Let's talk about our political views.
Do not, I mean DO NOT trounce your presidential candidate around. I want what YOU think. Regardless of alignment.
Here's a survey. Please put "Y" if you support it and "N" if you do not. If you have a reason then please go ahead.
>Gay marriage
>Gun rights
>Legalization of marijuana
>Legalization of all drugs
>Tighter immigration laws
>Wall?
>Public medicine
>TPP
>Common core
>Allowing refugees into the country
>Feminist?
>Should Hillary be indicted?
>>29428048
And I'll do mine really quick
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
Y
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage - Y
>Gun rights - Y
>Legalization of marijuana - Y
>Legalization of all drugs - N
>Tighter immigration laws - Y
>Wall? If possible
>Public medicine - Y
>TPP - N
>Common core -N
>Allowing refugees into the country - Limited amount, families only, no single men
>Feminist? N
>Should Hillary be indicted? Y
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
N
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
Y
>Common core
N
>Allowing refuges into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
N
>>29428048
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Not on the scale that I imagine a lot of people imagine, but rebuilding our borders is a good idea.
Y
N
Education should be completely redone
Yes but on an extremely limited basis involving screening.
N
Y
Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Idk, but less penalties and more recovery for users, do something hard to dealers on an El Chapo level
>Tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall?
N, remove borders and dispose of elites, make new world
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
Idk, no as it is now
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y
>Feminist?
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y, as a war criminal
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
doesn't make sense but I'm down for increased border security
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
only in a sane way, I think women should be able to vote, have rights, etc.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
is anyone going to actual read/respond to any of this?
>>29428614
Sure.
You're a cuck.
>Gay marriage
Yes for a Gov institution, no for a religious institution
>Gun rights
Yes
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes
>Legalization of all drugs
Maybe
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes
>Wall?
BUILD THE GODDAMN WALL DONALD
>Public medicine
Some
>TPP
No
>Common core
NO
>Allowing refugees into the country
No
>Feminist?
No
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes
What's wrong with common core???
>>29428668
it just doesn't work
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
N doesn't affect me so i don't care about it
>>Gun rights
N doesn't affect me so i don't care about it
>>Legalization of marijuana
Y would make getting it easier
>>Legalization of all drugs
Y would make getting them easier
>>Tighter immigration laws
N doesn't affect me do not care
>>Wall?
what?
>>Public medicine
?? medicine is public, right?
>>TPP
??
>>Common core
??
>>Allowing refugees into the country
??
>>Feminist?
N feminism is useless
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
??
>>29428641
well_memed_my_friend.png
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
N if stonerfags werent annoying as shit maybe, personally i couldn't care less because i dont smoke
>Legalization of all drugs
N this ones just retarded
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
i dont know about a wall but as >>29428614 said increased border security is nice
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
this >>29428091 and >>29428143
>Feminist?
i dont care
women should have rights and all that jazz and shouldnt be kept as rape prisoners but being a homemaker and not whoring around should be a priority
>>29428668
Let's say you have a house. After a few years, it's falling apart. You then decide to commission someone to build you a new house. This person cuts all corners, all regulations, all common sense in regards to house-building and shows you a house that looks like a Picasso painting had anal sex with a Pollock painting. You reluctantly accept and pay him, even though the house begins to fall apart right in front of you.
This is common core. A broken, untenable house.
Should be obvious who I support.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Yes
>Gun rights
No
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes
>Legalization of all drugs
Yes
>Tighter immigration laws
No
>Wall?
No
>Public medicine
Yes
>TPP
Unknown
>Common core
Unknown
>Allowing refugees into the country
Yes
>Feminist?
Yes
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Unknown
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Yes
>Gun rights
Yes
>Legalization of marijuana
Sure why not, I dont really feel strongly about this at all.
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes
>Wall?
Yeah, increased border security and preventing illegal immigration as much as possible are both important
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
Not a problem at all
>>Gun rights
They should be much harder to get in America, very very fucking difficult. Most all guns should be in the military.
>>Legalization of marijuana
I fucking hate marijuana but yeah sure that's fine.
>>Legalization of all drugs
No.
>>Tighter immigration laws
Abso-fuckin-lutely baby. Real fuckin tight.
>>Wall?
It's so impractical I can't imagine it really working, but if someone thought of a good way to do it sure, I'd support it.
>>Public medicine
This needs to change a lot in America. We should be helping everyone that legally lives here without bleeding them so fucking dry.
>>TPP
I'm not very well versed on this yet but it seems kind of weird to me.
>>Common core
Sounds pretty shitty to me but I seriously have almost no faith in the education system anymore and would pity the children if they weren't such shit already.
>>Allowing refugees into the country
I'm not very supportive of that.
>>Feminist?
No. The whole thing is ridiculous.
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes.
>Gay marriage
Yes
>Gun rights
Too broad. People should be allowed guns but it should be harder to get them. There needs to be strict licensing like with cars or something.
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes, controlled obviously
>Legalization of all drugs
Yes, controlled obviously
>Tighter immigration laws
I don't know a lot about the US' immigration laws.
>Wall?
lol no.
>Public medicine
Yes
>TPP
Yes, but I'm not too informed on the minute detail
>Common core
So long as it meets an acceptable standard. US is lagging embarassingly behind in education for a nation of its stature
>Allowing refugees into the country
After screening
>Feminist?
No
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y, but to an extent. Anti-civilians having assault rifles.
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
N/A, uninformed
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N/A
>TPP
N/A
>Common core
N/A
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y, to an extent.
>Feminist?
Depends on your definition.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29428048
Gay marriage: Y
Gun rights: Y
Legalization of marijuana: Y
Legalization of all drugs: Y
Tighter immigration laws: Y*
Wall: N
Public medicine: Y
TPP: N
Common core: N*
Allowing refugees: Y*
Feminist: N
Hillary Indictment: N
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y, with background c h e c c
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
N, but I live in US, I think it should be tighter in europe
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
Y? give more details to the public first, but I generally support free trade
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y
>Feminist?
eh. equal treatment under law with no legally mandated equal treatment. take that as you will
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y/N
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted?
N
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N (but definitely others besides marijunana)
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
fuck no
>Feminist?
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted?
don't know enough about it to say
>mfw there are globalist pieces of shit in this thread actually supporting TPP
>In May 2015, Nobel prize winning economist Paul Krugman expressed concern that the TPP would tighten the patent laws and allow corporations such as big pharmaceutical companies and Hollywood to gain advantages, in terms of increasing rewards, at the cost of consumers, and that people in developing countries would not be able to access the medicines under the TPP regime. He also pointed out that the TPP would allow multinational corporations to sue national governments, and have cases where group of people who are privately elected can judge.
>>29428048
>gay marriage
Y
>gun rights
Much too oversimplified. The issue is far more complex than pro or anti. It's about the level of regulation wanted. Very few people are legitimately arguing for an outright gun ban.
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall
N
>Public Medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common Core
N, at least not without major reform
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y
>Feminist
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted
Y
>>29429066
they're probably Loos staying here with their h1b visa
>Gay marriage
No.
>Gun rights
Yes.
>Legalization of marijuana
No.
>Legalization of all drugs
No.
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes.
>Wall?
Yes.
>Public medicine
Depends.
>TPP
No.
>Common core
No.
>Allowing refugees into the country
No.
>Feminist?
No.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
No.
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y, but background checks need to be more strictly enforced
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N, but clinics that offer safe practice should be made
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
Idk
>Common core
Y, American education system is so fucking broken and stupid you could pass without learning a single thing
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y
>Feminist?
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted?
N
>all these communist reddit cucks ITT
>>29428684
Whoa dude it's like you're not even trying not to be a total piece of shit.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y and N, I would say tighter regulation etc, but I know it won't work in America, the country has already dug itself too deep in gun culture to recover so I currently I'd say yes to supporting gun rights.
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N, but support changing laws to recognize it as a mental health issue instead of a criminal issue. A crack addict should be seen the same way as someone with depression, not like a murderer.
>Tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
Y, though more of a two tier system. Allow private system to continue for those who can and want to afford premium service, but make a public system funded by taxes for those who can't afford better than basic care.
>TPP
N
>Common core
Y
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y, temporarily and monitored. Have refugee centers for them to stay in until the conflict is over and they can go home.
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Yes
>Gun rights
No
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes
>Legalization of all drugs
No
>Tighter immigration laws
No
>Wall?
Hell no
>Public medicine
Yes
>TPP
No
>Common core
No
>Allowing refugees into the country
Yes
>Feminist?
Yes
>Should Hillary be indicted?
I don't know
>Gay marriage
yes
>Gun rights
yes
>Legalization of marijuana
yes
>Legalization of all drugs
no
>Tighter immigration laws
yes
>Wall?
yes
>Public medicine
yes
>TPP
no
>Common core
idk
>Allowing refugees into the country
yes
>Feminist?
no
>Should Hillary be indicted?
yes
>>29429214
Low quality desu.
FUCKING REDDIT LIBERAL KEKS GO BACK TO LEREDDIT FUUUCKASEF G\fafagfasdgsaeb7672y2e5 ywe y
Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
N
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Yes
>Gun rights
Yes
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes
>Legalization of all drugs
Yes
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes
>Wall?
Walls are also to keep people in, so no
>Public medicine
No
>TPP
No
>Common core
No
>Allowing refugees into the country
No
>Feminist?
No
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes
Im a protectionist social liberal fiscal conservatice who believes in strict adherence to the constitution.
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>>Legalization of all drugs
N (Decriminalize)
>>Tighter immigration laws
Y (Anyone should be allowed to immigrate but should be documented and skills should be taken into account)
>Wall?
Unsure, don't think it would actually change anything due to cartel tunnels and most of california runs on illegal immigrant workers
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y (But they should be heavily documented)
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
government should stay out of marriage, none of anybodies business who marries who
>>Gun rights
i ought to buy as many belt fed machine guns as i damn well please, shall not be infringed motherfucker
>>Legalization of marijuana
government stay out of my body
>>Legalization of all drugs
government stay out of my body
>>Tighter immigration laws
anybody should have the opportunity to enter the country.
>>Wall?
nah
>>Public medicine
government stay out of my body
>>TPP
dont know enough
>>Common core
get rid of public schools
>>Allowing refugees into the country
if theyre not crazy or terrorists or whatever
>>Feminist?
all women have the same rights as men.abortion is a moral wrong, but women should be able to get as many abortions as they want, but no public money allocated to any health services
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
maybe
>>29429386
>literal lolbertarian
I honestly can't tell if you're autistic enough to believe the novel you wrote there
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
N
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Government shouldn't be involved in marriage.
>Gun rights
"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
I'm not part of the investigation and don't have enough information to know. I'd like her to be, but I don't know if she should be.
>>29428048
>Gay Marriage
Ye
>Gun Rights
Pro-2A
>Marijuana Legalization
Medical
>Legalization of all drugs
No
>Tighter immigration laws
Ye
>Wall?
I'd be down
>Public medicine
Could be done better
>TPP
nah
>Common Core
nope
>Allowing refugees into the country
nope
>Feminist?
I don't care that much
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Ye, but it probably won't happen
>>29429422
fuck off statist
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
yes
>>Gun rights
more limited
>>Legalization of marijuana
yes
>>Legalization of all drugs
decriminalize
>>Tighter immigration laws
laxer
>>Wall?
lol
>>Public medicine
paid for with taxes
>>TPP
no get away from fossil fuels
>>Common core
don't know never looked into it
>>Allowing refugees into the country
yeah
>>Feminist?
yeah
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
maybe i'd rather have her than trump
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
N
>Legalization of marijuana
N
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
Y
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
Only families, no single men, women or children over 11
>Feminist?
Women should have rights, but should be first and foremost homemakers, no whores/prostitutes/porn/etc.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29429422
Kill yourself, filthy statist scum.
>>29429489
Changing this, no TTP.
>>Gay marriage
N
>>Gun rights
Y
>>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>>Wall?
N
>>Public medicine
N
>>TPP
N
>>Common core
N
>>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>>Feminist?
what? I don't support modern feminism
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29428063
>Gay marriage
Yes
>Gun rights
No
>Legalization of marijuana
Abstain
>Legalization of all drugs
No
>Tighter immigration laws
Abstain
>Wall?
No - economically makes no sense
>Public medicine
Yes
>TPP
Abstain
>Common core
Abstain
>Allowing refugees into the country
Yes - as long as they can assimilate
>Feminist?
No - Modern feminism is cancer
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Abstain
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y (don't really care about it)
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N (If you get immigration laws right and actually enforce the wall should be unnecessary)
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N (To be far I'm Canadian and I don't know enough about this issue, I'm just basis this on /pol/'s memeing)
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Y, but marriage blows, so idk why they want it
>Gun rights
Y. it's one of the things that makes this country awesome
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
decriminalization of everything, legalization of weed, mdma, and psychedelics for sale, and opium for personal use production
>Tighter immigration laws
Y, mass migration benefits no one but the ultra rich
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
genuine refugees willing to assimilate? sure. economic migrants with dark age beliefs? fuck no
>Feminist?
N, feminism is cancer
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y, she and her husband are criminal hypocrites
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
Y
but I think marriage in general is not something that should be administered by the government, hopefully we move away from "official marriages" in due time
>>Gun rights
Y
I think guns should be regulated in a similar manner to cars
>>Legalization of marijuana
Y
I hate drug users. I think they are all stupid, annoying people. But I do not think they should go to prison, I think they should just be taxed for their addictions. I believe all drugs should be able to be legally used in your home, but NOT in public, including alcohol
>>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>>Tighter immigration laws
N
I really see no reason for this. Immigrants are a scape goat that the right often uses, and here in the USA, well, we are a nation of immigrants after all. I am a first gen immigrant, and I am an American. People will integrate if you give them time.
>>Wall?
This is stupid and impossible. The wall will never happen, and it's embarrassing that a presidential candidate is even suggesting a project like this
>>Public medicine
semi Y
I think health insurance should be carried out on a state level, not a national level, but I do believe it should be required and covered through taxes
>>TPP
Y
trade agreements have generally worked in the USAs favor, this one included. Encouraging trade partnerships with Asian countries, especially Malaysia and Vietnam, will help the United States in the future when China's manufactering dominance declines.
1/2
2/2
>>Common core
N
I don't know a lot about common core as it is currently, I will concede, so I don't think I can give an educated answer on this
but I think there should be a national baseline of some kind for education. The state high school exit exams deviate far too much, the Regents of New York are much more difficult than the AIMS in Arizona
>>Allowing refugees into the country
Y
The refugees the United States lets into the country are not the same as the economic migrants in Europe. The groups of refugees the United States has accepted largely do not commit many crimes, and vary from slightly below average income to above average income. Not only that, but there is no way any population of refugees will ever be a significant population in the USA, ever.
Jews were refugees in the USA and are now the richest group here.
>>Feminist?
N
First of all, this word has been greatly corrupted as of late, it doesn't mean what it did a decade or two ago - do I think genders should be treated equally in the eyes of the law? Yes
I think that the genders are currently as equal in the eyes of the law as they could be, in fact, it's quite clear that women have an edge in family and domestic policy. What needs to change next will be societal, not political.
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
She is a criminal, plain and simple. What she did during her time as Secretary of State isn't excusable, but it's a shame we virtually only have a choice between her and another moron
so yeah that's it
>>29428048
>Gay Marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public Medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common Core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
Keep kebab out of this country
>>29429471
>Wants more immigrants
>wants to limit gun rights
why do you want to genocide white people?
>>29429872
see:
>>feminist?
>yeah
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
I don't know what I consider myself, but those are my positions.
>Gay marriage: Y
I don't care whatsoever, if they wanna get married, who the fuck cares, as long as they don't try to force their views down my throat.
>Gun rights: Y&N
Believe in the second amendment, but also think there needs to be stronger regulations.
>Legalization of marijuana: N
I don't support the war on drugs, and I know it's absolute stupidity, but stoners piss me off so much I enjoy watching them bitch and moan. Realistically I do support legalizing it though.
>Legalization of all drugs: N
Jesus Christ, no. Potheads are bad enough.
>Tighter immigration laws: N
I don't care how many pictures of sad Mexicans are thrown at me, borders are borders. They're not suggestions, they're set in stone.
>Wall?: Y
Only if it was financially feasible.
>Public medicine: Y
Literally no reason not to, unless you're a "muh free market" faggot
>TPP: N
Get that corporatist shit out of here.
>Common core: Y
I'd rather the feds dictate standards than some idiots in bumfuck Idaho
>Allowing refugees into the country: Y
Assuming we can verify who they are.
>Feminist?:N
Fuuuuuuuuck no
>Should Hillary be indicted?:Y
Please God.
>Gay marriage
No, marriage is between a man and woman. Gays can have a different form of legal recognition for insurance and hospital purposes.
>Gun rights
Yes, although people with mental illnesses like schizophrenia shouldn't own them.
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes.
>Legalization of all drugs
No.
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes, only Europeans should be allowed.
>Wall?
Yes.
>Public medicine
Yes, single-payer.
>TPP
No.
>Common core
No.
>Allowing refugees into the country
Not middle-eastern refugees.
>Feminist?
Men & women are not mentally or physically equal. So no.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes, most politicians should be.
>>29429386
>>>Tighter immigration laws
>anybody should have the opportunity to enter the country.
>>>Wall?
>nah
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LIBERTARIANS ACTUALLY BELIEVE IT'S BENEFICIAL TO THEIR IDEOLOGY TO ALLOW MILLIONS OF LEFTIST MEXICANS INTO THE COUNTRY
What am I senpai?
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Don't give a fuck
>Gun rights
Except for terrorists
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
Don't give a fuck
>Allowing refugees into the country
Christians and women only
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Probably
Gay marriage
>Y
Gun rights
>Y
Legalization of marijuana
>Y
Legalization of all drugs
>N
Tighter immigration laws
>Y
Wall?
>Y
Public medicine
>Y
TPP
>?
Common core
>Holy fuck no
Allowing refugees into the country
>Depends on the "refugee"
Feminist?
>N
Should Hillary be indicted?
>Y
>>29430279
>Christians and women only
what the fuck kind of opinion is this
freedom of religion is literally a constitutional right
>>29430336
It's the kind of opinion that doesn't give us a generation of clubshooters and marathon bombers around 2040
>>29430336
Firstly, not everybody here is American, and not every American supports freedom of religion (I personally think Islam should be banned). Secondly, freedom of religion does not apply to non-citizens. It's perfectly constitutional to stop immigration of a religious group - Carter did it during the Iranian crisis.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
Women, children, and the elderly only, men should be trained to fight back against ISIS
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Of course
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
N
>>Gun rights
Y
>>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>>Tighter immigration laws\
Y
>>Wall?
N
>>Public medicine
Y
>>TPP
?
>>Common core
?
>>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>>Feminist?
N
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
?
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Should be stricter but no awb pls
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Decriminalization but not legalization
>Tighter immigration laws
Y. We should only accept maybe 1k per year
>Wall?
Sure but repealing nafta wpild have more of an effect
>Public medicine
Y. Single payer absolutely.
>TPP
N
>Common core
Y
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
First and second wave only
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Idc
>Gay marriage
for it, let them wander into legal hell along with all of the straight couples. that guy/girl won't be as cute as they are now, and you'll be paying out the ass in alimony one day
>Gun rights
fuck guns, the military isn't going to subdue us. no one needs anything except for a hunting rifle, anything else is just posturing
>Legalization of marijuana
for it, thc helps people with terminal illnesses get over some of the side-effects of their treatment (i.e. chemo patients lose their appetites while undergoing radiation which hurts their ability to heal afterwards. smoking some pot gives them the munchies and nutrients)
>Legalization of all drugs
for it, drug laws put a lot of people behind bars and force a lot of otherwise good people into bad situations. this would also help for people who are addicts to more readily find help much like Alcoholics Anonymous
>Tighter immigration laws
for it, good people promote a good country. but if we legalize drugs it would remove a lot of the money down south, which would enable mexico to build itself up again
>Wall?
dumb as fuck
>Public medicine
for it, a healthy country is a productive country
>TPP
a few of the world's economic powerhouses meeting in secret to decide the fate of much of the world's trade? fuck that.
>Common core
for school? it needs to be heavily modernized and rethought. we have too much accurate info at our fingertips compared to 2000 not to re-work our education system
>Allowing refugees into the country
if they have educational/professional credentials, i'd welcome them with open arms. otherwise it's a tough call
>Feminist?
women have strengths that men don't and vice versa. we are equal in our differences
>Should Hillary be indicted?
yes
>>29430411
Automatic weapons are already banned, it's semi-automatic weapons that the left are going after
>>29430467
I meant assault weapon ban.
>>29430488
Oh m'bad
>>29430467
isn't it pretty easy to convert a semi-auto to automatic
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
>murrican
>Legalization of Marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
>murrican
>Wall?
>>>>>>>>>>murrican
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>murrican
>Allowing refugees into the country
My country doesn't deal with that shit, but I'd say go ahead
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>murrican "politics"
>>29430431
>fuck guns, the military isn't going to subdue us. no one needs anything except for a hunting rifle, anything else is just posturing
People need handguns to defend themselves from thieves, rapists, and so on.
It's telling that the survey is mostly meme issues with no mention of class issues or labor rights. Fuckin SJWs framing the conversation to bull shit idpol.
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Fuck no. Marriage is to encourage quality breeding, not degenerate buttfuckery.
>Gun rights
Yes.
>Legalization of marijuana
Heavily taxed and stigmatized, like tobacco. Taxes go to drug treatment.
>Legalization of all drugs
Production illegal. Possession misdemeanor. Clinics for detox/weaning.
>Tighter immigration laws
Build the wall.
>Wall?
Build the wall.
>Public medicine
Single payer.
>TPP
Fuck no.
>Common core
Fuck no. Vouchers.
>Allowing refugees into the country
Naturalization process. Must learn English and renounce ideologies incompatible with our system of government (communism, Islam).
>Feminist?
Fuck no.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
NNN
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Y, marriage shouldn't even exist, better yet be put into the government with marriage licenses
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y, but digging under it is possible
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
How the fuck would you do this? This is as dumb as the wall. Do you get a plane and give free rides to the shitskins? Do you shove them on a boat and give them free rides too on the boat? Any way of transport can lead to a terror attack. We're talking about the US and not Europe. There's water inbetween.
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
Not only for her crimes as secretary of state, but for her voter fraud shit too.
>>29430569
t. buttblasted marxist
>>29428048
>gay marriage
No
>gun rights
Absolutely
>legalization of marijuana
Yes
>legalization of drugs
Only cocaine and opioids
>tighter immigration laws
Of course. The survival of our national integrity depends on it
>Wall
Yes sir
>Public Medicine
2 tier medical system
>TPP
No
>common core
Noooooo
>refugees
NO.
>feminist
Fuck feminism fuck egalitarianism. Equality is a social construct
>indict Hillary
Yes
R8 me
>Gay marriage
If it can be proven that it benefits the state as much as straight marriage, then yes. Marriage is not a perk of being a citizen, it is a contract between the state and two of its members. The contract has to have up sides for both ends.
>Gun rights
Yes, for responsible owners who can prove they are responsible. Fingerprinting, tracking, licensing should all be mandatory. We know whose car caused an accident, we should know whose gun fired a round.
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes, fucking duh
>Legalization of all drugs
Yes also fucking duh it makes disease and crime drop
>Tighter immigration laws
yes
>Wall?
is that the only way to fight illegals? then yes. (it's not)
>Public medicine
what does this mean? single-payer healthcare? if so, yes.
>TPP
please no more
>Common core
not educated on the subject, will not weigh in
>Allowing refugees into the country
which refugees? it matters. (no muzzies)
>Feminist?
REEEEEEEEEEEEE
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Not educated; refuse to judge
>>29428168
Remove borders? You're batshit, anon, go eat some lead.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
N
>Common core
N NN NNNNNNNNNNN
>Allowing refugees into the country
N*E10000000
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage: they have a right to be as miserable in family court as the rest of us.
>Gun rights: 2nd amendment is a restriction on government power, dumbass. Of course.
>Legalization of marijuana: yep.
>Legalization of all drugs: yep
>Tighter immigration laws: yep. Corporate sponsored visas, H-1B and green card need to stop. Especially for tech.
>Wall? Yep.
>Public medicine. Yep.
>TPP: hell no
>Common core: nope. better teachers who need more than a frucking elementary retard degree to work would be nice.
>Allowing refugees into the country: nope.
>>29428168
You won't have gun rights, gay marriage, or healthcare if you remove borders. You'll have millions upon millions of poor people flooding the country and destroying its institutions.
>Gay marriage
NO
>Gun rights
YES
>Legalization of marijuana
NO
>Legalization of all drugs
NO
>Tighter immigration laws
YES
>Wall?
YES
>Public medicine
YES
>TPP
NO
>Common core
NO
>Allowing refugees into the country
NO
>Feminist?
NO
>Should Hillary be indicted?
YES
and if you don't agree you're a normie, plain n simple
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
Don't really care, most people don't get married. It's a government institution and so it should remain secular. It really doesn't do anything
>>Gun rights
Every man should own a gun
>>Legalization of marijuana
Better than alcohol, also would be a fuck you to the cartels
>>Legalization of all drugs
Nah, too addicting. Some of that shit shouldn't exist period
>>Tighter immigration laws
Tighten up on illegal immigration from everywhere, legal immigration is fine.
>>Wall?
Never going to happen. Don't hate Trump but wall is a waste of time
>>Public medicine
Whole family worked in the medical system. They say that it helps because the hospital doesn't have to cover the costs which means they get paid more. I think there should be an absolutely bare minimum service provided by the government that gives like a single doctor's appointment and a single dentist appoint a year, but still allow the market to exist. I think Obamacare is the wrong way to handle it, at least in it's current form.
>>TPP
No
>>Common core
No, it's a bad way to fix the school system
>>Allowing refugees into the country
Keep them in a fucking kennel and deport their asses if they step out of line, only let them stay here for a year at max before sending them home. Real refugees from war are fine and I'd hate to see them suffer but that's not what most of these people are.
>>Feminist?
The fuck do you think?
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes, I hate that people can get off on crimes because they're important. However I think Snowden was a hero so I guess I'm a hypocrite
>>29430569
This is true. Class struggle is the oldest struggle in history and nothing has ever been done and sadly nothing probably will be done about it.
>>29430567
>need
so outlaw handguns and small caliber bullets until thieves are forced to use knives and we can just blast them with mace
>Gay marriage
No, gayness is not an identity, it should only be an act of bonding between two masculine adolescents.
>Gun rights
Yes
>Legalization of marijuana
no
>Legalization of all drugs
no, and expand the war on drugs
>Tighter immigration laws
of course
>Wall?
100 feet tall
>Public medicine
yes
>TPP
no
>Common core
no
>Allowing refugees into the country
white refugees, of course. christian non-whites, sure. the rest no.
>Feminist?
no
>Should Hillary be indicted?
yes
>>29430754
>just outlaw it and it'll go away!
Because that worked so well for alcohol and marijuana, right?
Also, few criminals use guns registered to their name, they buy guns off their buddies.
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
I don't give a flying fuck, marriage has good sides and bad sides. Honestly, as a mostly-straight man (tw: cis scum) I wish it were the other way around; I've read too many marriage memes and now believe my life would be better if I could not legally marry. And thus, by extension, could never be pressured by a woman into essentially signing over half my income and assets if she ever found a more Chadly Chad to leave me for.
>>Gun rights
Fully automatic assault weapons should be legal in 50 states (don't care about lesser nations) but I believe cities should be able to set their own gun laws. New York, for example, would benefit far more from strict gun control than Justiceburg, Texas. Memes are real.
>>Legalization of marijuana
I don't care at all, one way or another. I don't smoke the meme drug, and as a non-user I can see both pros and cons. I do believe if it was legalized it should be treated as alcohol for driving purposes, and both as tobacco and alcohol for smoking-in-public purposes.
>>Legalization of all drugs
No. As much as I lean towards "let citizens hurt themselves all they want as long as they're not hurting anyone else," legalizing all drugs opens up far too many easy methods for citizens to destroy themselves. Harder, darker drugs almost inarguably cause violent crime and reckless human endangerment as well.
>>Tighter immigration laws
Build
>>Wall?
Yes
>>Public medicine
Is a meme. Nigs gon nig, wait in the ER for three hours with a broken leg because everyone goes to the ER for their cough and then tell me that it's a workable system.
>>TPP
Build seawall.
>>Common core
Pros and cons. I don't believe it should be abolished, though. Mostly because SJWs call it racist, and anything SJWs call racist is usually good. It may need to be refined by a neutral entity, though, if such an entity were able to exist.
>>Allowing refugees into the country
B U I L D
U
I
L
D
>>Feminist?
W A L L
A
L
L
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Sure.
>Gay marriage Y
>Gun rights Y
>Legalization of marijuana Y
>Legalization of all drugs Y
>Tighter immigration laws Y
>Wall? Y
>Public medicine Not sure
>TPP don't know what the fuck that is
>Common core no
>>29430812
NYC has much stricter gun laws than Texas, yet it still has a much higher homicide rate.
It's almost as if there are some factors besides gun control that contribute to the homicide rate...
>>29428048
Let's talk about our political views.
Do not, I mean DO NOT trounce your presidential candidate around. I want what YOU think. Regardless of alignment.
Here's a survey. Please put "Y" if you support it and "N" if you do not. If you have a reason then please go ahead.
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
I think the most important thing the government should be changing is ensuring that the free market works for everyone. patents laws should me more lenient and companies should be broken up more often
also, products should not be subject to fda regulations, consumer reports can ensure quality alone. The government meddling only slows things down in this case
however building codes are still important, as are working conditions regulations
>Gay marriage
Yes. Not the governments responsibility to care who stuck your dick in or marry, as long as it's not a kid or another animal species.
>Gun rights
Yes. It's the second amendment that's imn the Constitution.
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes. Does less harm than alcohol, not saying it dosent harm you though.
>Legalization of all drugs
Nope. No reason to make crack or coke or some other hard drug legal and would only cause problems.
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes. It should be focused on stopping illegal immigration though and only the educated should come here or if they're hired by someone in America.
>Wall?
Y. But if there's a way to do it without fucking up the economy
>Public medicine
Yes. No one needs to die by some curable disease since they could not afford it.
>TPP
No. No intruding on my internet.
>Common core
No. Parents like it, but I can see how fucked up it is.
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y. Limited amount. Should be checked. Families as well.
>Feminist?
No. Men and women should be treated equal though, with no side being higher than the other. For drafting women as well, the non exceptional ones should keep to their own squads.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes. She would've been executed in a different time for negligence.
>>29430812
It affects the state as well for New York. People around where I live actually hate those city ducks since it's mostly red upstate and we have to deal with their extreme liberal bullshit and regulations. Kind of like today.
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2016/06/20/New-York-Senate-passes-anti-Airbnb-bill/9291466413328/
>>29428048
Gay marriage: Y
Gun rights: Keep guns away from mentally ill, terrorist suspects, and criminals
Pot legalization: Y
All drugs: Y/N
Immigration: They need to look more into the individuals rather than just making it tougher to apply
Wall: waste of money
Public medicine: for certain people (vets and whatnot)
TPP: Y
Common core: N
Refugees: After extensive background checks
Feminist: Absolutely not
Hillary: haven't looked into it very much and when I have, it's been very biased in either direction
>>29431039
I meant to put N for TPP
Also, I'm anti feminist but I still believe in gender equality
>Gay marriage
Yes. The government has no business prohibiting consensual marriages. The same goes for polyamory
>Gun rights
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
>Legalization of marijuana
Yeah
>Legalization of all drugs
Bring it on
>Tighter immigration laws
No
>Wall?
Hard no
>Public medicine
When feasible.
>TPP
I'm not sure. It's a pretty complicated issue, and I don't know as much as I need to. Tentative yes.
>Common core
No
>Allowing refugees into the country
Yes, after the current screening process, which is pretty rigorous
>Feminist?
I believe women should have equal rights, but I wouldn't really call myself a feminist. Certainly not a feminist of this wave.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Probably.
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
N
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
N
>TPP
Y
>Common core
Y
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y
>Feminist?
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted?
N
>>29431064
>anti feminist but I still believe in gender equality
that doesn't make any sense
>Gay marriage
Sure
>Gun rights
Regulate like cars.
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes.
>Legalization of all drugs
Yes.
>Tighter immigration laws
If this is referring to a ban on muslims, then no.
>Wall?
No.
>Public medicine
Yes.
>TPP
Don't know enough about it.
>Common core
Don't know enough about it.
>Allowing refugees into the country
Yes.
>Feminist?
Depends on the specific issue and your definitions.
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes.
>>29431110
What the fuck is up with your views? They're all over the place is a weird fucking way.
>>29428048
Fuck is that image
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
N
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
IDK
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
Limited amount
>Feminist?
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29431110
you're actual shit
>>29431127
he sounds like one of those "feminists are the REAL sexists" fags who thinks hes smart because he denies sexual dimorphism
>>29431147
Why is that, nigguhhh?
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
These are the only correct answers desu
>>Gay marriage
y
>>Gun rights
n, needs more regulation, not a ban
>>Legalization of marijuana
y
>>Legalization of all drugs
n
>>Tighter immigration laws
n
>>Wall?
n
>>Public medicine
y
>>TPP
undecided
>>Common core
n
>>Allowing refugees into the country
y
>>Feminist?
n
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
y
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Marriage is a religious institution, let them have legal partnerships. Not even religious, it's just common sense.
>Gun rights
If a people are treated properly, there is no reason to disarm them.
>Legalization of marijuana
No
>Legalization of all drugs
No, opiates and some stims should be available with id like beer, though
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes
>Wall?
Necessary
>Public medicine
No, it hurts more than it helps
>TPP
Fuck you
>Common core
No
>Allowing refugees into the country
Intensive screening, immigration like any other with informed and consentual surveillance
>Feminist?
Fuck no
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Of course, how is this even a question?
>gay marriage
who cares marriage is way overrated
>gun rights
its in the constitution
>legalization of marijuana
sure, wont have to pay for overpopulated prisons
>legalization of all drugs
don't think it will be a big problem all the meth heads will die off
>Tighter Immigration laws
yes for many reasons. national security and don't need more people dependent on the welfare state
>Wall?
why not? walls keep immigration problems down. see above
>Public medicine
no opinion don't care
>TPP
no opinion don't know enough about it
>common core
standardized tests aren't working how would standardized education do better
>allowing refugees
only if they couldn't be, beyond a reasonable doubt, a threat
>feminist
MGTOW
>should Hillary be indicted
she's should be very thoroughly examined
>>29431269
>no to weed and drugs, but opiates and uppers should be legal
You're seriously blowing my mind.
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
N
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Make assault rifles harder to get, but not impossible
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
would be pretty awesome if it was cheap
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
idk
>Allowing refugees into the country
Only if they're from a neighbouring country at war
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
If there's enough evidence to
>>29428048
I don't care what any of your political affiliations are, if you support common core you are a fucking retard. Research how common core was created and is being implemented and what it does. It does nothing to improve educational standards, in fact it makes it worse. And yet it is being implemented across the country in public schools and the same commie that wrote the standards, a guy with no education credentials, is now the head of the national SAT organization and making the SATs common core compliant.
It is fucking retarded. Everyone that knows about it hates it. Literally who supports it? All teachers and parents hate it, only the uninformed democrats(read: blacks and Hispanics) like it.
I'm not going to try to influence your decision, just please research it and who funded it fully(Bill Gates). It has nothing to do with teaching kids better, it's about making all students equal to the lowest common denominator.
Every issue has decent arguments for and against but common core has no positives. Teachers and educators had no input in the curriculum and the people hired to inspect the standards to see if they were decent in math and English said that the curriculum would lower standards and make it harder for kids to get into college. Just research it.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
NNNNNNNNNN
>Should Hillary be indicted?
YYYYYYYYYYY
>allowing refugees into the country
You help more people for less money by setiing up safe zones in or near their country. It costs less per person and you help way more refugees. Bringing them into the country is inefficient and destroys the fabric of society when done in massive numbers. There is no reason to bring them in other than to change the home country.
That is how they traditionally helped refugees and people suffering from war. Why do they have to be brought in? And the answer is because the Globalists want more third world immigration. It benefits neither side.
>>29431344
Just give it to me straigh, anon. How high is my power level?
I'm nervous as fuck, also checking those sweet dubs.
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>Tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall?
Y because it would be fucking hillarious
>Public medicine
N - I want all insurance or pools of money to either be non-profit
>TPP
Y
>Common core
Y - Fuck your culture
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
Sure.
>Gun rights
Dual wield your AR's
>Legalization of marijuana
Yes.
>Legalization of all drugs
No.
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes.
>Wall?
Sure.
>Public medicine
Not here.
>TPP
Nope.
>Common core
No.
>Allowing refugees into the country
Not even one.
>Feminist?
No. The guys that cry women's rights are the biggest scumbags
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes, but not for that stuff.
>Gay marriage
N (I'm fine with them having the same rights and all, but the title of marriage should remain with heterosexuals)
>Gun rights
Y (Applying law too the lawless isn't going to work)
>Legalization of marijuana
Y (Only if it's taxed and regulated)
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
NNNNNNN
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y (Only if they're white, like those currently being treated like shit in South Africa)
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
YYYYYYYYYY
I'm not American though.....
>>29429214
Shitto baito desu
>no replies, the thread
>>29428048
aw fuck you OP. I was just about to eat breakfast until I saw that and now I'm not hungry anymore.
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
N
>>Gun rights
Y
>>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>>Legalization of all drugs
N
>>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>>Wall?
N
>>Public medicine
Y
>>TPP
N
>>Common core
N
>>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>>Feminist?
N
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29431675
he said Y or N because it's being parsed with a script you edgy faggot
>>29431862
Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me.
Super original
>>29428048
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
>Feminist?
First wave ideals sure not any of this current bullshit about mansplaining
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
what's with all the fags condoning gay marriage holy shit neoleftliberalredditumblr4chan is real
>Gay marriage
Yes
>Gun rights
Yes
>Legalization of marijuana
No
>Legalization of all drugs
No
>Tighter immigration laws
Yes
>Wall?
Yes
>Public medicine
Yes
>TPP
No
>Common core
Yes
>Allowing refugees into the country
No
>Feminist?
No
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes
>Gay marriage
don't care
>Gun rights
y
>Legalization of marijuana
y
>Legalization of all drugs
n
>Tighter immigration laws
y
>Wall?
n
>Public medicine
y
>TPP
n
>Common core
n
>Allowing refugees into the country
n
>Feminist?
n
>Should Hillary be indicted?
y
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
N
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
Depends on your definition of Feminist but N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29432767
Because I don't give a fuck if Faggots want to get married. It's none of my business and it shouldn't be the Government's either
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
Kill the fags
>>Gun rights
y
>>Legalization of marijuana
No, kill all degenerates
>>Legalization of all drugs
See above^
>>Tighter immigration laws
Kill all immigrants and darkies
>>Wall?
Y
>>Public medicine
No
>>TP
N
>>Common core
N
>>Allowing refugees into the country
Allow refugees into the gas chambers
>>Feminist?
N
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Yes
Let's talk about our political views.
Do not, I mean DO NOT trounce your presidential candidate around. I want what YOU think. Regardless of alignment.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
Y with background checks etc.
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Y/N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
Not sure.
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
Depends on what kind of refugee. But the kind of refugees coming into Sweden and Germany. No
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29433424
>12 year old finds out about /pol/
>>29428048
>>Gay marriage
N
>>Gun rights
N
>>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>>Legalization of all drugs
Y
>>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>>Wall?
Y
>>Public medicine
Y
>>TPP
Y
>>Common core
Y
>>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>>Feminist?
N
>>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
eastern yuro here
>Gay marriage
N
>Gun rights
make it similar to getting a driver's license and no full auto
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
Yes, but make them Rx only (aside from alcohol, nicotine and DUDE), discourage smoking and general over-indulgence
>Tighter immigration laws
Y, only members of my ethnic group living abroad
>Wall?
If its becomes necessary, then yes. Armed patrols until then
>Public medicine
Y, single payer healthcare
>TPP
Have to read up on this one, sorry.
>Common core
Y
>Allowing refugees into the country
see immigration laws
>Feminist?
discourage women from pursuing carreers and not having babbies
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>implying anyone will read this
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
Y
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
Y
>Wall?
Y
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N
>Common core
N
>Allowing refugees into the country
N
>Feminist?
N
>Should Hillary be indicted?
Y
>>29428048
Some of these aren't really 'yes' or 'no' questions.
>Gay marriage
Y
>Gun rights
I support some proposed gun control legislation (not all), but don't want to ban all guns.
>Legalization of marijuana
Y
>Legalization of all drugs
N
>Tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall?
N
>Public medicine
Y
>TPP
N, but I'm not opposed to free trade. I just don't like the secrecy behind the TPP's formulation and the total lack of democratic involvement. Wasn't put up for a vote in congress or in any sort of nationwide referendum even though it'll affect the entire country.
>Common core
I'd wait a few years to see whether these methods have a consistently positive or negative impact on standardized test scores. Undecided.
>Allowing refugees into the country
Y, with strict background checks.
>Feminist?
Y
>Should Hillary be indicted?
I don't know, I haven't followed the email issue enough. I think if she doesn't end up being indicted, it will be because there simply isn't enough evidence to get an indictment rather than because she's just too powerful to touch.
>>29428048
>Gay marriage
Y, why not, i dont care what others do if it doesnt affect me.
>gun rights
in america? yeah, banning them is impossible by now, however in countries such as germany, keeping them banned is a good idea. Worked so far.
>Legalization of weed
sure why not. I'm not gonna use it cause everyone ive seen it take became mentally retarded due to it, but if tobacco and alcohol is legal i dont see a reason why weed wouldnt be.
>legalization of all drugs
sure whatever
>tighter immigration laws
Yes. Mostly securing borders and 1) registering everyone coming in and 2) doing a background check
>wall
kinda superfluous, but if it makes people feel secure then whatever. Like the tsa, little effect, but the feeling of security.
>public medicine
Yep.
>TPP
Nah, american copyright laws suck balls, dont wanna copy those.
>common core
From what i gather the general idea is setting a standard across the us what should be taught in schools. Generally yes, but it seems to be implemented shittily.
>allowing refugees
Refugees? YES. Most definitely. Register all of them, keep tabs on them, but if they are ACTUAL refugees and not just economic migrants, then yeah allow them in. Only refugees though.
>Feminist
If at all then the "old" feminism that actually strived for equality. Rather egalitarianism. Also yay for the female draft.
>Hillary
Fuck yeah she stored high security emails on an unsecured server, she ordered drone strikes from her phone. That's not presidential material.
>>29428048
>gay marriage
Y
>gun rights
Y
>legalization of marijuana
Fuck y
>tighter immigration laws
N
>Wall
N
>public medicine
Kinda y
>Tpp
Y
>common core
Fuck n
>refugees
N
>Feminist
Egalitarian
>indicting Hillary
N (because I hate trump)
