Ever since the school shooting, the state of this board has become a mix of /soc/ and /r9k/, so I propose /wiz/, a board specifically catered to us robots as a community.
Thread is up at /qa/
link:
>>>/qa/421781
Discuss
what school shooting
>>26007935
Oregon school shooting where the guy posted on /r9k/ before doing it.
It spawned a bunch of memes and the news mentioned /r9k/ periodically, bringing a bunch of new people here kind of like how project chanology ruined /b/
>>26007906
There seems to be no reason not to. It's a trial board after all
Current rules set for the board:
1) Posters cannot reference themselves as non-virgins or women
2) all images are SFW
Any other suggestions?
>>26007906
so wizardchan?
>>26008018
We used to be a form of wizardChan bUT then the normies attacked
>>26008061
>SFW
You already blew it, retard. Nice shit board you have there.
>>26008108
It prevents it from just becoming a porn board and stops the BLACKED cuck spammers.
>>26007906
sounds good, I already wanna shitpost the fuck out of it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36odfqA-Xqw
>>26008114
Why would I wanna browse a website where porn, gore and hentai is not allowed?
I'd rather be a smart guy and use the filter if I have a problem with shit like cuckold or traps.
Faggots should be prohibited as well, if you want the board to work.
>>26008165
Then feel free to post it in the /qa/ thread
this whole idea is just starting out and we need to plan it out so it ideally suits the robots of /r9k/.
>>26008084
Meant for >>26008068
Bloooooxxxxx blocks blocks
>>26008176
I don't give enough of a fuck.
Sure, it'd be nice to have a robot board, but it'll most likely blow. I mean, the first thing you think of is making it SFW?
Nah shit will definitely blow. I'm not wasting my time cross boarding.
>actually expecting a board to be created and enforce no women, NEET tears, and virgins only
you're delusional
>>26008061
It will never ever be created. Think about it for one fucking second. Those rules go against the very nature of 4chan. Every board is open to everyone. There is not one board where only certain types of people are allowed to post. A "no girls allowed" rule or anything similar would completely be what 4chan is not about.
If you don't like non-virgins on /r9k/, then either ignore them or fuck off to wizchan.
Posting here to add my IP.
>>26007996
he actually never did post that. It was just a coincidence.
>>26008360
/mlp/
/lgbt/
boards explicitly created for a particular community
>>26008360
Maybe it should be a sort of thematic board about virginity instead of a robot club?
Like, just as /sp/ is sports and /mu/ is music, this board should be about being a virgin.
wizchan is already a thing
there does not need to be a new board here
idiot
>>26008061
you fucking failure.
why the fuck would I want a sfw board?
>>26007906
I'd be really happy with this, /r9k/ was better before people thought it was a place just to feel sorry about yourself. Might actually make this board better if we get rid of these people.
>>26008402
So far these are the rules from the /qa/ thread (SFW has been removed)
Proposed Rules:
1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women
2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are not virgins
3) No gay threads (take it to /lgbt/)
4) Nothing designated as normie-posting (referencing having an active social life and talking about it/insulting robots for being robots and praising normalfaggotry)
5) advice threads and camwhoring/hookup/"rate me" threads should go on /adv/ - Advice and /soc/ - Cams & Meetups respectively.
I think we can agree on that
>>26008418
Robots in normie situations is what makes this board great.
Your shit is just gonna be a bunch of retards posting comfy threads.
Eliminate the virgin qualifier. Robots who got lucky once or twice or paid a hooker can still be robots.
Change it to GF. Too many normalfags on here talk about having gfs.
Watching other robots try to wrestle with social situations is why I come here. Take that away and you're left with nothing but the shit posting.
>>26008383
>>26008395
boards about certain interests don't have rules saying you need to be a certain demographic to post there, which is what you're trying to do and won't happen
>>26008418
>Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women
>Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are not virgins
>Nothing designated as normie-posting (referencing having an active social life and talking about it/insulting robots for being robots and praising normalfaggotry)
>he thinks this shit would actually make it as rules
Bumping for the well being of robots.
>>26008485
>Robots in normie situations is what makes this board great.
yes, hence the 'active social life' bit. We can understand robots being in normie situations.
>Eliminate the virgin qualifier.
I think we should only go so far as to allow people that have fucked hookers. If a robot got lucky once, he should keep it to himself. I don't want a snowball effect. You can only open the floodgates so much
>>26008486
That's why I'm saying it shouldn't target a certain demographic and just be a board whose theme is virginity.
That'd keep normies away anyways, since it's not about being a "robot" which attracts normies, but about being a virgin, which is something normalfags don't relate with.
>>26008486
these people are *literally* asking for a safe space, on 4chan of all places. As much as i'd love this to happen it's so fucking obvious it won't
>>26008486
>boards about certain interests
yes, because being gay is just an interest.
Hold on, let me go make a thread for straight people on /lgbt/
>>26008418
I like it but I agree with this anon>>26008485 for the same reasons. Make mentioning gfs or relationships bannable but hooker threads ok.
>>26008585
updated rules
>>>/qa/421874
>>26008585
I think mentioning relationships should be ok because I had a gf in preschool.
Some people randomly get a gf and don't have sex. Sex should be where we draw the line.
>>26008648
>>26008585
I think it's easiest if you just generalize it and ban anything that hurts your feelings or challenges your worldview.
>>26008670
so far no one has proposed that, normie
The rules are fairly broad and just regard the demographic
>>>/qa/421877
Seriously, why do you even come to /r9k/ if we upset you that much?
>>26008535
4chan is already a safe space you fucking retard.
It wouldn't expect you to understand.
>>26007906
>Ever since the school shooting, the state of this board has become a mix of /soc/ and /r9k/, so I propose /wiz/, a board specifically catered to us robots as a community.
nah man just go some obscure imageboard sure traffic is low but normalfags will eventually plague that board if it got made. 4chan is fucking normalfag center now
>>26008291
nah you just want to fap to cucks and trap porns
>>26008383
Anyone can post on /mlp/ or /lgbt/. Show me the rule on /lgbt/ that says "no straight people allowed".
You completely missed the point. It's against everything 4chan is about to create a board where only a certain demographic is allowed.
>>26008745
>It's against everything 4chan is about
>4chan originally created by moot so he could talk about weeb shit with his friends
>It's against everything 4chan is about
>>26008745
You're a fucking idiot.
Anyone can use the board. They just can't say that they aren't a male virgin.
If I started a thread saying I was female and wanted attention, it would be the same as going to /v/ and starting a thread about Toradora.
>>26008761
Yes, moot would totally have created such a board.
>rolleyes.jpg
>>26008796
yeah well moot is gone. Hiroshima has the last word now
>>26008761
but but 4chan is about trolling for them epic maymay and free speech man fuck this website and what it stands for
>>26008785
Just like mentioning you're straight on /lgbt/ gets you banned. Right?
>>26007906
>You will never browse r9k in the months following elliot rodger's shooting
That was r9k at it's peak.
>>26008815
Well you would know since it's your home board.
Maybe you should return there now.
How about we create a new board called /chad/ instead.
>no virgins allowed
>no poorfags
>no mentally ill people
>>26008857
so /soc/?
>>26008382
It was more than factual that he did post that.
>>26008862
>no mentally ill people
>>26008868
Everyone on /soc/ has NPD.
>>26008682
Every rule so far falls under one or both of those.
>why do you even come to /r9k/ if we upset you that much?
I'm not upset by who or what you are, I just find it pathetic when people want to shut out anything that doesn't agree with them. Like the kids on college campuses banning speakers when they don't like what they have to say. I probably vaue open discourse more than anything and it's hard for me to empathize with people who get triggered like this.
>>26008896
We're not banning you though. We're trying to leave.
I don't want your empathy either. All normalfags ever do is shit on us.
>>26008857
That's called real life
>>26008896
we want a community of fellow social outcasts. That is all. You are welcome to join the board, but don't go in simply to boast about having fucked women and gone to parties and stuff like that.
We're all virgins who can't socialize well in real life. You won't fit in if you do that.
>>26008670
That's exactly what OP wants.
>waaaaahhh ban anyone I don't like
/r9k/ was never made to be a hangout for angry virgin failures of life. If you can't tolerate normies posting, then fuck off to wizchan.
>>26008924
I just understand now. Normies are not here to shit on us, they're here because they like us. That's why they don't want us to leave.
Imagine /r9k/ with no robots. The board would die, and the board with no normies would be the place all the cool kids are at, discussing suicide and loneliness.
>>26008936
What's wrong with wizchan?
>>26008924
You would be banning me if I were a girl.
Also, I don't qualify as a normie, I'm just not one of the NEETs who blames the world for his shortcomings.
>>26008353
disgusting piss flapped roastie detected
You risk upsetting the balance of meme magic. You might unknowingly create a neckbeard shit hole.
>>26008896
I get sick of coming to r9k and seeing threads related
>>26008919
>>26006605
>>26008162
>>26008054
in the same way "unoriginality" is banned blatant normal shit stuff like "my gf" stories should be anathema
>>26008061
Sfw is good. Otherwise the retardd will just spam it to 50% porn content. Don't listen to the half-brains who probably contribute nothing good to the board.
>>26009010
I'm pretty sure those are all bait threads dude.
>>26009019
rules are still up for discussion. Just post in the /qa/ about it.
We ban femposting and filter the word fembot. We make this board exclusively for robots again and kick out the /b/kiddies who think they can post here
And if not, we can force a limit to normie threads by making it a ratio of 5 Robot threads to 1 normie thread to preserve our board culture
Tbqh senpai we don't need a new board, we just need mods to permaban anyone who's obviously a normie (SJWs, people with girlfriends that aren't practice gfs, anyone bragging about their social life, "red flags for guys" threads, etc.).
>>26009021
That doesnt change the fact that they shit up the catalog
>yfw the female&non-virgin apologists are the same fucking beta orbiters spamming r9k with fem""""""bot"""""" threads and soc-threads in order to thirst after every fem'"""""bot"""""" that posts
Kill yourselves faggots.
>>26009097
Just one tiny little detail. Where does it say in the rules that normies are not allowed?
>>26009058
Sorry, this board was never intended for kissless virgins to feel sorry for themselves. Don't worry though, you can still have your safe space, it just needs to be a different board to /r9k/!
>>26009231
This is true, but that is what its primary theme has evolved into, especially after r9k was recreated.
>>26008108
people abuse NSFW boards. do you really want half out board to be mindless black dick and tranny spam? fuck off to one of the many porn boards if you need to jerk of you fucking normie
>>26010420
And now it's evolving into something else.
>>26008972
>implying there is anyone on /wizchan/ that's actually a wizard
It's a bunch of depressed 18-22 year old fuckups that think they might possibly be wizards some day.
There is no where for such a small group as actual wizards to meet anonymously on the internet. It will be ruined by normalfags and dipshit kids trying to feel special.
>>26008061
DISABLE TRIPFUCKS!!!
>>26008863
source?
dfdohij0th0495905y4ydf
the new board shouldn't be called /wiz/
It should be something like /khv/
I rather have a /NEET/ board. A wizard board will turn into PUAhate.
>>26010719
yeah robot tolerant NEET board
am i the only one here who cannot stand
tripwhores?
>>26009007
don't be mad that this board will never be created. the rules are all just "ban people who say they're from groups I don't like", which is completely different from the rules of any other board. you robots aren't special snowflakes, you have to deal with 4chan being an open platform for anyone to post just like everyone else
>>26010594
U mad white boi?
Stay mad
>>26007906
I second this idea.
>>26010594
Remove name field entirely, like on /b/ and /trash/.
>>26008418
I think it could be ok to post having had a social life and some success in the past (childhood/adolescence) as long as the poster doesn't imply that he's not a virgin and he doesn't insult robots or praise normalfaggotry.
>>26010708
Yes. /wiz/ implies it's for posters aged 30 and over.
>>26009231
and /new/ wasn't intended for stormfags too, board culture changes faggot
>>26007906
>the school shooting
>the
I know you're referring to Umpqua but holy shit, this is America; there are a lot of school shootings.
>>26013811
At least moot accepted this and replaced /new/ with /pol/.
>>26007906
Proposed Rules:
1) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are women
2) Posters cannot reference themselves as or imply that they are not virgins (only exceptions being having sex with hookers)
3) No gay threads (take it to /lgbt/)
4) Nothing designated as normie-posting (referencing having an active social life and talking about it/insulting robots for being robots and praising normalfaggotry)
5. No frogposting
6. No anime posting
7. No porn
8. No trap threads
9. No MLP shit
10. No wagecuck threads
Remove r9k and all real virgins go to wizchan.
>>26014696
tl;dr version:
1. Ban anyone I don't like.
>>26014696
Where do frogposters go? Should a /pepe/ board be created for them?
I'm a normie and I'm happy about this choice
r9k is for original comment and not pathetic whining about Chads and Stacey ruling the society and tfw no gf
>>26013811
Has /pol/ ever asked mods to ban everyone who disagrees with them?
