Why are we so gross while women are so heavenly, bros? We almost look like beasts compared to them.
>covered in coarse body hair from feet to face (ok, I'm mediterranean, this might be just me)
>more muscle mass and less fat makes us harder to the touch
>less neoteny features on the face
>stupid parts that have no use for us like nipples
>areas with prominent veins on the surface like the forearms and genitals
>our genitals are a veiny shaft we try to invade other bodies with and a wrinkly sac
>smell heavier than women on average, except when they are on their period
Meanwhile they are softer and smoother and you want to hug them and bury your face on their body and fall sleep in there forever.
The only thing we have going on is we can reach higher places and have more strength, both of which we have made antiquated and irrelevant thanks to technology.
You only think this way because, as a heterosexual, you see women as the fairer sex
If you were gay or something, you'd be praising all the things you love about men
Nothing is inherently pretty or ugly - our brain decide what's considered valuable and admirable.
That being said, to answer your question where the difference lies:
Sex takes 5 minutes and then an impregnated woman is occupied for 9 months. No other man can spread his genes through her. One alpha animal can impregnate 10 females in a day and this means none of the other males are going to reproduce. Any women that gets fucked gets to reproduce. (Only 1/6 of male sea lions ever get to reproduce, 5/6 don't continue their genetic pathway)
Thus, we see, woman are the strict bottleneck of reproduction. Naturally all fertile women are desirable. The most healthy ones are desirable the most. Naturally most men are irrelevant as far as reproduction goes, except to themselves.
So we find the valuable gender attractive / the largest part of the not inherently valuable gender irrelevant.
That's bullshit bro. Just lose the gut, jog, lift, start doing calisthenics and 'mire urself in the mirror. When you get in shape you'll realize the male form is aesthetically superior to the baby-'n-milk factory that is the female one.
>>29321960
The fact that one guy can train a lot and become ascetic is hardly a reponse to why people generally like watching female bodies more than male ones.
Men's magazines have a bunch of guys wearing expensive watches, pics of sports guys with an interview, and then pictures of 70% women. Women's magazines have 95% pictures of women.
Bullshit anon. Men are far more aesthetically pleasing. You're just not sexually attracted to them.
>>29321901
Which is why anyone who is not top Chad and tries to participate in society and actually succeed a fucking cuck. Only smart move is to either be a NEET who only leeches off, or join ISIS.
>>29321867
I doubt it, I know most (heterosexual) girls find women to be more beautiful than men, even if they are only sexually attracted to us.
In fact I'm pretty sure if you show a pictures of an average naked woman and an average naked man to random people of all sexes and sexualities and ages and whatnot most would find the woman to be more aesthetic regardless of what they are sexually attracted to.
>>29321960
I'm fit.
You can find functionality exciting, but that's a whole different thing. It's like saying you like the aesthetics of a Mitsubishi Evo over the ones of a slow replica of a Ferrari 330 P4. Do you really like the first because of its form or because it's faster? If the Evo was slower, which would you prefer?
Unfortunately our better athletic performance has become meaningless in a world were machines are more efficient than us at it.
You've obviously never lived with a woman or had to clean a woman's bathroom
>>29322103
>In fact I'm pretty sure if you show a pictures of an average naked woman and an average naked man to random people of all sexes and sexualities and ages and whatnot most would find the woman to be more aesthetic regardless of what they are sexually attracted to.
wouldn't work, women are known to be aroused by women's bodies regardless of actual sexual preference
>>29322103
Women may make your peepee hard, but the night sky probably doesn't.
Arousal =! Awe
You know how you lose interest in porn in the split second after cumming? That's not what would happen if you were actually fapping to beauty.
>>29321814
>Floppy sacks of fat prominently on Chest
>awkward hips so specialized for childbirth that women have a distinctive "walk" specifically because their doofy hips require it
>genitals are an unsightly slit that varies from woman to woman and has patterns of stimulation different from woman to woman
There's a reason men were considered the fairer gender until Shakespeare went megacuck and started shilling for females. Seriously, the female body isn't only uglier, but it's fucking broken for anything but childbirth and conception, and the latter only works because male psychology is bent to like all of these retarded childbirth tradeoffs
>>29322014
People like watching female bodies because men want to fuck them.
>>29322110
This, women are truly disgusting creatures. Way more disgusting than any man could hope to be
>>29322014
Womens magazine market specific products to women. Men's magazines advertise a specific attitude to men and then suggest the product. Pay attention and you will see it.
Look at axe VS makeup or 'fragrances' versus perfumes in advertising.
I'm not sure why women wanna see women though. Overall the men's magazines don't have people in them. Unless you're talking 'men's magazines' like playboy.
>>29322168
>women are known to be aroused by women's bodies regardless of actual sexual preference
that's pretty much what he said. :|
>>29321814
I can guarantee you that very few women are as heavenly as Racquel was in the 60s. Women are just as gross as men.
