and intellectual assumptions implicit to the state.
Women and feminists have no problem lobbying for maternity (and paternity) leave for example. They're insisting that the government enforce a supposed moral ENTITLEMENT. Maternity leave is one example but the entire structure of society is build on these assumptions - and when you deny most men any hope of having a functional relationship with women, you can't then be consistent in insisting on various other moral entitlements. The women of the west are setting up the conditions for social disorder, collapse, hyper-violence - by setting up a one-sided brutal imposition on most men.
TLDR; if roasties want Chad, there's no reason Billy the Beta should be taxed to pay for it.
>>27792931
That's still evolution though, just in a different environment
>>27792897
Because the chad looks like a better example of manhood and appears to have self determination and better genes, even of he doesn't.
>>27792854
I don't particularly care about how I phrase my sentences in this thread because I never took the internet seriously.
If anyone has read biology books then you know what I mean by that.
The premise of this thread is pessimistic by nature, if I was to phrase my sentences stupid and you respond to the stupid part, the pessimist premise has arrived at it's logical conclusion.
>>27792938
Agin, it's not about getting fucking laid. I'm saying that even as a perfectly normal well adjusted man it's almost impossible to find a good mate because of this fucking ridiculous system that's really only gained traction in the western world in the past five decades or so
>>27791965
Thanks for the self-esteem boost, OP.
Your pic related really did it for me 10/10
>>27792917
>literally all i can say is 'no' because there's nowhere to begin here
Because you haven't been grounded enough in biology. There's never anything wrong with going back to the basics.
>>27792469
>this hurts humanity because it narrows the gene pool.
>people with bad genes not reproducing is bad thing
literally muh feels tier garbage
Reminder that almost every man has mating experience by the time they are 30. Angry 16-20 men dont count.
>>27792951
evolution implies selective pressure. we haven't evolved in over 10,000 years. if you want to use the term that scientists defined, you'll have to use their definitions and theories. unless you're using it just to be a cheeky cunt, like you evolved since childhood to shitpost faster.
inb4 beta men. there's no loser gene in humans. if you wiped out the bottom 80% of men you'd get the same distribution of weak and whiny men in the next generation.
>>27792336
Fine. But, if we deserve nothing, then allow us to choose our peaceful death.
>>27792968
That's some advanced butthurt and autism you're displaying, you definitly read your books on autism
*tips fedora*
>>27792942
Anon maybe i need to see some stats or soemthing but usually i see women settling for regular guys. Even in college i see regular girls hanging out with regular guys as a couple. I never see all of this nonsettling
>>27793024
You're the one with the fedora and I'm the one who's autist? lol
>>27792968
You have NO idea what you're talking about. Go back to school and learn English, then pick up a Biology book, you fucking cretinous subhumanoid.
>>27792964
This isn't medieval fucking Europe. You don't need a giant bearded hulk to protect you, shit I just bought a gun recently, I'd love to see if chads chest muscles can stop a hollow point.
I will admit that I shouldn't have used the word "deserve" but can you not see how ridiculous it is that perfectly good men are relegated to becoming basement dwelling losers because they DONT look like Calvin Klein models?
Like I would understand if 10/10 beautiful successful women wanted a partner that was as good as them but it gets out of hand when fucking 15 year old girls are exposed to bullshit tumblr brand feminism that has them believing they should settle for nothing less that physical perfection
>women flock to Chad, who currently has highest SMV
>you're surprised
True autism here. You should get a discount for your disability.
>>27793009
You know what anon, you're right. Human trash like you should never be allowed to procreate
>>27792969
So you blame society for all of your problems? If there is a system in place like that, which i don't believe there is because i see beta males in long term realtionships, then try to fix it.
>>27792999
back to what basics? shit you can just google? you have no clue what you're talking about, what will it matter if i argue?
genes don't sense anything, they mutate at at a rate based on their location on a chromosome and how well the DNA assembly/repair mechanisms work. "Resources" aren't even relevant at this point, and you could easily argue that an abundance of energy has the opposite effect on how often genes mutate.
as for everything else, it's literally word salad. there are no basics to explain. you just said life needs something and genes alter themselves to be better. what the fuck is wrong with you.
>>27793058
>it gets out of hand when fucking 15 year old girls are exposed to bullshit tumblr brand feminism that has them believing they should settle for nothing less that physical perfection
Not only are feminists spouting annoying bs but they also corrupt the next generations its like a Kafkaesque nightmare
>>27793063
No one's surprised, you retard. OP's image has been doing the rounds on /r9k/ for 4 years
>>27793058
>i was forced to be a basement dwelling loser
nice. i hope you really suffer.
The natural selection argument is stupid because women with low quality genetics van reproduce just as easily as women with high quality genetics. Men are desperate and have no problems fucking deformed and old women and having kids with them. Only men with low quality genes lose.
>>27793050
The post you're responding to explicitly state's that I don't care how I phrase my sentences. Why would I care if my English is bad?
Anyway's, no one responding to these basic facts:
1. Life requires resources
2. Each life is suited to the resources it has access to (through genetics)
3. If resources are meager, life alters itself to suit only the most essential basics
4. On the other hand, if resources are bountiful, life alters itself to suit a more diverse environment.
Being a grammar nazi on 4chan is literally SJW stuff. You should go to tumblr if you're that butthurt about grammar.
>>27793058
I don't doubt that there are perfectly good men that doen't get mates and I can beleive feminist are to blame, but anon, fix the problem. Because if you guys don't fix it, then it will stah this way. You know i feel like maybe i haven't been giving yku guys a fair shake
>>27793009
>>27793009
I am by almost any standard a very intelligent man. I am decent looking with no physical or mental disabilities. I eat healthy execrise and make more than enough money to support a wife and children easily.
In what way do I (or the millions of men like me) have shitty genes? In the past people like us would have been regular hard working people that strong communities are built off of.
But because I'm not some muscle bulging nigger or a 6'6 Adonis with a perfect face i can't get shit.
If anything it's to the detriment of society when women pursue Chad endlessly
>>27793110
yeah but everyone here 4 years ago is dead or grown up and in a relationship.
the new wave of 14-18 year olds is definitely surprised, and it's embarrassing
>>27793122
chad isn't desperate. and you only have to think about it for 2 seconds to realize the shitty genes still get cucked out of existence over time, even if only half of their carriers (maximum) pass their genes on. technically there's a threshold where it starts climbing again but its negligible.
>>27793127
>Each life is suited to the resources it has access to (through genetics)
> life alters itself
dude stop embarassing yourself
>>27793102
> they mutate at at a rate based on their location
Environment is part of a species's resources. Try arguing against that.
>>27793141
your intelligence is good for society, but not for a family. your existence is meant to support the rest of us.
you have terrible genes but we still made a good wagecuck out of you.
>>27793127
Can you name any of these processes? Got proof/studies showing this?
>>27793186
Evolution is non existent yes?
>>27793189
that's wrong though. the resources are a part of the environment, if you want to even use these terms. what are you even arguing?
>>27793096
How the fuck can we fix it? The only way i could see it turning around in my lifetime is by pairing every woman with a man of the same level and keeping a small population of chads around for the purposes of perpetuating alpha genetics
>>27793120
I make nearly 160k a year have an active social life and can fuck girls pretty easily. I'm talking about the millions of guys who have perfectly fine genetics that will never be passed on because women only want 6'10 ripped chadgods
>>27793016
>evolution implies selective pressure. we haven't evolved in over 10,000 years
Selective pressure always exists. Evolution doesn't stop. Selective pressures are defined by the environment, and if it changes the selective pressures change too.
You user complicated words that make no sense the way you are using them. Read up on biology basics, you have no idea what you are talking about.
>>27793204
evolution isn't life altering itself, cumguzzler. learn english, then learn biology, then talk shit.
All these cucks thinking social darwinism justifies the weeding out of inferior genes, we've moved past a point in evolution where this doesn't need to happen, humanity isn't in severe danger of dying out so we can afford to let everyone fuck
>>27793229
>social darwinism
This isn't social darwinism, it's just women following mating strategies that evolved over millions of years and made sure that our species continues to this day.
>>27793190
>strong healthy young man
>No disabilities
>Intelligent
Nice try faggot. The system is clearly broken as fuck and society will soon go to shit if something doesn't change.
Don't get me wrong I've got no problem with Chad getting his dick wet(Id prefer it be him that reproduces than many of the sperglord robots here) but I should be able to pass on my genes and raise a family too. That would be the best for society in all honesty
>>27793223
>if i repeat what he says i can sound smart too!
how has genetic diversity changed in the last 10k years?
>>27793244
Women don't need to fear about predators devouring them and their children, they don't need 6"7 muscular brutes to protect them anymore. Old mating strategies are at best useless and at worst detrimental to society
>>27793267
then donate your sperm. you might not be genetically fucked up, but you ruined your own life.
the system is fine. look at the computer you use and how easy it is to get literally anything you want in this world (except a family because you're a cuckold)
>>27793267
>I-I'm different!! Not liek the sperglords on here!!
yet you still browse
I hope you die alone.
>>27793202
Sure
>Life requires resources
All known life requires water. Which in my estimation is a resource
>Each life is suited to the resources it has access to (through genetics)
You won't find a siberian tiger in the desert because the siberian tiger's prey (resource) doesn't exist on the desert
>If resources are meager, life alters itself to suit only the most essential basics
Hibernation is still mostly a mystery to science, yet bears stock up on food during summer so that they get fat and stop all activity during the winter to hibernate since during winter there's not much to eat.
>On the other hand, if resources are bountiful, life alters itself to suit a more diverse environment.
Tropical rain forests have more sunlight (resource) and thus tropical rainforests have way more diversity of life than the siberian tundra.
>>27793271
>how has genetic diversity changed in the last 10k years?
Depends on the population(s) you're referring to :^)
>>27793213
Nope, environment's are formed by the resources available. That's why there's aren't any mango's naturally growing on Sweden since mangos usually require a tropical climate.
>>27793326
Which require a lot of sunlight
>>27793342
I forgot to add that
>>27793342
Don't you know mangos create their own sunlight?
Dude's obviously knowing his biology and shiet
>>27793326
>no, resources are not part of the environment
>environment are formed by resources
???
Also, I'm not justifying evolution, just explaining why it's the way it is.
>>27792336
>refuse to participate in mobile/online hook up culture
>chances to find a mate instantly lowered by three gazillion percent
I can't remember the last time I've seen a girls face not buried into a smartphone. Its honestly tragic.
>>27793355
This means you can grow mangos in space because there's lots of sunlight
>>27793110
OP sure seems surprised, or at the very least naive, judging by his post.
>>27793355
Sunlight is a resource, when you have a lot of sunlight, such as in the tropics, you get more diverse life.
Real simple.
Seriously putting all the science apart, is it really too much to ask for women to have a quick fuck with men?
>>27792507
>women are good at judging genes and character.
>>27793314
the most you'll get is some edgy new-age scientist who sees minor changes in bone density and muscle strength. beyond shit like that (which are examples of absence of selective pressure) and combinations that are novel by the crossing of multiple cultural groups (so far insignificant to evolution), there's nothing we can quantify. we've been studying this shit for 200 years and evolution at any scale we can measure takes 100k-1m years without some rapid extinction event.
>>27793355
Resources such as water don't form the environment? So there's lot's of trees in the desert since the desert is an environment and it doesn't require any water right?
>>27793297
>>27793297
>implying every single person that lurks and occasionally posts is a sperg?
>being this much of a dumb nigger
>>27793386
there is far more diverse life in the deep sea where almost no sunlight hits. you are a fucking retard.
>>27793372
this.
Seriously, to the guys who are arguing with, why all the hate? I'm not justifying anything, just explaining how this stuff works. I'm a virgin myself so I'm not benefiting at all.
>>27793420
trees are in a desert because there is no sunlight? but what about at night :)
>>27792688
Modern mate selection is based on social value, we are no longer trying to survive we only wajt pleasurr, evolution doesn't work well if you remove survival from the equation.
Fuck your naturalistic fallacy
>>27793433
Sunlight isn't the only resource. Minerals are also a resource.
>>27793419
Juggling fancy words together doesn't make you look smart, you have no idea what you are talking about.
Are you honestly a sperg or just really bad with words, I'm not even sure you are trolling anymore
>>27793428
Calm down, sperg. I wouldn't have said anything if I'd known you were going to throw an autist tantrum
>>27793464
you said when you have sunlight, you get more diverse life.
then you say desert has less diverse life, and you also admit that its not the only resource. you are shit.
>>27793464
Your ass is apparently a rich resource for the bullshit you're posting
>>27793466
>doesn't
yes it does. clearly confused you to the point of babbling.
>>27793451
>social value
These things don't exist in a vacuum, social value and capital means you're good at networking and interacting with people which means you're more likely to suceed in life and generate resources to properly care for eventual offspring. The basic logic behind mate selection is still sound
>>27793451
>Modern mate selection is based on social value
Social value is determined by a variety of other values, the most valued of which is money.
>we are no longer trying to survive we only wajt pleasurr
And that's only achievable through resources available or not?
>evolution doesn't work well if you remove survival from the equation.
Evolution happens in a set of species during desperate times and when it thrives.
>>27793476
I was using sunlight as an example. If you aren't aware how the word resource is used in biology you should talk to the grammar nazi.
>>27793484
Calm down. I'm not your enemy here. Not justifying anything just explaining basic biology.
>>27793519
And you used a terrible fucking example you dumb shit.
More sunlight =/= greater species diversity. you are blatantly wrong. we aren't talking about my awareness of anything, you argue that resources are not a part of the environment and you think that evolution happens when you have more sunshine. just shut the fuck up.
>>27793544
>you think that evolution happens when you have more sunshine
that part made me lol
>>27793505
>Social value is determined by a variety of other values, the most valued of which is money.
Wrong it's looks and social proof.
>Evolution happens in a set of species during desperate times and when it thrives.
So you will stop using "muh evolution" as an argument?
>>27793493
Social value is based on the fulfillment of society standards, artificial standards.
>>27793244
>Muh bad boy Chad will provide and protect me from chichuahuas and niggers
Go suck a dick
>>27793592
#triggered
#notallbetas
>>27793544
>And you used a terrible fucking example you dumb shit.
Calm down.
>you argue that resources are not a part of the environment
Never said that, I said that environments are formed by the resources available. Minerals are a resource, so that's why there's a lot of diversity in the deep sea.
>you think that evolution happens when you have more sunshine
I explained numerous times that evolution happens regardless of whether there are more sunshine or less. I also used forests as an example because forest environment relies on sunlight. Try reading.
>just shut the fuck up.
calm yourself sir
>>27793592
>he thinks modern women don't benefit from the defense/security of a strong partner
>foreveralone.jpg
>>27793617
Where are you from? I need to know which country produces such retards
>>27793627
Why so angry sir?
>>27793617
I said resources are a part of the environment. You said "nope"
Minerals are not why there's a lot of diversity in the deep sea.
forest environment does not rely on sunlight, and sunlight is a bad qualifier for species diversity. try READING
>>27793646
That guy is either a good troll or a genuine autist
I'm not sure which desu, if troll, very good troll
>>27792618
survival of the fittest [genes] is in fact real
Most of you dont understand how evolution and natural selection work.
Evolution is random: each time a new human (or any living being) is conceived, it is given a set of genes which slightly varies from its parents' genes, in a random fashion.
Afterwards, only humans with the right genes survive, and that's what we call the natural selection.
But,
It happens on a huge timeframe, not just some decades.
Which means, girls fucking Chads have nothing to do with genetics.
You have basically the exact same genes as all Chads, except for a slight minor random variation that noone can see or feel.
Girls fucking Chads has to do with trends
Tl;dr I don't give a fuck about science I just wanna fuck
>>27793697
best post
>>27793678
it doesn't matter because his english is so shit.
>>27793697
>this post
>this whole thread
JUST
>>27793620
>He thinks that women choose "strong" partners
>he believes that your average "playa" is able to protect himself and others
Man you need to understand something, women don't care about strength or resources, they only care about social proof. Social proof produces confidence and that's why women love confidence, they don't care about your strenghts or abilities, they only care about how many people are invested on you.
Highschool drug-dealers have social proof do you think they are strong?
>>27793603
Shaming the opposition is another way of opressing other men
>>27793691
>women
>caring about genes
Maybe "liberating" things wasn't such a good idea...
Well, those are burdens of past and future generations anyway. lets live for the moment and enjoy our lives!
>>27793646
>You said "nope"
My nope was to the logic behind that statement. Not the statement itself
>Minerals are not why there's a lot of diversity in the deep sea.
Can you tell me the reason without anything involving resources such bacteria or dead animals?
>forest environment does not rely on sunlight
Yes it does, photosynthesis is crucial to forests.
>>27793734
>implying social abilities aren't part of the genetic repertoire
>>2779372
>this thread= Trolling:the movie
Everyone is trolling. It's perfect chaos. Its beautiful
>>27793716
Grammar nazi's on 4chan. Not only that, but grammar nazi's flexing their e-peen. What a sight.
>>27791965
>>27792299
>>27792897
If you expect the world to be fair with you because you are fair, you're fooling yourself
That's like expecting a Tiger not to hurt you because you didn't hurt him.
Regardless of what is what, evolution is true and still determines life even if we're not cavemen anymore. Even though you guys like to insult me, I mean no one harm and apologize to those hurt by internet arguings. lol sry mister so bad englishlolololol
>>27793697
>evolution is random
you're thinking of mutation buddy boi
>not knowing about memetic evolution
see pic
>>27793745
the reasons for a simple fag like you are time and energy. resources are everywhere, it depends usually on how species interact that defines the diversity over time. but yes you god damn idiot, heat and radiation certainly are important. as important in the forest as it is in the fucking arctics.
pls don't be butthurt by bad english arguings lolololhahaha
>tfw people take interest in me for a week then get bored of me
>tfw they stop picking up if I call
>tfw your messages aren't even "seen"
>tfw your friends don't tell you when they go out and mingle with girls
I'm not completely silent, not that talkative but I participate in conversations usually with sharing my retarded opinions. I'm not good looking, barely presentable. I was rejected by a fat chick who wore braces at the age of 23.
I'll just play vidya, but it felt good to rant...
YES YES YES!!! KEEP KILLING EACH OTHER!!! I LOVE IT, ALL THIS HATE!!! KEEP FEEDING ME HATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111!!!!!!!!!!
>>27793809
>a simple fag like you
No reason for angries sir, lolololol
>resources are everywhere
Not all resources are equal, water is essential, but as you are so butthurt about, sunlight might not be.
>you god damn idiot
pls don't angry i no speak english hahahahaha
>as important in the forest as it is in the fucking arctics.
Both are essential and yet both have a very different amount of diversity. Comprende?
>>27791965
This is how the rules of engagement between men and women were for centuries
Guy approaches the woman, pursues her, wins her over.
Girl waits for interaction, could try and throw signals but for the most part must just accept what shows up around her.
With that kind of power in the dating game for a man you are going to look at women very differently then women look at finding a man.
It leads to a woman being more picky because they can't control who they get and it makes them fear settling much more than a guy that at any point can drop a girl and look else where if he so choose where if the girl drops the guy she's just left floating hoping those signals shes throws at the other guys take at all.
>>27793829
why don't you work on it?
>>27793877
>thinks he can troll with bad english
nah it doesn't quite do it for me.
>>27791965
All this silly infographic tells me is that men are more willing to settle and give up on standards for a fuck, yet you all bitch and moan about women because you don't live up to ours.
s m h, what a joke.
>>27793853
Don't forget to root for me since my engrish bad so i not like them so i underdog k?
>>27793898
Are you 12 or just a girl
>>27793906
The real world isn't one thing or the other. I told you i'm an underdog?
r u can read or just not smart?
>>27793894
men truly are the pathetic race.
>>27793898
AS LONG AS YOU CREATE AS MUCH CHAOS AND DESTRUCTION, I SHALL FAVOR YOU!!!!! I'M FUCKKING INSANE QUENCH MY THRIST FOR DESTRUCTION!!!11!!11!1!
>>27793890
i understand this and accept it, it's true.
but then comes in the human brain.
as humans, we don't have to keep perpetuating that. if a woman wants, she can pursue.
people who don't try to break the mold of their own biology are as basic as it gets and will get basic results.
>i'm hungry, i think i'll just keep eating and never exercise and i think i'll just become fat.
this is how 50% of the population thinks. they just fall into the mold of their own biology without even trying. fifty fucking percent.
>>27793894
>some men don't have standards
>you should meet women's standards or else you'll be an incel
>>27791965
that picture is inverted you failed cuck
genetic data indicates that, before civilization and "relationships", only 20% of the males would reproduce
we are literally living in the left picture and you could get a gf right now if you weren't "that guy who will take care of my chad's son when I want to settle down"
>>27793957
If you put half as much effort into yourself and dating as you do making shitty infographics about how unfair life is, maybe you'll get to be one of those little purple men with an arrow pointed at them.
lol.
HE DINDU NOFFING WRONG
/THREAD ORIGINAL COMMENTATO
>>27793893
Why should I care if it works on you?
>>27793893
>why don't you work on it?
Work on what?
Looks? I am but that's my body, However my weak chin and lazy eye can't be fixed with gains.
Personality?
I don't know what is wrong with it, and if I criticize my self I find everything wrong with it.
I'm 26, I try online dating every once and a while and I never got farther than messages. Publicly I was rejected too many times to try again.
My post was a rant, I'm sticking to online dating it's simple and it's done on the computer along with my work and entertainment/self loathing.
>>27793984
>we are literally living in the left picture and you could get a gf right now if you weren't "that guy who will take care of my chad's son when I want to settle down"
>implying you ever had a chance.
>>27794009
Women don't know anything about lesser males, i'm sure you are basing this out of those "10 millonaires that were poor" lists from Forbes
>>27793942
>we don't have to keep perpetuating that
true but the people around us are not clay. As a guy I am never interested in a girl that has approach me first.
Think how many anons here that can't take rejection? Now imagine a girl facing that rejection, might force you to go with the flow harder than you realize. Same with the flip of a guy that will just wait for a girl to come to him, he might just have a lot of lonely cafe' and beach side days.
And the eating/food thing you shared shows the bigger issues of adversity vs pleasure, yes we the majority can have bodies like the greek gods, we can have exactly what we want in success, love and life, but are we willing to walk that ring of fire? Are we going to hold the strength when the bad days rise up and put us in our worse moods?
That is why numbers can reach as many as half the population, they know how to fall off a horse, they just never learn how to get back on it.
>>27794053
yeah the online dating thing is cool lmao ;) but you should also go to social events. if you don't know whats wrong, start asking and then work on it.
WHY? WHY CANT WOMEN FUCK BETAS? THERES NO NEED TO SPREAD SUPERIOR GENES!!!!111111!!! IS NOT HARD PPLEEEASSSEEE
>>27793890
>if the girl drops the guy she's just left floating hoping those signals shes throws at the other guys take at all.
Sometimes I think this is why there is the cliche' that women have another man already lined up when they break it off with there current bf, they don't want to break it off and find out they can't get another guy to hook up with.
I think it's scummy as fuck those girls do that but I see what's causing it
>>27794102
raising chads kids takes a lot of energy and she can't spare any time on beta cucks until she is old enough to send those kids off to college.
>>27794081
they're not clay, just as dumb as clay.
i've had girls come to me. it makes no difference, i will hesitate to have sex with anyone i don't know or don't care about, again, fighting off the biological mold, exercising choice, that is human to me.
animals go: OKAY, LETS FUGG, then never talk to the other person again.
>>27794163
>humans are not animals
>its a struggle to say no to sex
what are you 13?
>>27794098
Anon, spare me your insight, even if you're genuinely trying to help, you're making it worse. I've accepted my place in the world, I go to sleep without thinking about it 5/7 nights a week and the rest I got pills for, which is good. I can live with online romances every once and a while.
Hypergamy not goopd
>>27794182
can you quote me word for word instead of taking my shit out of context and spinning into shit that doesn't even make sense?
if anything, you're the 13 year old in this situation.
>>27791965
1) you deserve zero
2) That chart is shockingly stupid and wrong.
>Pew, CDC, GSS, Ohio State, NHS, Birkbeck, and more all show that about 9% of men and women are virgins, about 12% of men and women have a very large number of sexual partners, and everyone else has about the same number
>The only ways that works is
>A) 12% of men are fucking a lot but almost exclusively the 'upper' 12% of women
>B) 12% of women are fucking a lot but almost exclusively in the 'upper' 12% of men
>C) about 9% of men and women are robots
>D) everyone else is having 1-5 partners among everyone else
>If 12% of the men were fucking 90% of the women there would be far more male virgins and men with a count of 1 or two than exists. Also, the 12% of women with a really high count would have to be fucking about 90% of the guys, which you tell me ain't happening.
This was total bullshit made up by a bitter, jealous loser that has no support other than 'it FEELS true!'.
>>27794212
>what are you 13?
>uhhhh NO YOU!
got him!
>>27794229
cool you really showed me nothing. have a nice day, lol.
>>27794102
because why should they when they could fuck something better
>>27794238
*nervous laughter*
>>27794163
For starters we as a culture have been "fighting off the biological mold" for about two centuries now. What you share is by most part common sense and only the most degraded would disapprove of the idea that you take value in your sex life not to hump every pretty ass you see. Really post modernism is a counter culture crying to go back to that more primal way of life, we succeed in two centuries of being better than mud huts only to have the population want to return to those ways at least on a human level.
Even if you had some revolutionary idea to change the rules of engagement it won't make the world turn an ear over night. They will not conform because a few people go against the flow, there are always challengers to test what is being encouraged it takes life times to shape that. We will be incredibly old or dead before we get to see how the next group will engage dating.
>>27794261
(You) A splendid reply!
You have always had shitty genes fat ass, I hope you die alone with cancer, in turn, chads deserve women because chads where given the right genetic combination, opportunities, and mental growth to attract women rightfully so.
>>27794217
Tl;dr
You are wrong, retard.
Kill yourself. Or leave /r9k/ at least .
>>27794217
>This was total bullshit made up by a bitter, jealous loser that has no support other than 'it FEELS true!'.
This should be an r9k banner.
>>27794296
*upvoted and gilded*
>>27794292
you gonna' start chanting "I can't hear you!"?
>>27794275
it isn't common sense for a lot of people and there are still a lot of single mothers, more and more each day, they don't value their sex life, they fuck every cute guy that comes around and puts up a good enough front.
what you're saying is also common sense: there is no "turning the world's ear" over night. everyone is going through a vicious cycle of phases, right now is the post-modern phase.
the "next group" will ping-pong all over the place just like we are.
Conforming is the problem here. no one knows what to conform to anymore, there are no leaders, so they conform to the closest, coolest scum.
>>27792026
Is sex a RIGHT? Yes and no.
Sex is a basic human need. People who are dreprived of sex suffer severe emotional and physical symptoms.
With other basic needs society recognises that people have to be provided them. If someone has no food then society is obligated to give them food. If someone has no shelter then society is obligated to give them shelter.
The big difference though is that 'society' cannot give someone sex. It has to be provided by an individual.
While people agree that no one should go without food, very few people agree that anyone who is hungry has the right to invite themselves to dinner at their home.
With other rights the obligation to provide them can be spread out through society via social programs, but with sex you cannot do that, it has to be provided for by an individual.
The obvious solution to this would be to legalize prostitution and let sex deprived people pay for sex but this is hard to do because women as a class oppose it.
Prostitution lowers the value of sex and makes it more freely available to men, this lowers the value of women. Feminism (which should be seen as a trade union for women) is usually opposed to legal prostitution. Even some 'sex positive'' feminists who supports legalizing female prostitutes still support criminalizing male customers of prostitutes.
It is these feminists who mostly loudly shout that 'no one has the right to sex'. Because giving people the right to have sex would lower the value of women as a class.
The suffering of low status sexless men is a neccessary part of maintaining the high price of female sexuality, usually at the cost of long term societal collapse, because as Gad Saad mentioned on his latest Joe Rogan Experience appearance, a society where most men are not mated will not be very peaceful.
Part of the bargain that is a (relatively) peaceful civilization involves leveling the sexual playing field by distributing women more evenly among men.
>>27794354
>still a lot of single mothers, more and more each day
actually numbers are dropping. There are fewer in the last five years.
They can't stop you. Just rape.
Women owe men sex. Their genitals were specifically made to procreate with men. If women become lesbians bc of feminism they are denying their own biology
>>27794605
I think I want to rape. Next 10/10 goddess who teases muh cock, Il berry my dick in her pussy and asshole and destroy both
>>27794421
>People who are dreprived of sex suffer severe emotional and physical symptoms.
Really?
Buddhist monks and nuns are celibate
Catholic priests, monks, and nuns are celibate
Hindu monks and nuns are celibate
>They all have better health and longer lives than people of the same age, race, income, etc. in the same culture
So - you're fucking wrong
>
The suffering of low status sexless men is a neccessary part of maintaining the high price of female sexuality
About the same percentage of women are lifelong virgins as men - what is THEIR virginity "paying for" in your imaginary world?
>Oh - that's right - you're stupid enough to believe OP's picture
>>27794659
U need sex to live. men have more chances of getting prostate cancer if they don't have regular sex. Even nature hates betas
>>27792026
>>27792313
>>27792336
>>27792345
When someone says that a man does not "deserve" and is not "entitled" to a woman, one of my first questions is "Do women deserve, or are they entitled to, men's financial support?"
Because that's the current system we live in right now: the welfare state forcibly transfers wealth from mostly tax paying men (60 odd percent of taxpayers are men) to mostly irresponsible and/or lazy women (60 odd percent of welfare recipients are women, and most Government """workers""" are women), usually to pay for these women's sexual and reproductive fuck ups.
Do these men get anything in return from these women? We have Government forcing men to support women, but is there Government mandated and funded prostitution that ensures those men sex in return for their support, as was the traditional bargain between the sexes?
No.
See, women are born with innate value; the womb and eggs. Men must *do* to have value. Woman is the human being, Man is the human doing.
A large part of our appeal as a mate comes from our potential as a provider. Women almost always want men above them in the socio-economic ladder.
So now imagine a woman who eats healthy and works out like a demon; yoga, cardio, kettlebells, etc several hours a week. She works for her sex appeal. Now imagine the Government sucking the fat out of a lazy Tumblr landwhale and pumping it into the healthy, sexy woman. The healthy sexy woman, who worked to stay appealing, is now fat. The fat lazy ham-planet is now thin and appealing.
This is what the Husband/Daddy State does to many men; it robs them of a big chunk of their value in the dating and mating market, and gives the hot loser who "spits tight game brah" the advantage and the ability to pump and dump woman after woman and leave Beta Bob the loyal taxpayer to foot the bill for him. This seen at its worst in the black community, but over the next 2 decades or so it will be the white population as well.
>>27793058
>You don't need a giant bearded hulk to protect you, shit I just bought a gun recently
Maybe in 200 thousand years when women have evolved to find guns attractive you'll get a gf.
>>27794704
>literally millions of monks, nuns, priests, etc. of religious groups all over the world
>They have long, healthy lives
>"Uneed secks 2 live"
Thanks for confirming your moron status
>>27794754
>do women deserve
no
the rest of your rambling is silly. plenty of men who don't deserve to get laid still do. i have a fatass friend who dropped out of high school literally harassing chicks for sex at parties and he often comes home with them.
>>27794655
Remember that rape is a part of youe religion and culture. Praise Allah
>>27794754
>I am going to confuse the welfare system of the one nation I live in with general ethical constraints, the post
Were you born this fucking stupid or did you attend classes?
>>27794781
How do you explain all the robots in here who are virgins and become an heroes? They died because lack of sex
>>27794659
>Buddhist monks and nuns are celibate
[Desperately citing outliers intensifies]
>Catholic priests, monks, and nuns are celibate
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>he actually believes this
Look, if you have any rebuttal by all means go ahead. Otherwise cut the snark and sack up.
In the current post-sexual liberation paradigm (so slow return to nature in the realm of relationships), you'll have an increasing number of human males unable to be mated, so you'll probably have more Elliot and Cho in the future, because without access to a mate (sex, affection and maybe reproduction), most men have no fundamental interest in society. Cheap bread and circuses are a good buffer, but if you want to avoid civil unrest, you'll have to add legalized cannabis and prostitution to that.
Either you're a tournament species or you're a civilization (marriage), you can't ask millions of males "just work, work, work, shut up and die alone without getting any recognition or affection while we give your taxes to Stacey to fund her orgies with Chad, Brad and Thad". This isn't sustainable. It's a wrongful termination of the social contract by letting women get men's support without giving any in return. Men who see soon enough that they have no place in society will drop out and those who break their back all their life expecting to get the package they were promised only to suddenly realize they've been lied to will snap.
I'm not an expert but unless the powers that be implement Brave New World-type behavior control measures, you can be sure that it's going to get real supreme in the western world in the next few decades.
>>27794808
I'm actually Swedish but the blood of Vikings pillaging and raping the women of foreign lands runs in my veins
>>27794864
The only thing running in your veins is Islamic cum.
>>27794843
it will be sustainable though. we already keep most of you at your computers all day after work. nobody cares about elliot or cho coming up once in a hundred lifetimes, there are far more chads who go on murder sprees or abuse people anyway.
>>27793768
A tiger can't be held to ethical standards because he is incapable of understanding them.
>>27792482
Additionally this means that there is a growing market for male sex robots which in turn increases the demand for that market.
>>27794893
Nigga you right Im getting cucked by these rapefugees but I have to give asylum bc multiculturalism is gud ALLAHU AKBAR INFIDEL
>>27794813
>one nation
More like most of Western civilization, son.
Answer the question: Do women deserve, or are they entitled to, men's financial support in exchange for nothing?
If the answer is no, you can stop posting now.
If it's yes, you can stop posting and find the nearest ceiling fan to hang yourself from.
>>27794943
>damage control: max
>>27794836
the HKVs of arcanine will be the first to tell you that their issue is themselves. And if lack of sex is enough to make you suck on a shotgun there are about 90 other things that would have done it, too.
Lack of sex is not actually bad for you. Stop pretending.
I mean, look at this faggot
>>27794843
who thinks 'personal incredulity' is an argument! He states bullshit like
>In the current post-sexual liberation paradigm (so slow return to nature in the realm of relationships), you'll have an increasing number of human males unable to be mated
which totally ignores the fact that the percentage of male virgins is essentially identical to the number of female virgins AND dismisses the fact that female virginity is *increasing* for the last decade while the number of single mothers has been *decreasing* for the last 8 years.
Add in the fact that the overwhelming majority of single mothers are Black, Hispanic, or American Indian and, well - he doesn't even realize how stupid he sounds.
Of course, he's just parroting some PUA website, wo how the fuck would he know?
>>27794943
FFS, I can smell the cheap-ass spaghetti over TCP/IP
>>27794943
>"Women owe me pity sex because welfare exists"
quick question - how much are you making in neetbux a month?
I mean, you obviously aren't allowed out without a wrangler.
>>27791965
For posterity, genecuck.
>>27795025
>while the number of single mothers has been *decreasing* for the last 8 years.
Why are you spewing lies like that?
http://www.familyfacts.org/charts/135/more-than-one-in-four-children-live-in-a-single-parent-home
>>27795144
>hurr durr, google doesn't exist
Instead of going to some POS blog try the CDC and their actual fucking science
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db162.pdf
Awwww - look at that, the report is even titled
"Recent Declines in Non-Marital Childbearing"
What's next, a post from Return of Kings that misuses the words 'hypergamy', 'solipsism', and 'psychology'?
>>27795144
let me guess, you also wrote
>>27794843
right?
protip: read an actual book.
>>27794911
It won't be sustainable just from a financial standpoint, let alone a "guys getting pissed off and dropping out/fucking your shit up" standpoint. The welfare state is expensive, let alone the war machine and other shit.
And if men keep dropping out of higher education and high earning jobs like they are, combined with the fact that women generally don't work as much or as hard as men which means they won't make up the deficit, the tax base will erode even further.
There's no scenario where this plays out as a long term viable strategy.
>>27795025
Get real kid.
The majority of single moms are minorities and I stated such, but I also stated that in the coming years the difference will wash out and whites be as fucked as the others.
Don't take it from me, take it from a fucking professor at the University of Toronto, Dr. Jordan B. Peterson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7uYengUXFG0
watch the whole thing, it'll be good for you :^)
>male virgins
It's not just about fucking, it's about being *mated*. Fucking once =/= "mated".
Dr. Chris Ryan and Dr. Gad Saad have talked about many tribes around the world that understand what you can't seem to. They have social conventions in place to make sure as many men as possible are being mated and therefore have a stake in the tribe.
One tribe has a custom where the each woman, I shit you not, goes up to a dude in a hammock or a tent or whatever and tells him that if goes hunting and brings back some meat, she'll fuck his brains out that night. When they go out and hunt, they butcher their kills before returning to the village and every man is handed a piece of meat, so that when they walk into the village they all get credit and all get pussy.
Another tribe, I think in Peru or Tibet, has "fraternal polyandry". This means brothers fucking the same woman, so that even if not every man reproduces, his DNA is still propagated and he still has some investment in the baby and the tribe.
>all the retards ITT
it's a pretty well-established fact that civilization is built on a beta male labor surplus which is built on the institution of traditional (provider) marriage, which is of course built on an exchange of sex for that labor surplus.
but i guess if i had to explain it to you dumb cunts like you were a five-year-old, i would ask what technologies and institutions make up what you'd call "civilization," and what jobs make those things possible, and then which gender it is that overwhelmingly does those types of jobs, and then the reason that men ever bothered producing more than they need just to survive to begin with.
>>27795294
This paper is not talking about single mothers.
If you cannot point out a number that refutes the above you are only strawmanning the discussion.
This thread... Its insane... its a kafkaesque nightmare... the system...its' real...theres no escape...might as well become an hero
>>27795345
> in the coming years the difference will wash out and whites be as fucked as the others
Bullshit - and your little youtube video from a psychologist doesn't do shit about the work of demographers or the trends seen that single motherhood is declining among Whites, the educated, and non-Protestant religious minorities.
>I have no idea why you posted a psychologist that specializes in myth to discuss demographics.... Oh, yeah - you're a dolt
.
>Ryan and Saad
>More psychologists
What,, you think psychologists know things about population trends?
Oh, and I do love that you write
>Fucking once =/= "mated".
and three lines later equate fucking once with mating.
Further, if you look at marriage rates plus cohabitation rates the actual decline on men in long-term sexual relations has declined from 1970 to 2010 a blistering - 2%.
Sure, marriage is down 20% for men 25-50 but living together is waaaaaay up, so - yeah.
Also, you want to get some of the MGTOW babblers in here to discuss how they don't want to "mate" (or whichever instantly reversible term you want to use)?
>>27795454
>Paper discusses non-marital childbirth
>you think that doesn't mean single mothers
So, unless you are not a native speaker of English AND didn't read the actual report, please report to the sterilization center to remove your sub-75 IQ from the gene pool.
>Pro-tip - what do you call a woman who isn't married, has a kid, and raises it by herself...?
>>27791965
>deserve
Go vote for Bernie a man deserves nothing but the right to live and succeed or fail on his merits
Your right is liberty, but liberty doesn't garuntee anything.
This is probably why women don't like you, you are a whiney bitch
>>27795700
Equating nonmartial childbirth to ALL single mothers is intellectually dishonest. nonmartial childbirth is only a sub set of ALL single mothers.
>>27791965
That picture makes no sense
70% of men aren't virgins.
>>27794421
>decks a basic human need
No, water, food, oxygen, and shelter are basic human needs
You cannot die from lack of sex
>>27795757
>I didn't read it
FTFY
the paper distinguishes between cohabiting and non-cohabitating.
The more you write the more you prove you didn't read/understand it.
>>27795800
You are still talking about child births and not the current amount of single mothers.
>>27795785
>You cannot die from lack of sex.
Other people can.
>>27795842
To be clear: you are talking about the derivative of the amount of single mothers. A decline in change doesn't necessitate a decline in absolute numbers.
>>27795647
Google, you dumb cunt.
If you won't listen to legit authorities on the matter and want to move goalposts while posting snarky pics, you're fucking hopeless.
This is the 2nd and last time I come to this shit-hole.
And as for
>and three lines later equate fucking once with mating.
you need to brush up on your reading comp; it's a common practice of that tribe which they practice regularly...why the fuck would they only do it once?
I'm sorry you didn't get enough oxygen at birth, but god damn.
>>27792026
if only one could report for shitposting
>>27795842
Anon
>The number of unmarried women who do not live with a long-term boyfriend having children is declining, here is the proof
You
>What does that have to do with single mothers?
This entire thread in a nutshell.
>>27795975
Childbirths are single unique events.
Single mothers are living states for roughly 18 years. They are fundamentally two different things.
I am not sure why you are so active in your usage of derogatory terms, but to each his own.
>>27793058
why did you choose photo of a bastard child human and elf-pig?
women confirmed for shit taste again.
fuck logic
>>27795941
>Guy posts links to demographic studies
>You post a psychologist
>you whine about 'legit authorities'
LOL
so you think a FWB once a month is 'mating'?
No wonder you think psychologists know everything - you're mental
traditional monogamous patriarchal Christian influence doesn't look all that bad now does it?
the real beta uprising happened with Christ, a virgin like Elliot who died for our sins.
the beta uprising is not yet to start, but has finished with the return of pagan hypergamy.
the rupture of western social fabric is a direct result of spiritual treason by the aristocracy. The post-Christian civilization we are entering is going to be a rough ride.
You think hypergamy is bad? Just you wait until Chad throws you into the arena to be torn by mutated animals while Stacey watches.
The sexual liberation will trickle down they said...
>>27795941
>On an imageboard
>bitching about a guy posting images
Really?
What's next, you going to /a/ and wondering why everyone is talking about Japan?
>>27796010
>your usage of derogatory terms
First - I used no derogatory terms
Next - pretentious much?
>>27796074
Now you are denying to be disrespectful ITT.
>>27791965
>deserve
here's a reply to your bait thread you dumb nigger
/threading this
>>27792969
>as a perfectly normal well adjusted men it's almost impossible
Ok just stop right there because no it really isn't.
>>27791965
The worst part is that women are usually incompetent parents, so the Chad genetics end up being wasted anyway.
>>27796211
so right
>>27796211
This is what single-parenthood tends to result in.
